(Not) autogenerated *.so dependencies

[Radoslaw Zielinski]

Nah, "r" instead of "L"; sorry.

Jakub Bogusz <qboosh at pld-linux.org> [28-11-2004 15:14]:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:04:52PM +0100, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>>   $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libsa.so.12.0.22 --requires
[...]
>>   $ ldd /usr/lib/libsa.so.12.0.22              =20
>>           libex.so.10 =3D> /usr/lib/libex.so.10 (0x41406000)
>>           libnsl.so.1 =3D> /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x41408000)
[...]
>> Shouldn't the libex.so.10 dependency be autogenerated?
> They should. Is libsa.so.12.0.22 installed (in buildroot) with
> execute permission?

No.  Mystery solved, thanks.

> PS. is libnsl needed here, or some Solaris-specific leftover?

I don't know; guessing from other faults and your question I'd blame
brain-dead ac/am.

-- 
Radosław Zieliński <radek at karnet.pl>
[ GPG key: http://radek.karnet.pl/ ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20041128/77afdf52/attachment-0002.bin