cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW),

[wrobell]

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 17:57 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 09 of September 2005 17:19, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> 
> > > How would I make "cvs up SPECS" (without getting any SOURCES) then?
> >
> > /me would like also to do sth like:
> >
> > rsync -a some-rsync-pld-server::cvs/SPECS
> >
> > (and minimizing network activity while doing this, of course)
> 
> Do you remember about atomic commits in svn? It's not possible due to that 
> (and atomic commits is much important feature than rsyncing specs only). 
> 
> It's possible to provide rsync access to the whole tree but without history - 
> then you will be able to fetch specs only for example.

hm... what about svk instead of rsync?

  wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>