SPECS: python-psycopg2.spec - better explanation why not to require nor sug...

[wrobell]

Author: wrobell                      Date: Fri Jan 23 20:21:34 2009 GMT
Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
- better explanation why not to require nor suggest mx.DateTime

---- Files affected:
SPECS:
   python-psycopg2.spec (1.65 -> 1.66) 

---- Diffs:

================================================================
Index: SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec
diff -u SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec:1.65 SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec:1.66
--- SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec:1.65	Fri Jan 23 01:19:17 2009
+++ SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec	Fri Jan 23 21:21:27 2009
@@ -27,9 +27,12 @@
 BuildRequires:	python-mx-DateTime-devel
 Requires:	python-mx-DateTime
 %else
-# allow mx.DateTime to be optional
-# don't use Suggest - it is rare to use mx.DateTime; python provides its
-# own datetime implementation, now
+# if somebody really needs mx.DateTime, then one can request mx.Datetime
+# usage on runtime;
+# it is pointless to use 'Requires' or 'Suggest' field because
+# - python provides its own datetime implementation
+# - one can request it on runtime (as said above)
+# - usage of mx.DateTime type is application specific
 BuildConflicts:   python-mx-DateTime
 %endif
 BuildRoot:	%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
@@ -83,6 +86,9 @@
 All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
 
 $Log$
+Revision 1.66  2009/01/23 20:21:27  wrobell
+- better explanation why not to require nor suggest mx.DateTime
+
 Revision 1.65  2009/01/23 00:19:17  wrobell
 - fixed typo to include missing egg file properly, thx glen
 - rel. 5
================================================================

---- CVS-web:
    http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/python-psycopg2.spec?r1=1.65&r2=1.66&f=u