cvs vs svn...

[Piotr Szymanski]

Hi,
wrobell (Friday 09 of September 2005 10:42):
> which is de facto the branch name... so, what's the problem?
lenght?

djurban at djurban ~ $ cd rpm/SPECS/
djurban at djurban SPECS $ up koffice.spec
P koffice.spec
djurban at djurban SPECS $ vi koffice.spec
djurban at djurban SPECS $ up -r DEVEL koffice.spec
P koffice.spec
djurban at djurban SPECS $ vi koffice.spec
djurban at djurban SPECS $

I needed to check some parts of the spec in different branches, i do that very 
often, now try do this with a not greater number of words in commands with 
svn. 

Not to mention that after a probable reorganisation doingh such stuff would 
mean rechecking folders (per package folders), which sucks, because some 
package could be sharing sources but have different setups on branches or in 
specs, but the tarballs would remain the same, that would be another 
disadvantage.
-- 
Piotr Szymanski
djurban at pld-linux.org