From aredridel at nbtsc.org Tue Jun 17 03:20:10 2003 From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aredridel) Date: 16 Jun 2003 19:20:10 -0600 Subject: SPECS: libxfcegui4.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <1055812809.1429.19.camel@mizar> Is there a reason I cannot check out libxfcegui4.spec from CVS? Ari From qboosh at pld.org.pl Tue Jun 17 10:23:43 2003 From: qboosh at pld.org.pl (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:23:43 +0200 Subject: SPECS: libxfcegui4.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <1055812809.1429.19.camel@mizar> References:

<1055812809.1429.19.camel@mizar> Message-ID: <20030617082343.GA6014@gruby.cs.net.pl> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:20:10PM -0600, Aredridel wrote: > Is there a reason I cannot check out libxfcegui4.spec from CVS? How are you trying to do this? $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs at cvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot get SPECS/libxfcegui4.spec U SPECS/libxfcegui4.spec $ ls -l SPECS/libxfcegui4.spec -rw------- 1 qboosh users 2200 2003-06-16 16:41 SPECS/libxfcegui4.spec or you can use cvsweb: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/libxfcegui4.spec -- Jakub Bogusz http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/ PLD Linux http://www.pld-linux.org/ From malekith at pld-linux.org Tue Jun 17 15:53:04 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:53:04 +0200 Subject: SPECS: libxfcegui4.spec (HEAD) In-Reply-To: <1055857727.2063.0.camel@mizar> References:

<1055812809.1429.19.camel@mizar> <20030617072502.GA5805@roke.freak> <1055857727.2063.0.camel@mizar> Message-ID: <20030617135304.GA12113@roke.freak> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:48:47AM -0600, Aredridel wrote: > On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 01:25, Michal Moskal wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:20:10PM -0600, Aredridel wrote: > > > Is there a reason I cannot check out libxfcegui4.spec from CVS? > > > > Hmm... I works for me. > > > > [malekith at roke SPECS]$ cvs up libxfcegui4.spec > > U libxfcegui4.spec > > > > Could you provide some more information? > > > > % cvs up libxfcegui4.spec > cvs server: nothing known about libxfcegui4.spec > % cat CVS/Root > :pserver:cvs at cvs.pld.org.pl:/cvsroot > % cat CVS/Repository > SPECS Please use :pserver:cvs at cvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From wrobell at ite.pl Sat Jun 21 16:48:16 2003 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 16:48:16 +0200 Subject: fonts group Message-ID: <20030621144816.GB16873@pred.dk.org> There is X11/Fonts group in rpm package. I think, it should be changed into Fonts. For example, some web applications which use gd or pdflib library can use the fonts, so current group name is inappropriate. Any comments? wrobell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aredridel at nbtsc.org Sat Jun 21 17:35:59 2003 From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aredridel) Date: 21 Jun 2003 09:35:59 -0600 Subject: fonts group In-Reply-To: <20030621144816.GB16873@pred.dk.org> References: <20030621144816.GB16873@pred.dk.org> Message-ID: <1056209759.15726.9.camel@mizar> On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 08:48, wrobell wrote: > There is X11/Fonts group in rpm package. I think, it should be changed > into Fonts. > > For example, some web applications which use gd or pdflib library can > use the fonts, so current group name is inappropriate. > > Any comments? Yay! I think that the entire X11 grouping is rather silly, sometimes. Saying Depends: XFree86-libs is a good way to see if it's X-based -- why group based on that, too, and have a clone of the group tree under X11/? Ari From blues at ds.pg.gda.pl Sat Jun 21 20:49:32 2003 From: blues at ds.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 20:49:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: fonts group In-Reply-To: <20030621144816.GB16873@pred.dk.org> References: <20030621144816.GB16873@pred.dk.org> Message-ID: On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, wrobell wrote: > There is X11/Fonts group in rpm package. I think, it should be changed > into Fonts. For example, some web applications which use gd or pdflib > library can use the fonts, so current group name is inappropriate. > > Any comments? none. except one - do this :) -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- worth to see: http://www.againsttcpa.com/ CPU not found - software emulation...