AC TODO [03/01/2006]

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:16:52PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> There left only a few things todo in dependencies area (and much more in other 
> areas)
> 
> all arches:
> bd: lilypond-2.2.4-2: req libkpathsea.so.3.4.5 not found
> - I'm going to put all ghostscripts we have into ac (if they will compile)

At least -esp from HEAD does.

> bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp-gnome-1.0.10-4: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch
> bd: dotnet-gtk-sharp2-gnome-2.5.91-3: req gtkhtml = 3.8.1 version mismatch
> - what's the problem here exactly with athlon? Unfortunately I no longer have 
> athlon machine and I don't have access to ac-athlon.

Probably kernel problem on builder (2.6.8/amd64 with 32-bit userspace).

> ppc:
> bd: mono-tools-1.1.9-2: req mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.3600.0 version mismatch

?
Didn't mono-tools-1.1.10-2 build on ppc? buildlog?

> alpha:
> bd: autopano-sift-2.3-1: req dotnet-gtk-sharp >= 1.0 not found

2.4-2 with EA already in ac-ready

> amd64:
> bd: avifile-lame_audioenc-0.7.38-8: req libmp3lame.so.0 not found

fixed in avifile.spec on HEAD

> bd: libstdc++32-3.3.6-3: req libc.so.6 not found
> - tons of these due to multilib so the question arrives. What we do with 
> multilib glibc, gcc and so on - qboosh? Does it go into Ac or not?

IMO it should.
The same in our limited sparc64 port.

(BTW: I'm not the one who introduced multilib on ac-amd64 (I just made
it possible), so I'm not the only person to ask)

> The kernels:
> - is kernel24.spec ready on all architectures, qboosh?

Yes, 2.4.32-2 already in ac-ready (incl. sparc64; still no amd64 - nobody
cared).
The question is routes patch (2.4.32-2 has the patch applied, HEAD
disabled) - which version should go to Ac (I'd prefer not to change it
after Ac release). As I don't have a strong opinion here, I'm asking now -
does anyone need this patch?


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.cs.net.pl/