On Thursday 23 April 2009 14:18:12 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > And why did you changed "$@" to ${1:+"$@"}? "$@" is expanded to > nothing (instead of empty string) when no parameters where given (it is > not "$*"). i always tought "$@" expands to list with one empty string, thx for tearing down this false bit from me :) -- glen