Vim
Jan Rekorajski
baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl
Wed Apr 27 17:49:35 CEST 2005
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 of April 2005 06:00, Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> > Any objections on reversing Vim's bconds for perl/python/ruby/tcl
> > interpreters? If not, than in the name of 'we are feature rich' I am
> > going to enable these by default.
> >
> > At least I am going to enable perl interp, since it adds only perl-base
> > R: to few vim packages, and perl-base is already required by vim-rt.
> Enable these IMO. There is vim-static for those people who don't want
> additional deps.
You don't know what you're talking about. vim-static is /bin/vi and the
first thing I do is alias vi=vim because vim-static is just too feature
poor. I can live with perl but python/ruby/tcl/etc is just an overkill.
If you really want a huge monster with all bells and whistles just do a
vim-this-package-requires-a-lot subpackage :/
Janek
--
Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list