broken pl LC_TIME
Tomasz Pala
gotar at polanet.pl
Fri Jun 22 11:20:58 CEST 2007
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> >
> > Exactly. There's absolutely no reason to use roman numbers. The most
> > common and proper way is [day].mm.yyyy (day<10 with or without leading
>
> Numeric mm is NOT month name _abbreviayion_.
Yep. Roman numeric neither. These abbreviations don't exist thus we use
numbers. Arabic numbers.
> Intention is clearly explained in bugzilla references.
And it's wrong.
> IMO I/II/III is better than sty/lut/mar.
Roman numbers ARE NOT abbreviations. They are obsoleted form of writing
dates in numeric.
> But maybe yhey all should have trailing/leading spaces to keep fixed length.
We should not follow grammar from '70s.
--
Tom Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org> http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
http://tccs.sourceforge.net/
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list