xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Monday 22 December 2008 20:43:48 wrobell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > On Monday 22 December 2008 11:22:42 wrobell wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:35:54PM +0100, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of
> > > > > ac bcond in xulrunner.spec?
> > > >
> > > > I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or
> > > > some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so
> > > > simple things.
> > >
> > > one question, though. if one of the distro lines dies, then who is
> > > going to clean up the conditionals introduced by such distro line?
> >
> > you can always do cvs annotate and ask whoever added it...
>
> to be honest, that's too optymistic statement. but... will you?

i'l complete the sentence: "and ask whoever added it, whether you can remove 
it".

i don't say how things should be, i just say how they are...

-- 
glen