BR-s and R-s policy

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Thursday 20 September 2007 13:57:50 Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 20 of September 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > User sends request for: libcrap, few seconds later for appX appY.
> > > libcrap installes fine on i386 but not i686. appX and appY on i386
> > > rebuilds fine with new libcrap and with old libcrap on i686. Whoops.
> >
> > True, but only difference is that RM will have to delete appX and appY
> > for i686 and user or RM will need to resend it using auto- tag. I'd
> > prefer to have correct version deps and fix such issues myself than
> > doesn't have that issues but have to create and maintain additional
> > branches where they aren't needed.
>
> While rising BR makes no need for any manual action on RM side and can be
> fixed immediately by user ;)

one can trash specs in place called SPECS/test.spec:RPM [1] and send that one to builders.

[1] http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/Attic/test.spec?only_with_tag=RPM

-- 
glen