cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> > 
> > [baggins at sith rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS 
> > 959M    SOURCES
> > 63M     SPECS
> 
> Obviously svn makes no sense with such file organization (in two
> directories). To allow reasonable branching, each package would have to
> have a directory of its own. Which is a good idea anyway, but probably
> it's not worth changing now.

How would I make "cvs up SPECS" (without getting any SOURCES) then?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/