kernel devel provides obsoletes
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl
Thu Aug 31 19:54:47 CEST 2006
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Dnia 31-08-2006, czw o godzinie 19:28 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisaĹ(a):
> > On Thursday 31 August 2006 17:26, havner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:10:50PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > > %package headers
> > > > Provides: kernel-i2c-devel
> > > > Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel
> > >
> > > If that worked as it should you wouldn't have conflicts but proper
> > > obsoletes.
> > what is "should work" ? ;)
> >
> > if each kernel-headers provides kernel-i2c-devel and other one obsoletes,
> > surely it would be marked as removed.
> >
> > for the resolution i suggest removing 'Provides: kernel-i2c-devel' so other
> > package Obsolete: wouldn't mark (all!) kernel-headers packages
>
> Isn't it possible to write Obsoletes: kernel-i2c-devel < 2.6.0?
1. The Provides are not versioned.
2. What about kernel24-headers? No longer needed on builders?
--
=======================================================================
Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list