From wrobell at ite.pl Mon Sep 15 12:51:01 2003 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:51:01 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <20030915105101.GL27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:13:19PM +0200, Pawe? Go?aszewski wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > b.....t > > cvs diff -u shit... db in my brain is out of date :-\ wrobell From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 15 13:33:57 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:33:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030915104029.GA22432@roke.freak> from "Michal Moskal" at Sep 15, 2003 12:40:29 PM Message-ID: <200309151133.h8FBXwRW017739@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Michal Moskal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > > > > > b.....t > > > > > > cvs diff -u > > > > A tak BTW, czy mozna zmienic liczbe linii kontekstu ze standardowych 3 na > > inna ? _Tego_ CVS-owy diff nie potrafi :-( A szkoda... > > -en! > > To change number of diff lines you need to simply plug in external diff > program ;) No wlasnie. ;) I bez ciagniecia obu pelnych wersji lub zmiany konfiguracji serwera sie nie obejdzie... Nie podobala im sie opcja diffa "-A" ... ? -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From malekith at pld-linux.org Mon Sep 15 12:40:29 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:40:29 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <200309151019.h8FAJnCI004518@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> References: <200309151019.h8FAJnCI004518@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Message-ID: <20030915104029.GA22432@roke.freak> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > > > b.....t > > > > cvs diff -u > > A tak BTW, czy mozna zmienic liczbe linii kontekstu ze standardowych 3 na > inna ? _Tego_ CVS-owy diff nie potrafi :-( A szkoda... -en! To change number of diff lines you need to simply plug in external diff program ;) -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From malekith at pld-linux.org Mon Sep 15 13:41:11 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:41:11 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <200309151133.h8FBXwRW017739@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> References: <20030915104029.GA22432@roke.freak> <200309151133.h8FBXwRW017739@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Message-ID: <20030915114111.GA31581@roke.freak> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:33:57PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > Michal Moskal wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote: > > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > > > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > > > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > > > > > > > b.....t > > > > > > > > cvs diff -u > > > > > > A tak BTW, czy mozna zmienic liczbe linii kontekstu ze standardowych 3 na > > > inna ? _Tego_ CVS-owy diff nie potrafi :-( A szkoda... > > > > -en! ^^^^ > > > > To change number of diff lines you need to simply plug in external diff > > program ;) > > No wlasnie. ;) > > I bez ciagniecia obu pelnych wersji lub zmiany konfiguracji serwera sie nie > obejdzie... > > Nie podobala im sie opcja diffa "-A" ... ? This is *English* list! I believe that it will do without transferring entire files. It depends on what you want to diff. If diff of what you have done locally you don't need *any* network. If you want to diff between two arbitratrary revisions -- you will need to transfer one file and xdelta for the second. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From superluser at frontiernet.net Mon Sep 1 17:44:29 2003 From: superluser at frontiernet.net (Andrew A. Gill) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:44:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: PLD on DEC Alpha In-Reply-To: <20030826180006.GA1328@roke.freak> Message-ID: On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Michal Moskal wrote: > > I see. So you will probably have to go with chroot approach. I tried poldek --mkdir --install-dist=/mnt/chroot -v poldek rc-scripts shadow (I mounted my RH7.1 root under /mnt/chroot on the alpha-chr root) but it keeps complaining about how my packages are newer. Some (like setup) are indeed newer, but won't work with PLD. -- |Andrew A. Gill |I posted to Silent-Tristero and| | |all I got was this stupid sig! | |alt.tv.simpsons CBG-FAQ author | | | (Report all obscene mail to Le Maitre Pots)| |Nothing here yet: Temporary sig: -- Little help? From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 1 17:36:31 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:36:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: tla.spec Message-ID: <200309011536.h81FaVcl021170@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> What is the difference between tla.spec and arch.spec (except version) ? Shouldn't one of them be removed ? -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From aredridel at nbtsc.org Tue Sep 2 01:03:17 2003 From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aredridel) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 17:03:17 -0600 Subject: tla.spec In-Reply-To: <200309011536.h81FaVcl021170@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> References: <200309011536.h81FaVcl021170@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Message-ID: <1062457397.5030.38.camel@mizar.nbtsc.org> On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 09:36, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > What is the difference between tla.spec and arch.spec (except version) ? > > Shouldn't one of them be removed ? tla is the C implementation; arch is shell scripts, ArX is C/C++ version, a fork. Version is the biggest difference, and I didn't think to look in arch.spec to find tla, so I made a new one. Probably they should be merged to tla.spec. Ari -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From malekith at pld-linux.org Tue Sep 2 17:47:10 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 17:47:10 +0200 Subject: PLD on DEC Alpha In-Reply-To: References: <20030826180006.GA1328@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030902154710.GA6083@roke.freak> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:44:29AM -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Michal Moskal wrote: > > > > I see. So you will probably have to go with chroot approach. > > I tried > > poldek --mkdir --install-dist=/mnt/chroot -v poldek rc-scripts shadow > > (I mounted my RH7.1 root under /mnt/chroot on the alpha-chr root) > > but it keeps complaining about how my packages are newer. Some (like > setup) are indeed newer, but won't work with PLD. Try upgrading on package by package basis using upgrade --downgrade (whatever sill it might seem :-) Maybe others have some better advice. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From malekith at pld-linux.org Tue Sep 2 20:13:23 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:13:23 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:08:37PM +0200, malekith wrote: > Module name: SPECS > Changes by: malekith 03/09/02 20:08:35 > > Modified files: > esound.spec > > Log message: > - fix --without alsa descripting -- enabling alsa disables OSS You can enable either alsa or OSS in esd. I personally use OSS, some people use alsa, so there is no good default for distribution. A solution would be to provide esound-alsa and esound-oss mutually exclusive packages, but only way to do it, I see, is to make libesd.so.x.y a symlink (made in %post) to proper library which is ugly hack I think. Does anybody have better solution? -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From radek at karnet.pl Wed Sep 3 14:26:37 2003 From: radek at karnet.pl (Radoslaw Zielinski) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:26:37 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> Michal Moskal [02-09-2003 20:13]: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:08:37PM +0200, malekith wrote: >> Module name: SPECS >> Changes by: malekith 03/09/02 20:08:35 >> Modified files: >> esound.spec >> Log message: >> - fix --without alsa descripting -- enabling alsa disables OSS > You can enable either alsa or OSS in esd. I personally use OSS, some > people use alsa, so there is no good default for distribution. A > solution would be to provide esound-alsa and esound-oss mutually > exclusive packages, but only way to do it, I see, is to make > libesd.so.x.y a symlink (made in %post) to proper library which is ugly > hack I think. Does anybody have better solution? Make two distinct packages Conflict:'ing each other, give them Provides: esound(thistimereally), and add this to Requires in the (almost empty) esound package. And turn off resolving libfoo.so.x.y -> `rpm -q --qf '%{NAME}\n' --whatprovides libfoo.so.x.y` at the building stage, for there will only be one esound-(alsa|oss) installed on a builder. -- Rados?aw Zieli?ski [ GPG key: http://radek.karnet.pl/ ] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From qboosh at pld-linux.org Wed Sep 3 15:08:47 2003 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:08:47 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> Message-ID: <20030903130847.GE22590@gruby.cs.net.pl> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > Michal Moskal [02-09-2003 20:13]: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:08:37PM +0200, malekith wrote: > >> Module name: SPECS > >> Changes by: malekith 03/09/02 20:08:35 > > >> Modified files: > >> esound.spec > > >> Log message: > >> - fix --without alsa descripting -- enabling alsa disables OSS > > You can enable either alsa or OSS in esd. I personally use OSS, some > > people use alsa, so there is no good default for distribution. A > > solution would be to provide esound-alsa and esound-oss mutually > > exclusive packages, but only way to do it, I see, is to make > > libesd.so.x.y a symlink (made in %post) to proper library which is ugly > > hack I think. Does anybody have better solution? > > Make two distinct packages Conflict:'ing each other, give them Provides: > esound(thistimereally), and add this to Requires in the (almost empty) > esound package. And turn off resolving libfoo.so.x.y -> `rpm -q --qf > '%{NAME}\n' --whatprovides libfoo.so.x.y` at the building stage, for > there will only be one esound-(alsa|oss) installed on a builder. If esound-alsa is to be installed on builder, all built packages would be linked with alsa libs anyway... -- Jakub Bogusz http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/ From malekith at pld-linux.org Wed Sep 3 15:11:59 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:11:59 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030903130847.GE22590@gruby.cs.net.pl> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> <20030903130847.GE22590@gruby.cs.net.pl> Message-ID: <20030903131159.GA5644@roke.freak> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:08:47PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > Make two distinct packages Conflict:'ing each other, give them Provides: > > esound(thistimereally), and add this to Requires in the (almost empty) > > esound package. And turn off resolving libfoo.so.x.y -> `rpm -q --qf > > '%{NAME}\n' --whatprovides libfoo.so.x.y` at the building stage, for > > there will only be one esound-(alsa|oss) installed on a builder. > > If esound-alsa is to be installed on builder, all built packages would > be linked with alsa libs anyway... The problem is not presence of alsa-lib. I don't care. The problem is that esound *can't* use oss if compiled with alsa (and vice versa). -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From malekith at pld-linux.org Wed Sep 3 15:16:57 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:16:57 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> Message-ID: <20030903131657.GB5644@roke.freak> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:26:37PM +0200, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: > Michal Moskal [02-09-2003 20:13]: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:08:37PM +0200, malekith wrote: > >> Module name: SPECS > >> Changes by: malekith 03/09/02 20:08:35 > > >> Modified files: > >> esound.spec > > >> Log message: > >> - fix --without alsa descripting -- enabling alsa disables OSS > > You can enable either alsa or OSS in esd. I personally use OSS, some > > people use alsa, so there is no good default for distribution. A > > solution would be to provide esound-alsa and esound-oss mutually > > exclusive packages, but only way to do it, I see, is to make > > libesd.so.x.y a symlink (made in %post) to proper library which is ugly > > hack I think. Does anybody have better solution? > > Make two distinct packages Conflict:'ing each other, give them Provides: > esound(thistimereally), and add this to Requires in the (almost empty) > esound package. And turn off resolving libfoo.so.x.y -> `rpm -q --qf > '%{NAME}\n' --whatprovides libfoo.so.x.y` at the building stage, for > there will only be one esound-(alsa|oss) installed on a builder. Yes, this is what I was thinking about, except for the fact that only thing that depends on alsa vs oss choice is libesd.so, and there is much more stuff in esound (some utils). What I don't like is %files section. Is there a way to put files with different contents but the same name in subpackages? -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From wolf42 at wp.pl Wed Sep 3 19:33:41 2003 From: wolf42 at wp.pl (Bartosz Taudul) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 19:33:41 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030903131159.GA5644@roke.freak> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> <20030903130847.GE22590@gruby.cs.net.pl> <20030903131159.GA5644@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030903173341.GA3100@bajzel> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:11:59PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > The problem is not presence of alsa-lib. I don't care. The problem is > that esound *can't* use oss if compiled with alsa (and vice versa). Doesn't esound compiled with oss work with alsa and it's oss emulation? wolf -- Bartek . - Daj mi spok?j. Taudul : .:.................................................................... w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g .:. http://chimera.one.pl/~wolf/ From malekith at pld-linux.org Wed Sep 3 19:55:20 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 19:55:20 +0200 Subject: alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD)) In-Reply-To: <20030903173341.GA3100@bajzel> References:

<20030902181323.GA26861@roke.freak> <20030903122637.GC2471@bongo.whisky.rz> <20030903130847.GE22590@gruby.cs.net.pl> <20030903131159.GA5644@roke.freak> <20030903173341.GA3100@bajzel> Message-ID: <20030903175520.GA15537@roke.freak> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:33:41PM +0200, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:11:59PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > > The problem is not presence of alsa-lib. I don't care. The problem is > > that esound *can't* use oss if compiled with alsa (and vice versa). > Doesn't esound compiled with oss work with alsa and it's oss emulation? Maybe. Don't know. Don't have also and have no intention to. -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From migo at supernet.com.pl Mon Sep 8 14:42:43 2003 From: migo at supernet.com.pl (Bartek Jakubski) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:42:43 +0200 Subject: If perl module contains .so file ... Message-ID: <20030908124243.GA17369@anorak.localhost> ... does it need to be 755? -- -- .- Bartek Jakubski --------------------- Sosnowiec -. -- -- | Free Software is a matter of liberty, not price | -- -- `---------------(http://www.fsf.org/philosophy)-----' -- From superluser at frontiernet.net Sat Sep 13 05:47:06 2003 From: superluser at frontiernet.net (Andrew A. Gill) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:47:06 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The secret of Alpha updates Message-ID: I think I figured out how to update my RedHat 7.1 system to PLD. The problem stems from an RPM/glibc incompatability. The secret is to upgrade RPM to 4.0.4 (the last RPM that doesn't support PartialHardlinkSets), and then to the next one. Then update glibc and install compat-db, compat-glibc, and compat-libstdc++. This will allow you to get the newer files and upgrade to PLD. -- |Andrew A. Gill |I posted to Silent-Tristero and| | |all I got was this stupid sig! | |alt.tv.simpsons CBG-FAQ author | | | (Report all obscene mail to Le Maitre Pots)| |Nothing here yet: Temporary sig: -- Thanks for all your help. From adamg at biomerieux.pl Sat Sep 13 09:47:46 2003 From: adamg at biomerieux.pl (Adam =?iso-8859-2?Q?Go=B3=EAbiowski?=) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:47:46 +0200 Subject: The secret of Alpha updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030913074746.GB18612@mysza.eu.org> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:47:06PM -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote: > I think I figured out how to update my RedHat 7.1 system to PLD. The > problem stems from an RPM/glibc incompatability. The secret is to upgrade > RPM to 4.0.4 (the last RPM that doesn't support PartialHardlinkSets), and > then to the next one. Then update glibc and install compat-db, > compat-glibc, and compat-libstdc++. This will allow you to get the newer > files and upgrade to PLD. Then maybe you could write some kind of mini howto describing migrating from RedHat to PLD on alpha arch? -- http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. From malekith at pld-linux.org Sat Sep 13 10:25:36 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:25:36 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org Message-ID: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> I've setup subversion repo for PLD Linux yesterday. It's now mainly aimed to be used as alternative to CVS for various projects sitting in our CVS (i.e. not for SPECS or SOURCES). Everybody having an CVS rw account also has subversion one. Password is the same. Repo URL is: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/ https and alternative ports to be run shortly. viewcvs for subversion is available at: http://svn.pld-linux.org/ It's also possible to migrate CVS projects to subversion. If you want do it for your project -- drop me an email. Wrobell has already done this for atob and cdpl. I did it for dml. Are *you* going to be next? Go ahead! Don't wait! ;) -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From michal at michal.waw.pl Sat Sep 13 12:12:20 2003 From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:12:20 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030913101220.GA4752@wieszak.lan> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > I've setup subversion repo for PLD Linux yesterday. It's now mainly Does it still have such a fascist licence? -- --= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =-- --= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =-- --==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==-- A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!! From malekith at pld-linux.org Sat Sep 13 12:20:20 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:20:20 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913101220.GA4752@wieszak.lan> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913101220.GA4752@wieszak.lan> Message-ID: <20030913102020.GA29512@roke.freak> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:12:20PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > > I've setup subversion repo for PLD Linux yesterday. It's now mainly > Does it still have such a fascist licence? Hem? BSD? -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From superluser at frontiernet.net Sat Sep 13 12:35:13 2003 From: superluser at frontiernet.net (Andrew A. Gill) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 06:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: The secret of Alpha updates In-Reply-To: <20030913074746.GB18612@mysza.eu.org> Message-ID: On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Adam [iso-8859-2] Go??biowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:47:06PM -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote: > > I think I figured out how to update my RedHat 7.1 system to PLD. The > > problem stems from an RPM/glibc incompatability. The secret is to upgrade > > RPM to 4.0.4 (the last RPM that doesn't support PartialHardlinkSets), and > > then to the next one. Then update glibc and install compat-db, > > compat-glibc, and compat-libstdc++. This will allow you to get the newer > > files and upgrade to PLD. > > Then maybe you could write some kind of mini howto describing migrating > from RedHat to PLD on alpha arch? No... But I could write a mini-howto on how to upgrade from RedHat 7.1's glibc to RedHat > 7.1's glibc-- which is a prerequisite for upgrading to PLD on any architecture. If I can remember how to do it, that is. It was a while back and my ..bash_history is now clean. I'm also building my kernel in another session, so the list of things that I'm willing to do is a little smaller. But I can see if I can't reconstruct it. -- |Andrew A. Gill |I posted to Silent-Tristero and| | |all I got was this stupid sig! | |alt.tv.simpsons CBG-FAQ author | | | (Report all obscene mail to Le Maitre Pots)| |Nothing here yet: Temporary sig: -- RSN... From michal at michal.waw.pl Sat Sep 13 12:33:20 2003 From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:33:20 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913102020.GA29512@roke.freak> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913101220.GA4752@wieszak.lan> <20030913102020.GA29512@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030913103320.GB5548@wieszak.lan> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:20:20PM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > Hem? BSD? Fuck. BitKeeper != Subversion. ;-P -- --= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =-- --= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =-- --==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==-- A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!! From mmazur at kernel.pl Sat Sep 13 12:34:20 2003 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:34:20 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913102020.GA29512@roke.freak> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913101220.GA4752@wieszak.lan> <20030913102020.GA29512@roke.freak> Message-ID: <200309131234.20280.mmazur@kernel.pl> On Saturday 13 of September 2003 12:20, Michal Moskal wrote: > > Does it still have such a fascist licence? > > Hem? BSD? You mean you didn't know that Otto de Raadt was one of Hitler's commanders? :) -- Ka?dy cz?owiek, kt?ry naprawd? ?yje, nie ma charakteru, nie mo?e go mie?. Charakter jest zawsze martwy, otacza ci? zgni?a struktura przeniesiona z przesz?o?ci. Je?eli dzia?asz zgodnie z charakterem wtedy nie dzia?asz w og?le - jedynie mechanicznie reagujesz. { Osho } From arekm at pld-linux.org Sat Sep 13 12:47:53 2003 From: arekm at pld-linux.org (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:47:53 +0200 Subject: The secret of Alpha updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200309131247.53838.arekm@pld-linux.org> On Saturday 13 of September 2003 05:47, Andrew A. Gill wrote: > The secret is to upgrade > RPM to 4.0.4 (the last RPM that doesn't support PartialHardlinkSets), and > then to the next one. Well, I always did --force when installing glibc and then when new glibc/poldek/rpm were installed I did install --reinstall glibc. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology arekm.pld-linux.org AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux From malekith at pld-linux.org Sat Sep 13 13:29:53 2003 From: malekith at pld-linux.org (Michal Moskal) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:29:53 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030913112953.GA7773@roke.freak> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > It's also possible to migrate CVS projects to subversion. If you want > do it for your project -- drop me an email. Wrobell has already done > this for atob and cdpl. I did it for dml. Are *you* going to be next? Go > ahead! Don't wait! ;) rc-scripts and geninitrd has been migrated. Please remember that after migration you need to do some cleanup -- remove unneeded branches and tags, convert .cvsignore to svn:ignore (remember that svn:ignore uses \n as separator, not arbitrary whitespace). -- : Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv : When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h From arturs at iidea.pl Sat Sep 13 21:18:43 2003 From: arturs at iidea.pl (Artur Skura) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:18:43 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak>; from malekith@pld-linux.org on Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200 References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> Message-ID: <20030913211843.A18739@aph.waw.pdi.net> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > It's also possible to migrate CVS projects to subversion. If you want > do it for your project -- drop me an email. Wrobell has already done > this for atob and cdpl. I did it for dml. Are *you* going to be next? Go > ahead! Don't wait! ;) fortunes-pl? Regards, Artur -- http://www.amnesty.org.pl From michal at michal.waw.pl Sat Sep 13 21:42:21 2003 From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:42:21 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913211843.A18739@aph.waw.pdi.net> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913211843.A18739@aph.waw.pdi.net> Message-ID: <20030913194221.GE22243@wieszak.lan> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:18:43PM +0200, Artur Skura wrote: > fortunes-pl? Kt?ra z cech SVN jest niezb?dna dla utrzymania tego modu?u? -- --= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =-- --= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =-- --==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==-- A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!! From michal at michal.waw.pl Sat Sep 13 21:57:06 2003 From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:57:06 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913194221.GE22243@wieszak.lan> References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913211843.A18739@aph.waw.pdi.net> <20030913194221.GE22243@wieszak.lan> Message-ID: <20030913195706.GG22243@wieszak.lan> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:42:21PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:18:43PM +0200, Artur Skura wrote: > > fortunes-pl? > Kt?ra z cech SVN jest niezb?dna dla utrzymania tego modu?u? Hehehe I've cut too much to notice this is "-en" list :) So the question was: Which features of SVN are vital to maintain this module? -- --= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =-- --= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =-- --==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==-- A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!! From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 15 01:01:00 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 01:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913112953.GA7773@roke.freak> from "Michal Moskal" at Sep 13, 2003 01:29:53 PM Message-ID: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Michal Moskal wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > > It's also possible to migrate CVS projects to subversion. If you want > > do it for your project -- drop me an email. Wrobell has already done > > this for atob and cdpl. I did it for dml. Are *you* going to be next? Go > > ahead! Don't wait! ;) > > rc-scripts and geninitrd has been migrated. Does it mean that I can no longer commit to rc-scripts CVS repo ? Who took the decision and why ? -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From arekm at pld-linux.org Mon Sep 15 10:35:11 2003 From: arekm at pld-linux.org (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:35:11 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Message-ID: <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> On Monday 15 of September 2003 01:01, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > rc-scripts and geninitrd has been migrated. > > Does it mean that I can no longer commit to rc-scripts CVS repo ? You can only commit to rc-scripts svn repo. > Who took the decision and why ? I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz CS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology arekm.pld-linux.org AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux From wrobell at ite.pl Mon Sep 15 10:58:34 2003 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:58:34 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:35:11AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: [...] > > Who took the decision and why ? > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like svn you > can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's unified format and with cvs you can't [...] wrobell From blues at ds.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 15 12:13:19 2003 From: blues at ds.pg.gda.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:13:19 +0200 (CEST) Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > unified format and with cvs you can't b.....t cvs diff -u -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- worth to see: http://www.againsttcpa.com/ CPU not found - software emulation... From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 15 12:19:49 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:19:49 +0200 (CEST) Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: from "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=" at Sep 15, 2003 12:13:19 PM Message-ID: <200309151019.h8FAJnCI004518@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > b.....t > > cvs diff -u A tak BTW, czy mozna zmienic liczbe linii kontekstu ze standardowych 3 na inna ? _Tego_ CVS-owy diff nie potrafi :-( A szkoda... -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Mon Sep 15 13:50:43 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:50:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030915114111.GA31581@roke.freak> from "Michal Moskal" at Sep 15, 2003 01:41:11 PM Message-ID: <200309151150.h8FBohRh018545@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Michal Moskal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 01:33:57PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > Michal Moskal wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > > > > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, wrobell wrote: > > > > > > > > Who took the decision and why ? > > > > > > > I. To force myself and other people to learn svn. If you don't like > > > > > > > svn you can always send patches to pld-rc-scripts at pld-linux.org. > > > > > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches in diff's > > > > > > unified format and with cvs you can't > > > > > > > > > > b.....t > > > > > > > > > > cvs diff -u > > > > > > > > A tak BTW, czy mozna zmienic liczbe linii kontekstu ze standardowych 3 na > > > > inna ? _Tego_ CVS-owy diff nie potrafi :-( A szkoda... > > > > > > -en! > ^^^^ Sorry, I missed. Translation follows. BTW: can you change the default number of context lines (3) ? The CVS diff does not seem to support this :-( It's a pity... > > > > > > To change number of diff lines you need to simply plug in external diff > > > program ;) > > > > No wlasnie. ;) > > > > I bez ciagniecia obu pelnych wersji lub zmiany konfiguracji serwera sie nie > > obejdzie... > > > > Nie podobala im sie opcja diffa "-A" ... ? Thats it. ;) But without full transfer od both versions or the server configuration change you can't do it. Sb. didn't like the diff "-A" option ... ? > This is *English* list! > > I believe that it will do without transferring entire files. It depends > on what you want to diff. If diff of what you have done locally you > don't need *any* network. If you want to diff between two arbitratrary > revisions -- you will need to transfer one file and xdelta for the > second. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From gotar at polanet.pl Mon Sep 15 19:33:18 2003 From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:33:18 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> Message-ID: <20030915173318.GD17597@os> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:58:34 +0200, wrobell wrote: > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches > in diff's unified format and with cvs you can't You can. cvs diff -u -r x.y bleble -- GoTaR gotar> USA sux http://www.pld-linux.org/Members/gotar/ http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/ http://mops.uci.agh.edu.pl/~gotar/ http://informatica.agh.edu.pl/ From wrobell at ite.pl Mon Sep 15 20:17:17 2003 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:17:17 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030915173318.GD17597@os> References: <200309142301.h8EN10kT005911@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <200309151035.11767.arekm@pld-linux.org> <20030915085834.GF27934@pred.posexperts.com.pl> <20030915173318.GD17597@os> Message-ID: <20030915181717.GH19946@pred.dk.org> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:33:18PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:58:34 +0200, wrobell wrote: > > > however, it is better to use svn, because you can make patches > > in diff's unified format and with cvs you can't > > You can. cvs diff -u -r x.y bleble yeah, i know... [ashamed] wrobell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From arturs at iidea.pl Tue Sep 16 18:19:57 2003 From: arturs at iidea.pl (Artur Skura) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:19:57 +0200 Subject: svn.pld-linux.org In-Reply-To: <20030913195706.GG22243@wieszak.lan>; from michal@michal.waw.pl on Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:57:06PM +0200 References: <20030913082536.GA13020@roke.freak> <20030913211843.A18739@aph.waw.pdi.net> <20030913194221.GE22243@wieszak.lan> <20030913195706.GG22243@wieszak.lan> Message-ID: <20030916181957.A15241@aph.waw.pdi.net> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:57:06PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:42:21PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 09:18:43PM +0200, Artur Skura wrote: > > > fortunes-pl? > > Kt?ra z cech SVN jest niezb?dna dla utrzymania tego modu?u? > Hehehe I've cut too much to notice this is "-en" list :) So the question > was: > Which features of SVN are vital to maintain this module? Fortunes are for fun. SVN is more fun than CVS. Regards, Artur -- http://www.amnesty.org.pl From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Fri Sep 19 14:28:35 2003 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:28:35 +0200 (CEST) Subject: SPECS: postfix.spec (DEVEL) In-Reply-To: from "eothane" at Sep 19, 2003 02:15:46 PM Message-ID: <200309191228.h8JCSZpv014330@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> eothane wrote: > Module name: SPECS (BRANCH: DEVEL) > Changes by: eothane 03/09/19 14:15:44 > > Modified files: > postfix.spec > > Log message: > - rright.. > > Index: postfix.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/SPECS/postfix.spec,v > diff -d -u -r1.107.2.10 -r1.107.2.11 > --- postfix.spec 19 Sep 2003 12:14:51 -0000 1.107.2.10 > +++ postfix.spec 19 Sep 2003 12:15:43 -0000 1.107.2.11 > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ > Summary(pt_BR): Postfix - Um MTA (Mail Transport Agent) de alto desempenho > Summary(sk): Agent prenosu po?ty Postfix > Name: postfix > -Version: 2.0.16_%{snap} > +Version: 2.0.16 Epoch++ if you downgrade version. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 14 61 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From wrobell at ite.pl Tue Sep 23 10:40:42 2003 From: wrobell at ite.pl (wrobell) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:40:42 +0200 Subject: Build log: tk.spec In-Reply-To: <20030922224500.21262.qmail@site_for_freedom> References: <20030922224500.21262.qmail@site_for_freedom> Message-ID: <20030923084041.GC29598@pred.posexperts.com.pl> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:45:00PM -0000, PLD Nest athlon builder wrote: > Build request > from: wrobell at ite.pl > message-id: <27357220721060.17287.builder at pred> > started processing at: Mon Sep 22 21:39:04 CEST 2003 > > Executing: /home/users/builder/rpm/SPECS/builder -c -bb -nu tk.spec > > P tk.spec > # $Revision: 1.64 $, $Date: 2003/09/22 17:34:47 $ > tk8.4.4-src.tar.gz having proper md5sum already exists > U tk-unix-3d-borders.patch > cvs server: nothing known about tk-aa-cairo.patch can someone fix it? thanks in advance wrobell From aredridel at nbtsc.org Wed Sep 24 04:55:53 2003 From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aredridel) Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:55:53 -0600 Subject: CVS Status Message-ID: <1064372153.30704.5.camel@mizar.nbtsc.org> cvs.pld-linux.org seems to be down for me, at 20:55, Zone -700. Is it me? Ari -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From lists at mmt.pl Wed Sep 24 08:10:40 2003 From: lists at mmt.pl (Tomasz Wittner) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:10:40 +0200 Subject: CVS Status In-Reply-To: <1064372153.30704.5.camel@mizar.nbtsc.org> References: <1064372153.30704.5.camel@mizar.nbtsc.org> Message-ID: <200309240810.40925.lists@mmt.pl> Dnia ?ro 24. wrze?nia 2003 04:55, Aredridel napisa?: > cvs.pld-linux.org seems to be down for me, at 20:55, Zone -700. Is it > me? Unfortunately, not only for you :-( > Ari Tom -- Tomasz Wittner