From qboosh at pld-linux.org Thu Oct 1 16:43:38 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:43:38 +0200 Subject: packages: taglib/taglib.spec - add build type In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091001144338.GA16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:50:22PM +0200, cactus wrote: > Author: cactus Date: Thu Sep 24 19:50:22 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - add build type > %cmake \ > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ > -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=%{_libdir} \ > + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=%{!?debug:Release}%{?debug:Debug} \ CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release causes cmake to override our optflags by cmake-defined ones; particularly - by -O3, which causes code to be bigger (because of more aggressive inlining), and thus - in larger projects - possibly slower due to more code cache misses. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From kiesiu at kiesiu.com Thu Oct 1 23:42:17 2009 From: kiesiu at kiesiu.com (Lukasz Kies) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 23:42:17 +0200 Subject: packages: gnome-do-plugins In-Reply-To: <1adc5bd30909291602v686110bbhd5cdd6ed077c5540@mail.gmail.com> References: <1adc5bd30909291602v686110bbhd5cdd6ed077c5540@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1adc5bd30910011442g400d6a6aya2a0bea1ab9eb0b4@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I've sent it recently to PLD Devel PL list but no one add this to CVS. Please find in attachment patch for spec and for sources with following changes: - add missing BuildRequires - add patch to fix broken banshee_indexer Makefile.am In was built on i686 and it's working fine. I'll appreciate if someone with RW rights to CVS could commit those patches and send STBR. Regards, Lukasz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gnome-do-plugins.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1425 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gnome-do-plugins-banshee_indexer.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 757 bytes Desc: not available URL: From qboosh at pld-linux.org Fri Oct 2 07:27:31 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:27:31 +0200 Subject: packages: taglib/taglib.spec - add build type In-Reply-To: <20091001144338.GA16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20091001144338.GA16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <20091002052730.GD9518@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 04:43:38PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 09:50:22PM +0200, cactus wrote: > > Author: cactus Date: Thu Sep 24 19:50:22 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - add build type > > > %cmake \ > > -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_prefix} \ > > -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=%{_libdir} \ > > + -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=%{!?debug:Release}%{?debug:Debug} \ > > CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release causes cmake to override our optflags by > cmake-defined ones; particularly - by -O3, which causes code to be > bigger (because of more aggressive inlining), and thus - in larger > projects - possibly slower due to more code cache misses. Some solutions to choose from: - add "PLDRelease" build type to cmake, which just adds "-DNDEBUG" to passed optflags (and use it instead of Release) - use Release builds, but pass -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-DNDEBUG" (and -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE for C code) to avoid adding -O3 globally - use "None" builds, but add -DNDEBUG to flags somehow -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From qboosh at pld-linux.org Sat Oct 3 09:11:05 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:11:05 +0200 Subject: packages: heimdal/heimdal.spec - devel conflicts with libgssglue-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091003071105.GB16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:17:51PM +0200, baggins wrote: > Author: baggins Date: Thu Jul 2 12:17:51 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - devel conflicts with libgssglue-devel > --- packages/heimdal/heimdal.spec:1.163 Thu Jul 2 11:49:03 2009 > +++ packages/heimdal/heimdal.spec Thu Jul 2 14:17:46 2009 > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ > Requires: libcom_err-devel >= 1.34-5 > Requires: openssl-devel > Conflicts: krb5-devel > +Conflicts: libgssglue-devel That's not true; there was conflict with libgssapi-devel, libgssglue predecessor, but now nothing conflicts: $ rpm -ql libgssglue-devel /usr/include/gssglue /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h /usr/lib/libgssglue.la /usr/lib/libgssglue.so /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgssglue.pc -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From glen at pld-linux.org Mon Oct 5 09:26:22 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-15?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:26:22 +0300 Subject: packages: gnome-do-plugins In-Reply-To: <1adc5bd30910011442g400d6a6aya2a0bea1ab9eb0b4@mail.gmail.com> References: <1adc5bd30909291602v686110bbhd5cdd6ed077c5540@mail.gmail.com> <1adc5bd30910011442g400d6a6aya2a0bea1ab9eb0b4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200910051026.22962.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 02 October 2009 00:42:17 Lukasz Kies wrote: > Hi, > In was built on i686 and it's working fine. I'll appreciate if someone > with RW rights to CVS could commit those patches and send STBR. applied. have fun! -- glen From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl Mon Oct 5 12:29:16 2009 From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:29:16 +0200 Subject: packages: heimdal/heimdal.spec - devel conflicts with libgssglue-devel In-Reply-To: <20091003071105.GB16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20091003071105.GB16685@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <20091005102916.GJ5653@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> On Sat, 03 Oct 2009, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:17:51PM +0200, baggins wrote: > > Author: baggins Date: Thu Jul 2 12:17:51 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - devel conflicts with libgssglue-devel > > > --- packages/heimdal/heimdal.spec:1.163 Thu Jul 2 11:49:03 2009 > > +++ packages/heimdal/heimdal.spec Thu Jul 2 14:17:46 2009 > > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ > > Requires: libcom_err-devel >= 1.34-5 > > Requires: openssl-devel > > Conflicts: krb5-devel > > +Conflicts: libgssglue-devel > > That's not true; there was conflict with libgssapi-devel, libgssglue > predecessor, but now nothing conflicts: I know no files conflict but this conflict is more of a "You don't want this library, you really don't, or you will get problems, big ones". -- Jan Rekorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! bagginsmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Oct 7 16:15:17 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-15?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:15:17 +0300 Subject: packages: rsyslog5/rsyslog5.spec - updated to 5.1.5 In-Reply-To: References: <200909141736.04402.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200910071715.17430.glen@pld-linux.org> On Thursday 17 September 2009 09:55:35 Andrzej Mateja wrote: > ????????I don't care whether it will be a separate package or a branch. We > should make this decision because glen keeps mailing me after every update > in rsyslog5 ;). Also it could be two individual packages for a while and > after rsyslog v.4 is no longer maintained we could merge it. The truth is > that rsyslog5 is present in our CVS and it cannot be undone. So what is > your opinion? Leave it or merge? i see you merged it to rsyslog package, and now it's again back? ?Revision 1.6 ?2009/09/25 06:21:33 ?amateja ?- reverted and rsyslog5 dir _can_ be rm -rf -- glen From amateja at pimpek.one.pl Wed Oct 7 21:35:21 2009 From: amateja at pimpek.one.pl (Andrzej Mateja) Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:35:21 +0200 Subject: packages: rsyslog5/rsyslog5.spec - updated to 5.1.5 In-Reply-To: <200910071715.17430.glen@pld-linux.org> References: <200909141736.04402.glen@pld-linux.org> <200910071715.17430.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <4ACCED79.9050502@pimpek.one.pl> Elan Ruusam?e pisze: > On Thursday 17 September 2009 09:55:35 Andrzej Mateja wrote: >> I don't care whether it will be a separate package or a branch. We >> should make this decision because glen keeps mailing me after every update >> in rsyslog5 ;). Also it could be two individual packages for a while and >> after rsyslog v.4 is no longer maintained we could merge it. The truth is >> that rsyslog5 is present in our CVS and it cannot be undone. So what is >> your opinion? Leave it or merge? > > i see you merged it to rsyslog package, and now it's again back? > > Revision 1.6 2009/09/25 06:21:33 amateja > - reverted > > and rsyslog5 dir _can_ be rm -rf > Hi, Yes, that's true. I did it as you asked, but then arekm realized me that I can't have both rsyslog-4 and rsyslog-5 at once. So we had a chat and decided to continue that way. Arem sad if you had a some questions you should contact him. Best regards Andrzej Mateja amateja at pimpek.one.pl From qboosh at pld-linux.org Fri Oct 9 06:55:29 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 06:55:29 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - et and sr@latin manpages and locale removed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091009045529.GA17280@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:17:24PM +0200, Micha? Lisowski wrote: > Wiadomo?? napisana przez uzsolt w dniu 2009-10-08, o godz. 19:36: > > > Author: uzsolt Date: Thu Oct 8 17:36:31 2009 > > GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - et and sr at latin manpages and locale removed > > ^^^^^^^^^ > are you sure sr at latin is unsupported? et is supported too, ask Glen ;) -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From udvzsolt at gmail.com Fri Oct 9 08:57:18 2009 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 08:57:18 +0200 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - et and sr@latin manpages and locale removed In-Reply-To: <20091009045529.GA17280@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20091009045529.GA17280@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <760ece280910082357y4bf2e646v1cb068bd58b02341@mail.gmail.com> 2009/10/9 Jakub Bogusz : > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:17:24PM +0200, Micha? Lisowski wrote: >> Wiadomo?? napisana przez uzsolt w dniu 2009-10-08, o godz. 19:36: >> >> > Author: uzsolt ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Date: Thu Oct ?8 17:36:31 2009 >> > GMT >> > Module: packages ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tag: HEAD >> > ---- Log message: >> > - et and sr at latin manpages and locale removed >> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^^ >> are you sure sr at latin is unsupported? > > et is supported too, ask Glen ;) My changelog was wrong: I've deleted only the manpages. Try install the wesnoth 1.6.4 and you'll see... Zsolt From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Oct 9 18:54:57 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:54:57 +0300 Subject: packages: wesnoth/wesnoth.spec - et and sr@latin manpages and locale removed In-Reply-To: <760ece280910082357y4bf2e646v1cb068bd58b02341@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091009045529.GA17280@stranger.qboosh.pl> <760ece280910082357y4bf2e646v1cb068bd58b02341@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200910091954.57882.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 09 October 2009 09:57:18 Zsolt Udvari wrote: > 2009/10/9 Jakub Bogusz : > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:17:24PM +0200, Micha? Lisowski wrote: > >> Wiadomo?? napisana przez uzsolt w dniu 2009-10-08, o godz. 19:36: > >> > Author: uzsolt ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Date: Thu Oct ?8 17:36:31 2009 > >> > GMT > >> > Module: packages ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tag: HEAD > >> > ---- Log message: > >> > - et and sr at latin manpages and locale removed > >> > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^^^^^^^^^ > >> are you sure sr at latin is unsupported? > > > > et is supported too, ask glen ;) > > My changelog was wrong: I've deleted only the manpages. Try install > the wesnoth 1.6.4 and you'll see... why delete the manpages? they contain junk? > Zsolt -- glen From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Oct 9 19:15:49 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 20:15:49 +0300 Subject: packages: libxml2/libxml2.spec - conditional build with zlib - zlib disable... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910092015.49144.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 09 October 2009 02:28:17 emes wrote: > Author: emes Date: Thu Oct 8 23:28:17 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - conditional build with zlib > - zlib disabled on x86_64 due to pointer bug ... > %configure \ > %{!?with_static_libs:--enable-static=no} \ > - %{!?with_python:--without-python} > + %{!?with_python:--without-python} \ > + %{!?with_zlib:--with-zlib=no} > > %{__make} > > @@ -245,6 +254,10 @@ > All persons listed below can be reached at @pld-linux.org > > $Log$ > +Revision 1.171 2009/10/08 23:28:11 emes > +- conditional build with zlib > +- zlib disabled on x86_64 due to pointer bug do you really think such go into pld distros? this should rather have BR blocker rather disabling some features. -- glen From adamg at pld-linux.org Sun Oct 11 13:13:25 2009 From: adamg at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?QWRhbSBHb8WCxJliaW93c2tp?=) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:13:25 +0200 Subject: RW do CVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4AD1BDD5.7010000@pld-linux.org> Krzysztof Krakowiak pisze: > Witam, > > Prosze o dostep RW do CVS PLD. > Dane do: (....) Konto za?o?one, za??? sobie alias pocztowy dodaj?c odpowiedni wpis do CVSROOT/users. [en] account created -- http://adam.golebiowski.eu/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true, PLD Linux developer | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do. From arekm at maven.pl Sun Oct 11 14:01:11 2009 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:01:11 +0200 Subject: configure --host/build/target Message-ID: <200910111401.11760.arekm@maven.pl> Does anyone remember why we use such configure macro: ./configure \ --host=%{_target_platform} \ --build=%{_target_platform} \ instead of ./configure \ --host=%{_host_platform} \ --build=%{_build_platform} \ --target=%{_target_platform} (where rpmbuild --target xyz changes only target_macro) ? -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From n3npq at mac.com Sun Oct 11 15:28:52 2009 From: n3npq at mac.com (Jeff Johnson) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:28:52 -0400 Subject: configure --host/build/target In-Reply-To: <200910111401.11760.arekm@maven.pl> References: <200910111401.11760.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <809792FB-B5F9-459D-8285-567EBD022430@mac.com> On Oct 11, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Does anyone remember why we use such configure macro: > > ./configure \ > --host=%{_target_platform} \ > --build=%{_target_platform} \ > > instead of > > ./configure \ > --host=%{_host_platform} \ > --build=%{_build_platform} \ > --target=%{_target_platform} > > (where rpmbuild --target xyz changes only target_macro) > Likely because if what was commonly used in autoconf and RPM way back when. What additional actions RPM should undertake with %{_host_platform} and %{_build_platform} have never been clear, nor does RPM do anything special with those two macros, other than to permit the values to be configured with macros and given to autoconf configure. Sure --target changes only target macros. Well duh. 73 de Jeff From qboosh at pld-linux.org Wed Oct 14 23:03:50 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:03:50 +0200 Subject: packages: FHS/FHS.spec, FHS/locale-dirs - lots of more locale dirs from gli... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091014210349.GA26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:45:37AM +0200, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Mon Oct 12 06:45:37 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - lots of more locale dirs from glibc; rel 27 > @@ -1,32 +1,185 @@ > +aa > +aa at saaho > +af > +am > +an > +ang > +ar > +ar_TN > +as > +ast > +az > +be This is just waste of inodes, most of these locales will never have any manuals... Even in glibc LC_MESSAGES dirs are added on demand basis. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From glen at pld-linux.org Thu Oct 15 11:26:25 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:26:25 +0300 Subject: packages: FHS/FHS.spec, FHS/locale-dirs - lots of more locale dirs from gli... In-Reply-To: <20091014210349.GA26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20091014210349.GA26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <200910151226.25510.glen@pld-linux.org> On Thursday 15 October 2009 00:03:50 Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:45:37AM +0200, glen wrote: > > Author: glen Date: Mon Oct 12 06:45:37 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - lots of more locale dirs from glibc; rel 27 > > > > @@ -1,32 +1,185 @@ > > +aa > > +aa at saaho > > +af > > +am > > +an > > +ang > > +ar > > +ar_TN > > +as > > +ast > > +az > > +be > > This is just waste of inodes, most of these locales will never have any > manuals... > > Even in glibc LC_MESSAGES dirs are added on demand basis. what you suggest? and most of the systems have %_install_langs C:pl:en afaik? how do we search for the on demain dirs? -- glen From ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl Thu Oct 15 13:34:46 2009 From: ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Andrzej Krzysztofowicz) Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:34:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: FHS/FHS.spec, In-Reply-To: <200910151226.25510.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <200910151134.n9FBYk3r014892@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote: > > This is just waste of inodes, most of these locales will never have any > > manuals... > > > > Even in glibc LC_MESSAGES dirs are added on demand basis. > > what you suggest? Dirs are added when sb finds a manpage that does not fit to any existing dir. -- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl From glen at pld-linux.org Mon Oct 19 08:26:10 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:26:10 +0300 Subject: packages: keepalived/keepalived.spec, keepalived/keepalived-use-linux-libc-... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200910190926.11423.glen@pld-linux.org> On Monday 19 October 2009 00:24:34 mguevara wrote: > +diff -NurpP --minimal keepalived-1.1.19.a/configure > keepalived-1.1.19.b/configure +--- > keepalived-1.1.19.a/configure??????2009-09-28 12:56:54.000000000 +0200 ++++ > keepalived-1.1.19.b/configure??????2009-10-18 22:52:53.000000000 +0200 we don't usualy produce patches from generated files... -- glen From mguevara at pld-linux.org Mon Oct 19 09:23:47 2009 From: mguevara at pld-linux.org (Marek Guevara Braun) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:23:47 +0200 Subject: packages: keepalived/keepalived.spec, keepalived/keepalived-use-linux-libc-... In-Reply-To: <200910190926.11423.glen@pld-linux.org> References: <200910190926.11423.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <4ADC1403.5010706@pld-linux.org> Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > On Monday 19 October 2009 00:24:34 mguevara wrote: >> +diff -NurpP --minimal keepalived-1.1.19.a/configure >> keepalived-1.1.19.b/configure +--- >> keepalived-1.1.19.a/configure 2009-09-28 12:56:54.000000000 +0200 ++++ >> keepalived-1.1.19.b/configure 2009-10-18 22:52:53.000000000 +0200 > > we don't usualy produce patches from generated files... > Yes. but in this case we don't generate the config file yet :-) Regards, Marek From qboosh at pld-linux.org Mon Oct 26 07:34:00 2009 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:34:00 +0100 Subject: packages: gnutls/gnutls.spec - BuildConflicts: gnutls-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091026063400.GB26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:38:45PM +0100, sls wrote: > Author: sls Date: Sun Oct 25 21:38:45 2009 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - BuildConflicts: gnutls-devel > > ---- Files affected: > packages/gnutls: > gnutls.spec (1.106 -> 1.107) ? ENOWAY -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From sls at poczta.wp.pl Mon Oct 26 09:23:39 2009 From: sls at poczta.wp.pl (Szymon Siwek) Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:23:39 +0100 Subject: packages: gnutls/gnutls.spec - BuildConflicts: gnutls-devel In-Reply-To: <20091026063400.GB26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20091026063400.GB26745@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <20091026082339.GA18295@cion.siwster.com> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 07:34:00AM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 10:38:45PM +0100, sls wrote: > > Author: sls Date: Sun Oct 25 21:38:45 2009 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > ---- Log message: > > - BuildConflicts: gnutls-devel > > > > ---- Files affected: > > packages/gnutls: > > gnutls.spec (1.106 -> 1.107) > > ? details on pld-devel-pl > ENOWAY > Without this BC libgnutls-openssl links with already installed gnutls. -- Szymon Siwek From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Oct 30 16:18:25 2009 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:18:25 +0300 Subject: packages/apache/apache.spec - diff - 1.578 Message-ID: <200910301718.25457.glen@pld-linux.org> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/packages/apache/apache.spec.diff?r1=1.577;r2=1.578;f=h could it be like described what for this requirement was raised? -- glen