From jajcus at bnet.pl  Wed Jun  1 17:28:12 2005
From: jajcus at bnet.pl (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:28:12 +0200
Subject: [wietse@porcupine.org: Re: [bug&patch] master failing on setsid()
	when already started as a session leader]
Message-ID: <20050601152812.GA7468@nic.nigdzie>

This is about my recent patch to postfix (already in our CVS). I think
it should stay (doesn't break anythig), but maybe someone has some
objections...

----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse at porcupine.org> -----

Subject: Re: [bug&patch] master failing on setsid() when already started as a
 session leader
In-Reply-To: <20050601132201.GB1462 at serwis2.beta> "from Jacek Konieczny at Jun
 1, 2005 03:22:01 pm"
To: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus at bnet.pl>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:17:10 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Wietse Venema <wietse at porcupine.org>
X-Time-Zone:  USA EST, 6 hours behind central European time
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)]
From: wietse at porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bnet.pl
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.005875, version=0.16.1

Sorry, this is not a bug. You are starting the master daemon in an
unsupported manner.

	Wietse

Jacek Konieczny:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to post this bug report with a patch to postfix-users at postfix.org, the only address 
> for bug reports I have found in the documentation (DEBUG_README), and it
> bounced because I am not subscribed to the list.
> 
> Could you, please, forward it to a right (for a bug-report/patch) address?
> 
> Greets,
> 	Jacek
> 
> -----------
> 
> I wanted to use postfix (2.2.3) with freedt (daemontools clone)
> supervision. It requires the service to start in foreground, but
> "master" daemon started this way was failing with error:
> 
> Jun  1 09:16:54 serwis2 postfix/master[17168]: fatal: unable to set session and process group ID: Operation not permitted
> 
> Here is the piece of original code that does that:
> 
>     /*
>      * Run in a separate process group, so that "postfix stop" can terminate
>      * all MTA processes cleanly. Give up if we can't separate from our
>      * parent process. We're not supposed to blow away the parent.
>      */
>     if (debug_me == 0 && setsid() == -1)
>         msg_fatal("unable to set session and process group ID: %m");
> 
> This may be reasonable not to allow master continue in a "foreign"
> process group, but setsid() also fails when the calling process is
> already a process group leader.  
> 
> Here is the patch which fixes this problem for me:
> 
> --- postfix-2.2.3.orig/src/master/master.c      2005-02-15 01:36:58.000000000 +0100
> +++ postfix-2.2.3/src/master/master.c   2005-06-01 09:55:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
>       * all MTA processes cleanly. Give up if we can't separate from our
>       * parent process. We're not supposed to blow away the parent.
>       */
> -    if (debug_me == 0 && setsid() == -1)
> -       msg_fatal("unable to set session and process group ID: %m");
> +    if (debug_me == 0 && setsid() == -1 && getsid(0) != getpid())
> +       msg_fatal("unable to set session and process group ID: %m (pid=%d, sid=%d)", (int)getpid(), (int)getsid(0));
> 
>      /*
>       * Make some room for plumbing with file descriptors. XXX This breaks
> 
> 
> Greets,
> 	Jacek
> 


----- End forwarded message -----


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun  1 19:34:08 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:34:08 +0300
Subject: SOURCES: postfix.aliases - set standard alias (this user executes
	...
In-Reply-To: <SOURCES_postfix.aliases.1.2@pld-linux.org>
References: <SOURCES_postfix.aliases.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_postfix.aliases.1.2@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506012034.09543.glen@delfi.ee>

why not MAILTO=root in cron definition?

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 20:29, blues wrote:
> Author: blues                        Date: Wed Jun  1 17:29:31 2005 GMT
> Module: SOURCES                       Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - set standard alias (this user executes cron jobs). Consider adding it to
>   other mail-daemons.
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SOURCES:
>    postfix.aliases (1.1 -> 1.2)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SOURCES/postfix.aliases
> diff -u SOURCES/postfix.aliases:1.1 SOURCES/postfix.aliases:1.2
> --- SOURCES/postfix.aliases:1.1	Sat May 22 12:41:21 1999
> +++ SOURCES/postfix.aliases	Wed Jun  1 19:29:26 2005
> @@ -31,5 +31,8 @@
>  # trap decode to catch security attacks
>  decode:		root
>
> +# Standard users added by PLD:
> +stats:		root
> +
>  # Person who should get root's mail
>  #root:		marc
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SOURCES/postfix.aliases?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From blues at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun  1 19:56:30 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:56:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SOURCES: postfix.aliases - set standard alias (this user executes
	...
In-Reply-To: <200506012034.09543.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SOURCES_postfix.aliases.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_postfix.aliases.1.2@pld-linux.org>
	<200506012034.09543.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506011953520.29832@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-1] Ruusam?e wrote:
> why not MAILTO=root in cron definition?

I think we should provide proper alias.

MAILTO is IMO additional thing... I can be wrong, of course :D

> > - set standard alias (this user executes cron jobs). Consider adding it to
> >   other mail-daemons.
[...]
> > +# Standard users added by PLD:
> > +stats:		root
> > +
[...]

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski 
---------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo,
then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost
and all the music is free.

From jajcus at bnet.pl  Wed Jun  1 20:02:18 2005
From: jajcus at bnet.pl (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:02:18 +0200
Subject: [wietse@porcupine.org: Re: [bug&patch] master failing on setsid()
	when already started as a session leader]
In-Reply-To: <20050601152812.GA7468@nic.nigdzie>
Message-ID: <20050601180218.GB12146@nic.nigdzie>

So, we should have no problems either. :-)

----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse at porcupine.org> -----
Subject: Re: [bug&patch] master failing on setsid() when already started as a
 session leader
To: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus at bnet.pl>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:48:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: wietse at porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)

[... short discussion cut ...]

I have no problems adopting the patch, but I cannot support
people who run Postfix in an unsupported configuration.

	Wietse


----- End forwarded message -----


From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl  Wed Jun  1 22:54:00 2005
From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:54:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: sftpd.spec - use %useradd
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_sftpd.spec.1.8@pld-linux.org> from "glen" at Jun 01,
	2005 09:38:53 PM
Message-ID: <200506012054.j51Ks0lQ012976@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>

glen wrote:
> 
> Author: glen                         Date: Wed Jun  1 19:38:53 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - use %useradd

Any reason for no %userremove here ?

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology


From blues at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun  2 07:33:32 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:33:32 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: sftpd.spec - use %useradd
In-Reply-To: <200506012054.j51Ks0lQ012976@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200506012054.j51Ks0lQ012976@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506020732400.4817@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > Author: glen                         Date: Wed Jun  1 19:38:53 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - use %useradd
> Any reason for no %userremove here ?

no.
I don't have time to finish it... :( I needed only client, which I have 
now...

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski 
---------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo,
then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost
and all the music is free.

From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun  2 19:20:22 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:20:22 +0200
Subject: SPECS: bopm.spec - BR(findutils) for xargs and find
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_bopm.spec.1.7@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_bopm.spec.1.6@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_bopm.spec.1.7@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050602172022.GA11498@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:42:23PM +0200, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Thu Jun  2 16:42:23 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - BR(findutils) for xargs and find

already required by rpm-build (used by post-%install scripts)


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun  2 19:22:15 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:22:15 +0200
Subject: SPECS: winetools.spec - BR(gettext-devel) - cosmetics
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_winetools.spec.1.5@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_winetools.spec.1.4@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_winetools.spec.1.5@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050602172215.GB11498@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 06:47:06PM +0200, glen wrote:
> +# TODO: Xdialog is binary, find it's source and create separate spec
>  install Xdialog $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}

Isn't it just already existing Xdialog.spec ?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun  2 19:48:16 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:48:16 +0200
Subject: STBR arpwatch
Message-ID: <20050602174816.GA395@os>

asd
-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From loc at toya.net.pl  Fri Jun  3 09:33:44 2005
From: loc at toya.net.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jakub_Piotr_C=B3apa?=)
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:33:44 +0200
Subject: SPECS: gajim.spec (NEW) - new spec - tried both 0.7 and latest
	sna...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_gajim.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_gajim.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_gajim.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <42A007D8.2070106@toya.net.pl>

jpc wrote:
> Author: jpc                          Date: Thu Jun  2 23:03:56 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - new spec
> - tried both 0.7 and latest snap and both hang trying to connect
>   could someone confirm it?

Anyone? :-)

-- 
Regards,
Jakub Piotr C?apa


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun  3 11:41:48 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:41:48 +0300
Subject: SPECS: lstat.spec - make %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc symlink to
	%{_do...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_lstat.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_lstat.spec.1.54@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_lstat.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506031241.49337.glen@delfi.ee>

well. imho this is wrong.

documentation that application uses should be still bundled with package main 
files, as if i install package --exclude docs, i get partial package.

as this is against for point one from devel-hints-en.txt:

[...]
Documentation (%doc files):

Every package should, whenever possible, contain documentation files.
Documentation files should be marked with %doc, which makes it possible
to refrain from installing them by passing the --exclude-docs rpm
option, if that's what the user desires. You shouldn't:

- mark files crucial to the program's functionality as %doc
- mark man files as %doc (it gets done automatically)
- compress doc files (it gets done automatically and can be disabled
  with %define no_compress_doc when necessary)
- add files that contain the same documentation in various formats
- add standard license files, contained in the common-licenses package
[...]

and perhaps consider creating -doc subpackage, for folks having --exclude docs 
and still get those documentation files used by app?




On Friday 03 June 2005 12:09, gotar wrote:
> Author: gotar                        Date: Fri Jun  3 09:09:43 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - make %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc symlink to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    lstat.spec (1.54 -> 1.55)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/lstat.spec
> diff -u SPECS/lstat.spec:1.54 SPECS/lstat.spec:1.55
> --- SPECS/lstat.spec:1.54	Mon May  9 10:09:11 2005
> +++ SPECS/lstat.spec	Fri Jun  3 11:09:38 2005
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>  Summary(pl):	LinuxStat s?u?y do generowania i prezentacji r??nych
> statystyk Name:		lstat
>  Version:	2.3.2
> -Release:	10.1
> +Release:	10.2
>  Epoch:		1
>  License:	GPL
>  Group:		Applications/Networking
> @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@
>  	DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>
>  install %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initdir}/lstatd
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc
> +ln -sf %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc
>
>  %if %{with apache1}
>  sed -i -e "s#lstat/#lstat#g"
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/apache/conf.d/lstat.conf @@ -204,7 +206,7 @@
>  %attr(640,root,root) %config(noreplace) %verify(not size mtime md5)
> %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/httpd.conf/lstat.conf %endif
>  %dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat
> -%dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc
> +%{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc
>  %dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/icons
>  %dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/skins
>  %dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/edit
> @@ -212,7 +214,6 @@
>  %attr(700,http,http) %dir %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/statimg
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/edit/edit.cgi
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/lstat.cgi
> -%{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc/*
>  %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/skins/*
>  %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/icons/*
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/lstatd
> @@ -233,6 +234,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.55  2005/06/03 09:09:38  gotar
> +- make %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc symlink to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
> +
>  Revision 1.54  2005/05/09 08:09:11  glen
>  - todo
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/lstat.spec?r1=1.54&r2=1.55&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From gotar at polanet.pl  Fri Jun  3 12:25:54 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:25:54 +0200
Subject: SPECS: lstat.spec - make %{_wwwrootdir}/lstat/doc symlink to
	%{_do...
In-Reply-To: <200506031241.49337.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_lstat.spec.1.54@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_lstat.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
	<200506031241.49337.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050603102553.GA4137@os>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:41:48 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:

> well. imho this is wrong.

This is how it's done for many packages.

> documentation that application uses should be still bundled with package main 
> files, as if i install package --exclude docs, i get partial package.

Yes. That's what exclude docs mean.

> as this is against for point one from devel-hints-en.txt:

Could you emphase where exactly?

> Every package should, whenever possible, contain documentation files.

It does.

> Documentation files should be marked with %doc, which makes it possible

That's right.

> to refrain from installing them by passing the --exclude-docs rpm
> option, if that's what the user desires. You shouldn't:

Yeah.

> - mark files crucial to the program's functionality as %doc

It's not crucial to use lstat.

> and perhaps consider creating -doc subpackage, for folks having --exclude docs 
> and still get those documentation files used by app?

Feel free. But package these files only once, as it's 600KB.

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun  3 15:16:15 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:16:15 +0300
Subject: SPECS: ldap-account-manager.spec - url fix
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_ldap_account_manager.spec.1.3@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_ldap_account_manager.spec.1.2@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_ldap_account_manager.spec.1.3@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506031616.15633.glen@delfi.ee>

please read 
"Apache version independant packages"

from PLD-doc/devel-hints-en.txt

On Friday 03 June 2005 16:03, mwinkler wrote:
> Author: mwinkler                     Date: Fri Jun  3 13:03:43 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - url fix
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    ldap-account-manager.spec (1.2 -> 1.3)


-- 
glen


From koorek at gmail.com  Fri Jun  3 17:37:11 2005
From: koorek at gmail.com (Robert Kurowski)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:37:11 +0200
Subject: SPECS: gajim.spec (NEW) - new spec - tried both 0.7 and latest
	sna...
In-Reply-To: <42A007D8.2070106@toya.net.pl>
References: <SPECS_gajim.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_gajim.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org> <42A007D8.2070106@toya.net.pl>
Message-ID: <6181c2de0506030837500caf86@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/3/05, Jakub Piotr C?apa <loc at toya.net.pl> wrote:
> > - tried both 0.7 and latest snap and both hang trying to connect
> >   could someone confirm it?
> 
> Anyone? :-)

Nope, just installed 0.7 (from spec) works fine (well, conects at
least), but there's no way to set up specified serwer so connectiong
to pld's jabber serwer is not possible. I've used an account at
chrome.pl

-- 
Robert 'koorek' Kurowski
JID: koorek at pld-linux.org

From twittner at o2.pl  Fri Jun  3 20:59:48 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:59:48 +0200
Subject: SPECS: ldapbrowser.spec (NEW) - new. useful, but license unknown
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_ldapbrowser.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_ldapbrowser.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_ldapbrowser.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506032059.49191.twittner@o2.pl>

On Fri 3. of June 2005 19:11, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Fri Jun  3 17:11:31 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - new. useful, but license unknown
Some license information you may find on:
http://www.softwareshop.anl.gov/ldapbrowser.html
http://www.softwareshop.anl.gov/pdfs/Ldap_dev.pdf
http://www.softwareshop.anl.gov/pdfs/Ldap_lic.pdf
But in pdf's only version 2.7 is mentioned.
[...]
> +License: ?
Licensing Information

   End User Fees

   Maximum No. of Copies
                 or CPUs Price per Copy, U.S. Dollars
                                     1-10            $35.00
                                    11-25            $30.00
                                    26-50*           $25.00

   *Pricing  for  purchases  of  more  than  50  copies  is  available by
   contacting  Paul Betten, Software Licensing Coordinator (639-252-4962,
   [13]betten at anl.gov).

   Developer Fee -- $700

Quite expensive. ;)

Regards,
-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From jajcus at bnet.pl  Sun Jun  5 21:35:35 2005
From: jajcus at bnet.pl (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 21:35:35 +0200
Subject: To Apache and Java gurus: Resin
Message-ID: <20050605193535.GA12701@nic.nigdzie>

Hello,

I have just packaged Resin, which I need for my current project. What I
did (several hours work) seem usable and enough for my needs. I would
like some Java and Apache experts too look at the package and fix what
should be fixed (Apache module is not even tested now).

I chose 3.0.13  ("beta") version instead of "stable" 2.1.x, because
3.0.x is GPLed, which seems better for PLD.

Any comments?

Greets,
        Jacek


From glen at delfi.ee  Mon Jun  6 09:45:51 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:45:51 +0300
Subject: SOURCES: asa.sh - typo
In-Reply-To: <SOURCES_asa.sh.1.2@pld-linux.org>
References: <SOURCES_asa.sh.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_asa.sh.1.2@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506061045.52417.glen@delfi.ee>

what this supposed to do?
run 'smsagent.pl 2' redirecting stdout to /dev/null and background?

or run 'smsagent.pl' redirecting stderr and stdout to /dev/null and backgroud?

for #2 it should be then
smsagent.pl >/dev/null 2>&1 &

in anycase 2&1 construct is just weird.

On Friday 03 June 2005 23:46, dzeus wrote:
> Author: dzeus                        Date: Fri Jun  3 20:46:36 2005 GMT
> Module: SOURCES                       Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - typo

> --- SOURCES/asa.sh:1.1	Wed Feb 16 00:57:50 2005
> +++ SOURCES/asa.sh	Fri Jun  3 22:46:31 2005
> @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
> -su -f -m jabber -c /usr/sbin/ApaSMSAgent.pl 2>1 > /dev/null &
> -
> +su -f -m jabber -c /usr/sbin/ApaSMSAgent.pl 2&1> /dev/null &

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Mon Jun  6 10:03:01 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:03:01 +0300
Subject: SPECS: libfwbuilder.spec, fwbuilder.spec - updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.34@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_libfwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.34@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506061103.02184.glen@delfi.ee>

please also update patches, they don't apply

Patch #0 (libfwbuilder-configure.patch):
+ patch -p1 -s
+ < /home/builder/rpm/SOURCES/libfwbuilder-configure.patch
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmake.inc.in.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73961 (%prep)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73961 (%prep)
Error: package build failed. (no more info)



On Monday 06 June 2005 01:12, paszczus wrote:
> Author: paszczus                     Date: Sun Jun  5 22:12:43 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    libfwbuilder.spec (1.33 -> 1.34) , fwbuilder.spec (1.33 -> 1.34)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec
> diff -u SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec:1.33 SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec:1.34
> --- SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec:1.33	Mon Feb 21 10:59:45 2005
> +++ SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec	Mon Jun  6 00:12:38 2005
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
>  Summary:	Firewall Builder API
>  Summary(pl):	Biblioteka Firewall Buildera
>  Name:		libfwbuilder
> -Version:	2.0.6
> +Version:	2.0.7
>  Release:	1
>  License:	GPL v2
>  Group:		Libraries
>  Source0:	http://dl.sourceforge.net/fwbuilder/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> -# Source0-md5:	d53a69f5774fc987779ac0df4e54beb6
> +# Source0-md5:	bf2c35710ee69380754a1c1a0fb81551
>  Patch0:		%{name}-configure.patch
>  URL:		http://www.fwbuilder.org/
>  BuildRequires:	autoconf
> @@ -100,6 +100,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.34  2005/06/05 22:12:38  paszczus
> +- updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
> +
>  Revision 1.33  2005/02/21 09:59:45  charles
>  - updated to 2.0.6
>
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/fwbuilder.spec
> diff -u SPECS/fwbuilder.spec:1.33 SPECS/fwbuilder.spec:1.34
> --- SPECS/fwbuilder.spec:1.33	Mon Feb 21 11:03:40 2005
> +++ SPECS/fwbuilder.spec	Mon Jun  6 00:12:38 2005
> @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
>  Summary:	Firewall Builder
>  Summary(pl):	Narz?dzie do tworzenia firewalli
>  Name:		fwbuilder
> -Version:	2.0.6
> +Version:	2.0.7
>  Release:	1
>  License:	GPL v2
>  Group:		Applications/System
>  Source0:	http://dl.sourceforge.net/fwbuilder/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> -# Source0-md5:	41554801c43e14a48b19ade91e5a14cd
> +# Source0-md5:	e381567247165bb4a8a9a130d3abe446
>  Source1:	%{name}.desktop
>  Source2:	%{name}.png
>  Patch0:		%{name}-configure.patch
> @@ -305,6 +305,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.34  2005/06/05 22:12:38  paszczus
> +- updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
> +
>  Revision 1.33  2005/02/21 10:03:40  charles
>  - updated to 2.0.6
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/libfwbuilder.spec?r1=1.33&r2=1.34&f=u
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/fwbuilder.spec?r1=1.33&r2=1.34&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From freetz at gmx.net  Mon Jun  6 10:39:59 2005
From: freetz at gmx.net (Fryderyk Dziarmagowski)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:39:59 +0200
Subject: SPECS: libfwbuilder.spec, fwbuilder.spec - updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
In-Reply-To: <200506061103.02184.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_libfwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.34@pld-linux.org>
	<200506061103.02184.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050606103959.731f1a0d.freetz@gmx.net>

On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:03:01 +0300
"Elan Ruusam?e" <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:

> please also update patches, they don't apply
> 
> Patch #0 (libfwbuilder-configure.patch):
> + patch -p1 -s
> + < /home/builder/rpm/SOURCES/libfwbuilder-configure.patch
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmake.inc.in.rej
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73961 (%prep)

paszczus was already warned about his development methods. as we see,
without expected results.

-- 
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski


From loc at toya.net.pl  Mon Jun  6 17:47:34 2005
From: loc at toya.net.pl (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jakub_Piotr_C=B3apa?=)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:47:34 +0200
Subject: SPECS: libfwbuilder.spec, fwbuilder.spec - updated to 2.0.7 ; STBR
In-Reply-To: <20050606103959.731f1a0d.freetz@gmx.net>
References: <SPECS_libfwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.33@pld-linux.org>	<SPECS_fwbuilder.spec.1.34@pld-linux.org>	<200506061103.02184.glen@delfi.ee>
	<20050606103959.731f1a0d.freetz@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <42A47016.9030604@toya.net.pl>

Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:03:01 +0300
> "Elan Ruusam?e" <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
> 
>>please also update patches, they don't apply
>>
>>Patch #0 (libfwbuilder-configure.patch):
>>+ patch -p1 -s
>>+ < /home/builder/rpm/SOURCES/libfwbuilder-configure.patch
>>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file qmake.inc.in.rej
>>error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73961 (%prep)
> 
> paszczus was already warned about his development methods. as we see,
> without expected results.

Kill him, yeah!

.....

-- 
Regards,
Jakub Piotr C?apa


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun  8 11:38:46 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:38:46 +0300
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - release 0.2: updated Provides
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.309@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.308@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_perl.spec.1.309@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>

please look on this one too:

https://bugs.pld-linux.org/index.php?do=details&id=5656

On Wednesday 08 June 2005 12:14, radek wrote:
> Author: radek                        Date: Wed Jun  8 09:14:29 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - release 0.2: updated Provides
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    perl.spec (1.308 -> 1.309)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/perl.spec
> diff -u SPECS/perl.spec:1.308 SPECS/perl.spec:1.309
> --- SPECS/perl.spec:1.308	Wed Jun  8 10:59:41 2005
> +++ SPECS/perl.spec	Wed Jun  8 11:14:24 2005
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>  Summary(zh_CN):	Perl ??????????
>  Name:		perl
>  Version:	5.8.7
> -Release:	0.1%{!?with_threads:_nothr}
> +Release:	0.2%{!?with_threads:_nothr}
>  Epoch:		1
>  License:	GPL v1+ or Artistic
>  Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
> @@ -266,8 +266,8 @@
>  Summary(pl):	Podstawowe sk?adniki potrzebne do minimalnej instalacji Perla
>  Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
>  Provides:	perl-File-Compare = 1.1003
> -Provides:	perl-File-Spec = 3.01
> -Provides:	perl-File-Temp = 0.14
> +Provides:	perl-File-Spec = 3.05
> +Provides:	perl-File-Temp = 0.16
>  Provides:	perl-IO = 1.21
>  Provides:	perl-Safe = 2.11
>  Provides:	perl-Socket = 1.77
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
>  Summary(pl):	GDBM_File - dost?p do biblioteki gdbm w Perlu
>  Group:		Libraries
>  Requires:	%{name}-base = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> -# FIXME: Set Version: 1.06 and Release: 1 instead of inheriting
> +# FIXME: Set Version: 1.07 and Release: 1 instead of inheriting
>  #        values from the main package.  Why this causes setting
>  #        version and release macros up to the end of this spec?
>
> @@ -313,9 +313,9 @@
>  Requires:	%{name}-modules = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>  Requires:	%{name}-tools-pod = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>  Provides:	perl-CPAN = 1.76_01
> -Provides:	perl-Devel-DProf = 20030813.00
> -Provides:	perl-Devel-PPPort = 3.03
> -Provides:	perl-Devel-Peek = 1.01
> +Provides:	perl-Devel-DProf = 20050310.00
> +Provides:	perl-Devel-PPPort = 3.06
> +Provides:	perl-Devel-Peek = 1.02
>  Provides:	perl-ExtUtils-Embed = 1.2506_01
>  Provides:	perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker = 6.17
>  Obsoletes:	perl-lib-devel
> @@ -361,9 +361,9 @@
>  Group:		Libraries
>  Requires:	%{name}-base = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>  Provides:	perl-Attribute-Handlers = 0.78_01
> -Provides:	perl-CGI = 3.05
> -Provides:	perl-Class-ISA = 0.32
> -Provides:	perl-Digest = 1.08
> +Provides:	perl-CGI = 3.10
> +Provides:	perl-Class-ISA = 0.33
> +Provides:	perl-Digest = 1.10
>  Provides:	perl-Digest-MD5 = 2.33
>  Provides:	perl-Filter-Simple = 0.78
>  Provides:	perl-FindBin = 1.44
> @@ -373,30 +373,30 @@
>  Provides:	perl-Locale-Codes = 2.07
>  Provides:	perl-Locale-Maketext = 1.09
>  Provides:	perl-MIME-Base64 = 3.05
> -Provides:	perl-Math-BigInt = 1.73
> -Provides:	perl-Math-BigRat = 0.13
> +Provides:	perl-Math-BigInt = 1.77
> +Provides:	perl-Math-BigRat = 0.15
>  Provides:	perl-Math-Trig = 1.02
>  Provides:	perl-Memoize = 1.01
>  Provides:	perl-NEXT = 0.60
>  Provides:	perl-PerlIO-via-QuotedPrint = 0.06
> -Provides:	perl-Pod-LaTeX = 0.56
> -Provides:	perl-Pod-Parser = 1.14
> +Provides:	perl-Pod-LaTeX = 0.58
> +Provides:	perl-Pod-Parser = 1.30
>  Provides:	perl-Scalar-List-Utils = 1.14
>  Provides:	perl-Storable = 2.13
> -Provides:	perl-Term-ANSIColor = 1.08
> +Provides:	perl-Term-ANSIColor = 1.09
>  Provides:	perl-Term-Cap = 1.09
>  Provides:	perl-Test = 1.25
> -Provides:	perl-Test-Harness = 2.42
> -Provides:	perl-Test-Simple = 0.47
> +Provides:	perl-Test-Harness = 2.48
> +Provides:	perl-Test-Simple = 0.54
>  Provides:	perl-Text-Balanced = 1.95
> -Provides:	perl-Text-ParseWords = 3.23
> +Provides:	perl-Text-ParseWords = 3.24
>  Provides:	perl-Text-Soundex = 1.01
>  # XXX: I'm not sure what to do with this one...
>  #Provides:	perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap = 2001.09291
> -Provides:	perl-Time-HiRes = 1.65
> +Provides:	perl-Time-HiRes = 1.66
>  Provides:	perl-UNIVERSAL = 1.01
>  Provides:	perl-Unicode-Collate = 0.40
> -Provides:	perl-Unicode-Normalize = 0.30
> +Provides:	perl-Unicode-Normalize = 0.32
>  Provides:	perl-libnet = 1.19
>  Obsoletes:	perl-Encode-compat
>  Obsoletes:	perl-lib
> @@ -1437,6 +1437,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.309  2005/06/08 09:14:24  radek
> +- release 0.2: updated Provides
> +
>  Revision 1.308  2005/06/08 08:59:41  radek
>  - version 5.8.7, NFY
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/perl.spec?r1=1.308&r2=1.309&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From radek42 at gmail.com  Wed Jun  8 12:59:49 2005
From: radek42 at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Zieli=F1ski?=)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:59:49 +0200
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - release 0.2: updated Provides
In-Reply-To: <200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.308@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_perl.spec.1.309@pld-linux.org>
	<200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/8/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
> please look on this one too:
> https://bugs.pld-linux.org/index.php?do=details&id=5656

As migo wrote, this is not a bug.  As long as the CPAN module provides
equal or newer version and there is no conflict.

Yes, we have some conflicts on files, for example: both
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker and perl-tools provide /usr/bin/instmodsh. 
Solution: developing a consistent renaming policy.  Current status:
stale.


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun  9 18:28:47 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:28:47 +0200
Subject: ERRORS: subversion.spec
In-Reply-To: <pld-builder.1118331924.045933.20882@serwus>
References: <3d67e803-ef5c-4a53-b06a-e90112f59d7b@pld.src.builder>
	<pld-builder.1118331924.045933.20882@serwus>
Message-ID: <20050609162847.GA4084@aramin.net>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 03:45:24PM +0000, PLD ac-amd64 builder wrote:
> RPM build errors:
>     File not found by glob: /tmp/B.901c3f/subversion-1.2.0-root-builder/usr/share/man/man3/*.3pm*

perl 5.8.7 generate man pages *.3perl
perl 5.8.6 generate man pages *.3pm
what are we doing with this?

change specs, or perl behaviour?

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun  9 18:39:56 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:39:56 +0200
Subject: ERRORS: subversion.spec
In-Reply-To: <20050609162847.GA4084@aramin.net>
References: <3d67e803-ef5c-4a53-b06a-e90112f59d7b@pld.src.builder>
	<pld-builder.1118331924.045933.20882@serwus>
	<20050609162847.GA4084@aramin.net>
Message-ID: <20050609163956.GA15905@aramin.net>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:28:47PM +0200, The Undefined wrote:
> perl 5.8.7 generate man pages *.3perl
> perl 5.8.6 generate man pages *.3pm
> what are we doing with this?
> 
> change specs, or perl behaviour?
in perl:

[undefine at uc64 undefine]$ grep ^man3ext /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.6/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config*   
man3ext='3pm'

[undefine at amd64-devel undefine]$ grep ^man3ext /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.7/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config*
/usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.7/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config_heavy.pl:man3ext='3perl'

what is correct?
is there any perl "hacker"? ;)

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun  9 19:02:46 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:02:46 +0200
Subject: ERRORS: subversion.spec
In-Reply-To: <20050609163956.GA15905@aramin.net>
References: <3d67e803-ef5c-4a53-b06a-e90112f59d7b@pld.src.builder>
	<pld-builder.1118331924.045933.20882@serwus>
	<20050609162847.GA4084@aramin.net>
	<20050609163956.GA15905@aramin.net>
Message-ID: <20050609170246.GA31546@fngna.oyu>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:39:56PM +0200, The Undefined wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 06:28:47PM +0200, The Undefined wrote:
> > perl 5.8.7 generate man pages *.3perl
> > perl 5.8.6 generate man pages *.3pm
> > what are we doing with this?
> > 
> > change specs, or perl behaviour?
> in perl:
> 
> [undefine at uc64 undefine]$ grep ^man3ext /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.6/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config*   
> man3ext='3pm'
> 
> [undefine at amd64-devel undefine]$ grep ^man3ext /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.7/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config*
> /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.7/amd64-pld-linux-thread-multi/Config_heavy.pl:man3ext='3perl'
> 
> what is correct?
> is there any perl "hacker"? ;)

Uhm, perl.spec passes:

        -Dman1dir=%{_mandir}/man1 -Dman1ext=1 \
        -Dman3dir=%{_mandir}/man3 -Dman3ext=3perl \
        -Dvendorman1dir=%{_mandir}/man1 -Dvendorman1ext=1p \
        -Dvendorman3dir=%{_mandir}/man3 -Dvendorman3ext=3pm \
                                                        ^^^
        -Dsiteman1dir=%{_usr}/local/man/man1 -Dsiteman1ext=1p \
        -Dsiteman3dir=%{_usr}/local/man/man3 -Dsiteman3ext=3pm \

Maybe subversion has some broken makefile which partially uses privdirs
instead of vendordirs?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun  9 19:08:03 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:08:03 +0200
Subject: ERRORS: subversion.spec
In-Reply-To: <20050609170246.GA31546@fngna.oyu>
References: <3d67e803-ef5c-4a53-b06a-e90112f59d7b@pld.src.builder>
	<pld-builder.1118331924.045933.20882@serwus>
	<20050609162847.GA4084@aramin.net>
	<20050609163956.GA15905@aramin.net>
	<20050609170246.GA31546@fngna.oyu>
Message-ID: <20050609170803.GB15905@aramin.net>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Uhm, perl.spec passes:
> 
>         -Dman1dir=%{_mandir}/man1 -Dman1ext=1 \
>         -Dman3dir=%{_mandir}/man3 -Dman3ext=3perl \
>         -Dvendorman1dir=%{_mandir}/man1 -Dvendorman1ext=1p \
>         -Dvendorman3dir=%{_mandir}/man3 -Dvendorman3ext=3pm \
>                                                         ^^^
>         -Dsiteman1dir=%{_usr}/local/man/man1 -Dsiteman1ext=1p \
>         -Dsiteman3dir=%{_usr}/local/man/man3 -Dsiteman3ext=3pm \
> 
> Maybe subversion has some broken makefile which partially uses privdirs
> instead of vendordirs?
ok, I found it. config file partialy goes to Config_heavy and in
perl.spec was changed only Config.pm... i think ;)
fixed in rel 1.316 perl.spec

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun  9 20:57:56 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:57:56 +0300
Subject: flash vs gplflash
Message-ID: <200506092157.56223.glen@delfi.ee>

flash is obsoleted by gplflash, please remove it's packages from ftp:
- flash, 
- flash-devel, 
- flash-static, 
- mozilla-plugin-flash, 



-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun  9 21:00:03 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:00:03 +0300
Subject: cvs mv (resend)
Message-ID: <200506092200.04202.glen@delfi.ee>

mv SPECS/kernel-{char,video}-spca5xx.spec,v

-- 
glen


From devel-pl at pld-dc.org  Thu Jun  9 21:29:14 2005
From: devel-pl at pld-dc.org (Marcin =?iso-8859-2?q?Doli=F1ski?=)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:29:14 +0200
Subject: flash vs gplflash
In-Reply-To: <200506092157.56223.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506092157.56223.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506092129.14895.devel-pl@pld-dc.org>

On Thursday 09 of June 2005 20:57, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> flash is obsoleted by gplflash, please remove it's packages from ftp:
> - flash,
> - flash-devel,
> - flash-static,
> - mozilla-plugin-flash,
Ok.

-- 
Marcin Doli?ski
PLD Linux Distribution


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun  9 22:02:54 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:02:54 +0200
Subject: [builder-ac-athlon@pld-linux.org: ERRORS: perl.spec]
Message-ID: <20050609200254.GA22093@aramin.net>

----- Forwarded message from PLD ac-athlon builder <builder-ac-athlon at pld-linux.org> -----

Failed 1 test script out of 906, 99.89% okay.
### Since not all tests were successful, you may want to run some of
### them individually and examine any diagnostic messages they produce.
### See the INSTALL document's section on "make test".
### You have a good chance to get more information by running
###   ./perl harness
### in the 't' directory since most (>=80%) of the tests succeeded.
u=1.57  s=0.58  cu=193.7  cs=18.28  scripts=906  tests=100304
make[2]: *** [_test_notty] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/perl-5.8.7'
make[1]: *** [_test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/users/builder/rpm/BUILD/perl-5.8.7'
make: *** [test] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.61018 (%build)

----- End forwarded message -----
what is wrong?
could anyone with access to builder check it?

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 10 07:46:21 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:46:21 +0300
Subject: cvs mv (resend)
In-Reply-To: <b323bb98050609130147d311f9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200506092200.04202.glen@delfi.ee>
	<b323bb98050609130147d311f9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200506100846.21868.glen@delfi.ee>

On Thursday 09 June 2005 23:01, Michal Moskal wrote:
> On 6/9/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
> > mv SPECS/kernel-{char,video}-spca5xx.spec,v
>
> Done.
>
> PS: Was this email ever posted to cvsadmin@ (the (resend) part)? I
> don't recall it.
nope. only devel-en.

-- 
glen


From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl  Fri Jun 10 08:22:55 2005
From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:22:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: cvs mv (resend)
In-Reply-To: <200506100846.21868.glen@delfi.ee> from "Elan
	=?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=" at Jun 10, 2005 08:46:21 AM
Message-ID: <200506100622.j5A6Mtsj013727@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>

Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 09 June 2005 23:01, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > On 6/9/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
> > > mv SPECS/kernel-{char,video}-spca5xx.spec,v
> >
> > Done.
> >
> > PS: Was this email ever posted to cvsadmin@ (the (resend) part)? I
> > don't recall it.
> nope. only devel-en.

It should be CC-ed.

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun  9 12:49:50 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:49:50 +0300
Subject: cvs mv
Message-ID: <200506091349.50718.glen@delfi.ee>

mv SPECS/kernel-{char,video}-spca5xx.spec,v

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun  8 13:29:38 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?windows-1257?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:29:38 +0300
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - release 0.2: updated Provides
In-Reply-To: <a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.308@pld-linux.org>
	<200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>
	<a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200506081429.38516.glen@delfi.ee>

On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:59, Rados?aw Zieli?ski wrote:
> On 6/8/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
> > please look on this one too:
> > https://bugs.pld-linux.org/index.php?do=details&id=5656
>
> As migo wrote, this is not a bug.  As long as the CPAN module provides
> equal or newer version and there is no conflict.
>
> Yes, we have some conflicts on files, for example: both
> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker and perl-tools provide /usr/bin/instmodsh.
> Solution: developing a consistent renaming policy.  Current status:
> stale.
why not just keep the perl-MODNAME packages, and remove from perl-modules, 
perl-tools?

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Tue Jun  7 19:00:08 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:00:08 +0300
Subject: Fwd: pear packages with pear program
Message-ID: <200506072000.08561.glen@delfi.ee>



----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: pear packages with pear program
Date: Tuesday 07 June 2005 19:20
From: Elan Ruusam?e <glen at pld-linux.org>
To: adamg at pld-linux.org

hi

i tried to package pear packages using /usr/bin/pear.
everything is cool and fine, but when the source files are patched or
reorganized, the checksum check will fail.

i also added /etc/pear and /usr/share/pear/data and /usr/share/pear/.registry
to php-pear package. i wonder what's the goal in pld how to handle this, are
these packaging needed?

why use pear program to install in first place was the fact that layout is
already included in package.xml and it would be duplicate work to do the same
in %install of package. especially it was felt with phpDocumentor package.

i didn't want to clobber cvs, so i'm attaching the diffs to this email.

i embedded the /usr/bin/pear as __pear macro due need to increase memory
 limit for phpDocumentor.

--
glen

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
glen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pear.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 11416 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050607/3423a616/attachment.bin>

From pluto at agmk.net  Fri Jun 10 17:22:34 2005
From: pluto at agmk.net (Pawel Sikora)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:22:34 +0200
Subject: SPECS (LINUX_2_6): kernel.spec - add initrd to package as %ghost
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_kernel.spec.1.441.2.1098@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_kernel.spec.1.441.2.1097@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_kernel.spec.1.441.2.1098@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506101722.34416.pluto@agmk.net>

On Friday 10 of June 2005 12:33, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Fri Jun 10 10:33:50 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: LINUX_2_6
> ---- Log message:
> - add initrd to package as %ghost

what for?
%postun cleans up /boot/initrd-%{version}-%{release}.gz

-- 
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil
  is for good men to do nothing.
                                           - Edmund Burke


From radek42 at gmail.com  Sat Jun 11 12:00:54 2005
From: radek42 at gmail.com (Radoslaw Zielinski)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:00:54 +0200
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - release 0.2: updated Provides
In-Reply-To: <200506081429.38516.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.308@pld-linux.org>
	<200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>
	<a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>
	<200506081429.38516.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050611100054.GA8427@bongo>

Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> [08-06-2005 13:29]:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:59, Rados?aw Zieli?ski wrote:
>> On 6/8/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
>>> please look on this one too:
>>> https://bugs.pld-linux.org/index.php?do=details&id=5656

>> As migo wrote, this is not a bug.  As long as the CPAN module provides
>> equal or newer version and there is no conflict.

>> Yes, we have some conflicts on files, for example: both
>> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker and perl-tools provide /usr/bin/instmodsh.
>> Solution: developing a consistent renaming policy.  Current status:
>> stale.
> why not just keep the perl-MODNAME packages, and remove from perl-modules, 
> perl-tools?

If you have an application, which relies on some of these modules, and
want to say ``this works with perl-x.y.z'', it is nice to have the full
set in the distribution.  It sometimes happens, that the version in core
differs heavily from the one available on CPAN; example:

  $ rpm -q perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker          
  perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.30-1

  $ rpm -q --provides perl-devel-5.8.7 | grep Make | head -n1
  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.17

I usually want the newest one, but sometimes do a lazy switch: poldek -e,
use 6.17, poldek -i.

-- 
Rados?aw Zieli?ski <radek42 at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050611/a164e2df/attachment.sig>

From radek42 at gmail.com  Sat Jun 11 16:02:31 2005
From: radek42 at gmail.com (Radoslaw Zielinski)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:02:31 +0200
Subject: SPECS: perl.spec - release 0.2: updated Provides
In-Reply-To: <a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <SPECS_perl.spec.1.308@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_perl.spec.1.309@pld-linux.org>
	<200506081238.46541.glen@delfi.ee>
	<a8dae1ea05060803597cb83c1e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20050611140231.GA12068@bongo>

Rados?aw Zieli?ski <radek42 at gmail.com> [08-06-2005 12:59]:
> On 6/8/05, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at delfi.ee> wrote:
>> please look on this one too:
>> https://bugs.pld-linux.org/index.php?do=details&id=5656
> As migo wrote, this is not a bug.  As long as the CPAN module provides
> equal or newer version and there is no conflict.

> Yes, we have some conflicts on files, for example: both
> perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker and perl-tools provide /usr/bin/instmodsh. 
> Solution: developing a consistent renaming policy.  Current status:
> stale.

Proposal: adding .cpan suffix to conflicting scripts.  Comments?

Done in perl-Pod-Parser-1.31-3.

-- 
Rados?aw Zieli?ski <radek42 at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050611/de518cec/attachment.sig>

From twittner at o2.pl  Sat Jun 11 18:40:20 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:40:20 +0200
Subject: %apache_config_install
Message-ID: <200506111840.20672.twittner@o2.pl>

%apache_config_install(v:c:n:) \
[...]
# restart apache if the config symlink is there\
if [ -L /etc/apache/conf.d/%{-n*}%{!-n:99}_%{name}.conf ]; then\
if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/%{__apache_svcname %{-v*}} ]; then\
/etc/rc.d/init.d/%{__apache_svcname %{-v*}} restart 1>&2\
fi\
fi\
%{nil}

Why %apache_config_install doesn't restart (or reload) apache when symlink is 
placed in /etc/httpd/httpd.conf/ directory? Package containing f.e. Alias 
directive doesn't work after instalation without restarting apache. 
rpmbuild(macros) = 1.222, apache-2.0.54-2, AutoIndex-2.1.0-0.1

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From undefine at aramin.net  Sat Jun 11 23:41:04 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:41:04 +0200
Subject: sharutils-tmpfix.patch
Message-ID: <20050611214104.GA16513@aramin.net>

I can't understand how this patch works.
It launch command tempfile... but - where is this command? I can't find
anything like tempfile.

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 12 15:51:46 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:51:46 +0300
Subject: %apache_config_install
In-Reply-To: <200506111840.20672.twittner@o2.pl>
References: <200506111840.20672.twittner@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <200506121651.46513.glen@delfi.ee>

hardcoded  /etc/apache/conf.d. fixed in CVS

On Saturday 11 June 2005 19:40, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> %apache_config_install(v:c:n:) \
> [...]
> # restart apache if the config symlink is there\
> if [ -L /etc/apache/conf.d/%{-n*}%{!-n:99}_%{name}.conf ]; then\
> if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/%{__apache_svcname %{-v*}} ]; then\
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/%{__apache_svcname %{-v*}} restart 1>&2\
> fi\
> fi\
> %{nil}
>
> Why %apache_config_install doesn't restart (or reload) apache when symlink
> is placed in /etc/httpd/httpd.conf/ directory? Package containing f.e.
> Alias directive doesn't work after instalation without restarting apache.
> rpmbuild(macros) = 1.222, apache-2.0.54-2, AutoIndex-2.1.0-0.1

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 12 18:08:07 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:08:07 +0300
Subject: rpm macros as separate package?
Message-ID: <200506121908.07596.glen@delfi.ee>

what about splitting rpm.macros to separate package, to avoid building and 
installing whole rpm.spec?

this also avoids need to have AC-branch branch and HEAD for duplication.

-- 
glen


From jack at jack.eu.org  Sun Jun 12 19:23:45 2005
From: jack at jack.eu.org (=?iso-8859-2?q?Jaros=B3aw_Kamper?=)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:23:45 +0200
Subject: SPECS: gaim.spec - STBR if it works (see
	http://security.gentoo.or...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_gaim.spec.1.142@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_gaim.spec.1.141@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_gaim.spec.1.142@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506121923.45284.jack@jack.eu.org>

Dnia niedziela, 12 czerwca 2005 17:48, glen napisa?:
> Author: glen                         Date: Sun Jun 12 15:48:38 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - STBR if it works (see
> http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200506-11.xml)

It works, I'm using it.

-- 
Jaros?aw Kamper <jack at jack.eu.org> http://jack.eu.org/


From glen at delfi.ee  Tue Jun 14 18:32:01 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:32:01 +0300
Subject: SPECS: lib765.spec - added bcond_without static libs
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_lib765.spec.1.13@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_lib765.spec.1.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_lib765.spec.1.13@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506141932.01964.glen@delfi.ee>

why 'static_libs'?
why not 'static'?
earlier packages seem to have 'static' bcond


On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:20, witekfl wrote:
> Author: witekfl                      Date: Tue Jun 14 16:20:54 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - added bcond_without static libs
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    lib765.spec (1.12 -> 1.13)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/lib765.spec
> diff -u SPECS/lib765.spec:1.12 SPECS/lib765.spec:1.13
> --- SPECS/lib765.spec:1.12	Sun Feb  6 02:02:17 2005
> +++ SPECS/lib765.spec	Tue Jun 14 18:20:48 2005
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  # $Revision$, $Date$
> +%bcond_without	static_libs	# don't build static library
>  Summary:	765 FDC library
>  Summary(pl):	Biblioteka FDC 765
>  Name:		lib765
> @@ -70,7 +71,8 @@
>  %{__autoconf}
>  %{__autoheader}
>  %{__automake}
> -%configure
> +%configure \
> +	%{!?with_static_libs:--disable-static}
>  %{__make}
>
>  %install
> @@ -97,9 +99,11 @@
>  %{_libdir}/lib765.la
>  %{_includedir}/*.h
>
> +%if %{with static_libs}
>  %files static
>  %defattr(644,root,root,755)
>  %{_libdir}/lib*.a
> +%endif
>
>  %define date	%(echo `LC_ALL="C" date +"%a %b %d %Y"`)
>  %changelog
> @@ -107,6 +111,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.13  2005/06/14 16:20:48  witekfl
> +- added bcond_without static libs
> +
>  Revision 1.12  2005/02/06 01:02:17  qboosh
>  - ...but soname has changed
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/lib765.spec?r1=1.12&r2=1.13&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Tue Jun 14 19:17:30 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:17:30 +0200
Subject: SPECS: lib765.spec - added bcond_without static libs
In-Reply-To: <200506141932.01964.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_lib765.spec.1.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_lib765.spec.1.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506141932.01964.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050614171730.GA13702@fngna.oyu>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 07:32:01PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> why 'static_libs'?
> why not 'static'?
> earlier packages seem to have 'static' bcond

"static" bcond used to mean static linking (of some binaries against
some libraries).
It's different case.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From pluto at agmk.net  Tue Jun 14 19:10:28 2005
From: pluto at agmk.net (Pawel Sikora)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:10:28 +0200
Subject: SPECS: lib765.spec - added bcond_without static libs
In-Reply-To: <200506141932.01964.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_lib765.spec.1.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_lib765.spec.1.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506141932.01964.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506141910.29107.pluto@agmk.net>

On Tuesday 14 of June 2005 18:32, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> why 'static_libs'?
> why not 'static'?
> earlier packages seem to have 'static' bcond

`static` is used for static binaries (e.g. shells, rpm, etc.)
`static_libs` has sense only for time-consuming builds (e.g. qt)

-- 
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil
  is for good men to do nothing.
                                           - Edmund Burke


From glen at delfi.ee  Tue Jun 14 19:22:17 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:22:17 +0300
Subject: patch on builders
Message-ID: <200506142022.17810.glen@delfi.ee>

hi, i suspect builder enviroinment has setup this var:
export VERSION_CONTROL=simple

is this really neccesary?

using it makes it .orig files go into packages which do not clean/remove 
*.orig in %prep and package whole dirs.

-- 
glen


From twittner at o2.pl  Tue Jun 14 20:14:44 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 20:14:44 +0200
Subject: rpm macros as separate package?
In-Reply-To: <200506121908.07596.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506121908.07596.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506142014.44871.twittner@o2.pl>

On Sun 12. of June 2005 18:08, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> what about splitting rpm.macros to separate package, to avoid building and
> installing whole rpm.spec?
>
> this also avoids need to have AC-branch branch and HEAD for duplication.
Yes, I agree with you and I think if no one posted any reservations within 48 
hours all the more you are allowed to do it.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From dev-null at telus.net  Tue Jun 14 21:21:32 2005
From: dev-null at telus.net (Chris Poon)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:21:32 -0700
Subject: Anyone actually running a 32 bit kernel on sun4u?
Message-ID: <1118776892.42af2e3c3f127@webmail.telus.net>

It seems to me that with the current state of ioctl translation, having
a 32 bit userland is a PITA for a 64 bit kernel. I'm not certain that
a 32 bit kernel would work on a sun4u and hence I have always built my
own 64 bit kernel RPMs. What gets me the latest is XFS - seems that none
of those ioctl would work with a 64 bit kernel and I have heard reports
about 64 bit userland still not working properly. Searching on compat_ioctl
doesn't get me anywhere (as it seems XFS switched to using compat_ioctl)
and I get a lot of "ioctl32 Unknown cmd" with the XFS tools. I know that
staying with Linux on sun4u platform is an up-hill battle but Sun hardware
do have its advantages.



From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Tue Jun 14 21:45:33 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:45:33 +0200
Subject: Anyone actually running a 32 bit kernel on sun4u?
In-Reply-To: <1118776892.42af2e3c3f127@webmail.telus.net>
References: <1118776892.42af2e3c3f127@webmail.telus.net>
Message-ID: <20050614194533.GF13702@fngna.oyu>

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 12:21:32PM -0700, Chris Poon wrote:
> It seems to me that with the current state of ioctl translation, having
> a 32 bit userland is a PITA for a 64 bit kernel. I'm not certain that
> a 32 bit kernel would work on a sun4u and hence I have always built my
> own 64 bit kernel RPMs.

AFAIK it won't work.
>From linux-2.6.10/arch/sparc/kernel/head.S:

sun4u_6:
                .asciz  "\n\rOn sun4u you have to use UltraLinux (64bit) kernel\n\rand not a 32bit sun4[cdem] version\n\r\n\r"

And yes, I saw this messate trying to boot sparc(32) kernel (2.4.x or
2.6.x, I don't remember now) once on Sun Ultra 1.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun 15 20:31:08 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 21:31:08 +0300
Subject: bind package
Message-ID: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>

is this really proper?

# rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
bind-9.2.5-2
bind-9.2.5-2
# l dev/
total 0
-rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
-rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
# pwd
/var/lib/named

spec reads:
%attr(770,root,named) %{_var}/lib/named/dev/*

and those 'files' are opened by named:
21:30:32 root[0]@player lib/named# rlsof -c named|grep `pwd`
      5 named named    6w   REG        3,6    1233   304107 /var/lib/named/named.log
      5 named named   10r   REG        3,6       0   304102 /var/lib/named/dev/random
      5 named named  cwd    DIR        3,6    4096   304095 /var/lib/named
      5 named named  rtd    DIR        3,6    4096   304095 /var/lib/named

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun 15 21:57:24 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:57:24 +0300
Subject: SOURCES: peercast-ini-location.patch (NEW) - unix-like config
	file...
In-Reply-To: <SOURCES_peercast_ini_location.patch.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <SOURCES_peercast_ini_location.patch.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_peercast_ini_location.patch.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506152257.24946.glen@delfi.ee>

erm, this makes config path /.peercast.ini, if $HOME is unset, should be sth 
like "peercast.ini" ?

On Wednesday 15 June 2005 16:00, saq wrote:
> Author: saq                          Date: Wed Jun 15 13:00:29 2005 GMT
> Module: SOURCES                       Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - unix-like config file placement
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SOURCES:
>    peercast-ini-location.patch (NONE -> 1.1)  (NEW)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SOURCES/peercast-ini-location.patch
> diff -u /dev/null SOURCES/peercast-ini-location.patch:1.1
> --- /dev/null	Wed Jun 15 15:00:29 2005
> +++ SOURCES/peercast-ini-location.patch	Wed Jun 15 15:00:24 2005
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +--- peercast-0.1212/ui/linux/main.cpp.orig	2005-06-15 13:46:02.000000000
> +0200 ++++ peercast-0.1212/ui/linux/main.cpp	2005-06-15 13:48:02.000000000
> +0200 +@@ -97,8 +97,10 @@
> + // ----------------------------------
> + int main(int argc, char* argv[])
> + {
> +-
> +-	iniFileName.set("peercast.ini");
> ++	const char *home = getenv("HOME");
> ++	if (home == NULL) home = "";
> ++	iniFileName.set(home);
> ++	iniFileName.append("/.peercast.ini");
> +
> + 	if (argc > 2)
> + 		if (strcmp(argv[1],"-inifile")==0)
> ================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From patrys at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 15 23:15:42 2005
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:15:42 +0200
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>

Dnia 15-06-2005, ?ro o godzinie 21:31 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e napisa?(a):
> is this really proper?
> 
> # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> bind-9.2.5-2
> bind-9.2.5-2
> # l dev/
> total 0
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> # pwd
> /var/lib/named

Are these filed or device nodes?

> spec reads:
> %attr(770,root,named) %{_var}/lib/named/dev/*
> 
> and those 'files' are opened by named:
> 21:30:32 root[0]@player lib/named# rlsof -c named|grep `pwd`
>       5 named named    6w   REG        3,6    1233   304107 /var/lib/named/named.log
>       5 named named   10r   REG        3,6       0   304102 /var/lib/named/dev/random
>       5 named named  cwd    DIR        3,6    4096   304095 /var/lib/named
>       5 named named  rtd    DIR        3,6    4096   304095 /var/lib/named

Yes as named is chrooting itself to a strict jail in /var/lib/named.

-- 
Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050615/b5053a5f/attachment.sig>

From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun 15 23:32:55 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-13?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:32:55 +0300
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>

On Thursday 16 June 2005 00:15, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Dnia 15-06-2005, ?ro o godzinie 21:31 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e napisa?(a):
> > is this really proper?
> >
> > # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> > bind-9.2.5-2
> > bind-9.2.5-2
> > # l dev/
> > total 0
> > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> > # pwd
> > /var/lib/named
>
> Are these filed or device nodes?
look again:

# l dev/
total 0
-rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
-rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*

i'm 99.37% sure these should be devices, and a little different permissions

-- 
glen


From adamg at biomerieux.pl  Wed Jun 15 23:41:59 2005
From: adamg at biomerieux.pl (Adam =?iso-8859-2?Q?Go=B3=EAbiowski?=)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:41:59 +0200
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
	<200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050615214159.GG7545@mysza.eu.org>

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:32:55AM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > # l dev/
> > > total 0
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> > > # pwd
> > > /var/lib/named
> >
> > Are these filed or device nodes?
> look again:
> 
> # l dev/
> total 0
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> 
> i'm 99.37% sure these should be devices, and a little different permissions

You're right. These should be devices. 

-- 
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
   PLD Linux developer   | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.


From twittner at o2.pl  Thu Jun 16 00:01:10 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:01:10 +0200
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
	<200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506160001.11196.twittner@o2.pl>

On Wed 15. of June 2005 23:32, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 00:15, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Dnia 15-06-2005, ?ro o godzinie 21:31 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e napisa?(a):
> > > is this really proper?
> > >
> > > # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > # l dev/
> > > total 0
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> > > # pwd
> > > /var/lib/named
> >
> > Are these filed or device nodes?
>
> look again:
>
> # l dev/
> total 0
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
>
> i'm 99.37% sure these should be devices, and a little different permissions
look into dev.spec - there is %dev macro for diveces - maybe it helps?
-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From dev-null at telus.net  Thu Jun 16 00:14:24 2005
From: dev-null at telus.net (Chris Poon)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:14:24 -0700
Subject: Anyone actually running a 32 bit kernel on sun4u?
In-Reply-To: <mailman.19.1118787797.4131.pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>
References: <mailman.19.1118787797.4131.pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1118873664.42b0a840e99b3@webmail.telus.net>

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:45:33 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> 
> AFAIK it won't work.
> >From linux-2.6.10/arch/sparc/kernel/head.S:
> 
> sun4u_6:
>                 .asciz  "\n\rOn sun4u you have to use UltraLinux (64bit)
> kernel\n\rand not a 32bit sun4[cdem] version\n\r\n\r"
> 
> And yes, I saw this messate trying to boot sparc(32) kernel (2.4.x or
> 2.6.x, I don't remember now) once on Sun Ultra 1.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/

Tried it for myself - SILO won't even try to boot the kernel.



From dev-null at telus.net  Thu Jun 16 00:18:41 2005
From: dev-null at telus.net (Chris Poon)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:18:41 -0700
Subject: PLD on sun4u/sparc64
Message-ID: <1118873921.42b0a94198e53@webmail.telus.net>

Just curious to see if anyone has an UltraSPARC loaded with PLD - seems
to me that lacking an official kernel RPM, nobody would have a working system.
The other major obstacle is the 32/64 bit translation between userland and
kernel - there is certainly no glibc64 RPM for sparc64 nor is there any 64-bit
userland program. Almost anything that needs to interact with the kernel
seems to have major problem if they are compiled as 32 bit...



From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun 16 01:47:56 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:47:56 +0200
Subject: PLD on sun4u/sparc64
In-Reply-To: <1118873921.42b0a94198e53@webmail.telus.net>
References: <1118873921.42b0a94198e53@webmail.telus.net>
Message-ID: <20050615234756.GA3421@aramin.net>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:18:41PM -0700, Chris Poon wrote:
> Just curious to see if anyone has an UltraSPARC loaded with PLD - seems
[undefine at ares undefine]$ uname -a; uptime
Linux ares 2.4.20 #4 wto gru 3 09:29:27 CET 2002 sparc64
TI_UltraSparc_IIi unknown PLD Linux
 01:43:18 up 73 days, 13:32, 14 users,  load average: 0.12, 0.04, 0.18

;)
i have 10 ultras 10, each with 192mb memory. 8 works as workstations, 1
is my "devel machine"(ares) and 1 is unused ;)

> to me that lacking an official kernel RPM, nobody would have a working system.
i have my own kernel, compiled long time ago...
i don't like reboots this machines, so.. i don't change it :)

> The other major obstacle is the 32/64 bit translation between userland and
> kernel - there is certainly no glibc64 RPM for sparc64 nor is there any 64-bit
> userland program. Almost anything that needs to interact with the kernel
> seems to have major problem if they are compiled as 32 bit...
i'm not interested in 64bit userland, because.. on this sparcs 64bit
userland is simply slow(much slower than 32bit). and those machines are
slow too...
slow + slow = very slow ;)
64bit userland is basicaly not needed for me. i have only 192mb ram, not
more than 4gbit ;). and I don't compute there very big numbers... simply
64bit userland is useless.

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun 16 08:30:25 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:30:25 +0200
Subject: PLD on sun4u/sparc64
In-Reply-To: <1118873921.42b0a94198e53@webmail.telus.net>
References: <1118873921.42b0a94198e53@webmail.telus.net>
Message-ID: <20050616063025.GA24048@fngna.oyu>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:18:41PM -0700, Chris Poon wrote:
> Just curious to see if anyone has an UltraSPARC loaded with PLD - seems
> to me that lacking an official kernel RPM, nobody would have a working system.

Yes, this is problem - as PLD build/ftp system isn't prepared yet to have
additional architecture with small subset of packages.
But I'm regularly testing building (and less regularly booting/running) of
kernel24 packages on sparc64 (and resulting packages can be found on my
homepage).

> The other major obstacle is the 32/64 bit translation between userland and
> kernel - there is certainly no glibc64 RPM for sparc64 nor is there any 64-bit
> userland program. Almost anything that needs to interact with the kernel
> seems to have major problem if they are compiled as 32 bit...

I think these are rare cases though (the only one I found and fixed few
days ago (in PLD kernel24 package; patch is in the way to official 2.4 tree)
was utimes() syscall in 2.4.x kernels).
Maybe iptables is problematic.
If you find more such problems, feel free to report them.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From twittner at o2.pl  Thu Jun 16 18:40:15 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:40:15 +0200
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
	<200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506161840.15883.twittner@o2.pl>

On Wed 15. of June 2005 23:32, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 00:15, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Dnia 15-06-2005, ?ro o godzinie 21:31 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e napisa?(a):
> > > is this really proper?
> > >
> > > # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > # l dev/
> > > total 0
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> > > # pwd
> > > /var/lib/named
> >
> > Are these filed or device nodes?
>
> look again:
>
> # l dev/
> total 0
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
>
> i'm 99.37% sure these should be devices, and a little different permissions
Thank you for pointing out that - fixed on 1.218, but unfortunately spec is 
screwed up on HEAD (1.219) again by blues.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From gotar at polanet.pl  Fri Jun 17 03:19:27 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:19:27 +0200
Subject: postfix upgrade failure
Message-ID: <20050617011927.GA6901@os>

poldek> upgrade postfix-2.2.3-1 
Processing dependencies...
postfix-2.1.5-5 obsoleted by postfix-2.2.3-1
There are 1 package to install, 1 to uninstall:
I postfix-2.2.3-1
R postfix-2.1.5-5
Need to download about 1MB of archives. After unpacking about 4MB will be used.
Retrieving ftp://ftp2.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/athlon/PLD/RPMS/postfix-2.2.3-1.athlon.rpm...
......................... 100.0% [1.3M (233.0K/s)]                       
Executing rpm --upgrade -vh --root / --noorder...
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
   1:postfix                warning: /etc/mail/access created as /etc/mail/access.rpmnew
warning: /etc/mail/main.cf created as /etc/mail/main.cf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/mail/master.cf created as /etc/mail/master.cf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/mail/virtual created as /etc/mail/virtual.rpmnew
########################################### [100%]
Editing /etc/mail/master.cf, adding missing entry for anvil service
Editing /etc/mail/master.cf, adding missing entry for scache service
Editing /etc/mail/master.cf, adding missing entry for discard service
Editing /etc/mail/master.cf, adding missing entry for tlsmgr service
Stopping Postfix service...........................................[ DONE ]
Starting Postfix service...........................................[ FAIL ]

error: %post(postfix-2.2.3-1) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
There were errors

maillog says:

Jun 17 03:15:37 pepin postfix/smtpd[17237]: warning: connect to private/tlsmgr: No such file or dir
ectory
Jun 17 03:15:38 pepin postfix/postfix-script: stopping the Postfix mail system
Jun 17 03:15:38 pepin postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is already running

I had to manually uninstall postfix-2.1.5 and restart postix. It works.

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From dev-null at telus.net  Fri Jun 17 07:58:40 2005
From: dev-null at telus.net (Chris Poon)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:58:40 -0700
Subject: PLD on sun4u/sparc64
In-Reply-To: <mailman.11.1118960596.19298.pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>
References: <mailman.11.1118960596.19298.pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1118987920.42b266908a146@webmail.telus.net>

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:30:25 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> 
> Yes, this is problem - as PLD build/ftp system isn't prepared yet to have
> additional architecture with small subset of packages.
> But I'm regularly testing building (and less regularly booting/running) of
> kernel24 packages on sparc64 (and resulting packages can be found on my
> homepage).
> 
I believe other than the kernel and a few packages that require ioctl to
the kernel, you can pretty much link the sparc RPM as the sparc64 RPM as
you wouldn't need to rebuild anyway.
 
> I think these are rare cases though (the only one I found and fixed few
> days ago (in PLD kernel24 package; patch is in the way to official 2.4 tree)
> was utimes() syscall in 2.4.x kernels).
> Maybe iptables is problematic.
> If you find more such problems, feel free to report them.
> 
I've been running 2.6 series since 2.6.5, and the latest 2.6.11.10 with PaX
turned on (just not the wisest thing to do as so many libraries are tagged
with executable stack required even though they don't need it). I remember
iptables used to be pretty bad, XFS is another for me under 2.6, specificall
xfs_growfs when it tries to make ioctl32 calls. ifenslave would never report
the correct information and earlier versions of it wouldn't even work properly.
Just a few things I listed - I want to make a 2.6 based PLD sparc64 system,
but it seems that I would have much better luck with Gentoo or Debian (which
isn't exactly stablized on 2.6 either). The main issue I have is a working
64 bit userland compiler (seems to me that crosssparc64 only works for the
kernel) so that if push comes to shove, I can produce the libraries for a 64
bit userland so stuff like XFS and iptables would work properly.

> 
> -- 
> Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/



From blues at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 09:40:57 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:40:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <200506161840.15883.twittner@o2.pl>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1118870142.8696.1.camel@localhost>
	<200506160032.55594.glen@delfi.ee> <200506161840.15883.twittner@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506170940210.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> > > > is this really proper?
> > > >
> > > > # rpm -qf dev/{null,random}
> > > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > > bind-9.2.5-2
> > > > # l dev/
> > > > total 0
> > > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > > > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> > > > # pwd
> > > > /var/lib/named
> > > Are these filed or device nodes?
> > look again:
> >
> > # l dev/
> > total 0
> > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 null*
> > -rwxrwx---  1 root named 0 Mar 24 00:54 random*
> >
> > i'm 99.37% sure these should be devices, and a little different 
> > permissions
> Thank you for pointing out that - fixed on 1.218, but unfortunately spec 
> is screwed up on HEAD (1.219) again by blues.

No, it's not.
It builds fine with that files.

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.

From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 10:31:01 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:31:01 +0300
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist,
	look at mailing list. rever...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.221@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_bind.spec.1.221@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506171131.01607.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 10:59, you wrote:
a:
> +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5 size
> mtime) %{_var}/log/named* 

b:
> #Something like that should be added... 
> ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats

do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?

i suggest then in %install:
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats

and in %post, touch the files again, plus chown / chmod

like in glibc:

%post -n nscd
/sbin/chkconfig --add nscd
touch /var/log/nscd
chmod 000 /var/log/nscd
chown root:root /var/log/nscd
chmod 640 /var/log/nscd
if [ -f /var/lock/subsys/nscd ]; then
    /etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd restart 1>&2
else
    echo "Run \"/etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd start\" to start nscd daemon." 1>&2
fi

i don't know reason for chmod 000, so ask smb else of this, but i guess it's 
something to do with race attack against suid bit :)

altho 
if [ ! -f /var/log/nscd ]; then
  install /dev/null -oroot -groot -m640 /var/log/nscd
fi
could work same way

-- 
glen


From blues at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 10:47:46 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist, look at mailing list.
	rever...
In-Reply-To: <200506171131.01607.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_bind.spec.1.221@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171131.01607.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171038220.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-1] Ruusam?e wrote:
> a:
> > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5 size
> > mtime) %{_var}/log/named* 
> 
> b:
> > #Something like that should be added... 
> > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> 
> do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?

no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is no 
possibility to write log there. b) should be added.

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.

From jajcus at bnet.pl  Fri Jun 17 10:52:48 2005
From: jajcus at bnet.pl (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:52:48 +0200
Subject: postfix upgrade failure
In-Reply-To: <20050617011927.GA6901@os>
References: <20050617011927.GA6901@os>
Message-ID: <20050617085248.GC15140@serwis2.beta>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:19:27AM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> Stopping Postfix service...........................................[ DONE ]
> Starting Postfix service...........................................[ FAIL ]
> 
> error: %post(postfix-2.2.3-1) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
> There were errors
> 
> maillog says:
> 
> Jun 17 03:15:37 pepin postfix/smtpd[17237]: warning: connect to private/tlsmgr: No such file or dir
> ectory
> Jun 17 03:15:38 pepin postfix/postfix-script: stopping the Postfix mail system
> Jun 17 03:15:38 pepin postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail system is already running
> 
> I had to manually uninstall postfix-2.1.5 and restart postix. It works.

Probably, when upgrading, postfix should be stopped in %pre and started
in %post. Which is what postfix documentation say, but is not widely
used in our packages and I am not sure how to do that right.

Greets,
	Jacek


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 11:21:27 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-13?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:21:27 +0300
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist,
	look at mailing list. rever...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171038220.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171131.01607.glen@delfi.ee>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171038220.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
Message-ID: <200506171221.28185.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 11:47, Pawe? Go?aszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-1] Ruusam?e wrote:
> > a:
> > > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5
> > > size mtime) %{_var}/log/named*
> >
> > b:
> > > #Something like that should be added...
> > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> >
> > do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?
>
> no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is no
> possibility to write log there. b) should be added.
but rpm install runs outside the chroot.

-- 
glen


From blues at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 12:20:07 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:20:07 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist, look at mailing list.
	rever...
In-Reply-To: <200506171221.28185.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171131.01607.glen@delfi.ee>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171038220.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
	<200506171221.28185.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171219240.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-13] Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > a:
> > > > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5
> > > > size mtime) %{_var}/log/named*
> > >
> > > b:
> > > > #Something like that should be added...
> > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> > > do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?
> > no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is no 
> > possibility to write log there. b) should be added.
> but rpm install runs outside the chroot.

??
How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.

From mmazur at kernel.pl  Fri Jun 17 12:25:41 2005
From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:25:41 +0200
Subject: PLD on sun4u/sparc64
In-Reply-To: <1118987920.42b266908a146@webmail.telus.net>
References: <mailman.11.1118960596.19298.pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org>
	<1118987920.42b266908a146@webmail.telus.net>
Message-ID: <200506171225.41726.mmazur@kernel.pl>

On pi?tek 17 czerwca 2005 07:58, Chris Poon wrote:
> I've been running 2.6 series since 2.6.5, and the latest 2.6.11.10 with PaX
> turned on (just not the wisest thing to do as so many libraries are tagged
> with executable stack required even though they don't need it). I remember
> iptables used to be pretty bad, XFS is another for me under 2.6,
> specificall xfs_growfs when it tries to make ioctl32 calls. ifenslave would
> never report the correct information and earlier versions of it wouldn't
> even work properly. Just a few things I listed - I want to make a 2.6 based
> PLD sparc64 system, but it seems that I would have much better luck with
> Gentoo or Debian (which isn't exactly stablized on 2.6 either). The main
> issue I have is a working 64 bit userland compiler (seems to me that
> crosssparc64 only works for the kernel) so that if push comes to shove, I
> can produce the libraries for a 64 bit userland so stuff like XFS and
> iptables would work properly.

Seems to me, that having full sparc64 support in PLD3.0 might be a good idea, 
since there's considerable interest in it.


-- 
In the year eighty five ten
God is gonna shake his mighty head
He'll either say,
"I'm pleased where man has been"
Or tear it down, and start again


From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl  Fri Jun 17 12:36:56 2005
From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:36:56 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist, look at mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171219240.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy> from
	"=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=" at Jun 17,
	2005 12:20:07 PM
Message-ID: <200506171036.j5HAauck021947@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?= wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-13] Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > > a:
> > > > > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5
> > > > > size mtime) %{_var}/log/named*
> > > >
> > > > b:
> > > > > #Something like that should be added...
> > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> > > > do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?
> > > no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is no 
> > > possibility to write log there. b) should be added.
> > but rpm install runs outside the chroot.
> 
> ??
> How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??

via syslog and pipe ?

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology


From blues at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 13:26:12 2005
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist, look at mailing list.
In-Reply-To: <200506171036.j5HAauck021947@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200506171036.j5HAauck021947@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171325300.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > > > > a:
> > > > > > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_var}/log/named*
> > > > >
> > > > > b:
> > > > > > #Something like that should be added...
> > > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> > > > > do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?
> > > > no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is 
> > > > no possibility to write log there. b) should be added.
> > > but rpm install runs outside the chroot.
> > ?? How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??
> via syslog and pipe ?

Can be done, but I don't know if it's the best idea...

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.

From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 15:09:21 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-13?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:09:21 +0300
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist,
	look at mailing list. rever...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171219240.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171221.28185.glen@delfi.ee>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171219240.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
Message-ID: <200506171609.21545.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 13:20, Pawe? Go?aszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Elan [iso-8859-13] Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > > a:
> > > > > +%attr(660,named,named) %config(noreplace,missingok) %verify(not
> > > > > md5 size mtime) %{_var}/log/named*
> > > >
> > > > b:
> > > > > #Something like that should be added...
> > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.log
> > > > > ?#%attr(660,named,named) %ghost ?%{_var}/lib/named/named.stats
> > > >
> > > > do you mean that the a) should be replaced with b) ?
> > >
> > > no, because it's impossible, I think. bind is chrooted - there is no
> > > possibility to write log there. b) should be added.
> >
> > but rpm install runs outside the chroot.
>
> ??
> How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??
hmm, if bind chroot is %{_var}/lib/named
then %{_var}/lib/named/named.log is inside chroot

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 15:10:28 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:10:28 +0300
Subject: SPECS: sharutils.spec - tmpfix with use tempfile is
	debian-specifi...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_sharutils.spec.1.47@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_sharutils.spec.1.46@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_sharutils.spec.1.47@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506171610.28689.glen@delfi.ee>

use mktemp? it's available in PLD

On Friday 17 June 2005 14:55, undefine wrote:
> Author: undefine                     Date: Fri Jun 17 11:55:21 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - tmpfix with use tempfile is debian-specific, not usable in pld
> - release 1
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    sharutils.spec (1.46 -> 1.47)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/sharutils.spec
> diff -u SPECS/sharutils.spec:1.46 SPECS/sharutils.spec:1.47
> --- SPECS/sharutils.spec:1.46	Sat Jun 11 23:06:46 2005
> +++ SPECS/sharutils.spec	Fri Jun 17 13:55:16 2005
> @@ -10,17 +10,15 @@
>  Summary(uk):	??????? GNU shar ??? ????????? ?? ?????????? shell-???????
>  Name:		sharutils
>  Version:	4.3.80
> -Release:	0.1
> +Release:	1
>  License:	GPL
>  Group:		Applications
> 
> Source0:	ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/sharutils/REL-%{version}/%{name}-%{versi
>on}.tar.bz2 # Source0-md5:	81449e6080bb28f6dd8d377fa7a14f12
> 
> Source1:	http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/ankry/man-PLD/%{name}-non-engli
>sh-man-pages.tar.bz2 # Source1-md5:	336f405f69324d129a6ccd3b66f8eb6c
> -Patch1:		%{name}-pl.patch
> -Patch5:		%{name}-sh.patch
> -# todo:
> -Patch6:		%{name}-tmpfix.patch
> +Patch0:		%{name}-pl.patch
> +Patch1:		%{name}-sh.patch
>  BuildRequires:	autoconf
>  BuildRequires:	automake
>  BuildRequires:	gettext-devel
> @@ -91,10 +89,8 @@
>
>  %prep
>  %setup -q -a1
> +%patch0 -p1
>  %patch1 -p1
> -%patch5 -p1
> -# %patch6 -p1
> -#%patch10 -p1
>
>  %build
>  %{__gettextize}
> @@ -143,6 +139,10 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.47  2005/06/17 11:55:16  undefine
> +- tmpfix with use tempfile is debian-specific, not usable in pld
> +- release 1
> +
>  Revision 1.46  2005/06/11 21:06:46  undefine
>  - cleanup install
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/sharutils.spec?r1=1.46&r2=1.47&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From undefine at aramin.net  Fri Jun 17 15:25:31 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:25:31 +0200
Subject: SPECS: sharutils.spec - tmpfix with use tempfile is
	debian-specifi...
In-Reply-To: <200506171610.28689.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_sharutils.spec.1.46@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_sharutils.spec.1.47@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171610.28689.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050617132531.GA19470@aramin.net>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:10:28PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> use mktemp? it's available in PLD
if type -p mktemp >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
  temp=`mktemp /var/tmp/$$.shar.XXXXXX` || exit 1
else
  temp=/var/tmp/$$.shar
  rm -f $temp*
fi

etc.. ;)
mktemp is already used. kloczek tok patch from debian, which used
tempfile and don't look, that there is no tempfile in pld.
and i wasted my time to seek tempfile in rpm-based distros ;)

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From undefine at aramin.net  Fri Jun 17 15:28:40 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:28:40 +0200
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist,
	look at mailing list. rever...
In-Reply-To: <200506171609.21545.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171221.28185.glen@delfi.ee>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506171219240.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
	<200506171609.21545.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050617132840.GA24773@aramin.net>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:09:21PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??
> hmm, if bind chroot is %{_var}/lib/named
> then %{_var}/lib/named/named.log is inside chroot
what about logrotate then? when archive is on /var/log?
(logrotate can't work, when source and archive are on different
partitions)

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 16:37:32 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:37:32 +0300
Subject: SPECS: bind.spec - please, check fist,
	look at mailing list. rever...
In-Reply-To: <20050617132840.GA24773@aramin.net>
References: <SPECS_bind.spec.1.220@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171609.21545.glen@delfi.ee>
	<20050617132840.GA24773@aramin.net>
Message-ID: <200506171737.33228.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 16:28, The Undefined wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 04:09:21PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > How do you want to make bind log outside the chroot??
> >
> > hmm, if bind chroot is %{_var}/lib/named
> > then %{_var}/lib/named/named.log is inside chroot
>
> what about logrotate then? when archive is on /var/log?
> (logrotate can't work, when source and archive are on different
> partitions)
unless you have /var/log as separate partition thenm yes. but usually people 
have /var in one piece :)

and logrotate can be made work using lastaction script:

/var/lib/named/named.log {
	create 640 named named

	# must be on same partition as log itself.
	olddir /var/lib/named

	# lastaction script does the compress
	nocompress

	# just to limit for on expression below
	rotate 9

	postrotate
		/bin/killall -HUP named
	endscript

	lastaction
	        for a in /var/lib/named/*.?; do
			/usr/bin/bzip2 < $a > /var/log/archiv/named/$(basename $a) && rm -f $a
		done
	endscript
}

(note: this script is not tested)

also it can be made working with copytruncate option, i believe, that could 
cause lost loglines, which isn't good either.

-- 
glen


From saq at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 17:39:31 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:39:31 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1
	- re...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 16:43 +0200, baggins wrote:
> Author: baggins                      Date: Fri Jun 17 14:43:35 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: AC-branch
> ---- Log message:
> - merged fro HEAD

IMO it's easier to (eventually) delete the AC-branch tag and simply
build from HEAD.

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From twittner at o2.pl  Fri Jun 17 17:43:07 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:43:07 +0200
Subject: bind package
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506170940210.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
References: <200506152131.08781.glen@delfi.ee>
	<200506161840.15883.twittner@o2.pl>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506170940210.27873@wby.gnfx.tqn.cy>
Message-ID: <200506171743.08031.twittner@o2.pl>

On Fri 17. of June 2005 09:40, Pawe? Go?aszewski wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
[...]
> > Thank you for pointing out that - fixed on 1.218, but unfortunately spec
> > is screwed up on HEAD (1.219) again by blues.
>
> No, it's not.
> It builds fine with that files.
Blues - I apologize to you for my words - I have very ancient rpm 
(rpm-4.4-0.20040614.0.9) which contains bugs related to this case as pluto 
said on pld-devel-pl.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl  Fri Jun 17 17:50:43 2005
From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:50:43 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1
In-Reply-To: <1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl> from
	"=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski" at Jun 17, 2005 05:39:31 PM
Message-ID: <200506171550.j5HFohLd023259@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>

=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 16:43 +0200, baggins wrote:
> > Author: baggins                      Date: Fri Jun 17 14:43:35 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: AC-branch
> > ---- Log message:
> > - merged fro HEAD
> 
> IMO it's easier to (eventually) delete the AC-branch tag and simply
> build from HEAD.

But baggins possibly has no rights to do it.

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology


From arekm at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 17:55:13 2005
From: arekm at pld-linux.org (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:55:13 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1 -
	re...
In-Reply-To: <1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
	<1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>

On Friday 17 of June 2005 17:39, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 16:43 +0200, baggins wrote:
> > Author: baggins                      Date: Fri Jun 17 14:43:35 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: AC-branch
> > ---- Log message:
> > - merged fro HEAD
>
> IMO it's easier to (eventually) delete the AC-branch tag and simply
> build from HEAD.
HEAD (still) differs from AC-branch for rpm and that's intentional since head 
targets Th in this case.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz                    PLD/Linux Team
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/  http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Fri Jun 17 17:56:06 2005
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:56:06 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1 -
	re...
In-Reply-To: <1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
	<1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <20050617155606.GG7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 16:43 +0200, baggins wrote:
> > Author: baggins                      Date: Fri Jun 17 14:43:35 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: AC-branch
> > ---- Log message:
> > - merged fro HEAD
> 
> IMO it's easier to (eventually) delete the AC-branch tag and simply
> build from HEAD.

It's RM decision.
But _there_ _are_ differences between HEAD and AC-branch. HEAD is for Th
and has some incompatible changes wrt x86_64.

Janek
-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From saq at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 18:24:23 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:24:23 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1
	- re...
In-Reply-To: <200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
	<1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:55 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> HEAD (still) differs from AC-branch for rpm

Invoked after the merge, before further changes:

[saq at neptune BUILD]$ cd ~/PLD/SPECS/
[saq at neptune SPECS]$ cvs diff -rHEAD -rAC-branch rpm.spec
[saq at neptune SPECS]$

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From arekm at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 18:39:24 2005
From: arekm at pld-linux.org (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:39:24 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1 -
	re...
In-Reply-To: <1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>
	<1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <200506171839.24579.arekm@pld-linux.org>

On Friday 17 of June 2005 18:24, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:55 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > HEAD (still) differs from AC-branch for rpm
>
> Invoked after the merge, before further changes:
>
> [saq at neptune BUILD]$ cd ~/PLD/SPECS/
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$ cvs diff -rHEAD -rAC-branch rpm.spec
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$
Whole rpm != rpm.spec. There are sources, patches.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz                    PLD/Linux Team
http://www.t17.ds.pwr.wroc.pl/~misiek/  http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Fri Jun 17 18:39:34 2005
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:39:34 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1 -
	re...
In-Reply-To: <1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
	<1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>
	<1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <20050617163934.GH7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 17:55 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > HEAD (still) differs from AC-branch for rpm
> 
> Invoked after the merge, before further changes:
> 
> [saq at neptune BUILD]$ cd ~/PLD/SPECS/
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$ cvs diff -rHEAD -rAC-branch rpm.spec
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$

Now try this:

cvs up -A rpm.spec
cvs diff -r AC-branch rpm.spec

Janek
-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 21:51:44 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:51:44 +0200
Subject: SPECS: weeder.spec - adapterized - FHS fix - package empty datadir
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_weeder.spec.1.2@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_weeder.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_weeder.spec.1.2@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050617195144.GA25408@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:58:22PM +0200, glen wrote:
> @@ -41,6 +45,7 @@
>  %doc README history.txt
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
>  %{_mandir}/man1/*
> +%dir %verify(not group mode user) %{_datadir}

Can't this dir have proper mode/ownership already in package?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 22:20:04 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:20:04 +0300
Subject: SPECS: weeder.spec - adapterized - FHS fix - package empty datadir
In-Reply-To: <20050617195144.GA25408@gruby.cs.net.pl>
References: <SPECS_weeder.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_weeder.spec.1.2@pld-linux.org>
	<20050617195144.GA25408@gruby.cs.net.pl>
Message-ID: <200506172320.04670.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 22:51, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:58:22PM +0200, glen wrote:
> > @@ -41,6 +45,7 @@
> >  %doc README history.txt
> >  %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
> >  %{_mandir}/man1/*
> > +%dir %verify(not group mode user) %{_datadir}
>
> Can't this dir have proper mode/ownership already in package?

i couldn't tought of any. perhaps not package at all the datadir?
because most likely the program isn't going to be run as root, and creating 
separate user/group is also not very well reasoned.

perhaps group=users? naah.

-- 
glen


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 22:48:53 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:48:53 +0200
Subject: SPECS: weeder.spec - adapterized - FHS fix - package empty datadir
In-Reply-To: <200506172320.04670.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_weeder.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_weeder.spec.1.2@pld-linux.org>
	<20050617195144.GA25408@gruby.cs.net.pl>
	<200506172320.04670.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050617204853.GA16207@fngna.oyu>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:20:04PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2005 22:51, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:58:22PM +0200, glen wrote:
> > > @@ -41,6 +45,7 @@
> > >  %doc README history.txt
> > >  %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
> > >  %{_mandir}/man1/*
> > > +%dir %verify(not group mode user) %{_datadir}
> >
> > Can't this dir have proper mode/ownership already in package?
> 
> i couldn't tought of any. perhaps not package at all the datadir?
> because most likely the program isn't going to be run as root, and creating 
> separate user/group is also not very well reasoned.
> 
> perhaps group=users? naah.

So maybe 1777,root,root?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From saq at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 17 23:00:15 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:00:15 +0200
Subject: SPECS (AC-branch): rpm.spec - merged fro HEAD - version 4.4.1
	- re...
In-Reply-To: <20050617163934.GH7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.67@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm.spec.1.555.2.68@pld-linux.org>
	<1119022771.25484.21.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506171755.13888.arekm@pld-linux.org>
	<1119025464.25484.23.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050617163934.GH7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <1119042015.25484.30.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 18:39 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> Now try this:
> 
> cvs up -A rpm.spec
> cvs diff -r AC-branch rpm.spec

I do read pld-cvs-commit and I understand perfectly that Ac and Th rpms
may differ. My observation is only that since a) they were identical for
a while and b) there are still no _major_ differences, maybe they don't
need to differ at all. rpm would be easier to maintain if they didn't.

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From glen at delfi.ee  Fri Jun 17 23:05:39 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:05:39 +0300
Subject: SPECS: weeder.spec - adapterized - FHS fix - package empty datadir
In-Reply-To: <20050617204853.GA16207@fngna.oyu>
References: <SPECS_weeder.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<200506172320.04670.glen@delfi.ee>
	<20050617204853.GA16207@fngna.oyu>
Message-ID: <200506180005.40111.glen@delfi.ee>

On Friday 17 June 2005 23:48, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:20:04PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > On Friday 17 June 2005 22:51, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 09:58:22PM +0200, glen wrote:
> > > > @@ -41,6 +45,7 @@
> > > >  %doc README history.txt
> > > >  %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
> > > >  %{_mandir}/man1/*
> > > > +%dir %verify(not group mode user) %{_datadir}
> > >
> > > Can't this dir have proper mode/ownership already in package?
> >
> > i couldn't tought of any. perhaps not package at all the datadir?
> > because most likely the program isn't going to be run as root, and
> > creating separate user/group is also not very well reasoned.
> >
> > perhaps group=users? naah.
>
> So maybe 1777,root,root?
seems ok (first one running will own the files)

-- 
glen


From twittner at o2.pl  Sat Jun 18 20:27:45 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:27:45 +0200
Subject: SPECS: cvsweb.spec - merged 3.0.5 from DEVEL
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.28@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.27@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.28@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506182027.46003.twittner@o2.pl>

On Sat 18. of June 2005 17:18, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Sat Jun 18 15:18:00 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - merged 3.0.5 from DEVEL
[...]
>  BuildArch:	noarch
[...]
> +%define		_cgibindir	%{_libdir}/cgi-bin
There is one small problem: we can choose between noarch and %{_libdir} ;) - 
%_libdir is arch-dependent due to /usr/lib64 on amd64 so whole package is 
arch-dependent. (To be honest I introduced this %define)

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Sun Jun 19 19:45:50 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:45:50 +0200
Subject: SPECS: rpm-macros.spec (NEW) - initial idea
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050619174550.GA15119@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 07:36:38PM +0200, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Sun Jun 19 17:36:38 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - initial idea

> +%define	rpm_macros_rev	1.223

> +Source0:	rpm.macros
> +Provides:	rpmbuild(macros) = %{rpm_macros_rev}
> +BuildArch:	noarch
> +BuildRoot:	%{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
> +
> +%description
> +This package contains rpm macros for PLD Linux.
> +
> +Use this package to get newer rpm macros than rpm-build provides
> +(perhaps this package will be separated in the future).
> +
> +%prep
> +
> +%install
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> +install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rpm
> +install %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/rpm.macros
> +
> +%clean
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> +
> +%files
> +%defattr(644,root,root,755)
> +%config(noreplace) %verify(not md5 mtime size) %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/rpm.macros

But if one modifies this file, he has to merge changes manually on each
upgrade...


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 19 19:46:32 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:46:32 +0300
Subject: rpm macros as separate package?
In-Reply-To: <200506142014.44871.twittner@o2.pl>
References: <200506121908.07596.glen@delfi.ee>
	<200506142014.44871.twittner@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <200506192046.32721.glen@delfi.ee>

On Tuesday 14 June 2005 21:14, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Sun 12. of June 2005 18:08, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > what about splitting rpm.macros to separate package, to avoid building
> > and installing whole rpm.spec?
> >
> > this also avoids need to have AC-branch branch and HEAD for duplication.
>
> Yes, I agree with you and I think if no one posted any reservations within
> 48 hours all the more you are allowed to do it.
created rpm-macros.spec.
comments and improvements welcome.

i'm not sure how it's going to work out :)

but indeed, if not duplicating the macros, the SOURCES/rpm.macros needs to be 
split, leaving the rpm specific things into original rpm.macros and cvs cp 
rpm.macros,v rpm-macros,v and then leaving in only the second portion of the 
macros, ie which are independant of rpm version, which are just pld macros, 
like %useradd/%groupadd/%gconf_schema_install

--
glen


From saq at pld-linux.org  Sun Jun 19 19:51:38 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:51:38 +0200
Subject: SPECS: rpm-macros.spec (NEW) - initial idea
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1119203498.5250.3.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 19:36 +0200, glen wrote:
> +%define	rpm_macros_rev	1.223
> +Summary:	PLD Linux RPM Macros
> +Name:		rpm-macros
> +Version:	0.1

Let's just use initial version 1.223 .

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 19 19:54:20 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:54:20 +0300
Subject: SPECS: rpm-macros.spec (NEW) - initial idea
In-Reply-To: <20050619174550.GA15119@gruby.cs.net.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<20050619174550.GA15119@gruby.cs.net.pl>
Message-ID: <200506192054.21074.glen@delfi.ee>

On Sunday 19 June 2005 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > +%files
> > +%defattr(644,root,root,755)
> > +%config(noreplace) %verify(not md5 mtime size)
> > %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/rpm.macros
>
> But if one modifies this file, he has to merge changes manually on each
> upgrade...

could remove the %config(noreplace) then
but where to place the file so it's readed additionally 
to /usr/lib/rpm/macros ?

need to modify rpmrc to and append to macrofiles list?

or do %include at the end of /usr/lib/rpm/macros and place file itself 
to /usr/lib/rpm/macros.pld ?

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 19 19:58:14 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:58:14 +0300
Subject: SPECS: rpm-macros.spec (NEW) - initial idea
In-Reply-To: <1119203498.5250.3.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<1119203498.5250.3.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <200506192058.14996.glen@delfi.ee>

On Sunday 19 June 2005 20:51, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 19:36 +0200, glen wrote:
> > +%define	rpm_macros_rev	1.223
> > +Summary:	PLD Linux RPM Macros
> > +Name:		rpm-macros
> > +Version:	0.1
>
> Let's just use initial version 1.223 .
perhaps then %{rpm_macros_rev} already?

-- 
glen


From twittner at o2.pl  Sun Jun 19 23:22:46 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:22:46 +0200
Subject: SPECS: cvsweb.spec - FHS fix: cvsweb.cgi moved to %{_datadir}
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.31@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.30@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_cvsweb.spec.1.31@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506192322.47208.twittner@o2.pl>

On Sun 19. of June 2005 21:35, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Sun Jun 19 19:35:54 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - FHS fix: cvsweb.cgi moved to %{_datadir}
I have some reservations about moving cgi script to /usr/share/....
Quoting from:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREARCHITECTUREINDEPENDENTDATA
/usr/share : Architecture-independent data
Purpose

The /usr/share hierarchy is for all read-only architecture independent data 
files.

IMO cgi script is not data file. On second thought IMO the best place for cgi 
programs is %{_prefix}/lib/cgi-bin - both - binary and arch-independent 
scripts.

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Mon Jun 20 22:45:58 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:45:58 +0200
Subject: SPECS: rpm-macros.spec (NEW) - initial idea
In-Reply-To: <200506192054.21074.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_rpm_macros.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<20050619174550.GA15119@gruby.cs.net.pl>
	<200506192054.21074.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050620204558.GB32034@fngna.oyu>

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:54:20PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > +%files
> > > +%defattr(644,root,root,755)
> > > +%config(noreplace) %verify(not md5 mtime size)
> > > %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/rpm.macros
> >
> > But if one modifies this file, he has to merge changes manually on each
> > upgrade...
> 
> could remove the %config(noreplace) then
> but where to place the file so it's readed additionally 
> to /usr/lib/rpm/macros ?
> 
> need to modify rpmrc to and append to macrofiles list?
> 
> or do %include at the end of /usr/lib/rpm/macros and place file itself 
> to /usr/lib/rpm/macros.pld ?

IMO it would be better not to use %config() for file with distro macros.
So it can go to /usr/lib/rpm.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From glen at delfi.ee  Tue Jun 21 20:41:09 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:09 +0300
Subject: SPECS: perl-Class-ErrorHandler.spec (NEW), muttprint.spec,
	perl-Co...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_perl_Log_Info.spec.1.7@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_perl_Class_ErrorHandler.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_perl_Log_Info.spec.1.6@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_perl_Log_Info.spec.1.7@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506212141.09891.glen@delfi.ee>

i believe you commited too much!!

i suggest you to review the changes you commited on other files and fix commit 
messages possibly revert the changes.

On Tuesday 21 June 2005 20:51, czucz wrote:
> Author: czucz                        Date: Tue Jun 21 17:51:26 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - initial release
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    perl-Class-ErrorHandler.spec (NONE -> 1.1)  (NEW), muttprint.spec (1.24
> -> 1.25) , perl-Convert-PEM.spec (1.13 -> 1.14) , perl-Crypt-DSA.spec (1.16
> -> 1.17) , perl-Log-Info.spec (1.6 -> 1.7)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/perl-Class-ErrorHandler.spec
> diff -u /dev/null SPECS/perl-Class-ErrorHandler.spec:1.1
> --- /dev/null	Tue Jun 21 19:51:26 2005
> +++ SPECS/perl-Class-ErrorHandler.spec	Tue Jun 21 19:51:21 2005
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +# $Revision$, $Date$
> +# TODO:
> +# - Summary, desc
> +#
> +# Conditional build:
> +%bcond_without  tests   # do not perform "make test"
> +#
> +%include        /usr/lib/rpm/macros.perl
> +%define         pdir    Class
> +%define         pnam    ErrorHandler
> +Summary:        Class::ErrorHandler - base class for error handling
> +Name:           perl-Class-ErrorHandler
> +Version:        0.01
> +Release:        1
> +# same as perl
> +License:        GPL v1+ or Artistic
> +Group:          Development/Languages/Perl
> +Source0:       
> http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/%{pdir}/%{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{version}.ta
>r.gz +# Source0-md5:	6a07ad34dfcdf510677f92e47643976d
> +BuildRequires:  perl-devel >= 1:5.8.0
> +BuildRequires:  rpm-perlprov >= 4.1-13
> +BuildArch:      noarch
> +BuildRoot:      %{tmpdir}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(id -u -n)
> +
> +%description
> +This is Class::ErrorHandler, a base class for classes that need to do
> +error handling (which is, probably, most of them).
> +
> +%prep
> +%setup -q -n %{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{version}
> +
> +%build
> +%{__perl} Makefile.PL \
> +        INSTALLDIRS=vendor
> +
> +%{__make}
> +%{?with_tests:%{__make} test}
> +
> +%install
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> +
> +%{__make} install \
> +        DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> +
> +%clean
> +rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> +
> +%files
> +%defattr(644,root,root,755)
> +%doc Changes README
> +%{perl_vendorlib}/Class/ErrorHandler.pm
> +%{_mandir}/man3/*
> +
> +%define date    %(echo `LC_ALL="C" date +"%a %b %d %Y"`)
> +%changelog
> +* %{date} PLD Team <feedback at pld-linux.org>
> +All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
> +
> +$Log$
> +Revision 1.1  2005/06/21 17:51:21  czucz
> +- initial release
> +
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/muttprint.spec
> diff -u SPECS/muttprint.spec:1.24 SPECS/muttprint.spec:1.25
> --- SPECS/muttprint.spec:1.24	Sun Dec 26 18:11:02 2004
> +++ SPECS/muttprint.spec	Tue Jun 21 19:51:21 2005
> @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
>  Summary:	Formats the output of mail clients to a good-looking printing
>  Summary(pl):	Program formatuj?cy wyj?cie klient?w pocztowych w dobrze
> wygl?daj?cy wydruk Name:		muttprint
> -Version:	0.72c
> +Version:	0.72d
>  Release:	1
>  License:	GPL
>  Group:		Applications/Printing
>  Source0:	http://dl.sourceforge.net/muttprint/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> -# Source0-md5:	b3e99f8f6f37c0711f6e20f8cf3ef6cb
> +# Source0-md5:	cab04c11b7dfb29a9c3a6348a07b86a3
>  URL:		http://muttprint.sourceforge.net/
>  Requires:	perl-Text-Iconv
>  Requires:	psutils
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.25  2005/06/21 17:51:21  czucz
> +- initial release
> +
>  Revision 1.24  2004/12/26 17:11:02  adamg
>  - updated to 0.72c
>  - include %%{_bindir}/muttprint-langinfo
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec
> diff -u SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec:1.13 SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec:1.14
> --- SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec:1.13	Wed Nov  3 23:30:11 2004
> +++ SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec	Tue Jun 21 19:51:21 2005
> @@ -5,17 +5,18 @@
>  Summary:	Convert::PEM Perl module - access to ASN.1-encoded PEM files
>  Summary(pl):	Modu? Perla Convert::PEM - dost?p do plik?w PEM kodowanych
> ASN.1 Name:		perl-Convert-PEM
> -Version:	0.06
> -Release:	3
> +Version:	0.07
> +Release:	1
>  # same as perl
>  License:	GPL v1+ or Artistic
>  Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
> 
> Source0:	http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/%{pdir}/%{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{ve
>rsion}.tar.gz -# Source0-md5:	1f15fa7ee5026e722d1ac6855eff39e3
> +# Source0-md5:	d2188dd87446004c8da882b5a1f20412
>  BuildRequires:	perl-devel >= 1:5.8.0
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Convert-ASN1 >= 0.10
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Crypt-DES_EDE3
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Digest-MD5
> +BuildRequires:	perl-Class-ErrorHandler
>  BuildRequires:	rpm-perlprov >= 4.1-13
>  Requires:	perl(Convert::ASN1) >= 0.10
>  Requires:	perl-Crypt-DES_EDE3
> @@ -62,6 +63,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.14  2005/06/21 17:51:21  czucz
> +- initial release
> +
>  Revision 1.13  2004/11/03 22:30:11  paladine
>  - formatting
>
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec
> diff -u SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec:1.16 SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec:1.17
> --- SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec:1.16	Wed Nov  3 23:30:12 2004
> +++ SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec	Tue Jun 21 19:51:21 2005
> @@ -9,14 +9,15 @@
>  Summary:	Crypt::DSA Perl module - DSA signature and key generation
>  Summary(pl):	Modu? Perla Crypt::DSA - generuj?cy sygnatury i klucze DSA
>  Name:		perl-Crypt-DSA
> -Version:	0.12
> -Release:	4
> +Version:	0.13
> +Release:	1
>  # same as perl
>  License:	GPL v1+ or Artistic
>  Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
> 
> Source0:	http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/%{pdir}/%{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{ve
>rsion}.tar.gz -# Source0-md5:	7324f8d65f041b153b6b4beeaeb9a953
> +# Source0-md5:	269261448ecc6b3b82a854e3b774c4ae
>  %if %{with tests}
> +BuildRequires:	perl-Convert-PEM >= 0.07
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Crypt-Random >= 0.33
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Digest-SHA1
>  BuildRequires:	perl-Math-Pari >= 2.001804
> @@ -81,6 +82,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.17  2005/06/21 17:51:21  czucz
> +- initial release
> +
>  Revision 1.16  2004/11/03 22:30:12  paladine
>  - formatting
>
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec
> diff -u SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec:1.6 SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec:1.7
> --- SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec:1.6	Wed Nov  3 23:30:31 2004
> +++ SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec	Tue Jun 21 19:51:21 2005
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
>  Group:		Development/Languages/Perl
> 
> Source0:	http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/%{pdir}/%{pdir}-%{pnam}-%{ve
>rsion}.tar.gz # Source0-md5:	80c2e6320e22e25310790d8a34cc65f6
> +BuildRequires:  perl-Class-MethodMaker >= 1.02
> +BuildRequires:	perl-IPC-Run
> +BuildRequires:	perl-Term-ProgressBar
>  BuildRequires:	perl-devel >= 1:5.8.0
>  BuildRequires:	rpm-perlprov >= 4.1-13
>  BuildArch:	noarch
> @@ -66,6 +69,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.7  2005/06/21 17:51:21  czucz
> +- initial release
> +
>  Revision 1.6  2004/11/03 22:30:31  paladine
>  - formatting
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/muttprint.spec?r1=1.24&r2=1.25&f=u
>    
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/perl-Convert-PEM.spec?r1=1.13&r2=1.14&f=u
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/perl-Crypt-DSA.spec?r1=1.16&r2=1.17&f=u
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/perl-Log-Info.spec?r1=1.6&r2=1.7&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun 22 17:06:39 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:06:39 +0300
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.115@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_wget.spec.1.115@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>

On Wednesday 22 June 2005 12:47, saq wrote:
> Author: saq                          Date: Wed Jun 22 09:47:51 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - starting upgrade to 1.10
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    wget.spec (1.114 -> 1.115)
>
> ---- Diffs:
[...]

>  # $Revision$, $Date$
> -# TODO
> -# - -porn patch does not work with LFS
did you fix it that you removed todo? it doesn't look so!

[...]
> ?Patch9:????????????????%{name}-porn.patch
> -Patch10:???????%{name}-nonperm.patch
> -Patch11:	%{name}-1.9.1-LFS.patch
does 1.10 work with LFS?

> -Patch12:	%{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
this is also in 1.10?

[...]
>  #%%patch9 -p1
> -%patch10 -p1
> -%patch11 -p1
> -%patch12 -p1
[...]

-- 
glen


From saq at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 22 18:16:26 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:16:26 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_wget.spec.1.115@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> >  # $Revision$, $Date$
> > -# TODO
> > -# - -porn patch does not work with LFS
> did you fix it that you removed todo? it doesn't look so!

The LFS patch is no more. Now there's native large file support in wget.

> > -Patch11:	%{name}-1.9.1-LFS.patch
> does 1.10 work with LFS?

See above.

> > -Patch12:	%{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
> this is also in 1.10?

Actually, I'm pretty confident this patch was a no-op. It would
basically just rename one variable :/

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From glen at delfi.ee  Wed Jun 22 18:21:23 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:21:23 +0300
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>

On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:16, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > >  # $Revision$, $Date$
> > > -# TODO
> > > -# - -porn patch does not work with LFS
> >
> > did you fix it that you removed todo? it doesn't look so!
>
> The LFS patch is no more. Now there's native large file support in wget.
but the porn patch still doesn't apply? (it's not applied by default), so the 
TODO should stay (or rewritten as -porn patch doesn't apply)


-- 
glen


From saq at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 22 18:52:30 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:52:30 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 19:21 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > The LFS patch is no more. Now there's native large file support in wget.
> but the porn patch still doesn't apply?

Nope.

>  (it's not applied by default), so the 
> TODO should stay (or rewritten as -porn patch doesn't apply)

OK. But I've got an even better idea. Does anybody give a damn about
that patch? If so, make it apply. If not, I'll just remove it.

And what about Patch3 a.k.a. wget-lame_fs.patch? It's also been disabled
for quite some time, and it doesn't apply cleanly. Anybody feels like
fixing it?

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From twittner at o2.pl  Wed Jun 22 19:30:09 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:30:09 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <200506221930.10260.twittner@o2.pl>

On Wed 22. of June 2005 18:16, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
[...]
> > > -Patch12:	%{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
> >
> > this is also in 1.10?
>
> Actually, I'm pretty confident this patch was a no-op. It would
> basically just rename one variable :/
You are no-op - I'm pretty confident you overlooked something:
-  { "useragent",   NULL,           cmd_spec_useragent },
+  { "useragent",   &opt.user_agent,    cmd_spec_useragent },

Please, adapt to new wget and restore this patch. I've tested it twice before 
commiting - it works.
-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 22 19:42:51 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:42:51 +0200
Subject: New task #5664 in fastjar: Conflicting P/O with gcc-java-tools
In-Reply-To: <task-5664@bugs.pld-linux.org>
References: <task-5664@bugs.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050622174251.GA20181@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:23:05PM +0200, Flyspray - The bug killer! wrote:
> Project: PLD 2.x (Ac)
> 
>   Reported by: Patryk Zawadzki (patrys)
>       Package: fastjar
>       Version: 0.93
>       Summary: Conflicting P/O with gcc-java-tools
>   
>   Fastjar provides the fastjar binary (required by D-BUS Java bindings)
> and obsoletes gcc-java-tools (directly b-required by D-BUS). Currently I
> am unable to build dbus.spec with Java bindings because it requires both
> gcc-java-tools and fastjar binary.

fastjar binary is part of gcc-java package in gcc >= 4.0.
To use gcc-java-tools 3.x "jar" command should be used instead of
"fastjar" (it's the same program anyway).


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From patrys at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 22 20:05:02 2005
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:05:02 +0200
Subject: New task #5664 in fastjar: Conflicting P/O with gcc-java-tools
In-Reply-To: <20050622174251.GA20181@gruby.cs.net.pl>
References: <task-5664@bugs.pld-linux.org>
	<20050622174251.GA20181@gruby.cs.net.pl>
Message-ID: <1119463502.7904.3.camel@localhost>

Dnia 22-06-2005, ?ro o godzinie 19:42 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisa?(a):
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:23:05PM +0200, Flyspray - The bug killer! wrote:
> > Project: PLD 2.x (Ac)
> > 
> >   Reported by: Patryk Zawadzki (patrys)
> >       Package: fastjar
> >       Version: 0.93
> >       Summary: Conflicting P/O with gcc-java-tools
> >   
> >   Fastjar provides the fastjar binary (required by D-BUS Java bindings)
> > and obsoletes gcc-java-tools (directly b-required by D-BUS). Currently I
> > am unable to build dbus.spec with Java bindings because it requires both
> > gcc-java-tools and fastjar binary.
> 
> fastjar binary is part of gcc-java package in gcc >= 4.0.
> To use gcc-java-tools 3.x "jar" command should be used instead of
> "fastjar" (it's the same program anyway).

Thanks, bug closed.

-- 
Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050622/dafd6be4/attachment.sig>

From twittner at o2.pl  Wed Jun 22 20:27:14 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:27:14 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <200506221930.10260.twittner@o2.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221930.10260.twittner@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <200506222027.14630.twittner@o2.pl>

On Wed 22. of June 2005 19:30, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Wed 22. of June 2005 18:16, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > -Patch12:	%{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
> > >
> > > this is also in 1.10?
> >
> > Actually, I'm pretty confident this patch was a no-op. It would
> > basically just rename one variable :/
Ech - it seems you are right.
> You are no-op - I'm pretty confident you overlooked something:
> -  { "useragent",   NULL,           cmd_spec_useragent },
> +  { "useragent",   &opt.user_agent,    cmd_spec_useragent },
>
> Please, adapt to new wget and restore this patch. I've tested it twice
> before commiting - it works.
Sorry - I've just checked wget-1.9.10 and wget-1.10 without this patch - 
user_agent = blabla in ~/.wgetrc works. I don't know why - what is the 
meaning of 2nd field of struct commands[] = (from src/init.c)?

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From saq at pld-linux.org  Wed Jun 22 22:15:33 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:15:33 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <200506222027.14630.twittner@o2.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221930.10260.twittner@o2.pl> <200506222027.14630.twittner@o2.pl>
Message-ID: <1119471333.5240.15.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 20:27 +0200, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> Sorry - I've just checked wget-1.9.10 and wget-1.10 without this patch - 
> user_agent = blabla in ~/.wgetrc works. I don't know why - what is the 
> meaning of 2nd field of struct commands[] = (from src/init.c)?

It's passed to the setter function (cmd_spec_useragent in this case) as
the third argument. cmd_spec_useragent's third argument is called "void
*place_ignored", and that's for a reason.

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From michal at michal.waw.pl  Thu Jun 23 12:51:31 2005
From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:51:31 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:52:30PM +0200, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> And what about Patch3 a.k.a. wget-lame_fs.patch? It's also been disabled
> for quite some time, and it doesn't apply cleanly. Anybody feels like
> fixing it?

That'd be nice. Without this patch you can't wget website on linux and
transfer it to windows. wget's built-in option doesn't handle all
situations (especially utf-8 in URLs).

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!!


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun 23 13:25:33 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:25:33 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
Message-ID: <20050623112533.GA19328@aramin.net>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > And what about Patch3 a.k.a. wget-lame_fs.patch? It's also been disabled
> > for quite some time, and it doesn't apply cleanly. Anybody feels like
> > fixing it?
> 
> That'd be nice. Without this patch you can't wget website on linux and
> transfer it to windows. wget's built-in option doesn't handle all
> situations (especially utf-8 in URLs).
SOD #1 ;)

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From saq at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun 23 15:41:36 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:41:36 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
Message-ID: <1119534096.5599.0.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 12:51 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > And what about Patch3 a.k.a. wget-lame_fs.patch? It's also been disabled
> > for quite some time, and it doesn't apply cleanly. Anybody feels like
> > fixing it?
> 
> That'd be nice. Without this patch you can't wget website on linux and
> transfer it to windows. wget's built-in option doesn't handle all
> situations (especially utf-8 in URLs).

wget&&zip ?

And yes, SOD#1. What else did you expect?

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From michal at michal.waw.pl  Thu Jun 23 17:39:40 2005
From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:39:40 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <1119534096.5599.0.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
	<1119534096.5599.0.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <20050623153939.GI17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:41:36PM +0200, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> wget&&zip ?

How do you expect this to work? You still can't extract the ZIP on
Windows as it contains not allowed characters.

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!!


From michal at michal.waw.pl  Thu Jun 23 17:40:31 2005
From: michal at michal.waw.pl (Michal Kochanowicz)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:40:31 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <20050623112533.GA19328@aramin.net>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
	<20050623112533.GA19328@aramin.net>
Message-ID: <20050623154031.GJ17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:25:33PM +0200, The Undefined wrote:
> SOD #1 ;)

What for? For be ignored like most of my patches?

-- 
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal at michal.waw.pl =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po g?rach SSIE!!!


From undefine at aramin.net  Thu Jun 23 20:28:22 2005
From: undefine at aramin.net (The Undefined)
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:28:22 +0200
Subject: SPECS: wget.spec - starting upgrade to 1.10
In-Reply-To: <20050623154031.GJ17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
References: <SPECS_wget.spec.1.114@pld-linux.org>
	<200506221806.40042.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119456986.5240.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<200506221921.23755.glen@delfi.ee>
	<1119459150.5240.11.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050623105131.GH17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
	<20050623112533.GA19328@aramin.net>
	<20050623154031.GJ17383@woland.michal.waw.pl>
Message-ID: <20050623182822.GA16897@aramin.net>

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > SOD #1 ;)
> 
> What for? For be ignored like most of my patches?
no, to put into cvs.

-- 
Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopiera?a
UNIX && Linux administrator,      Adam Mickiewicz University WMiI
PLD Linux Developer      HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/
JID: undefine at piastlan.net         e-mail: andrzej at dopierala.name


From zawadaa at gmail.com  Fri Jun 24 00:05:51 2005
From: zawadaa at gmail.com (Andrzej Zawadzki)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:05:51 +0200
Subject: FTP?
Message-ID: <42BB323F.1070407@gmail.com>

NEO
# poldek --upa
Pobieranie
ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)
Pobieranie
ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)

host ftp.pld-linux.org
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
ftp.cz.pld-linux.org has address 81.95.106.52
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.

Something is wrong...

NETIA
BTW. Different host:$ host ftp.pld-linux.org
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.
ftp.atm.pld-linux.org has address 217.149.246.5
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.
ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.

and everything is OK

-- 
Andrzej Zawadzki


From devel-pl at pld-dc.org  Fri Jun 24 00:15:57 2005
From: devel-pl at pld-dc.org (Marcin =?iso-8859-2?q?Doli=F1ski?=)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:15:57 +0200
Subject: FTP?
In-Reply-To: <42BB323F.1070407@gmail.com>
References: <42BB323F.1070407@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200506240015.57380.devel-pl@pld-dc.org>

On Friday 24 of June 2005 00:05, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
> NEO
> # poldek --upa
> Pobieranie
> ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
> b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
> pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)
> Pobieranie
> ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
> b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
> pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)
>
> host ftp.pld-linux.org
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
> ftp.cz.pld-linux.org has address 81.95.106.52
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
>
> Something is wrong...
No. This is view for TPNET subnets.

>
> NETIA
> BTW. Different host:$ host ftp.pld-linux.org
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.
> ftp.atm.pld-linux.org has address 217.149.246.5
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.
> ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.atm.pld-linux.org.
>
> and everything is OK

-- 
Marcin Doli?ski
PLD Linux Distribution
http://www.pld-linux.org/


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Fri Jun 24 00:34:03 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:34:03 +0200
Subject: FTP?
In-Reply-To: <200506240015.57380.devel-pl@pld-dc.org>
References: <42BB323F.1070407@gmail.com>
	<200506240015.57380.devel-pl@pld-dc.org>
Message-ID: <20050623223403.GB21738@fngna.oyu>

On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 12:15:57AM +0200, Marcin Doli?ski wrote:
> On Friday 24 of June 2005 00:05, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote:
> > NEO
> > # poldek --upa
> > Pobieranie
> > ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
> > b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
> > pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)
> > Pobieranie
> > ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd...
> > b??d: vftp: /dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/packages.dir.mdd: nie ma takiego
> > pliku (odpowied? serwera: allowed.)
> >
> > host ftp.pld-linux.org
> > ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> > ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
> > ftp.cz.pld-linux.org has address 81.95.106.52
> > ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> > ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
> > ftp.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp3.pld-linux.org.
> > ftp3.pld-linux.org is an alias for ftp.cz.pld-linux.org.
> >
> > Something is wrong...
> No. This is view for TPNET subnets.

And doesn't work ATM (but poldek truncates server message, thus
showing only strange "allowed." as the reason):

lftp ftp.pld-linux.org:/dists/ac/ready/athlon> get packages.dir.mdd
get: Brak dost?pu: 550-The load was 5.46 when you connected. We do not allow downloads by anonymous
users when the load is that high. Uploads are always allowed. (packages.dir.mdd)


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From saq at pld-linux.org  Sat Jun 25 03:38:54 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 03:38:54 +0200
Subject: lam.spec
Message-ID: <1119663534.23278.1.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

[saq at neptune SPECS]$ sudo poldek --shcmd='desc lam'
[...] LAM/MPI can use TCP/IP and/or shared memory for
message passing (currently, different RPMs are supplied for this --
see the main LAM web site for details).
[...]
[saq at neptune SPECS]$ grep %files lam.spec
%files

May the liar step forward.

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Sat Jun 25 05:07:31 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:07:31 +0200
Subject: lam.spec
In-Reply-To: <1119663534.23278.1.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
References: <1119663534.23278.1.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
Message-ID: <20050625030731.GA23732@fngna.oyu>

On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:38:54AM +0200, Pawe? Sakowski wrote:
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$ sudo poldek --shcmd='desc lam'
> [...] LAM/MPI can use TCP/IP and/or shared memory for
> message passing (currently, different RPMs are supplied for this --
> see the main LAM web site for details).
> [...]
> [saq at neptune SPECS]$ grep %files lam.spec
> %files
> 
> May the liar step forward.

Probably copied from some README or other distro desc?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From saq at pld-linux.org  Sat Jun 25 14:58:55 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:58:55 +0200
Subject: lam.spec
In-Reply-To: <20050625030731.GA23732@fngna.oyu>
References: <1119663534.23278.1.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>
	<20050625030731.GA23732@fngna.oyu>
Message-ID: <1119704335.5243.0.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 05:07 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > [saq at neptune SPECS]$ sudo poldek --shcmd='desc lam'
> > [...] LAM/MPI can use TCP/IP and/or shared memory for
> > message passing (currently, different RPMs are supplied for this --
> > see the main LAM web site for details).
> > [...]
> > [saq at neptune SPECS]$ grep %files lam.spec
> > %files
> > 
> > May the liar step forward.
> 
> Probably copied from some README or other distro desc?

Probably. But still incorrect and misleading.

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl  Sun Jun 26 02:23:57 2005
From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz)
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: maradns
Message-ID: <200506260023.j5Q0NvLV029287@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>

/bin/id: maradns: No such user
Stopping maraDNS service...........................................[ DONE ]
Starting maraDNS service...........................................[ FAIL ]

bad useradd condition ?
missing trigger ?

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology


From glen at delfi.ee  Sun Jun 26 02:40:48 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 03:40:48 +0300
Subject: maradns
In-Reply-To: <200506260023.j5Q0NvLV029287@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200506260023.j5Q0NvLV029287@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Message-ID: <200506260340.48516.glen@delfi.ee>

On Sunday 26 June 2005 03:23, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> /bin/id: maradns: No such user
> Stopping maraDNS service...........................................[ DONE ]
> Starting maraDNS service...........................................[ FAIL ]
>
> bad useradd condition ?
[ condition1 -a condition2 ] 
vs 
[ condition1 ] && [ condition2 ] 
issue

for the first case condition2 is evaluated, while for second version it isn't.

fixed in cvs.

> missing trigger ?

-- 
glen


From saq at pld-linux.org  Sun Jun 26 18:06:02 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:06:02 +0200
Subject: PLD-BTS/trunk/flyspray/scripts/details.php
In-Reply-To: <6187@svn.pld-linux.org>
References: <6187@svn.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1119801963.5241.4.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 17:54 +0200, jajcus wrote:
> - another XML well-formedness (and cross-site scripting) bug fixed. (this code is a stinking piece of crap)

So you're saying that having a flock of flies in the logo is
well-deserved? ;-)

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From saq at pld-linux.org  Sun Jun 26 19:09:54 2005
From: saq at pld-linux.org (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Sakowski)
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 19:09:54 +0200
Subject: SPECS: mythtv.spec - updated to 0.18.1, NFY
In-Reply-To: <200506261647.j5QGlnnZ032223@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
References: <200506261647.j5QGlnnZ032223@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Message-ID: <1119805794.5241.6.camel@neptune.sakowski.pl>

On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 18:47 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> averne wrote:
> > -ExclusiveArch:	i386 i686 athlon x86_64
> > +ExclusiveArch:	i386 i686 athlon x86_64 amd64
> 
> Why not %{x8664} ?

And what about i586 (and the rest of %{ix86})?

-- 
Pawe? Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution



From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Sun Jun 26 21:07:37 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:07:37 +0200
Subject: SPECS: smalltalk.spec - up to 2.1.11
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_smalltalk.spec.1.64@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_smalltalk.spec.1.63@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_smalltalk.spec.1.64@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050626190737.GA15198@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:30:29AM +0200, undefine wrote:
> +# why patch to excluded architecture?
> +# %patch4 -p1 

Because development versions (which support parameters passing properly
using libffi) needed this patch too (at the time I checked them), so
I decided to commit in order not to lose it.
See comment before ExclusiveArch.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 10:01:36 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:01:36 +0300
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee>

jeee!!! jippiiii!!! partyy!!!!

On Thursday 30 June 2005 01:41, baggins wrote:
> Author: baggins                      Date: Wed Jun 29 22:41:48 2005 GMT
> Module: SOURCES                       Tag: AC-branch
> ---- Log message:
> - removed stty erase setting to `tput kbs` as it causes nothing but
> problems
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SOURCES:
>    bashrc (1.14.2.12 -> 1.14.2.13)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SOURCES/bashrc
> diff -u SOURCES/bashrc:1.14.2.12 SOURCES/bashrc:1.14.2.13
> --- SOURCES/bashrc:1.14.2.12	Mon Jun 27 12:01:15 2005
> +++ SOURCES/bashrc	Thu Jun 30 00:41:43 2005
> @@ -22,6 +22,3 @@
>  	done
>  	unset i
>  fi
> -
> -[ -n "$TERM" -a "$TERM" != "rxvt" -a "$TERM" != "screen" ] && tty
> >/dev/null 2>&1 && \ -	tput kbs >/dev/null 2>&1 && stty erase `tput kbs`
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>     http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SOURCES/bashrc?r1=1.14.2.12&r2=1.14.2.13&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 10:03:22 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:03:22 +0300
Subject: SPECS (DEVEL): amarok.spec - up to 1.3beta2
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_amarok.spec.1.35.2.25@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_amarok.spec.1.35.2.24@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_amarok.spec.1.35.2.25@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506301103.22212.glen@delfi.ee>

hehe


On Wednesday 29 June 2005 23:57, averne wrote:
> Author: averne                       Date: Wed Jun 29 20:57:28 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: DEVEL
> ---- Log message:
> - up to 1.3beta2
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    amarok.spec (1.35.2.24 -> 1.35.2.25)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/amarok.spec
> diff -u SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.24 SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.25
> --- SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.24	Mon Jun 27 15:55:54 2005
> +++ SPECS/amarok.spec	Wed Jun 29 22:57:23 2005
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>  Summary(pl):	Odtwarzacz audio dla KDE
>  Name:		amarok
>  Version:	1.3
> -Release:	0.%{_beta}.1
> +Release:	0.%{_beta}.2
>  License:	GPL
>  Group:		X11/Applications/Multimedia
> 
> Source0:	http://dl.sourceforge.net/amarok/%{name}-%{version}-%{_beta}.tar.b
>z2 @@ -252,6 +252,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.35.2.25  2005/06/29 20:57:23  averne
> +- up to 1.3beta2
> +
>  Revision 1.35.2.24  2005/06/27 13:55:54  paszczus
>  - updated to 1.3beta2
>
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>    
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/amarok.spec?r1=1.35.2.24&r2=1.35.2.25&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 15:42:44 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:42:44 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050630134244.GA769@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:01:36 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:

> jeee!!! jippiiii!!! partyy!!!!

Yeah, brilliant idea:

$ infocmp | grep kbs
        is2=\E7\E[r\E[m\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l\E[4l\E8\E>, kbs=^H, 
$ stty -a | grep erase
intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
eol2 = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; werase = ^W;

Here you got geniuses:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11294#c13
http://howtos.linux.com/howtos/BackspaceDelete/system.shtml                                        
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-users/2004-07/msg00003.html                               

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 16:09:38 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:09:38 +0300
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630134244.GA769@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
Message-ID: <200506301709.39161.glen@delfi.ee>

On Thursday 30 June 2005 16:42, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:01:36 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > jeee!!! jippiiii!!! partyy!!!!
>
> Yeah, brilliant idea:
so if you're so smart, perhaps you implement it in a way it works everywhere 
(for me) not partially (for you)?

> $ infocmp | grep kbs
>         is2=\E7\E[r\E[m\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l\E[4l\E8\E>, kbs=^H,
> $ stty -a | grep erase
> intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
> eol2 = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; werase = ^W;
>
> Here you got geniuses:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c13
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c14
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11294#c13
> http://howtos.linux.com/howtos/BackspaceDelete/system.shtml
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-users/2004-07/msg00003.html

-- 
glen


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Thu Jun 30 16:12:37 2005
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 16:12:37 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630134244.GA769@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
Message-ID: <20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tomasz Pala wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:01:36 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> 
> > jeee!!! jippiiii!!! partyy!!!!
> 
> Yeah, brilliant idea:
> 
> $ infocmp | grep kbs
>         is2=\E7\E[r\E[m\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l\E[4l\E8\E>, kbs=^H, 
> $ stty -a | grep erase
> intr = ^C; quit = ^\; erase = ^?; kill = ^U; eof = ^D; eol = <undef>;
> eol2 = <undef>; start = ^Q; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; rprnt = ^R; werase = ^W;
> 
> Here you got geniuses:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c13
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77833#c14
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11294#c13
> http://howtos.linux.com/howtos/BackspaceDelete/system.shtml                                        
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-users/2004-07/msg00003.html                               

And because RH is just srewed we have to be more?
Come on, I have _never_ had any problems with it _until_ you "fixed" it.

Janek
-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From twittner at o2.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:15:20 2005
From: twittner at o2.pl (Tomasz Wittner)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:15:20 +0200
Subject: SPECS (DEVEL): amarok.spec - up to 1.3beta2
In-Reply-To: <200506301103.22212.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SPECS_amarok.spec.1.35.2.24@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_amarok.spec.1.35.2.25@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301103.22212.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <200506301815.21338.twittner@o2.pl>

On Thu 30. of June 2005 10:03, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> hehe
I'm rather sad:

http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SPECS/amarok.spec :

1.35.2.25 Wed Jun 29 20:57:23 2005  by averne 
Branch: DEVEL
Diffs to 1.35.2.24 
- up to 1.3beta2

1.35.2.24 Mon Jun 27 13:55:54 2005  by paszczus 
Branch: DEVEL
Diffs to 1.35.2.23 
- updated to 1.3beta2

Does he know what is `cvs log' for?
>
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 23:57, averne wrote:
> > Author: averne                       Date: Wed Jun 29 20:57:28 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: DEVEL
> > ---- Log message:
> > - up to 1.3beta2
> >
> > ---- Files affected:
> > SPECS:
> >    amarok.spec (1.35.2.24 -> 1.35.2.25)
> >
> > ---- Diffs:
> >
> > ================================================================
> > Index: SPECS/amarok.spec
> > diff -u SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.24 SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.25
> > --- SPECS/amarok.spec:1.35.2.24	Mon Jun 27 15:55:54 2005
> > +++ SPECS/amarok.spec	Wed Jun 29 22:57:23 2005
> > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> >  Summary(pl):	Odtwarzacz audio dla KDE
> >  Name:		amarok
> >  Version:	1.3
> > -Release:	0.%{_beta}.1
> > +Release:	0.%{_beta}.2
[...]

-- 
Tomasz Wittner


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:25:21 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:25:21 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <200506301709.39161.glen@delfi.ee>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<200506301709.39161.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <20050630162521.GA1061@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 17:09:38 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:

> so if you're so smart, perhaps you implement it in a way it works everywhere 
> (for me) not partially (for you)?

Just tell me what doesn't work PARTIALLY for you (as it works everywhere
for me).

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:26:14 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:26:14 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <20050630162614.GB1061@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 16:12:37 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:

> And because RH is just srewed we have to be more?

You could just read this.

> Come on, I have _never_ had any problems with it _until_ you "fixed" it.

You've got my bugreport with testcase, #5671 AFAIR.
And what are your problems?

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:27:49 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:27:49 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630162614.GB1061@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os>
Message-ID: <20050630162749.GA1125@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 18:26:14 +0200, GoTaR wrote:

> > And because RH is just srewed we have to be more?
> 
> You could just read this.

Just to be precise: we are screwed, RH has fixed everything (including
broken screen).

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:37:25 2005
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:37:25 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630162614.GB1061@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os>
Message-ID: <20050630163725.GS7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tomasz Pala wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 16:12:37 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> 
> > And because RH is just srewed we have to be more?
> 
> You could just read this.

I did.

> > Come on, I have _never_ had any problems with it _until_ you "fixed" it.
> 
> You've got my bugreport with testcase, #5671 AFAIR.
> And what are your problems?

Randomly non-working backspace in every xterm[1]/screen/whatever combination.
It just works without your "fix".

[1] xterm in this case means "any and every terminal emulator in X11".

Janek
-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 18:47:40 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:47:40 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630162749.GA1125@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os> <20050630162749.GA1125@os>
Message-ID: <20050630164740.GA1427@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 18:27:49 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:

> > You could just read this.
> 
> Just to be precise: we are screwed, RH has fixed everything (including
> broken screen).

Debian is the same. So we've got ridiculous situation: RH/FC/Debian
works everywhere, PLD works fine locally and remotely with RH/FC/Debian,
but it's not working remotely with _another PLD_. And you say, that RH
is screwed up, right? Do you mean that RH in some magic way has
influenced PLD-PLD interoperability, mhmm? Interesting.

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 19:11:58 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 19:11:58 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630163725.GS7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os>
	<20050630163725.GS7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <20050630171158.GA1660@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 18:37:25 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:

> Randomly non-working backspace in every xterm[1]/screen/whatever combination.

Great, now I can reproduce and trace it. Thanks a lot.

> It just works without your "fix".

It works just because readline understand hardcoded ^? sequence. ncurses
has not.

EOT

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 20:26:57 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:26:57 +0300
Subject: SPECS: traceroute-nanog.spec - double %%
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.29@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.28@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.29@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <200506302126.58368.glen@delfi.ee>

why?
PLD rpm supports it (single percent in rpm changelog) since 2001!

revision 1.233
date: 2001/08/30 22:42:41;  author: filon;  state: Exp;  lines: +6 -1
- added patch %%{name}-noexpand, which disable expanding of macros in 
%%changelog and %%description sections


On Thursday 30 June 2005 21:14, speedy wrote:
> Author: speedy                       Date: Thu Jun 30 18:14:21 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - double %%
>
> ---- Files affected:
> SPECS:
>    traceroute-nanog.spec (1.28 -> 1.29)
>
> ---- Diffs:
>
> ================================================================
> Index: SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec
> diff -u SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec:1.28 SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec:1.29
> --- SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec:1.28	Tue Nov  2 10:47:50 2004
> +++ SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec	Thu Jun 30 20:14:15 2005
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@
>  All persons listed below can be reached at <cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>  $Log$
> +Revision 1.29  2005/06/30 18:14:15  speedy
> +- double %%
> +
>  Revision 1.28  2004/11/02 09:47:50  areq
>  - kill *
>
> @@ -136,8 +139,8 @@
>  - added passing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS,
>  - changed License to distributable.
>  - changed Group to Applications/Networking,
> -- added "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" on top %install,
> -- added gzipping %doc.
> +- added "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" on top %%install,
> +- added gzipping %%doc.
>
>  * Thu Jan 20 2000 ?ukasz Tr?bi?ski <lukasz at pld.org.pl>
>  - cosmetics
> ================================================================
>
> ---- CVS-web:
>    
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/traceroute-nanog.spec?r1=1.28&r2=1.29&f=u
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-cvs-commit mailing list
> pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit

-- 
glen


From robert.wozny at gmail.com  Thu Jun 30 21:30:51 2005
From: robert.wozny at gmail.com (robert j. wozny)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:30:51 +0200
Subject: SPECS: traceroute-nanog.spec - double %%
References: <SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.28@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.29@pld-linux.org>
	<200506302126.58368.glen@delfi.ee>
Message-ID: <gnus.x7irzvd4lw.fsf@hell.ziew.org>

Quoting glen at delfi.ee ("Elan Ruusam?e"):

> why?
> PLD rpm supports it (single percent in rpm changelog) since 2001!

> revision 1.233
> date: 2001/08/30 22:42:41;  author: filon;  state: Exp;  lines: +6 -1
> - added patch %%{name}-noexpand, which disable expanding of macros in 
> %%changelog and %%description sections

khm. i've got: 

error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo

-- 
robert j. wozny
... Zycie biegnie wahadlowym ruchem miedzy bolem i nuda, 
a sa to faktycznie jego ostateczne skladniki. (Artur Schopenhauer)


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 21:36:29 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:36:29 +0300
Subject: SPECS: traceroute-nanog.spec - double %%
In-Reply-To: <gnus.x7irzvd4lw.fsf@hell.ziew.org>
References: <SPECS_traceroute_nanog.spec.1.28@pld-linux.org>
	<200506302126.58368.glen@delfi.ee>
	<gnus.x7irzvd4lw.fsf@hell.ziew.org>
Message-ID: <200506302236.34035.glen@delfi.ee>

On Thursday 30 June 2005 22:30, robert j. wozny wrote:
> Quoting glen at delfi.ee ("Elan Ruusam?e"):
> > why?
> > PLD rpm supports it (single percent in rpm changelog) since 2001!
> >
> > revision 1.233
> > date: 2001/08/30 22:42:41;  author: filon;  state: Exp;  lines: +6 -1
> > - added patch %%{name}-noexpand, which disable expanding of macros in
> > %%changelog and %%description sections
>
> khm. i've got:
>
> error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
works here. (rpm-4.4.1-3, rpm-4.3-0.20040107.62)
what is your rpm?

and %package debuginfo, this definately isn't against traceroute-nanog.spec!
so post more details!

-- 
glen


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Thu Jun 30 22:04:42 2005
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:04:42 +0200
Subject: SPECS: winetools.spec - use Xdialog package,
	so this package goes ...
In-Reply-To: <SPECS_winetools.spec.1.6@pld-linux.org>
References: <SPECS_winetools.spec.1.5@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_winetools.spec.1.6@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20050630200442.GA23024@gruby.cs.net.pl>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:14:05PM +0200, glen wrote:
> Author: glen                         Date: Wed Jun 29 18:14:05 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - use Xdialog package, so this package goes noarch

>  Requires:	perl-base
>  Requires:	wget
>  Requires:	wine
> +Requires:	Xdialog
> +BuildArch:	noarch
>  ExclusiveArch:	%{ix86}

Aren't BuildArch and ExclusiveArch mutually exclusive?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Thu Jun 30 22:19:50 2005
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:19:50 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630164740.GA1427@os>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os> <20050630162749.GA1125@os>
	<20050630164740.GA1427@os>
Message-ID: <20050630201950.GA11311@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Tomasz Pala wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 18:27:49 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> 
> > > You could just read this.
> > 
> > Just to be precise: we are screwed, RH has fixed everything (including
> > broken screen).
> 
> Debian is the same. So we've got ridiculous situation: RH/FC/Debian
> works everywhere, PLD works fine locally and remotely with RH/FC/Debian,
> but it's not working remotely with _another PLD_. And you say, that RH
> is screwed up, right? Do you mean that RH in some magic way has
> influenced PLD-PLD interoperability, mhmm? Interesting.

Oh, great all knowing!
Please show me _where_ exactly stty erase is set to tput kbs in Debian
and FC. I'm looking all over /etc in those two distributions and just
can not find it. And, yes, so happens that I have both installed and
both are quite fresh.

It seems to me they have fixed your problems some other, proper, way.
You just didn't look deep enough.

Janek
-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From gotar at polanet.pl  Thu Jun 30 23:00:44 2005
From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:00:44 +0200
Subject: SOURCES (AC-branch): bashrc - removed stty erase setting to `tput
	...
In-Reply-To: <20050630201950.GA11311@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.12@pld-linux.org>
	<SOURCES_bashrc.1.14.2.13@pld-linux.org>
	<200506301101.36332.glen@delfi.ee> <20050630134244.GA769@os>
	<20050630141237.GQ7452@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
	<20050630162614.GB1061@os> <20050630162749.GA1125@os>
	<20050630164740.GA1427@os>
	<20050630201950.GA11311@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <20050630210044.GA3175@os>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 22:19:50 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:

> Please show me _where_ exactly stty erase is set to tput kbs in Debian
> and FC.

That's the question I was trying to answer for a few days. Without
success. They used to do this even a year ago, after that sth else was
changed... I cannot find any trace.

> I'm looking all over /etc in those two distributions and just
> can not find it.

That's right.

> And, yes, so happens that I have both installed and
> both are quite fresh.
> 
> It seems to me they have fixed your problems some other, proper, way.
> You just didn't look deep enough.

For now I only suspect one thing: they use termcap, we use terminfo.
I've already smashed one of my systems - bash, pam, sshd, readline,
terminfo databases taken from Debian, and no change.
There's other workaround possible - changing behavior of xterm to
produce ^? instead of ^H:
	~Meta<Key>BackSpace: string(\177)\n\
Is hardcoded and recognized by readline, and it would be the same as
stty setting for ncurses, but it's not the right way. The same as using
[ "$TERM" = "xterm ] && tset -e

Really there's noone here who knows, where the hell is source of stty
settings after remote login?

-- 
GoTaR <priv0.onet.pl->gotar>        http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                    http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


From glen at delfi.ee  Thu Jun 30 23:56:55 2005
From: glen at delfi.ee (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 00:56:55 +0300
Subject: SPECS: winetools.spec - use Xdialog package,
	so this package goes ...
In-Reply-To: <20050630200442.GA23024@gruby.cs.net.pl>
References: <SPECS_winetools.spec.1.5@pld-linux.org>
	<SPECS_winetools.spec.1.6@pld-linux.org>
	<20050630200442.GA23024@gruby.cs.net.pl>
Message-ID: <200507010056.59615.glen@delfi.ee>

On Thursday 30 June 2005 23:04, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 08:14:05PM +0200, glen wrote:
> > Author: glen                         Date: Wed Jun 29 18:14:05 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS                         Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - use Xdialog package, so this package goes noarch
> >
> >  Requires:	perl-base
> >  Requires:	wget
> >  Requires:	wine
> > +Requires:	Xdialog
> > +BuildArch:	noarch
> >  ExclusiveArch:	%{ix86}
>
> Aren't BuildArch and ExclusiveArch mutually exclusive?
hmm, tricky. the package itself has nothing archidecture specific inside (just 
scripts), but it's not much of useful for other archidectures than wine runs, 
which is at this time %{ix86}

so i don't know, probably should remove EA?

-- 
glen