Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

Elan Ruusamäe glen at pld-linux.org
Thu Dec 3 07:18:33 CET 2009


On Wednesday 02 December 2009 11:39:10 Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > > you're writing of yourself in third tense? what is this letter about?
> >
> > About broken PHP. Not by me.
> >
> > > everybody is welcome to fix packages and stbr them to builders, there's
> > > even !stbr bot on irc for really everyone(?).
> >
> > There are already two votes to revert your change.
>
> The only mistake here is requires missing. php-common should require
> packeges that are in separate modules now. For few months, to satisfy
> existing instalations. After that is could be suggest only, if any.

the time bomb can be installed, but when it expires, then why would bother 
then anybody fix the deps if they couldn't do them (or report them) while 
package was in testing repo?

> package spliting itself is ok, IMO.

in fact, the pcre, session were separate packages. call it either bad package 
management or lazyness or introducing features that were not available as 
shared [1]. before that you were supposed to fill the requires lines for both 
modules, why were they discontinued being added?

[1] - session was made static because mm module was not thread safe. very 
later zts was enabled for all sapis as otherwise modules were not shareable 
between sapis.

-- 
glen


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list