SPECS (DEVEL): gnome-utils.spec - floppy subpackage is back; updat...
Jan Rekorajski
baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl
Tue Mar 6 21:44:07 CET 2007
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Mar 2007, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007 18:58:06 you wrote:
> >
> > [...cut...]
> >
> > > > -Requires: gnome-vfs2 >= 2.16.2
> > > > -Requires: libgnomeui >= 2.16.1
> > > > +Requires(post,preun): GConf2
> > > > +Requires: gnome-vfs2 >= 2.17.91
> > > > +Requires: libgnomeui >= 2.17.92
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > $Log$
> > > > +Revision 1.149.2.2 2007/03/06 16:58:00 megabajt
> > > > +- floppy subpackage is back; updated deps
> > >
> > > what is all behind that "updated deps" ????
> >
> > He's doing The Right Thing.
> > You have no idea how much you can fsck gnome without updating all
> > the required libs. I have, I shoot mysefl in the foot many times by
> > having mismatched libs and apps.
> shouldn't then runtime deps should be done with %requires_eq/%requires_eq_to
> then?
Lucky for us it's not _that_ bad :)
It's just "GNOME 2.x needs libs 2.x.*", so %requires_eq/%requires_eq_to
would be an overkill.
Janek
--
Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list