From wrobell at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 3 01:08:07 2009 From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (wrobell) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 00:08:07 +0100 Subject: packages: postgresql/postgresql.spec - rel 1 - looks good to me, blame rade... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20090702230807.GM5493@borg> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:33:43PM +0200, baggins wrote: > Author: baggins Date: Thu Jul 2 15:33:43 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - rel 1 > - looks good to me, blame radek and wrobell if something is broken well, it builds, it starts and i am able to connect to a database... enjoy regards, wrobell From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl Fri Jul 3 01:30:26 2009 From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 01:30:26 +0200 Subject: packages: postgresql/postgresql.spec - rel 1 - looks good to me, blame rade... In-Reply-To: <20090702230807.GM5493@borg> References:

<20090702230807.GM5493@borg> Message-ID: <20090702233026.GA26493@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, wrobell wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 05:33:43PM +0200, baggins wrote: > > Author: baggins Date: Thu Jul 2 15:33:43 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - rel 1 > > - looks good to me, blame radek and wrobell if something is broken > > well, it builds, it starts and i am able to connect to a database... enjoy Glad to see it works, as I will have to upgrade my server during summer :) Janek -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! bagginsmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio From wrobell at pld-linux.org Fri Jul 10 10:12:01 2009 From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (wrobell) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:12:01 +0100 Subject: packages: python-psycopg2/python-psycopg2.spec - Release 2. Disabled agai... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20090710081200.GH18895@borg.lan> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:58:38AM +0200, matkor wrote: > Author: matkor Date: Fri Jul 10 05:58:38 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - Release 2. > Disabled again nonworking (in Th) conditional build with python-mx-DateTime > Build was failing on missing python-mx-DateTime-devel headers. look, instead of discussing the thing, you are again starting stupid commit war. could you calm down a bit and think what are you doing, mate? regards, wrobell From arekm at maven.pl Sat Jul 11 22:03:33 2009 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:03:33 +0200 Subject: WARN: Th introduces new libjpeg Message-ID: <200907112203.33523.arekm@maven.pl> Hi, There is a big rebuild going on in Th currently due to new libjpeg 7. Please don't upgrade until rebuild is done because you can end up with applications segfaulting due to mixed libjpeg 6 and libjpeg 7 dynamic linking. Easiest way to be safe is to add "ignore = libjpeg*7*" to poldek configuration and not installing libjpeg 7. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From arekm at maven.pl Mon Jul 13 13:01:16 2009 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:01:16 +0200 Subject: Th: ppc and athlon unmaintained (end of July 2009) Message-ID: <200907131301.16458.arekm@maven.pl> www.pld-linux.org news: "13 July 2009 Th: ppc and athlon unmaintained ppc and athlon architectures in PLD Th line will become officialy deprecated at the end of July 2009 and moved out of official directory at PLD ftp server. Users of athlon arch are asked to switch to i686. ppc fate is unknown (there is a chance of keeping ppc alive in form of unofficial branch)." Reasons: - athlon arch provides almost no gain over i686 - lack of fast ppc server acting as builder (current one is slow and breaks too often) and, what is more important, lack of developer power to handle ppc arch -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Jul 15 07:03:10 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:03:10 +0300 Subject: packages: k3b/k3b.spec - fix R: and some crap from IRC - rel 7 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <200907150803.10378.glen@pld-linux.org> On Sunday 12 July 2009 21:13, shadzik wrote: > +%if "%{pld_release}" == "ti" > +Requires: kde4-kde3support-devel > +%else > Requires: kdelibs-devel > +%endif like th has "kdelibs" package available in main (th-obsolete doesn't count)? if you want to support ac on head use != "ac" -- glen From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Jul 15 11:57:05 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:57:05 +0300 Subject: packages: k3b/k3b.spec - fix R: and some crap from IRC - rel 7 In-Reply-To: References: <200907150803.10378.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200907151257.07558.glen@pld-linux.org> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 09:59, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote: > 2009/7/15 Elan Ruusam?e : > > On Sunday 12 July 2009 21:13, shadzik wrote: > >> +%if "%{pld_release}" == "ti" > >> +Requires: kde4-kde3support-devel > >> +%else > >> Requires: kdelibs-devel > >> +%endif > > > > like th has "kdelibs" package available in main (th-obsolete doesn't > > count)? if you want to support ac on head use != "ac" > > AFAIK noone in Th is interested in having k3b 1, they already use k3b > 2. Hawk asked me to force k3b 1 to build with kde4-kde3support on Ti > and so I did. This change doesn't break anything on Ac, does it? If > you like, feel free to change the 'if' statements I've added, but IMHO > it's useless cosmetics. what i'm saying the bcond is pointless. th has also no kdelibs-devel, but kde4-kde3support-devel. -- glen From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Jul 15 12:53:25 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:53:25 +0300 Subject: packages: k3b/k3b.spec - fix R: and some crap from IRC - rel 7 In-Reply-To: References: <200907151257.07558.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200907151353.26084.glen@pld-linux.org> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 13:04, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote: > W dniu 15 lipca 2009 11:57 u?ytkownik Elan Ruusam?e > > napisa?: > > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 09:59, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote: > >> 2009/7/15 Elan Ruusam?e : > >> > On Sunday 12 July 2009 21:13, shadzik wrote: > >> >> +%if "%{pld_release}" == "ti" > >> >> +Requires: kde4-kde3support-devel > >> >> +%else > >> >> Requires: kdelibs-devel > >> >> +%endif > >> > > >> > like th has "kdelibs" package available in main (th-obsolete doesn't > >> > count)? if you want to support ac on head use != "ac" > >> > >> AFAIK noone in Th is interested in having k3b 1, they already use k3b > >> 2. Hawk asked me to force k3b 1 to build with kde4-kde3support on Ti > >> and so I did. This change doesn't break anything on Ac, does it? If > >> you like, feel free to change the 'if' statements I've added, but IMHO > >> it's useless cosmetics. > > > > what i'm saying the bcond is pointless. th has also no kdelibs-devel, but > > kde4-kde3support-devel. > > You're probably right. I just didn't want to break anything on HEAD. > On the other hand, Th RM might want to rebuild kde3 with the new > libjpeg7 in which case k3b would also be rebuilt with kdelibs and not > kde4-kde3support, so maybe it's wise to wait until that is finished or > at least until the decision if kde3 is going to be rebuild is made. th has no kde3, which still means NO "kdelibs" packages. and stop removing cc: addresses when replying. -- glen From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Jul 15 16:33:57 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:33:57 +0300 Subject: packages: k3b/k3b.spec - fix R: and some crap from IRC - rel 7 In-Reply-To: References: <200907151353.26084.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200907151733.57741.glen@pld-linux.org> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:03, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote: > > and stop removing cc: addresses when replying. > > I'm not even thinking about stoping it... I'm not subscribed to > pld-devel-en and have no personal interest in sending there my > messages which will be rejected anyway. so what? i at least don't have to add it anytime. to keep thread intact in list. > Stop trolling. look in to the mirror first. -- glen From kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com Thu Jul 23 19:21:15 2009 From: kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw?= Kruk) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:21:15 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with g... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> Dnia 2009-07-23, czw o godzinie 14:36 +0200, lisu pisze: > Author: lisu Date: Thu Jul 23 12:36:08 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with glibc-misc < 6:2.7 (sr at Latn vs. sr at latin) > > +# sr at Latn vs. sr at latin > +Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 Nie mam w tym momencie czasu, ?eby rzuci? na to okiem, ale to mi wygl?da bardzo podejrzanie. Jeste? pewien tego konfliktu ? pozdrawiam -- Jaros?aw Kruk : jareq at pld-linux.org kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com GPG key Id : 0x78730F33 GPG FingerPrint : FD00 0082 DFBD 65AE 2FD9 A13F B879 7FB0 7873 0F33 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x78730F33 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo URL: From udvzsolt at gmail.com Thu Jul 23 19:40:02 2009 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:40:02 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with g... In-Reply-To: <1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> References:

<1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> Message-ID: <20090723194002.66c5f1a4@gmail.com> > Nie mam w tym momencie czasu, ?eby rzuci? na to okiem, ale to mi > wygl?da bardzo podejrzanie. Jeste? pewien tego konfliktu ? > > pozdrawiam Please english too ;) Zsolt From glen at pld-linux.org Thu Jul 23 20:09:59 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:09:59 +0300 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with g... In-Reply-To: <1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> References:

<1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> Message-ID: <200907232109.59939.glen@pld-linux.org> On Thursday 23 July 2009 20:21, Jaros?aw Kruk wrote: > Dnia 2009-07-23, czw o godzinie 14:36 +0200, lisu pisze: > > Author: lisu Date: Thu Jul 23 12:36:08 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with glibc-misc < 6:2.7 (sr at Latn > > vs. sr at latin) > > > > > > +# sr at Latn vs. sr at latin > > +Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 > > Nie mam w tym momencie czasu, ?eby rzuci? na to okiem, ale to mi wygl?da > bardzo podejrzanie. Jeste? pewien tego konfliktu ? [en via google translate] > I do not know at this point, time to throw to the eye, but it looks to me > very suspicious. Are you sure this conflict? yes. this is pretty standard, seen in other specs too: glen at builder-ac pld/all-specs $ grep -B1 glibc kde-i18n.spec # sr at Latn vs. sr at latin Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 however, now that everything, including locales were moved back to main package, not sure about this conflict line. we should include there perhaps version after the merge (as no earlier version is present): Conflicts: glibc < 6:2.10.1-5 or how do you handle such deps in sane manner? and do we need the conflict at all as it would fail to install due missing dirdeps anyway for older glibc... -- glen From kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com Thu Jul 23 20:12:28 2009 From: kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw?= Kruk) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:12:28 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with g... In-Reply-To: <20090723194002.66c5f1a4@gmail.com> References:

<1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> <20090723194002.66c5f1a4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1248372748.4877.5.camel@apollo> Dnia 2009-07-23, czw o godzinie 19:40 +0200, Zsolt Udvari pisze: > > Nie mam w tym momencie czasu, ?eby rzuci? na to okiem, ale to mi > > wygl?da bardzo podejrzanie. Jeste? pewien tego konfliktu ? > > > > pozdrawiam > > Please english too ;) I try but I don't feel strong in engilsh ;-) I don't have time at this moment to look to this, but I think that it looks suspicious. Are you sure about this conflict ? regards -- Jaros?aw Kruk : jareq at pld-linux.org kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com GPG key Id : 0x78730F33 GPG FingerPrint : FD00 0082 DFBD 65AE 2FD9 A13F B879 7FB0 7873 0F33 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x78730F33 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo URL: From kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com Thu Jul 23 20:47:47 2009 From: kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw?= Kruk) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:47:47 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server conflict with g... In-Reply-To: <200907232109.59939.glen@pld-linux.org> References:

<1248369675.4269.1.camel@apollo> <200907232109.59939.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <1248374867.4877.36.camel@apollo> Dnia 2009-07-23, czw o godzinie 21:09 +0300, Elan Ruusam?e pisze: > > > +# sr at Latn vs. sr at latin > > > +Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 > yes. this is pretty standard, seen in other specs too: > > glen at builder-ac pld/all-specs $ grep -B1 glibc kde-i18n.spec > # sr at Latn vs. sr at latin > Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 > > however, now that everything, including locales were moved back to main > package, not sure about this conflict line. we should include there perhaps > version after the merge (as no earlier version is present): > Conflicts: glibc < 6:2.10.1-5 > > or how do you handle such deps in sane manner? > > and do we need the conflict at all as it would fail to install due missing > dirdeps anyway for older glibc... Thanks for the information. regards -- Jaros?aw Kruk : jareq at pld-linux.org kruk.jaroslaw at gmail.com GPG key Id : 0x78730F33 GPG FingerPrint : FD00 0082 DFBD 65AE 2FD9 A13F B879 7FB0 7873 0F33 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x78730F33 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo URL: From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Fri Jul 24 08:16:14 2009 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:16:14 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - wesnoth and wesnoth-server In-Reply-To: <200907232109.59939.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200907240616.n6O6GEUT027215@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?= wrote: > > glen at builder-ac pld/all-specs $ grep -B1 glibc kde-i18n.spec > # sr at Latn vs. sr at latin > Conflicts: glibc-misc < 6:2.7 > > however, now that everything, including locales were moved back to main > package, not sure about this conflict line. we should include there perhaps > version after the merge (as no earlier version is present): > Conflicts: glibc < 6:2.10.1-5 > > or how do you handle such deps in sane manner? > > and do we need the conflict at all as it would fail to install due missing > dirdeps anyway for older glibc... The deps were generally for poldek that knew nothing about the dirdeps. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl phone (48)(58) 347 19 36 Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math., Gdansk University of Technology From patrys at pld-linux.org Mon Jul 27 11:02:40 2009 From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:02:40 +0200 Subject: packages: libdrm/libdrm.spec - revert part of 2.4.12 ( fixes Mesa-7.5 build... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <89b6ba3a0907270202u7257dfd2hcb242f0e897aef33@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM, adamg wrote: > Author: adamg ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Date: Sat Jul 25 22:43:46 2009 GMT > Module: packages ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - revert part of 2.4.12 ( fixes Mesa-7.5 build ) > - release 2 Results in either kernel oops or 16 colors with xorg-driver-video-nouveau-0.0.10-0.20090720.1.x86_64. Either fix or revert. -- Patryk Zawadzki From adamg at pld-linux.org Mon Jul 27 12:09:39 2009 From: adamg at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?QWRhbSBHb8WCxJliaW93c2tp?=) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:09:39 +0200 Subject: packages: libdrm/libdrm.spec - revert part of 2.4.12 ( fixes Mesa-7.5 build... In-Reply-To: <89b6ba3a0907270202u7257dfd2hcb242f0e897aef33@mail.gmail.com> References:

<89b6ba3a0907270202u7257dfd2hcb242f0e897aef33@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4A6D7CE3.5070101@pld-linux.org> Patryk Zawadzki pisze: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:43 AM, adamg wrote: >> Author: adamg Date: Sat Jul 25 22:43:46 2009 GMT >> Module: packages Tag: HEAD >> ---- Log message: >> - revert part of 2.4.12 ( fixes Mesa-7.5 build ) >> - release 2 > > Results in either kernel oops or 16 colors with > xorg-driver-video-nouveau-0.0.10-0.20090720.1.x86_64. > > Either fix or revert. Ahh, crap. ... or you can build libdrm-2.4.12-1 for now. I see there's a patch [0] in Mesa's git tree that hasn't been backported to mesa_7_5_branch. I don't have time to test it right now, will try to do in the evening. [0] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=40ed44991851a526f0e2cafd5dab6149cb7a3342 -- http://adam.golebiowski.eu/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.