From orzech at pld-linux.org  Wed Dec  3 00:31:48 2003
From: orzech at pld-linux.org (Tomek Orzechowski)
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 00:31:48 +0100
Subject: SPECS: rpm.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <rpm.spec.1.483@cvs.pld-linux.org>
References: <rpm.spec.1.482@cvs.pld-linux.org> <rpm.spec.1.483@cvs.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20031202233148.GA25476@black.lj.pl>

[Dec 02, 2003] wolf wrote:

>Module name:	SPECS
>Changes by:	wolf	03/12/02 23:33:26
>
>Modified files:
>	rpm.spec
>
>Log message:
>- we are using distfiles, so wget is no longer optional (or is it?)
>
>Index: rpm.spec
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/rpm.spec,v
>diff -d -u -r1.482 -r1.483
>--- rpm.spec	29 Nov 2003 10:26:18 -0000	1.482
>+++ rpm.spec	2 Dec 2003 22:33:25 -0000	1.483
>@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@
> Requires:	%{name}-build = %{version}-%{release}
> # these are optional
> #Requires:	cvs
>-#Requires:	wget
>+Requires:	wget

Really? During rpm --rebuild some.src.rpm wget is not required.
Builder uses wget, not rpm (rpmbuild).

-- 
  _  _._. _  .|_
 (_)|  /_(/.(.| )
Tomek  Orzechowski
                                       Solitude, mon Dieu, solitude...


From wrobell at ite.pl  Sat Dec  6 01:47:53 2003
From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 01:47:53 +0100
Subject: SPECS: bonobo.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <bonobo.spec.1.108@cvs.pld-linux.org>
References: <bonobo.spec.1.107@cvs.pld-linux.org> <bonobo.spec.1.108@cvs.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 06:28:07PM +0100, mmazur wrote:
> Module name:	SPECS
> Changes by:	mmazur	03/12/05 18:28:05
> 
> Modified files:
> 	bonobo.spec
> 
> Log message:
> - rel 4 to rebuild with new db
> - sorry guys, but some apps *do* require gnome1 libs to work, and refuse to
>   go along with plain gtk1

which one?

[...]

    wrobell <wrobell at ite.pl>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20031206/db062fef/attachment.sig>

From gotar at polanet.pl  Sat Dec  6 09:28:25 2003
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:28:25 +0100
Subject: SPECS: bonobo.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org>
References: <bonobo.spec.1.107@cvs.pld-linux.org> <bonobo.spec.1.108@cvs.pld-linux.org> <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org>
Message-ID: <20031206082825.GA4237@os>

On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:47:53 +0100, wrobell wrote:

> > - sorry guys, but some apps *do* require gnome1 libs to work, and refuse to
> >   go along with plain gtk1
> 
> which one?

vice

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>                                     USA sux
http://www.pld-linux.org/Members/gotar/     http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
http://mops.uci.agh.edu.pl/~gotar/        http://informatica.agh.edu.pl/


From wrobell at ite.pl  Sat Dec  6 11:23:05 2003
From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:23:05 +0100
Subject: SPECS: bonobo.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <20031206082825.GA4237@os>
References: <bonobo.spec.1.107@cvs.pld-linux.org> <bonobo.spec.1.108@cvs.pld-linux.org> <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org> <20031206082825.GA4237@os>
Message-ID: <20031206102305.GA5574@pred.dk.org>

On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:47:53 +0100, wrobell wrote:
> 
> > > - sorry guys, but some apps *do* require gnome1 libs to work, and refuse to
> > >   go along with plain gtk1
> > 
> > which one?
> 
> vice
what are advantages of vice built with gnome support?

    wrobell <wrobell at ite.pl>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20031206/12e5c11b/attachment.sig>

From gotar at polanet.pl  Sat Dec  6 13:36:47 2003
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:36:47 +0100
Subject: SPECS: bonobo.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <20031206102305.GA5574@pred.dk.org>
References: <bonobo.spec.1.107@cvs.pld-linux.org> <bonobo.spec.1.108@cvs.pld-linux.org> <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org> <20031206082825.GA4237@os> <20031206102305.GA5574@pred.dk.org>
Message-ID: <20031206123647.GA3885@os>

On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 11:23:05 +0100, wrobell wrote:

> > > > - sorry guys, but some apps *do* require gnome1 libs to work, and refuse to
> > > >   go along with plain gtk1
> > > 
> > > which one?
> > 
> > vice
> what are advantages of vice built with gnome support?

gtk wigdets instead of Xaw(3d).

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>                                     USA sux
http://www.pld-linux.org/Members/gotar/     http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
http://mops.uci.agh.edu.pl/~gotar/        http://informatica.agh.edu.pl/


From mmazur at kernel.pl  Sat Dec  6 15:46:37 2003
From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur)
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:46:37 +0100
Subject: SPECS: bonobo.spec (HEAD)
In-Reply-To: <20031206082825.GA4237@os>
References: <bonobo.spec.1.107@cvs.pld-linux.org> <20031206004753.GA27887@pred.dk.org> <20031206082825.GA4237@os>
Message-ID: <200312061546.37612.mmazur@kernel.pl>

On Saturday 06 of December 2003 09:28, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 01:47:53 +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > - sorry guys, but some apps *do* require gnome1 libs to work, and
> > > refuse to go along with plain gtk1
> >
> > which one?
>
> vice

Qboosh also named some a few threads back.

-- 
Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?.
Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z 
przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le
- jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz.                 { Osho }