alsa vs OSS in esound (Re: SPECS: esound.spec (HEAD))

Michal Moskal malekith at pld-linux.org
Wed Sep 3 15:11:59 CEST 2003


On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:08:47PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > Make two distinct packages Conflict:'ing each other, give them Provides:
> > esound(thistimereally), and add this to Requires in the (almost empty)
> > esound package.  And turn off resolving libfoo.so.x.y -> `rpm -q --qf
> > '%{NAME}\n' --whatprovides libfoo.so.x.y` at the building stage, for
> > there will only be one esound-(alsa|oss) installed on a builder.
> 
> If esound-alsa is to be installed on builder, all built packages would
> be linked with alsa libs anyway...

The problem is not presence of alsa-lib. I don't care. The problem is
that esound *can't* use oss if compiled with alsa (and vice versa).

-- 
: Michal Moskal :: http://www.kernel.pl/~malekith : GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson : {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h



More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list