Shouldn't glibc-devel r: kernel-headers?

[Michal Moskal]

On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:51:28PM +0200, wrobell wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 03:07:31PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:53:20PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 October 2002 23:37, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > > > Glibc references some <asm/*.h> files. They are in kernel-headers
> > > > package. Shouldn't therefore glibc-devel require kernel-headers?
> > > 
> > > I thought about it too (I stumbled across this yesterday when something didn't 
> > > want to build although all BuildRequires were met). Wouldn't it be ok to just 
> > > provide a kernel-fake.noarch.rpm for people not using disto kernel?
> > 
> > I guess this is better idea then hacks with %{?_without_dist_kernel:...}
> > all over the specs.
> > 
> > Anyway I heard somewhere about moving <asm/*> to glibc-devel (in rh, or
> > somewhere). Wouldn't that be a good idea?
> 
> No, because it will overwrite used asm headers from non-distro
> kernel.

I guess one should use kernel headers that was used during glibc
compilation?

-- 
: Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/pld-linux.org :  GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept :  {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h