Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?
Elan Ruusamäe
glen at pld-linux.org
Tue Mar 10 11:15:59 CET 2009
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 10:59:58 Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:19:44 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > Could some athlon*rpm owner see if upgrading athlon->i686 is nicely
> > handled in poldek (as amd64->x86_64 is for example) ?
yes, some recent fixes in poldek (with me & patrys: poldek-upgrade-dist.patch)
actually allow such upgrade (no more platform name used in depsolving, but
pkg colour bits)
> Upgrading rpms in one thing, upgrading packages having sth in
> */athlon-pld-linux/* (like perl) is another.
if it's just to get "32bit" dep, like glibc(?) had, then it should be used as
glibc(%{_target_base_arch}), not glibc(%{_target_arch})
but indeed, gcc, and perl have platform name in module paths. should we just
change it to use lib vs lib64?
--
glen
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list