SPECS (AC-branch): glibc.spec - workaround to be able upgrade

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Monday 20 December 2004 11:28, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > looks like dead end, only way to solve it is dependancy of package
> > containing static binary.
>
> This is the reason the "base" packages (like glibc, FHS, setup, etc.) do
> not contain %pre/%post shell scripts.
> The only acceptable script may be a LUA script.
> Or just a static binary program call.

ok. is this better?

http://glen.alkohol.ee/pld/glibc/diff.2.patch
http://glen.alkohol.ee/pld/glibc/glibc-LD-path.c

altho i'm not sure how that small script should be called.

one more idea slipped into my mind how to make this more clean. it is to 
update that .c program to scan director(ies) for libc*.so and if the version 
is different than tobeinstalled glibc rename those files, and that only for 
dirs that aren't in tobeinstalled glibc itself.

comments?

-- 
glen