tex in pld
Pawel Golaszewski
blues at pld-linux.org
Wed May 7 10:50:13 CEST 2008
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why I'm
> > asking what will be lost/broken when replacing tetex with texlive...
> If so - better ask about incompatibilities.
I was thinking about "incompatibilities" saying "broken" :)
> I've got dozens of macros, workarounds and other solutions for LaTeX,
> but some of them may be tetex specific, dunno.
I will take a look how is it made in ubuntu in a few days...
They have livetex...
Anyway - we won't see it if we won't try... :(
> > If nothing and one can replace another we could consider putting tetex
> > to (un)supported and texlive to main...
> There were differences even between tetex versions - after transition to
> 3.0 I compared dvi files generated by former tetex 2.0 and I've noticed
> different kerning (IMO it got worse).
Well - docs I was generating were better after switch 2->3
I think it depends what are you using...
--
pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list