glibc compilation problem
sparky at pld-linux.org
sparky at pld-linux.org
Mon Nov 6 22:11:24 CET 2006
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:10:01PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
> > On Monday 06 November 2006 22:06, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:32:39PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > > > > Or maybe I should try with glibc 2.5? Is it, as in PLD CVS, usable?
> > > >
> > > > I have tried. The same problem:
> > >
> > > Maybe too new gcc?
> > > glibc 2.5 builds for me with binutils-2.17.50.0.6-1.athlon and
> > > gcc-4.1.0-1.athlon.
> >
> > works for me for gcc-4.2.0-0.20061030r118195.3.
>
> Which architectures?
x86_64 probably
works for me, on ppc:
[sparky at forge ~]$ rpm -q glibc gcc binutils
glibc-2.5-0.2
gcc-4.1.2-0.20060928r117266.2
binutils-2.17.50.0.2-2
--
____ Sparky{PI] -- Przemyslaw _ ___ _ _ ........... LANG...Pl..Ca..Es..En
/____) ___ ___ _ _ || Iskra | | _ \| | | : WWW........ppcrcd.pld-linux.org
\____\| -_)'___| ||^'||//\\// < | _/| | | : JID......sparky<at>jabberes.org
(____/|| (_-_|_|| ||\\ || |_ |_| |_| _| : Mail....sparky<at>pld-linux.org
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list