[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten błąd?]

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >> 5. Not mentioning the fact that not everything in AC is signed and
> >> default config demands signed packages
> >
> > don't enable such trees then. signed in ac are 'ac' and 'ac-updates'
> > and 'ac-supported' trees only.
>
> Yes I mean only ac and ac-updates

well. if you are so sure you used ac and only ac-updates, point out the exact 
packages that were not signed.

-- 
glen