[th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz]

On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> >
> > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/file-offset.patch?rev=1.1
>
> More hacky but better :)
> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/file-offset.patch?rev=1.2

Of course there are still problems.

 libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.la

Now other packages get R: libtool(libdb.la) but nothing provides it since it's 
not detected.

Wouldn't be it better to generate Requires: /usr/lib/file.la instead of 
libtool(/usr/lib/file.la) ? That way we wouldn't need to rebuild all packages 
containing .la files.

> > > > Tomek

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/