[RFC] Repository layout change -- status update

[Aredridel]

> have 'packages/%{name}' containt (a) the spec file, (b) a 'files' subdir, that 
> contains the traditional 'SOURCES' content and (c) any other files containing 
> metadata. Off the top of my head -- the 'tag->revision' file we've discussed 
> wrt to svn migration. And in the future -- any other metadata that might 
> prove usefull (with the ability to just add a file with some interesting info 
> regarding a package, the possibilities are quite big; sooner or later 
> someone's bound to use it for builder/ftp/bugzilla/somethingelse 
> integration).
>   
This or flat makes the most sense to me.

If we're reorganizing on this scale, though, any reason not to move to
SVN in the process?