packages: autoconf/autoconf.spec - is there a reason for downloading tar.xz...

[shadzik]

Author: shadzik                      Date: Sun Feb 21 16:23:47 2010 GMT
Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
---- Log message:
- is there a reason for downloading tar.xz instead of .tar.bz2?
- if there was one, now there is a reason not to (th builders do not recognize .xz)
- rel 2

---- Files affected:
packages/autoconf:
   autoconf.spec (1.141 -> 1.142) 

---- Diffs:

================================================================
Index: packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec
diff -u packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.141 packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.142
--- packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec:1.141	Sun Feb 21 17:16:05 2010
+++ packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec	Sun Feb 21 17:23:42 2010
@@ -21,12 +21,12 @@
 Summary(uk.UTF-8):	GNU autoconf - автоконфігуратор вихідних текстів
 Name:		autoconf
 Version:	2.65
-Release:	1
+Release:	2
 License:	GPL v2+/v3+
 Group:		Development/Building
 # stable releases:
-Source0:	http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
-# Source0-md5:	dfb23a46ecb73a0abade39c053a6c5a1
+Source0:	http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+# Source0-md5:	a6de1cc6434cd64038b0a0ae4e252b33
 # devel releases:
 #Source0:	http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/autoconf/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
 Patch0:		%{name}-mawk.patch
@@ -280,6 +280,11 @@
 All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
 
 $Log$
+Revision 1.142  2010/02/21 16:23:42  shadzik
+- is there a reason for downloading tar.xz instead of .tar.bz2?
+- if there was one, now there is a reason not to (th builders do not recognize .xz)
+- rel 2
+
 Revision 1.141  2010/02/21 16:16:05  shadzik
 - up to 2.65
 - patch5 commented out, seems to be already upstream
================================================================

---- CVS-web:
    http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/autoconf/autoconf.spec?r1=1.141&r2=1.142&f=u