[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten

[Andrzej Krzysztofowicz]

Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:14, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
> > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Tomasz Mateja <tommat at pimpek.one.pl> 
> wrote:
> > >> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > >>>> Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox
> > >>>>
> > >>  > no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa' (answer to
> > >>  > question "what was installed afterall")
> > >>
> > >>  Ok I'll prepare detailed report but I don't like your attitude as a RM.
> > >>  Whats the difference between grey developer and RM?? RM can send build
> > >>  requests? move rpm's in ftp? true. But RM is required to use brain in
> > >>  every move he makes. He is the last QA for everything in distro.
> > >
> > > Not everything and especially not some old floppy installation method :)
> >
> > Why not? Is it part of AC or not? If not - please remove this from ftp.
> 
> and perhaps the .iso images should be recreated too to fix apparent bugs they 
> have?

Maybe call the quite big change as Ac 2.1 ?
When it is complete, of course.

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz                  ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 19 36
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology