RFC: Ruby Packaging style

[Bartek Jakubski]

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:27:37PM -0700, Aredridel wrote:
> I've been packing up a number of Ruby packages of late, and I had a
> style question:
> 
> If I have a ruby package, "active_record", version 0.5, that provides
> the classes/module "ActiveRecord", what's a good package name for it?
> 
> 	* active_record
>   * ruby-active_record
>   * ruby-ActiveRecord
> 
> I'm leaning toward the last, to be consistent with Perl. Comments?
> 

Sounds reasonable (not that I know anything about Ruby packages).

-- 
-- .- Bartek Jakubski ------- JabberID: migo at histeria.pl -. --
-- |   Free Software is a matter of liberty, not price    | --
-- `-----------------(http://www.fsf.org/philosophy)------' --