From alchemyx at uznam.net.pl Sun Dec 1 15:17:02 2002 From: alchemyx at uznam.net.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?Micha=B3=20Margula?=) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:17:02 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011513.06087.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011504.39019.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> <200212011513.06087.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <200212011517.02760.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Dnia nie 1. grudzie? 2002 15:13, Mariusz Mazur napisa?: > As far as I know some recent guys with rw access are (ex)script-kidies. If > they are dumb enough to brake into someone's boxes... well... You get the > point. Point them and let Kloczek remove theris rw 8-) -- Micha? Margula, alchemyx at uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ +) "W ?yciu pi?kne s? tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel] From mmazur at kernel.pl Sun Dec 1 15:18:46 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:18:46 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011517.02760.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011513.06087.mmazur@kernel.pl> <200212011517.02760.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Message-ID: <200212011518.46733.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Sunday 01 December 2002 15:17, Micha? Margula wrote: > Dnia nie 1. grudzie? 2002 15:13, Mariusz Mazur napisa?: > > As far as I know some recent guys with rw access are (ex)script-kidies. > > If they are dumb enough to brake into someone's boxes... well... You get > > the point. > > Point them and let Kloczek remove theris rw 8-) Witch hunting isn't my favorite sport :) -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From alchemyx at uznam.net.pl Sun Dec 1 15:26:43 2002 From: alchemyx at uznam.net.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?Micha=B3=20Margula?=) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:26:43 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011518.46733.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011517.02760.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> <200212011518.46733.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <200212011526.43390.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Dnia nie 1. grudzie? 2002 15:18, Mariusz Mazur napisa?: > > Point them and let Kloczek remove theris rw 8-) > > Witch hunting isn't my favorite sport :) LOL. But on the other hand risks which you have pointed are quite dangerous. I wonder how they overcome that in other open source projects. -- Micha? Margula, alchemyx at uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ +) "W ?yciu pi?kne s? tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel] From mmazur at kernel.pl Sun Dec 1 15:28:52 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:28:52 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011526.43390.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011518.46733.mmazur@kernel.pl> <200212011526.43390.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Message-ID: <200212011528.52693.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Sunday 01 December 2002 15:26, Micha? Margula wrote: > > Witch hunting isn't my favorite sport :) > > LOL. But on the other hand risks which you have pointed are quite > dangerous. I wonder how they overcome that in other open source projects. Dunno. Small projects just don't care. Big ones... well... I'll google around debian.org :) -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From mmazur at kernel.pl Sun Dec 1 15:47:03 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:47:03 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011528.52693.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011526.43390.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> <200212011528.52693.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <200212011547.03353.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Sunday 01 December 2002 15:28, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > Dunno. Small projects just don't care. Big ones... well... I'll google > around debian.org :) Hmmm... seems like Debian has "sponsors". That is a wannabe developer gets somebody to "look after him". He uploads the new guys work, and if after a while he gives the green light - the new guy gets his own account, and becomes a full-time developer. Though in debian most developers are just package maintainers and they don't have access to the really critical packages. And if the "sponsor" has any doubts about the new guys intentions - he can just discard him. In other words - it would be nice to get ourselfs some gestapo type team (just like we have sec-team). Idea would be quite simple - check if the new guy didn't do anything funny in the past and if he did - make him explain. -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From orzech at pld.org.pl Sun Dec 1 18:14:23 2002 From: orzech at pld.org.pl (Tomek Orzechowski) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 18:14:23 +0100 Subject: [PLDSA 1-1] New pine packages fix remote denial of service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021201171423.GA18834@alpha.hq.cs.net.pl> [29 listopad, 2002] Krzysiek Taraszka wrote: >- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >PLD Security Advisory PLDSA 1-1 security at pld.org.pl >http://www.pld.org.pl/security/ PLD Security Team >29 November 2002 http://www.pld.org.pl/security/faq >- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Package : pine prior to 4.44L-14 [...] >PLD Linux 1.0 alias ra >- -------------------- > > Source archives: > >ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/dists/ra/updates/security/SRPMS/pine-4.50L-1.src.rpm > MD5 checksum: 196cf67117f8875f74e806b350d6a9f1 > > I386 Architecture components: > >ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/dists/ra/updates/security/i386/pine-4.50L-1.i386.rpm > MD5 checksum: b7c34c8a309273b7e7abf785365e7b0d > > > I586 Architecture components: > >ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/dists/ra/updates/security/i586/pine-4.50L-1.i586.rpm > MD5 checksum: ccf92a843f1c103abb68f425b5458a82 > > > I686 Architecture components: > >ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/dists/ra/updates/security/i686/pine-4.50L-1.i686.rpm > MD5 checksum: bf2dce29f0aa6c08d2b937f21d27600a > > > PowerPC Architecture components: > >ftp://ftp.pld.org.pl/dists/ra/updates/security/ppc/pine-4.50L-1.ppc.rpm > MD5 checksum: 2a3525950c49f0f70a8f2584552af5db And what about alpha and sparc? Updates ARE available, so? -- _ _._. _ .|_ (_)| /_(/.(.| ) Tomek Orzechowski From wrobell at ite.pl Fri Dec 6 12:54:21 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:54:21 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > Module name: SPECS > Changes by: wrobell 02/12/06 12:50:41 > > Modified files: > mozilla.spec > > Log message: > - merged no-pl branch > > Index: mozilla.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/mozilla.spec,v > diff -d -u -r1.213 -r1.214 > --- mozilla.spec 5 Dec 2002 11:13:41 -0000 1.213 > +++ mozilla.spec 6 Dec 2002 11:50:41 -0000 1.214 > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ > # > # Conditional build: > # _with_gtk1 - use gtk+ 1.2.x instead of 2.x.x > -# _without_PL - without PL language pack [...] > +Revision 1.213.2.1 2002/12/06 09:37:57 wrobell > +- removed PL stuff, it should built from separate spec: > + - it is maintained separately and mozillapl version is always released _later_ > + - the spec is overcomplicated without it If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell me. I will make the spec. wrobell From jack at jack.eu.org Fri Dec 6 15:59:25 2002 From: jack at jack.eu.org (=?iso-8859-2?q?Jaros=B3aw=20Kamper?=) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:59:25 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> References: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <200212061559.25556.jack@jack.eu.org> Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 12:54, wrobell napisa?: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > [...] > > +Revision 1.213.2.1 2002/12/06 09:37:57 wrobell > > +- removed PL stuff, it should built from separate spec: > > + - it is maintained separately and mozillapl version is always > > released _later_ + - the spec is overcomplicated without it > > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell me. > I will make the spec. Make the spec for Ra! ;) -- Jaros?aw Kamper http://jack.eu.org/ From wrobell at ite.pl Fri Dec 6 16:11:56 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:11:56 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <20021206151156.GC1626@pred.dk.org> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Jaros?aw Kamper wrote: > Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 12:54, wrobell napisa?: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > > [...] > > > +Revision 1.213.2.1 2002/12/06 09:37:57 wrobell > > > +- removed PL stuff, it should built from separate spec: > > > + - it is maintained separately and mozillapl version is always > > > released _later_ + - the spec is overcomplicated without it > > > > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell me. > > I will make the spec. > > Make the spec for Ra! ;) There is no need for Ra. mozillapl stuff is in your mozilla rpm package. wrobell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl Fri Dec 6 16:12:26 2002 From: blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:12:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> References: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, wrobell wrote: > [...] > > +Revision 1.213.2.1 2002/12/06 09:37:57 wrobell > > +- removed PL stuff, it should built from separate spec: > > + - it is maintained separately and mozillapl version is always released _later_ > > + - the spec is overcomplicated without it > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell me. > I will make the spec. me! :) -- --------------------------------- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- CPU not found - software emulation... From jack at jack.eu.org Fri Dec 6 16:15:42 2002 From: jack at jack.eu.org (=?iso-8859-2?q?Jaros=B3aw=20Kamper?=) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:15:42 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <20021206151156.GC1626@pred.dk.org> References: <20021206151156.GC1626@pred.dk.org> Message-ID: <200212061615.42281.jack@jack.eu.org> Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 16:11, wrobell napisa?: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Jaros?aw Kamper wrote: > > Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 12:54, wrobell napisa?: > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > > > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell > > > me. I will make the spec. > > Make the spec for Ra! ;) > There is no need for Ra. mozillapl stuff is in your mozilla rpm > package. [jack at pldworkstation jack]$ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-1.0-10 Is it 1.2.1 ? -- Jaros?aw Kamper http://jack.eu.org/ From wrobell at ite.pl Fri Dec 6 16:26:33 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:26:33 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References: <20021206115421.GG20583@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <20021206152633.GD1626@pred.dk.org> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:12:26PM +0100, Pawe? Go?aszewski wrote: > On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, wrobell wrote: > > [...] > > > +Revision 1.213.2.1 2002/12/06 09:37:57 wrobell > > > +- removed PL stuff, it should built from separate spec: > > > + - it is maintained separately and mozillapl version is always released _later_ > > > + - the spec is overcomplicated without it > > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell me. > > I will make the spec. > > me! :) We should solve problem with registering items in installed-chrome.txt. wrobell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wrobell at ite.pl Fri Dec 6 16:43:57 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:43:57 +0100 Subject: SPECS: mozilla.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References: <20021206151156.GC1626@pred.dk.org> Message-ID: <20021206154357.GE1626@pred.dk.org> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:15:42PM +0100, Jaros?aw Kamper wrote: > Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 16:11, wrobell napisa?: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:59:25PM +0100, Jaros?aw Kamper wrote: > > > Dnia Friday 06 of December 2002 12:54, wrobell napisa?: > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:50:43PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > > > > If there are people who want mozillapl stuff in pld, then just tell > > > > me. I will make the spec. > > > Make the spec for Ra! ;) > > There is no need for Ra. mozillapl stuff is in your mozilla rpm > > package. > > [jack at pldworkstation jack]$ rpm -q mozilla > mozilla-1.0-10 > > Is it 1.2.1 ? Oh... common... get it from nest. :-) wrobell From wrobell at ite.pl Mon Dec 9 13:07:02 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:07:02 +0100 Subject: slighthint patch -> SPECS: Xft.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021209120702.GE2334@pred.posexperts.com.pl> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:00:37PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > Module name: SPECS > Changes by: wrobell 02/12/09 13:00:35 > > Modified files: > Xft.spec > > Log message: > - slighthint is back What about this patch? Do we really need it? Similar patches are applied to freetype, Xft, fontconfig, pango. It seems that the patch is partialy integrated into latest freetype sources... it should be removed from freetype.spec or not? wrobell From qboosh at pld.org.pl Mon Dec 9 13:09:41 2002 From: qboosh at pld.org.pl (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:09:41 +0100 Subject: slighthint patch -> SPECS: Xft.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <20021209120702.GE2334@pred.posexperts.com.pl> References: <20021209120702.GE2334@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <20021209120941.GB4931@gruby.cs.net.pl> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:07:02PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:00:37PM +0100, wrobell wrote: > > Module name: SPECS > > Changes by: wrobell 02/12/09 13:00:35 > > > > Modified files: > > Xft.spec > > > > Log message: > > - slighthint is back > What about this patch? Do we really need it? Similar patches are applied > to freetype, Xft, fontconfig, pango. > > It seems that the patch is partialy integrated into latest freetype > sources... it should be removed from freetype.spec or not? freetype 2.1.3 contains only (partial) API changes, without real action (new parameters are not used). -- Jakub Bogusz From martii at obgyn.edu.pl Mon Dec 9 15:32:35 2002 From: martii at obgyn.edu.pl (Marcin Chojnowski) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:32:35 +0100 Subject: BuilderReq check Message-ID: <20021209143235.GA8464@obgyn.edu.pl> Hi folks, I got one idea chow to check if all BR are in our spec files and if none is missing. My idea is as follows: 1 standalone machine for checking BR 2 chroots with minimal set of packages (poldek -i rpm-build) 3 we will use builder script for getting spec files with surces 4 than use poldek for installing BR 5 we store list of installed packages (accordnig what poldek installed) 6 after build was successful or not buildlog is created and send 7 all packages installed are removed (chroot from point 2) Advantages: Thare are alot of specs that require more BR for building. Problem is shown only when someone tries to build spec if has brand new devel PLD installed. For ex it could be aviable to people that makes new specs and want to add all BR needed. I think that we should build is such way some current packages than to send to builder all specs aviable. Disadvantages: eats a lot of hard drive bandwith and CPU time, very low performance. What do you think about ?? Martii From martii at obgyn.edu.pl Mon Dec 9 15:36:22 2002 From: martii at obgyn.edu.pl (Marcin Chojnowski) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:36:22 +0100 Subject: poldek and ppc (nest) Message-ID: <20021209143622.GA8504@obgyn.edu.pl> Hi, As some people noticed there is a problem with poldek (nest) on ppc. Builders are producing wrong one that ends with SegFault during reading of /var/lib/rpm/Pakages. I build poldek on my home machine with fresh nest environment from ftp.nest..... and ... ot works well. I had problems with argp.h that poldek configure was unable to find. I don't know but installing of krenel-headers helped. Maybe Pawe? Gajda can take a closer look for this problem ?? Martii From mmazur at kernel.pl Mon Dec 9 14:53:05 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:53:05 +0100 Subject: BuilderReq check In-Reply-To: <20021209143235.GA8464@obgyn.edu.pl> References: <20021209143235.GA8464@obgyn.edu.pl> Message-ID: <200212091453.05197.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Monday 09 December 2002 15:32, Marcin Chojnowski wrote: > What do you think about ?? I think that it's a lot of work to fully automate it. I did consider making such thing a couple of months ago but figured I'm too lazy :) -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From martii at obgyn.edu.pl Tue Dec 10 04:01:55 2002 From: martii at obgyn.edu.pl (Marcin Chojnowski) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 04:01:55 +0100 Subject: BuilderReq check In-Reply-To: <200212091453.05197.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021209143235.GA8464@obgyn.edu.pl> <200212091453.05197.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <20021210030155.GA16946@obgyn.edu.pl> Dnia Pa?skiego 09 Dec, 2002, Mariusz Mazur napisa?(a): > On Monday 09 December 2002 15:32, Marcin Chojnowski wrote: > > What do you think about ?? > > I think that it's a lot of work to fully automate it. I did consider making > such thing a couple of months ago but figured I'm too lazy :) I think it's worth to have HQ spec files. Martii From malekith at pld-linux.org Tue Dec 10 09:16:42 2002 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:16:42 +0100 Subject: BuilderReq check In-Reply-To: <200212091453.05197.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021209143235.GA8464@obgyn.edu.pl> <200212091453.05197.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <20021210081642.GA3597@roke.freak> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:53:05PM +0100, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > On Monday 09 December 2002 15:32, Marcin Chojnowski wrote: > > What do you think about ?? > > I think that it's a lot of work to fully automate it. I did consider making > such thing a couple of months ago but figured I'm too lazy :) I started it some time ago. But I was too lazy too... If somebody's intrested, I attach it. -- : Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/pld-linux.org : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: builder-ng.tar.bz2 Type: application/x-bzip2 Size: 7531 bytes Desc: not available URL: From qboosh at pld.org.pl Tue Dec 17 23:18:51 2002 From: qboosh at pld.org.pl (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:18:51 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011359.46747.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <20021217221851.GA10908@satan.blackhosts> On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > On Sunday 01 December 2002 13:59, Micha? Margula wrote: > > Would be nice but I haven't found at their site anything about security, > > because you need to trust your builders which could inject trojans into > > compilation results. > > Currently I can add a trojan to something, say "ac/am fixes" in commit log, > and there is a huge probability that nobody would *ever* notice. I think it's rather small. Some people (guess who ;>) read most of patches to packages they are using (or at least compiling, changing and messing with on other ways). It would be much larger, when you put trojaned sources... -- Jakub Bogusz http://www.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/ From orzech at pld.org.pl Wed Dec 18 11:48:44 2002 From: orzech at pld.org.pl (Tomek Orzechowski) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:48:44 +0100 Subject: [MBT] new ticket for pkg cvs "segfault with CONFIG_DIR" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021218104844.GA26908@alpha.hq.cs.net.pl> [18 grudzie?, 2002] bugs at pld.org.pl napisa?: > >Date: 2002-12-18 09:40:05+01 Author: Leszek Krupi?ski (Leon) >Title: segfault with CONFIG_DIR >Ticket ID: #505 >Ticket URL: http://bugs.pld.org.pl/?bug=505 >Package: cvs-1.11.2-6 >Distribution: PLD-Ra.main PLD-1.0.devel.main PLD-1.0.devel.test PLD-1.0.devel.supported >Category: doesn't work as it should >Current state: opened >Text: > >When CONFIG_DIR is set and that directory doesn't exists CVS dumps segmentation >fault. cvs home_etc patch has been improved/fixed few days ago - STBR cvs.spec to RA-updates, please. -- _ _._. _ .|_ (_)| /_(/.(.| ) Tomek Orzechowski From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 22 21:53:13 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:53:13 +0100 Subject: [a chart] Message-ID: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> TOP Ten of The Most Changed Specs in PLD by Revision: rpm 1.382 kernel 1.359 XFree86 1.354 glibc 1.255 php 1.224 mozilla 1.220 apache 1.215 util-linux 1.196 qt 1.187 postgresql 1.184 cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From ser at metalab.unc.edu Mon Dec 23 17:29:56 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:29:56 +0100 Subject: [last break in mail exchange] Message-ID: <20021223162956.GU17485@szafa.it-zone.org> hello - sorry for mail delays, but there was a big power outage at ibibilio.org. cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl Tue Dec 24 00:20:35 2002 From: blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 00:20:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > TOP Ten of The Most Changed Specs in PLD by Revision: > > rpm 1.382 > kernel 1.359 > XFree86 1.354 > glibc 1.255 > php 1.224 > mozilla 1.220 > apache 1.215 > util-linux 1.196 > qt 1.187 > postgresql 1.184 Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, many other specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should be first one. -- --------------------------------- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- CPU not found - software emulation... From wrobell at ite.pl Tue Dec 24 01:14:46 2002 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 01:14:46 +0100 Subject: Build log: alsa-driver.spec In-Reply-To: <200212231716.gBNHG1k5018665@aurora.gazetylokalne.pl> References: <200212231716.gBNHG1k5018665@aurora.gazetylokalne.pl> Message-ID: <20021224001446.GG20773@pred.dk.org> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 06:16:01PM +0100, PLD Nest athlon builder wrote: > Build request > from: wrobell > message-id: <216322987616795.3702.builder at pred> > started processing at: Mon Dec 23 14:55:25 CET 2002 > > Executing: /home/users/builder/rpm/SPECS/builder -c -bb -nu alsa-driver.spec > > U alsa-driver.spec > # $Revision: 1.78 $, $Date: 2002/12/10 17:13:37 $ > U alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6.tar.bz2 > U alsa-driver-make.patch > U alsa-driver-linux2.2.patch > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86048 > Patch #0 (alsa-driver-make.patch): > Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38537 > + umask 022 > + cd /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD > + cd alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6 > + aclocal > + autoconf [...] > checking for PCMCIA... "yes" [...] > > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5/misc/pcmcia/* > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5smp/misc/pcmcia/* > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5/misc/pcmcia/* > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5smp/misc/pcmcia/* > Error: package build failed. > Command exited with non-zero status 5 > 776.83user 42.96system 14:02.53elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > 0inputs+0outputs (1301054major+1749382minor)pagefaults 0swaps What is missing? wrobell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From grzegol at pld.org.pl Tue Dec 24 12:38:12 2002 From: grzegol at pld.org.pl (Grzegorz Golawski) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:38:12 +0100 Subject: Build log: alsa-driver.spec In-Reply-To: <20021224001446.GG20773@pred.dk.org> References: <200212231716.gBNHG1k5018665@aurora.gazetylokalne.pl> <20021224001446.GG20773@pred.dk.org> Message-ID: <20021224113812.GA16371@pld.org.pl> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:14:46AM +0100, wrobell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 06:16:01PM +0100, PLD Nest athlon builder wrote: > > Build request > > from: wrobell > > message-id: <216322987616795.3702.builder at pred> > > started processing at: Mon Dec 23 14:55:25 CET 2002 > > > > Executing: /home/users/builder/rpm/SPECS/builder -c -bb -nu alsa-driver.spec > > > > U alsa-driver.spec > > # $Revision: 1.78 $, $Date: 2002/12/10 17:13:37 $ > > U alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6.tar.bz2 > > U alsa-driver-make.patch > > U alsa-driver-linux2.2.patch > > Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86048 > > Patch #0 (alsa-driver-make.patch): > > Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.38537 > > + umask 022 > > + cd /home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD > > + cd alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6 > > + aclocal > > + autoconf > [...] > > checking for PCMCIA... "yes" > [...] > > > > RPM build errors: > > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5/misc/pcmcia/* > > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5smp/misc/pcmcia/* > > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5/misc/pcmcia/* > > File not found by glob: /home/users/builder/tmp/alsa-driver-0.9.0rc6-root-builder/lib/modules/2.4.18-5smp/misc/pcmcia/* > > Error: package build failed. > > Command exited with non-zero status 5 > > 776.83user 42.96system 14:02.53elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k > > 0inputs+0outputs (1301054major+1749382minor)pagefaults 0swaps > > What is missing? Try --with linux22. It works for me, although I have 2.4.19 kernel. -- <===========================> $+>> Grzegorz Go?awski <<+$ $+>> grzegol at pld.org.pl <<+$ <===========================> From rbuilder at pers.pl Tue Dec 24 13:39:38 2002 From: rbuilder at pers.pl (Rafal Cygnarowski) Date: 24 Dec 2002 13:39:38 +0100 Subject: Build log: alsa-driver.spec In-Reply-To: <20021224113812.GA16371@pld.org.pl> References: <200212231716.gBNHG1k5018665@aurora.gazetylokalne.pl> <20021224001446.GG20773@pred.dk.org> <20021224113812.GA16371@pld.org.pl> Message-ID: <1040733578.3299.4.camel@rafal> > > What is missing? > Try --with linux22. It works for me, although I have 2.4.19 kernel. strange... i done this patch while i was using 2.2 series kernel but now i'm using 2.4.18 on my desktop machine. I have no problem with alsa-driver compilation... It looks like 2.4.19 kernel has not pcmcia support configured or sth like that... (linux22 patch switchs off pcmcia cards compilation!) -- Rafal Cygnarowski From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 29 03:14:53 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 03:14:53 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> --->[Quoting Pawe? Go?aszewski :] > On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > TOP Ten of The Most Changed Specs in PLD by Revision: > > > > rpm 1.382 > > kernel 1.359 > > XFree86 1.354 > > glibc 1.255 > > php 1.224 > > mozilla 1.220 > > apache 1.215 > > util-linux 1.196 > > qt 1.187 > > postgresql 1.184 > > Wrong. > Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, many other specs are not on > HEAD, but in branches. > > This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should be first one. Could you please prepare the chart with taking into the concidaration a branch aspects? cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl Sun Dec 29 17:35:08 2002 From: blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:35:08 +0100 (CET) Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > > TOP Ten of The Most Changed Specs in PLD by Revision: > > > > > > rpm 1.382 > > > kernel 1.359 > > > XFree86 1.354 > > > > Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, many other specs > > are not on HEAD, but in branches. > > > > This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should be first one. > Could you please prepare the chart with taking into the concidaration a > branch aspects? I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D -- --------------------------------- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- CPU not found - software emulation... From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 29 17:40:04 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:40:04 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> --->[Quoting Pawe? Go?aszewski :] > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > > > > TOP Ten of The Most Changed Specs in PLD by Revision: > > > > > > > > rpm 1.382 kernel 1.359 XFree86 1.354 > > > > > > Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, > > > many other specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. > > > > > > This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should be > > > first one. > > > > Could you please prepare the chart with taking into the > > concidaration a branch aspects? > > I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D So please do not bother our heads - I loud and clear wrote it was __"chart by revision"__. cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl Sun Dec 29 18:33:21 2002 From: blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:33:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > > > > rpm 1.382 kernel 1.359 XFree86 1.354 > > > > Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, many other > > > > specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. This summary is not > > > > acurate, I think. kernel should be first one. > > > Could you please prepare the chart with taking into the > > > concidaration a branch aspects? > > I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D > So please do not bother our heads - I loud and clear wrote it was > __"chart by revision"__. ...and I've said that is not good chart, because it tells us nothing :) -- --------------------------------- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- CPU not found - software emulation... From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 29 18:39:55 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:39:55 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> --->[Quoting Pawe? Go?aszewski :] > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > > > > > > rpm 1.382 kernel 1.359 XFree86 1.354 > > > > > > > > > > Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, > > > > > many other specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. > > > > > This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should > > > > > be first one. > > > > > > > > Could you please prepare the chart with taking into > > > > the concidaration a branch aspects? > > > > > > I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D > > > > So please do not bother our heads - I loud and clear wrote > > it was __"chart by revision"__. > > ...and I've said that is not good chart, because it tells us > nothing :) Yeah, if it is not good, I'd proposed to prepare better, if you do not like to do it, please shut up. And what does it mean: "us"? Do you have split personality? cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl Sun Dec 29 18:43:44 2002 From: blues at ds6.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:43:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: > > > > > > Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, many > > > > > > other specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. This summary is > > > > > > not acurate, I think. kernel should be first one. > > > > > Could you please prepare the chart with taking into the > > > > > concidaration a branch aspects? > > > > I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D > > > So please do not bother our heads - I loud and clear wrote it was > > > __"chart by revision"__. > > ...and I've said that is not good chart, because it tells us nothing > Yeah, if it is not good, I'd proposed to prepare better, if you do not > like to do it, please shut up. Are we starting from the beggining? :D > And what does it mean: "us"? Do you have split personality? us == TEAM -- --------------------------------- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- CPU not found - software emulation... From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 29 19:14:28 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 19:14:28 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <20021229181428.GM17485@szafa.it-zone.org> --->[Quoting Pawe? Go?aszewski :] > Are we starting from the beggining? :D unfortunately > > And what does it mean: "us"? Do you have split personality? > > us == TEAM did you volunteer to be a spokesman? i did not see an offert. cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From migo at supernet.com.pl Sun Dec 29 21:07:36 2002 From: migo at supernet.com.pl (Bartosz Jakubski) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:07:36 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <20021229200736.GA26844@anorak.localdomain> Dnia 29 gru o godzinie 18:39:55 +0100, Sergiusz Pawlowicz napisa?(a): > --->[Quoting Pawe? Go?aszewski :] > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: >> >>>>>>> rpm 1.382 kernel 1.359 XFree86 1.354 >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Most changes in kernel, qt, KDE.... and many, >>>>>> many other specs are not on HEAD, but in branches. >>>>>> This summary is not acurate, I think. kernel should >>>>>> be first one. >>>>> >>>>> Could you please prepare the chart with taking into >>>>> the concidaration a branch aspects? >>>> >>>> I've no need to do that :) You've started this chart :D >>> >>> So please do not bother our heads - I loud and clear wrote >>> it was __"chart by revision"__. >> >> ...and I've said that is not good chart, because it tells us >> nothing :) > > Yeah, if it is not good, I'd proposed to prepare better, if > you do not like to do it, please shut up. > It's frightening how many people show this stupid attitude: "If you cannot do this better you have no right to criticize". -- -- .- Bartosz Jakubski ------------------- Sosnowiec -. -- -- | Free Software is a matter of liberty, not price | -- -- `---------------(http://www.fsf.org/philosophy)-----' -- From ser at metalab.unc.edu Mon Dec 30 11:57:48 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 11:57:48 +0100 Subject: [a chart] In-Reply-To: <20021229200736.GA26844@anorak.localdomain> References: <20021222205313.GO17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229021453.GE17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229164004.GK17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229173955.GL17485@szafa.it-zone.org> <20021229200736.GA26844@anorak.localdomain> Message-ID: <20021230105748.GY17485@szafa.it-zone.org> --->[Quoting Bartosz Jakubski :] > It's frightening how many people show this stupid attitude: > "If you cannot do this better you have no right to > criticize". I love opinions without arguments. cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From ser at metalab.unc.edu Sun Dec 1 13:35:16 2002 From: ser at metalab.unc.edu (Sergiusz Pawlowicz) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 13:35:16 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] Message-ID: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> is it possible (and worth of spending a time) to prepare distributed pld builder? http://distcc.samba.org/ cheers - Sergiusz -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ company: http://it-zone.org/ ______________________________________________________________ on wallpaper: tldp.org, gnu.org, pld-linux.org, hyperreal.info From alchemyx at uznam.net.pl Sun Dec 1 13:59:46 2002 From: alchemyx at uznam.net.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?Micha=B3=20Margula?=) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 13:59:46 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> Message-ID: <200212011359.46747.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Dnia nie 1. grudzie? 2002 13:35, Sergiusz Pawlowicz napisa?: > is it possible (and worth of spending a time) to prepare > distributed pld builder? > > http://distcc.samba.org/ Would be nice but I haven't found at their site anything about security, because you need to trust your builders which could inject trojans into compilation results. -- Micha? Margula, alchemyx at uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ +) "W ?yciu pi?kne s? tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel] From mmazur at kernel.pl Sun Dec 1 14:36:55 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 14:36:55 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011359.46747.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011359.46747.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Message-ID: <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Sunday 01 December 2002 13:59, Micha? Margula wrote: > Would be nice but I haven't found at their site anything about security, > because you need to trust your builders which could inject trojans into > compilation results. Currently I can add a trojan to something, say "ac/am fixes" in commit log, and there is a huge probability that nobody would *ever* notice. I would simply remove the trojan during the next upgrade. -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From alchemyx at uznam.net.pl Sun Dec 1 15:04:39 2002 From: alchemyx at uznam.net.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?Micha=B3=20Margula?=) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:04:39 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011359.46747.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> Message-ID: <200212011504.39019.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Dnia nie 1. grudzie? 2002 14:36, Mariusz Mazur napisa?: > Currently I can add a trojan to something, say "ac/am fixes" in commit log, > and there is a huge probability that nobody would *ever* notice. I would > simply remove the trojan during the next upgrade. But if anybody finds out it will be easy to check who has done it and to punish that person. -- Micha? Margula, alchemyx at uznam.net.pl, http://alchemyx.uznam.net.pl/ +) "W ?yciu pi?kne s? tylko chwile" [Ryszard Riedel] From mmazur at kernel.pl Sun Dec 1 15:13:06 2002 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 15:13:06 +0100 Subject: [distributed builder?] In-Reply-To: <200212011504.39019.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> References: <20021201123516.GU3244@szafa.it-zone.org> <200212011436.55873.mmazur@kernel.pl> <200212011504.39019.alchemyx@uznam.net.pl> Message-ID: <200212011513.06087.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Sunday 01 December 2002 15:04, Micha? Margula wrote: > But if anybody finds out it will be easy to check who has done it and to > punish that person. As far as I know some recent guys with rw access are (ex)script-kidies. If they are dumb enough to brake into someone's boxes... well... You get the point. -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho }