SPECS (AC-branch): spamassassin.spec - more -compile deps

Elan Ruusamäe glen at delfi.ee
Sun Jun 17 15:20:03 CEST 2007


On Saturday 16 June 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:43:17PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 20:40:53 glen wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +Requires:	glibc-headers
> > >  Requires:	make
> > >  Requires:	perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
> > >  Requires:	perl-Mail-SpamAssassin = %{version}-%{release}
> > > @@ -338,6 +339,9 @@
> >
> > maybe this dependency should be in perl-devel package instead?
>
> Well, in fact all *-devel packages with glibc-based C interfaces should
> require glibc-devel...
yes that was fixed later. but the actual question was, should the glibc-devel 
dep be in sa-compile or perl-devel package?

i see two points:
- in perl-devel because the perl-devel headers use glibc-headers, 

- in sa-devel because sa-devel actually invokdes gcc while perl-devel you 
might need for some other reason.


> (OC it can be omitted for *-devel which require *-devel already requiring
> glibc-devel)


-- 
glen


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list