SPECS: gnutls.spec - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790)
Elan Ruusamäe
glen at delfi.ee
Tue Oct 31 19:23:01 CET 2006
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:01, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> ping
>
> Would sb bacport a fix or are we switching Ac to use autoconf 2.60 and
> making libtasn1 soname change?
i'd go for ac, am upgrade.
if all apps compile with new libtasn1 - no blocker for soname change.
hawk?
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, qboosh wrote:
> > > Author: qboosh Date: Mon Sep 25 19:08:38 2006 GMT
> > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > > ---- Log message:
> > > - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790)
> >
> > Should we upgrade gnutls in Ac[1] or backport fix[2]?
> >
> > [1] it would require autoconf 2.60 (because of new gnulib) and libtasn1
> > soname change
> >
> > [2] from here:
> > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-September/001212.html
> > or from another distro
--
glen
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list