SPECS: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec (NEW) - perl-XML-RSS-1.22 ne...

[sls]

Author: sls                          Date: Sun Mar 25 23:23:24 2007 GMT
Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
- perl-XML-RSS-1.22 needs this

---- Files affected:
SPECS:
   perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec (NONE -> 1.1)  (NEW)

---- Diffs:

================================================================
Index: SPECS/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec
diff -u /dev/null SPECS/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec:1.1
--- /dev/null	Mon Mar 26 01:23:24 2007
+++ SPECS/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail.spec	Mon Mar 26 01:23:19 2007
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+# $Revision$, $Date$
+#
+# Conditional build:
+%bcond_without	tests		# do not perform "make test"
+#
+%include	/usr/lib/rpm/macros.perl
+%define	pdir	DateTime
+%define	pnam	Format-Mail
+Summary:	DateTime::Format::Mail - Convert between DateTime and RFC2822/822 formats
+#Summary(pl):
+Name:		perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
+Version:	0.30
+Release:	0.1
+# same as perl
+License:	GPL v1+ or Artistic
+Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
+Source0:	http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id/D/DR/DROLSKY/DateTime-Format-Mail-%{version}.tar.gz
+# Source0-md5:	d3940d6b387b75de0332201db1685e7d
+BuildRequires:	perl-devel >= 1:5.8.0
+BuildRequires:	rpm-perlprov >= 4.1-13
+%if %{with tests}
+BuildRequires:	perl(DateTime)
+BuildRequires:	perl(Module::Build)
+BuildRequires:	perl(Params::Validate) >= 0.67
+%endif
+BuildArch:	noarch
+BuildRoot:	%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
+
+%description
+RFCs 2822 and 822 specify date formats to be used by email. This
+module parses and emits such dates.
+
+RFC2822 (April 2001) introduces a slightly different format of date
+than that used by RFC822 (August 1982). The main correction is that
+the preferred format is more limited, and thus easier to parse
+programmatically.
+
+Despite the ease of generating and parsing perfectly valid RFC822 and
+RFC2822 people still get it wrong. So this module provides four things
+for those handling mail dates:
+
+As a future direction, I'm contemplating an even stricter parser that
+will only accept dates with no obsolete elements.
+
+
+
+# %description -l pl # TODO
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n %{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{version}
+
+%build
+%{__perl} Build.PL \
+	destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
+	installdirs=vendor
+./Build
+
+%{?with_tests:./Build test}
+
+%install
+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+./Build install
+
+%clean
+rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+
+%files
+%defattr(644,root,root,755)
+%doc AUTHORS Changes CREDITS notes README
+%{perl_vendorlib}/DateTime/Format/*.pm
+%{_mandir}/man3/*
+
+%define	date	%(echo `LC_ALL="C" date +"%a %b %d %Y"`)
+%changelog
+* %{date} PLD Team <feedback at pld-linux.org>
+All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
+
+$Log$
+Revision 1.1  2007/03/25 23:23:19  sls
+- perl-XML-RSS-1.22 needs this
+
================================================================