From z at xatka.net  Fri Apr  2 13:15:03 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:15:03 +0200
Subject: serverside rename request - xmlgraphics packages
Message-ID: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>

Please, move:

  fop -> java-xmlgraphics-fop
  batik -> java-xmlgraphics-batik
  xmlgraphics-commons -> java-xmlgraphics-commons

-- 
Thanks in advance,
Pawe?


From z at xatka.net  Fri Apr  2 13:33:31 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:33:31 +0200
Subject: serverside rename request - avalon packages
In-Reply-To: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <20100402113331.GB5242@davabel.touk.pl>

Two more packages to rename:

  avalon-framework -> java-avalon-framework
  avalon-logkit -> java-avalon-logkit

Thanks

-- 
Pawe?


From mike at osdn.org.ua  Fri Apr  2 14:29:16 2010
From: mike at osdn.org.ua (Michael Shigorin)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:29:16 +0300
Subject: serverside rename request - avalon packages
In-Reply-To: <20100402113331.GB5242@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
	<20100402113331.GB5242@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <20100402122916.GZ1691@osdn.org.ua>

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:33:31PM +0200, Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> Two more packages to rename:
>   avalon-framework -> java-avalon-framework
>   avalon-logkit -> java-avalon-logkit

Just in case, viy/altlinux.org has implemented a framework
to maintain "close fork" of jpackage.org for ALT Linux,
including things which are going to stay a bit different way
(sort of "persistent patches").

Not a "fire and forget" thing but previous attempt at packaging
java stack (e.g. up to tomcat) rather failed due to a person
simply burning out.

-- 
 ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike at altlinux.ru>
  ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/


From z at xatka.net  Fri Apr  2 15:24:21 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:24:21 +0200
Subject: serverside rename request - avalon packages
In-Reply-To: <20100402122916.GZ1691@osdn.org.ua>
References: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
	<20100402113331.GB5242@davabel.touk.pl>
	<20100402122916.GZ1691@osdn.org.ua>
Message-ID: <20100402132421.GC5242@davabel.touk.pl>

On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Michael Shigorin wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:33:31PM +0200, Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> > Two more packages to rename:
> >   avalon-framework -> java-avalon-framework
> >   avalon-logkit -> java-avalon-logkit
> 
> Just in case, viy/altlinux.org has implemented a framework
> to maintain "close fork" of jpackage.org for ALT Linux,
> including things which are going to stay a bit different way
> (sort of "persistent patches").

Interesting. Thanks.

> Not a "fire and forget" thing but previous attempt at packaging
> java stack (e.g. up to tomcat) rather failed due to a person
> simply burning out.

Now we have working tomcat with some web application in th :)

-- 
Regards,
Pawe? Zuzelski


From freetz at gmx.net  Sat Apr  3 15:12:46 2010
From: freetz at gmx.net (Fryderyk Dziarmagowski)
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:12:46 +0200
Subject: packages: xulrunner/xulrunner.spec - up to 1.9.2.3 - some loose
	*.so added ...
In-Reply-To: <packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.145@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.144@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.145@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100403151246.8afce783.freetz@gmx.net>

On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:52:28 +0200
duddits <duddits at pld-linux.org> wrote:

> Author: duddits                      Date: Sat Apr  3 13:52:28 2010 GMT
> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - up to 1.9.2.3
> - some loose *.so added to -libs
[...]
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libfreebl3.so
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libmozjs.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libnss3.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libnssckbi.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libnssdbm3.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libnssutil3.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libsmime3.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libsoftokn3.so
> +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libssl3.so
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libxpcom.so
>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libxul.so

this is wrong, those are already provided by nss.

-- 
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski


From glen at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr  3 18:36:27 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 19:36:27 +0300
Subject: serverside rename request - xmlgraphics packages
In-Reply-To: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <20100402111503.GA5242@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <201004031936.27541.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Friday 02 April 2010 14:15:03 Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> Please, move:
>
>   fop -> java-xmlgraphics-fop
>   batik -> java-xmlgraphics-batik
>   xmlgraphics-commons -> java-xmlgraphics-commons

done

On Friday 02 April 2010 14:33:31 Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> Two more packages to rename:
>
>   avalon-framework -> java-avalon-framework
>   avalon-logkit -> java-avalon-logkit

done

also randomly renamed patches as well, just cvs up in a package dir to get 
final names.

-- 
glen


From radek at pld-linux.org  Sun Apr  4 17:48:21 2010
From: radek at pld-linux.org (Radoslaw Zielinski)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 12:48:21 -0300
Subject: packages: xulrunner/xulrunner.spec - up to 1.9.2.3 - some
	loose *.so added ...
In-Reply-To: <20100403151246.8afce783.freetz@gmx.net>
References: <packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.144@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.145@pld-linux.org>
	<20100403151246.8afce783.freetz@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20100404154821.GA4675@bongo>

Fryderyk Dziarmagowski <freetz at gmx.net> [2010-04-03 10:12]:
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:52:28 +0200
> duddits <duddits at pld-linux.org> wrote:
>> Author: duddits                      Date: Sat Apr  3 13:52:28 2010 GMT
>> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
>> ---- Log message:
>> - up to 1.9.2.3
>> - some loose *.so added to -libs
[...]
> > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libssl3.so
[...]
> this is wrong, those are already provided by nss.

Something is still wrong.

  poldek:/all-avail> upgrade iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686 -t
  Processing dependencies...
  iceweasel-3.6.2-1.i686 obsoleted by iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686
  iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686 marks xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686 (cap xulrunner = 2:1.9.2.3)
   xulrunner-1.9.2-4.i686 obsoleted by xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686
   xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686 marks xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686 (cap xulrunner-libs = 2:1.9.2.3-2)
    xulrunner-libs-1.9.2-4.i686 obsoleted by xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686
    xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686 marks icedove-3.0.4-1.i686 (cap libssl3.so(NSS_3.12.6))

  $ iceweasel
  Couldn't load XPCOM.

-- 
Rados?aw Zieli?ski <radek at pld-linux.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100404/79b4b495/attachment.sig>

From glen at pld-linux.org  Sun Apr  4 20:39:21 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 21:39:21 +0300
Subject: packages: xulrunner/xulrunner.spec - up to 1.9.2.3 - some loose
	*.so added ...
In-Reply-To: <20100404154821.GA4675@bongo>
References: <packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.144@pld-linux.org>
	<20100403151246.8afce783.freetz@gmx.net>
	<20100404154821.GA4675@bongo>
Message-ID: <201004042139.21630.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Sunday 04 April 2010 18:48:21 Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
> Fryderyk Dziarmagowski <freetz at gmx.net> [2010-04-03 10:12]:
> > On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:52:28 +0200
> >
> > duddits <duddits at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> >> Author: duddits                      Date: Sat Apr  3 13:52:28 2010 GMT
> >> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> >> ---- Log message:
> >> - up to 1.9.2.3
> >> - some loose *.so added to -libs
>
> [...]
>
> > > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/%{name}/libssl3.so
>
> [...]
>
> > this is wrong, those are already provided by nss.
>
> Something is still wrong.
>
>   poldek:/all-avail> upgrade iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686 -t
>   Processing dependencies...
>   iceweasel-3.6.2-1.i686 obsoleted by iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686
>   iceweasel-3.6.3-1.i686 marks xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686 (cap xulrunner =
> 2:1.9.2.3) xulrunner-1.9.2-4.i686 obsoleted by xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686
>    xulrunner-1.9.2.3-2.i686 marks xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686 (cap
> xulrunner-libs = 2:1.9.2.3-2) xulrunner-libs-1.9.2-4.i686 obsoleted by
> xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686 xulrunner-libs-1.9.2.3-2.i686 marks
> icedove-3.0.4-1.i686 (cap libssl3.so(NSS_3.12.6))

icedove should not provide nss/nspr files/deps!

-- 
glen


From pawel at dlugosz.eu  Sun Apr  4 22:03:56 2010
From: pawel at dlugosz.eu (Pawel Dlugosz)
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 22:03:56 +0200
Subject: packages: xulrunner/xulrunner.spec - up to 1.9.2.3 - some loose
	*.so added ...
In-Reply-To: <20100404154821.GA4675@bongo>
References: <packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.144@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_xulrunner_xulrunner.spec.1.145@pld-linux.org>
	<20100403151246.8afce783.freetz@gmx.net>
	<20100404154821.GA4675@bongo>
Message-ID: <4BB8F0AC.30702@dlugosz.eu>

W dniu 2010-04-04 17:48, Radoslaw Zielinski pisze:
>   $ iceweasel
>   Couldn't load XPCOM.

Indeed.

/usr/lib/xulrunner/libxpcom.so: /usr/lib/libssl3.so: version
`NSS_3.12.6' not found (required by /usr/lib/xulrunner/libxul.so)

I've just sent new nss to th builders. Iceweasel should work fine after
nss upgrade.
Let me just tweak dependencies in respective specs to reflect those
requirements.

Thanks everyone for help.

-- 
Pawe? <@duddits> D?ugosz
.::http://dlugosz.eu::.


From Ron.Reed at Level3.com  Mon Apr  5 21:08:43 2010
From: Ron.Reed at Level3.com (Reed, Ron)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:08:43 -0600
Subject: Modification of the RescueCD
Message-ID: <9235BAA814A8EA4191B360DB2765467F0145719660@idc1embx0001.corp.global.level3.com>

How does one go about making minor changes (add a script to auto run, etc.) to the RescueCD? I just need to add a single script that installs some kernel modules and runs a script to configure an IPMI card.

Ronald Reed
Level 3 Communications
100 S. Cincinnati
Tulsa, OK 74103
p: 918-547-7686
f : 720-567-3756
c: 918-808-3492
e: ron.reed at level3.com<mailto:ron.reed at level3.com>



From z at xatka.net  Tue Apr  6 10:03:03 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:03:03 +0200
Subject: mv request: jcommon, jfreechart
Message-ID: <20100406080303.GA4505@davabel.touk.pl>

Please, move:

	jcommon -> java-jcommon
	jfreechart -> java-jfreechart

-- 
Thanks in advance,
Pawe?


From glen at pld-linux.org  Tue Apr  6 14:23:44 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-2?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:23:44 +0300
Subject: mv request: jcommon, jfreechart
In-Reply-To: <20100406080303.GA4505@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <20100406080303.GA4505@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <201004061523.44933.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Tuesday 06 April 2010 11:03:03 Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> Please, move:
>
> 	jcommon -> java-jcommon
> 	jfreechart -> java-jfreechart

....done!

-- 
glen


From lm at zork.pl  Tue Apr  6 14:52:12 2010
From: lm at zork.pl (Lukasz Michalski)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:52:12 +0200
Subject: Modification of the RescueCD
In-Reply-To: <9235BAA814A8EA4191B360DB2765467F0145719660@idc1embx0001.corp.global.level3.com>
References: <9235BAA814A8EA4191B360DB2765467F0145719660@idc1embx0001.corp.global.level3.com>
Message-ID: <4BBB2E7C.9080101@zork.pl>

On 04/05/10 21:08, Reed, Ron wrote:
> How does one go about making minor changes (add a script to auto run, etc.) to the RescueCD? I just need to add a single script that installs some kernel modules and runs a script to configure an IPMI card.
> 
Hi,

Below is FAQ entry from
http://rescuecd.pld-linux.org/download/current/FAQpl.txt translated to
english:

How could I add my own files to rescueCD image?

  You should prepare tgz archives named pld[01]0[0-9].tar.bz2 that
contains all your files. Allowed dirs are: etc tmp var root home opt.
  Use rcdmod script (from iso or download site) to add
pld[01]0[0-9].tar.bz2 archives to iso image this way:

    rcdmod -i rescue.iso -f pld000.tar.bz2,pld100.tar.bz2  -o rescue-new.iso

  Upon booting RescueCD detects added archives and untar its contents to
root dir of the system. For archives named pld00[0-9].tar.bz2 this
operation is performed just after call to /sbin/init, before hardware
detection phase. If added archive contains /etc/rc.d/rc.rescue0.*, then
it will be run at this time.

  Archives named pld10[0-9].tar.bz2 are added after hardware detection
phase and environment setup. If archive contains /etc/rc.d/rc.rescue1.*
then those scripts will be run at this time.

Regards,
?ukasz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100406/81209dc5/attachment.sig>

From jajcus at jajcus.net  Wed Apr  7 18:55:36 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:55:36 +0200
Subject: packages: python-docutils/python-docutils.spec (REMOVED) -
	WTF? The same pa...
In-Reply-To: <packages_python_docutils_python_docutils.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_python_docutils_python_docutils.spec.1.21@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_python_docutils_python_docutils.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100407165536.GB7469@lolek.nigdzie>

Greets,

I just wanted to build cherokee which required python-docutils and found
out it conflicts with already installed docutils package? Then I looked
into CVS to see which name is current valid one? and I was astonished?

It seems the same thing was maintained in PLD under two different names:
docutils.spec and python-docutils.spec? for nearly 6 years!

How the hell did it stay unnoticed?

I have just removed python-docutils.spec (the one maintained mostly by
me) as I already had plans to rename it to docutils.spec and current
docutils.spec contained newer version.

I have also split docutils.spec into two packages: docutils and
python-docutils, as that is how it should be packaged (docutils are
mostly the python modules and should be packaged under python-%{name}).

Greets,
        Jacek
_______________________________________________
pld-cvs-commit mailing list
pld-cvs-commit at lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-cvs-commit


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Thu Apr  8 20:51:38 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:51:38 +0200
Subject: Builder fault
Message-ID: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all!

I've a problem on carme-server:

[uzsolt at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ builder irssi
builder: SMP make flags are set to -j16
Warning: No CVS access defined - using local .spec file
cvs update: CVSROOT is set but empty!  Make sure that the
cvs update: specification of CVSROOT is legal, either via the
cvs update: `-d' option, the CVSROOT environment variable, or the
cvs [update aborted]: CVS/Root file (if any).
Error: spec file not stored in CVS repo.

With rpm-build-tools-4.4.35 worked well, but with .37 doesn't. What's
the problem?

Zsolt


From jwnews at debian.maszyna.pl  Fri Apr  9 14:15:38 2010
From: jwnews at debian.maszyna.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Jan_WIde=C5=82?=)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:15:38 +0200
Subject: Builder fault
In-Reply-To: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com>
References: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bf2099666705a9cbcf0a6d4e0fffc777@127.0.0.1>

On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:51:38 +0200, Zsolt Udvari <udvzsolt at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I've a problem on carme-server:
> 
> [uzsolt at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ builder irssi
> builder: SMP make flags are set to -j16
> Warning: No CVS access defined - using local .spec file
> cvs update: CVSROOT is set but empty!  Make sure that the
> cvs update: specification of CVSROOT is legal, either via the
> cvs update: `-d' option, the CVSROOT environment variable, or the
> cvs [update aborted]: CVS/Root file (if any).
> Error: spec file not stored in CVS repo.

cvs up builder? 

-- 
Poz,
JW


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Fri Apr  9 14:22:18 2010
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:22:18 +0300
Subject: Builder fault
In-Reply-To: <bf2099666705a9cbcf0a6d4e0fffc777@127.0.0.1>
References: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com> 
	<bf2099666705a9cbcf0a6d4e0fffc777@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID: <t2s5b3145a1004090522n18b25af9ja0da72b53881802@mail.gmail.com>

I have the same problem with the builder script on my local machine
after upgrading rpm-build-tools.

cvs up builder did not fix it although there was a newer version.

Caleb

2010/4/9 Jan WIde? <jwnews at debian.maszyna.pl>:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:51:38 +0200, Zsolt Udvari <udvzsolt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I've a problem on carme-server:
>>
>> [uzsolt at carme-pld-i686 ~]$ builder irssi
>> builder: SMP make flags are set to -j16
>> Warning: No CVS access defined - using local .spec file
>> cvs update: CVSROOT is set but empty! ?Make sure that the
>> cvs update: specification of CVSROOT is legal, either via the
>> cvs update: `-d' option, the CVSROOT environment variable, or the
>> cvs [update aborted]: CVS/Root file (if any).
>> Error: spec file not stored in CVS repo.
>
> cvs up builder?
>
> --
> Poz,
> JW
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
>


From z at xatka.net  Fri Apr  9 14:52:01 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 14:52:01 +0200
Subject: Builder fault
In-Reply-To: <t2s5b3145a1004090522n18b25af9ja0da72b53881802@mail.gmail.com>
References: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com>
	<bf2099666705a9cbcf0a6d4e0fffc777@127.0.0.1>
	<t2s5b3145a1004090522n18b25af9ja0da72b53881802@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100409125201.GC4674@davabel.touk.pl>

On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Caleb Maclennan wrote:

> I have the same problem with the builder script on my local machine
> after upgrading rpm-build-tools.
> 
> cvs up builder did not fix it although there was a newer version.

0. Please, DO NOT TOPPOST.

1. Do you use ./builder or builder? If you use ./builder, cvs up may
fix/break builder. If you use builder upgrading of rpm-build-tools
package may fix/broke builder.

2. Real problem is, you redefine %_topdir in your .rpmmacros. Remove
this line, and remove ~/rpm/SOURCES directory if you have one (it
may confuse builder).

-- 
Regards,
Pawe? Zuzelski


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Fri Apr  9 17:03:33 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:03:33 +0200
Subject: Builder fault
In-Reply-To: <20100409125201.GC4674@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <g2y760ece281004081151q2525c86ck43e992f51f291dec@mail.gmail.com>
	<bf2099666705a9cbcf0a6d4e0fffc777@127.0.0.1>
	<t2s5b3145a1004090522n18b25af9ja0da72b53881802@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100409125201.GC4674@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <20100409170333.69e3c8ec@pld-laptop>

> 2. Real problem is, you redefine %_topdir in your .rpmmacros. Remove
> this line, and remove ~/rpm/SOURCES directory if you have one (it
> may confuse builder).
> 

Oh, yes, the disabling of %_topdir was the solution... Thanks, so I can
again create spec files :D

Zsolt


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Sun Apr 11 16:16:05 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:16:05 +0200
Subject: Openoffice upgrade
Message-ID: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>

Hi all!

I don't know that I can upgrade Openoffice or not on th, but should be
upgrade because of openssl-update (0.9.x -> 1.0.0).

error: libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is required by installed
openoffice.org-core-3.2.0.7-ooo320_m12.1.i686

Zsolt


From arekm at maven.pl  Sun Apr 11 16:42:41 2010
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:42:41 +0200
Subject: Openoffice upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>
References: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>
Message-ID: <201004111642.41490.arekm@maven.pl>

On Sunday 11 of April 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I don't know that I can upgrade Openoffice or not on th, but should be
> upgrade because of openssl-update (0.9.x -> 1.0.0).
> 
> error: libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is required by installed
> openoffice.org-core-3.2.0.7-ooo320_m12.1.i686

It's known. Don't use th-test and the error is gone.

> Zsolt

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Sun Apr 11 17:08:46 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:08:46 +0200
Subject: Openoffice upgrade
In-Reply-To: <201004111642.41490.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>
	<201004111642.41490.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <20100411170846.56903382@pld-laptop>


> It's known. Don't use th-test and the error is gone.
And what's about upgrade? Doesn't build OOo with the newest openssl?


From arekm at maven.pl  Sun Apr 11 17:17:09 2010
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0200
Subject: Openoffice upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20100411170846.56903382@pld-laptop>
References: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>
	<201004111642.41490.arekm@maven.pl>
	<20100411170846.56903382@pld-laptop>
Message-ID: <201004111717.09792.arekm@maven.pl>

On Sunday 11 of April 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > It's known. Don't use th-test and the error is gone.
> 
> And what's about upgrade? Doesn't build OOo with the newest openssl?

Rebuild will be done in proper time. There is ton work to do - see 
http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Sun Apr 11 17:25:23 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:25:23 +0200
Subject: Openoffice upgrade
In-Reply-To: <201004111717.09792.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <20100411161605.70e5441e@pld-laptop>
	<201004111642.41490.arekm@maven.pl>
	<20100411170846.56903382@pld-laptop>
	<201004111717.09792.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <20100411172523.3363892e@pld-laptop>

Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:17:09 +0200 -n
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> ?rta:

> On Sunday 11 of April 2010, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
> > > It's known. Don't use th-test and the error is gone.
> > 
> > And what's about upgrade? Doesn't build OOo with the newest openssl?
> 
> Rebuild will be done in proper time. There is ton work to do - see 
> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt
> 

Okay, sorry. I wanted inquire about it.

Zsolt


From glen at pld-linux.org  Wed Apr 14 12:03:45 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:03:45 +0300
Subject: packages: icedtea6/TODO (NEW),
	icedtea6/icedtea6.spec (NEW) - new package, ...
In-Reply-To: <packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_icedtea6_TODO.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <201004141303.45474.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Wednesday 14 April 2010 12:53:55 jajcus wrote:
> +$Log$
> +Revision 1.1  2010/04/14 09:53:49  jajcus
> +- new package, the stable release of IcedTes, based on icedtea.spec, NFY

what's the point? icedtea.spec contains same content, and it's not finished or 
stable or anything, finish the first spec, and if it needs "development" we 
have branches for that...

-- 
glen


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Wed Apr 14 12:09:08 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:09:08 +0200
Subject: packages: icedtea6/TODO (NEW), icedtea6/icedtea6.spec (NEW) -
	new package,  ...
In-Reply-To: <201004141303.45474.glen@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_icedtea6_TODO.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
	<201004141303.45474.glen@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100414100908.GC32169@jajo.eggsoft>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:03:45PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 April 2010 12:53:55 jajcus wrote:
> > +$Log$
> > +Revision 1.1  2010/04/14 09:53:49  jajcus
> > +- new package, the stable release of IcedTes, based on icedtea.spec, NFY
> 
> what's the point? icedtea.spec contains same content, and it's not finished or 
> stable or anything, finish the first spec, and if it needs "development" we 
> have branches for that...

icedtea.spec contains a newer version of IcedTea ? based on IcedTea7
(Java 7) implementation. I don't want to move back or have may work with
the stable release quickly replaced by the bleeding edge (it is PLD, you
know).

And there is even a much more important reason: upstream source tar-balls
are named 'icedtea6' and have the same version numbers as 'icedtea'
(IcedTea7) tar-balls. Look: http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/

Greets,
        Jacek


From z at xatka.net  Wed Apr 14 19:17:44 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:17:44 +0200
Subject: java, *.src.jar packaging
Message-ID: <20100414171744.GB4752@davabel.touk.pl>

Hello,

sometimes it is convenient to have java sources (.src.jar file)
installed. These files act as documentation. They are used by IDEs
together with javadoc for completion, hilithing etc.

I would like to add -source subpackage to some java libraries.

My question is: where to install .src.jar files?

 1. to /usr/share/java - but there is already to many files

 2. to %{_docdir} (/usr/share/doc/%{name}-source) - I don't think
    it's a good idea

 3. create new directory, like /usr/share/javasrc - Needs
    modification in packages that provides jdk

As far as I know other distros don't package these files at all, so
there is no convention to follow.

-- 
Regards,
Pawe?


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Wed Apr 14 19:51:47 2010
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:51:47 +0200
Subject: java, *.src.jar packaging
In-Reply-To: <20100414171744.GB4752@davabel.touk.pl>
References: <20100414171744.GB4752@davabel.touk.pl>
Message-ID: <20100414175147.GA24009@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> sometimes it is convenient to have java sources (.src.jar file)
> installed. These files act as documentation. They are used by IDEs
> together with javadoc for completion, hilithing etc.
> 
> I would like to add -source subpackage to some java libraries.
> 
> My question is: where to install .src.jar files?
> 
>  1. to /usr/share/java - but there is already to many files
> 
>  2. to %{_docdir} (/usr/share/doc/%{name}-source) - I don't think
>     it's a good idea
> 
>  3. create new directory, like /usr/share/javasrc - Needs
>     modification in packages that provides jdk
> 
> As far as I know other distros don't package these files at all, so
> there is no convention to follow.

http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSRCSOURCECODE

-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From glen at pld-linux.org  Wed Apr 14 21:28:59 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:28:59 +0300
Subject: java, *.src.jar packaging
In-Reply-To: <20100414175147.GA24009@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <20100414171744.GB4752@davabel.touk.pl>
	<20100414175147.GA24009@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <201004142228.59388.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Wednesday 14 April 2010 20:51:47 Jan R?korajski wrote:
> > As far as I know other distros don't package these files at all, so
> > there is no convention to follow.
>
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSRCSOURCECODE

we also have %{_examplesdir} which could fit.

-- 
glen


From glen at pld-linux.org  Wed Apr 14 21:32:18 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:32:18 +0300
Subject: packages: icedtea6/TODO (NEW),
	icedtea6/icedtea6.spec (NEW) - new package, ...
In-Reply-To: <20100414100908.GC32169@jajo.eggsoft>
References: <packages_icedtea6_TODO.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<201004141303.45474.glen@pld-linux.org>
	<20100414100908.GC32169@jajo.eggsoft>
Message-ID: <201004142232.18884.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Wednesday 14 April 2010 13:09:08 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:03:45PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 April 2010 12:53:55 jajcus wrote:
> > > +$Log$
> > > +Revision 1.1 ?2010/04/14 09:53:49 ?jajcus
> > > +- new package, the stable release of IcedTes, based on icedtea.spec,
> > > NFY
> >
> > what's the point? icedtea.spec contains same content, and it's not
> > finished or stable or anything, finish the first spec, and if it needs
> > "development" we have branches for that...
>
> icedtea.spec contains a newer version of IcedTea ? based on IcedTea7
> (Java 7) implementation. I don't want to move back or have may work with
> the stable release quickly replaced by the bleeding edge (it is PLD, you
> know).

really?

even now the version: tag matches

pld at all-specs$ cvsstat icedtea.spec  icedtea6.spec
 icedtea.spec          Status: Up-to-date Local: 1.16 CVS: 1.16
 icedtea6.spec        *Status: Up-to-date Local: 1.2  CVS: 1.2

--- icedtea.spec    2010-02-05 10:30:16.590046939 +0200
+++ icedtea6.spec    2010-04-14 22:30:01.731810792 +0300
@@ -1,19 +1,23 @@
-# $Revision: 1.16 $, $Date: 2009/04/11 17:00:59 $
-# TODO:
-# - fix bash substitution
+# $Revision: 1.2 $, $Date: 2010/04/14 12:56:45 $
 #
 Summary:    OpenJDK and GNU Classpath code
 Summary(pl.UTF-8):    Kod OpenJDK i GNU Classpath
-Name:        icedtea
+Name:        icedtea6
 Version:    1.8
 Release:    0.1
 License:    GPL


-- 
glen


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Thu Apr 15 10:13:01 2010
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:13:01 +0300
Subject: packages: icedtea6/TODO (NEW), icedtea6/icedtea6.spec (NEW) - new 
	package, ...
In-Reply-To: <201004142232.18884.glen@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_icedtea6_TODO.NONE@pld-linux.org>
	<201004141303.45474.glen@pld-linux.org> 
	<20100414100908.GC32169@jajo.eggsoft>
	<201004142232.18884.glen@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <h2i5b3145a1004150113l40715eclb3df41ff21abb22e@mail.gmail.com>

2010/4/14 Elan Ruusam?e <glen at pld-linux.org>:
> even now the version: tag matches

Yes, the version tag matches, but the base package is different and
they are in fact different versions! I looked at the upstream project
files the other day and they apparently have different branches of the
project that share parallel version numbers. Only the base package
name is different. Crazy? Yes, but real enough.


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Thu Apr 15 11:22:37 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:22:37 +0200
Subject: Rename request rhino.spec -> java-rhino.spec
Message-ID: <20100415092237.GC13905@jajo.eggsoft>

Package rename request for the CVS admin:

    rhino ->  java-rhino

Greets,
        Jacek


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Thu Apr 15 12:27:08 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:27:08 +0200
Subject: IcedTea
Message-ID: <20100415102708.GD13905@jajo.eggsoft>

Hello,

As some of you have already noticed (and complained) I have been
preparing IcedTea package for PLD, in 'icedtea6.spec'.

IcedTea (http://icedtea.classpath.org/) is a set of sources, patches
and build environment to build fully featured Java developement kit
and runtime environment from OpenJDK sources.

OpenJDK is the GPL  release of Sun's Jave JDK. Though, but itself, it is
not complete (still some third-party, non-GPL components are needed to
build it and for full functionality) and does not support every platform
we have. And it needs another JDK to build itself.

IcedTea can be built with GCJ/ECJ and can support more platforms (I
hope).

First IcedTea was started with the OpenJDK code which was Java 7
development code. Java 7 is still a future and world uses Java 6,
so a Java 6 OpenJDK has been released and IcedTea6 based on it. That is
why the package is named 'icedtea6' not 'icedtea'. 

When packaging IcedTea I wanted to solve some problem we have with our
current JDK packages:

1. Only single JDK could be installed. 

That was unacceptable for many. I need to use Java5 (java-sun-1.5.x) and
Java 6 (java-sun-1.6.x) to do my job? I had to use chroots. Then, PLD
packages expected the GCJ java stack (java-gcj-devel package). To
install it one would have to uninistall whatever other Java JDK or JRE
he is using.

Even to build the IcedTea6 I needed java-gcj-devel, which I couldn't
install as I need to have my java-sun working here. That is why
'java-gcj-devel' is the first package I have 'fixed'.

The fix was moving all /usr/lib/jvm/* stuff to a *-base subpackages,
which would provide all the needed JDK functionality, and could be
installed together with java-sun-* or other JDK. The base package would
contain links in %{_bindir} and other things that would conflict with
other JDK.

Then I did the same with IcedTea. One may install icedtea-jdk-base and
icedtea-jre-base and use it without un-installing sun-jdk or
java-gcj-devel.

2. I forgot ;)


Some decisions I made, may be controversial. I will list them for
discussion:

1. icedtea6.spec instead of, already existing, icedtea.spec -> already
   discussed.

2. 'icedtea6' instead of 'java-icedtea6'.

  This is a Java implementation, not a library. Let's keep java- prefix
for Java libraries. I don't like the 'java-gcj-compat' name either.

3. 'icedtea6' instead of 'openjdk'

  Yes, the thing built from IcedTea is OpenJDK? but OpenJDK could,
theoretically, be built from their own sources too. And we would get
something a bit different. So let's keep 'openjdk' name for that
'vanilla OpenJDK'

4. '-base' suffix for the 'base' packages?

  This is the first idea for the name I got. It could be 'jdk-icedtea6'
  package, it could be other suffix. It doesn't matter much as long it
  will be consistent with other JDK implementations.

  Currently only icedtea6.spec and latest java-gcj-compat.spec use this 
  'feature', so it can be still changed. Though, the more I think about
  it the more I like my '-base' idea :)

5. No '-tools' package.

  java-sun provides java-sun-tools subpackage providing 'java-jre-tools'
  virtual. It seems a very artificial separation and I think any
  dependencies on java-sun-tools or java-jre-tools should be dropped in
  favour on precise executable path dependency.

  I have created a 'icedtea6-jar' subpackage instead, for the one
  utility from java-jre-tools. This way alternative JAR implementations
  may be provided by PLD under /usr/bin/jar name.

6. Lots of 'obsoletes' in 'icedtea6' packages, sometimes duplicating
  those inherited by icedtea6-* dependencies.

  I think this is a best way to provide simple replacement for
  'java-sun' and 'java-sun-jre'. In many cases there will be no need to
  install 'icedtea6' package anyway, as 'icedtea6-jdk', 'icedtea6-jre'
  or even 'icedtea-jre-base' will be enough. But, if one wants simply 
  to replace existing Java implementation with IcedTea simple 'install
  icedtea6' in poldek should be enough.

7. 'jar' and 'appletviewer' in the -jdk-base, the 'jar' and 'appletviewer'
   packages provide only links and manual pages.

  This causes 'icedtea6-jar' to pull whole 'icedtea6-jdk-base', but 
  otherwise we would probably need to have icedtea6-jar-base subpackage
  too. 

  Current solution seems good enough for me as:
  a) usually when one really needs 'jar' (and ZIP is not enough), he
     probably needs a JDK anyway.
  b) we have other, smaller JAR implementations in PLD, like fastjar

Any more questions, comments, proposition?

And one 'little' request from me: could anyone review the existing and
write missing package descriptions (English and Polish) in icedtea.spec,
please?

Greets,
        Jacek


From glen at pld-linux.org  Thu Apr 15 13:15:21 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:15:21 +0300
Subject: Rename request rhino.spec -> java-rhino.spec
In-Reply-To: <20100415092237.GC13905@jajo.eggsoft>
References: <20100415092237.GC13905@jajo.eggsoft>
Message-ID: <201004151415.21724.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Thursday 15 April 2010 12:22:37 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> Package rename request for the CVS admin:
>
>     rhino ->  java-rhino
do ne.

-- 
glen


From glen at pld-linux.org  Fri Apr 16 09:33:22 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:33:22 +0300
Subject: packages: mumble/mumble.spec - /etc/murmur must be owned by murmur
In-Reply-To: <packages_mumble_mumble.spec.1.21@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_mumble_mumble.spec.1.20@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_mumble_mumble.spec.1.21@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <201004161033.23034.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Thursday 15 April 2010 22:23:26 shadzik wrote:
> -%dir %{_sysconfdir}/murmur
> +%attr(755,murmur,murmur) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/murmur

no, we usually do not let services own the dir, but later allow writing dir 
via group ownership, this way they can't fck up the permissions, but still 
can write, add/remove files there:
%attr(775,root,murmur) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/murmur

that said, if you do not need service to add/remove/move files in that dir, 
you don't need to give it write permission to DIR, but files only.

-- 
glen


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Fri Apr 16 10:51:51 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:51:51 +0200
Subject: java-shared?
Message-ID: <20100416085151.GC25437@jajo.eggsoft>

poldek:/all-avail> search --provides java-shared
3 package(s) found:
fastjar-0.93-7.i686
java-gnu-classpath-tools-0.98-2.i686
java-sun-tools-1.6.0.18-3.i686

poldek:/all-avail> search --requires java-shared
1 package(s) found:
java-sun-1.6.0.18-3.i686

I think it can be removed, as it seems meaningless.

Greets,
        Jacek


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Fri Apr 16 11:47:22 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:47:22 +0200
Subject: How to make a dependency
Message-ID: <20100416094722.GE25437@jajo.eggsoft>

Hello,

I am updating the Java packages so different JRE implementations may be
installed together. Now I have a problem with defining one common
dependecy: 'require Java with X11 support'.

Currently it was 'solved' with 'R: jre-X11'. That worked, because
'jre-X11' contained the X11 driver for JRE and pulled 'jre' which
provided /usr/bin/java.

With current IcedTea6 I have 'jre' which provides /usr/bin/java,
'jre-base' which provides the base JRE under /usr/lib/jvm/icedtea6 and
'jre-X11' which provides X11 driver for JRE.

The problem is, I want 'jre-base' with 'jre-X11' usable without
installing 'jre', which may conflict with other /usr/bin/jave provider.

So, when I give 'P: jre-X11' to 'icedtea6-jre-X11' then 'R: jre-X11'
whould not work as expected if /usr/bin/java is provided by other jre
and the only 'jre-X11' installed is from icedtea6.


The question is: how to define a  'require /usr/bin/java and jre(X11)
matching this /usr/bin/java'?

The easiest solution would be to make another '-jre-X11-base' subpackage
with the X11 driver. But then, the '-jre-X11' would contain _only_ the
dependencies: 'R: %{name}-jre-X11-base' and 'R: %{name}-jre' and no
files?

Any better ideas?

Greets,
        Jacek


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Sat Apr 17 15:38:14 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:38:14 +0200
Subject: CVS admin request: java packages renames
Message-ID: <20100417133814.GA3823@lolek.nigdzie>

Hello,

Could we have another few java packages renamed?

antlr3 -> java-antlr3
antlr -> java-antlr
bsf -> java-bsf
jdepend -> java-jdepend
jsch -> java-jsch
netrexx -> java-netrexx

Greets,
        Jacek


From glen at pld-linux.org  Sun Apr 18 13:20:48 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:20:48 +0300
Subject: CVS admin request: java packages renames
In-Reply-To: <20100417133814.GA3823@lolek.nigdzie>
References: <20100417133814.GA3823@lolek.nigdzie>
Message-ID: <201004181420.48940.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Saturday 17 April 2010 16:38:14 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could we have another few java packages renamed?
>
> antlr3 -> java-antlr3
> antlr -> java-antlr
> bsf -> java-bsf
> jdepend -> java-jdepend
> jsch -> java-jsch
> netrexx -> java-netrexx

done.

-- 
glen


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Sun Apr 18 14:36:19 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 14:36:19 +0200
Subject: CVS admin request: java packages renames
In-Reply-To: <201004181420.48940.glen@pld-linux.org>
References: <20100417133814.GA3823@lolek.nigdzie>
	<201004181420.48940.glen@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100418123619.GA4078@lolek.nigdzie>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:20:48PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> On Saturday 17 April 2010 16:38:14 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Could we have another few java packages renamed?
> >
> > antlr -> java-antlr

Ooops? this one was too much. Java is just a part of it. 
Could you please revert this change?

antlr3 rename was ok (antlr3 provides only the Java library).

Greets,
        Jacek


From wolf.pld at gmail.com  Sun Apr 18 17:38:19 2010
From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:38:19 +0200
Subject: WTF?
Message-ID: <20100418153819.GA8723@bajzel>

[17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% cvs up -r 1.603 builder
P builder
[17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% ./builder -g oneko     
# $Revision: 1.18 $, $Date: 2008/07/27 22:18:56 $
oneko-1.2.tar.gz having proper md5sum already exists
[17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% cvs up -r 1.604 builder
P builder
[17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% ./builder -g oneko     
Warning: No CVS access defined - using local .spec file
cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified!  Please use the `-d' option
cvs [checkout aborted]: or set the CVSROOT environment variable.
Error: spec file not stored in CVS repo.


revision 1.604
date: 2010/02/11 19:25:12;  author: glen;  state: Exp;  lines: +3 -3;
kopt: kv;  commitid: 2ecc4b7459985abf;  filename: builder;
- packages_dir = top dir, requires rpm build macros >= 1.534


[17:36 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% rpm -q rpm-build-macros
rpm-build-macros-1.555-1.noarch

wolf
-- 
  Bartek   .  
  Taudul   :  
          .:....................................................................
w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g            .:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/


From udvzsolt at gmail.com  Sun Apr 18 17:48:37 2010
From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:48:37 +0200
Subject: WTF?
In-Reply-To: <20100418153819.GA8723@bajzel>
References: <20100418153819.GA8723@bajzel>
Message-ID: <20100418174837.480fe95d@pld-laptop>

> [17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% cvs up -r 1.604 builder
> P builder
> [17:35 wolf at bajzel:~/rpm/packages]% ./builder -g oneko     
> Warning: No CVS access defined - using local .spec file
> cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified!  Please use the `-d' option
> cvs [checkout aborted]: or set the CVSROOT environment variable.
> Error: spec file not stored in CVS repo.
See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org/msg05648.html


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Sun Apr 18 19:18:16 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:18:16 +0200
Subject: packages: icedtea6/icedtea6.spec - BR: fastjar, gawk,
	glibc-misc, lsb-relea...
In-Reply-To: <packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.54@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100418171816.GB4078@lolek.nigdzie>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:10:19PM +0200, sparky wrote:
> Author: sparky                       Date: Sun Apr 18 17:10:19 2010 GMT
> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - BR: fastjar, gawk, glibc-misc, lsb-release, pkgconfig, util-linux

fastjar? Why fastjar and not  java-sun-tools, icedtea6-jar or any other
jar?

lsb-release? it builds without it?

> - dropped BR: wget
> +	WGET=%{_bindir}/wget \

Will that be enough for this to pass?

Greets,
        Jacek


From sparky at pld-linux.org  Sun Apr 18 21:04:01 2010
From: sparky at pld-linux.org (Przemyslaw Iskra)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:04:01 +0200
Subject: packages: icedtea6/icedtea6.spec - BR: fastjar, gawk,
	glibc-misc, lsb-relea...
In-Reply-To: <20100418171816.GB4078@lolek.nigdzie>
References: <packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.54@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
	<20100418171816.GB4078@lolek.nigdzie>
Message-ID: <20100418190401.GA410@pld-linux.org>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:18:16PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:10:19PM +0200, sparky wrote:
> > Author: sparky                       Date: Sun Apr 18 17:10:19 2010 GMT
> > Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - BR: fastjar, gawk, glibc-misc, lsb-release, pkgconfig, util-linux
> 
> fastjar? Why fastjar and not  java-sun-tools, icedtea6-jar or any other
> jar?

yup, this is wrong, any jar will do

> lsb-release? it builds without it?

But distribution identificator is more correct, I think.

> > - dropped BR: wget
> > +	WGET=%{_bindir}/wget \

It is, there is nothing that checks for executability or file existance.

-- 
 ____  Sparky{PI] -- Przemyslaw _  ___  _  _  ........... LANG...Pl..Ca..Es..En
/____) ___  ___  _ _ || Iskra  |  | _ \| |  | : WWW........ppcrcd.pld-linux.org
\____\| -_)'___| ||^'||//\\// <   |  _/| |  | : JID......sparky<at>jabberes.org
(____/||   (_-_|_||  ||\\ ||   |_ |_|  |_| _| : Mail....sparky<at>pld-linux.org


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Sun Apr 18 21:12:14 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:12:14 +0200
Subject: packages: icedtea6/icedtea6.spec - BR: fastjar, gawk,
	glibc-misc, lsb-relea...
In-Reply-To: <20100418190401.GA410@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.54@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_icedtea6_icedtea6.spec.1.55@pld-linux.org>
	<20100418171816.GB4078@lolek.nigdzie>
	<20100418190401.GA410@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <20100418191214.GD4078@lolek.nigdzie>

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 09:04:01PM +0200, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:18:16PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 07:10:19PM +0200, sparky wrote:
> > 
> > fastjar? Why fastjar and not  java-sun-tools, icedtea6-jar or any other
> > jar?
> 
> yup, this is wrong, any jar will do

Fixed.
 
> > lsb-release? it builds without it?
> 
> But distribution identificator is more correct, I think.

That is good.
 
> > > - dropped BR: wget
> > > +	WGET=%{_bindir}/wget \
> 
> It is, there is nothing that checks for executability or file existance.

Maybe WGET=/bin/false would be even better? Will not silently allow to
download files during build? 
Of course, that would break things if that $WGET is embeded somewhere in
the built package?

Let's keep it the way it is now. Good enough, I guess.

Greets,
        Jacek


From glen at pld-linux.org  Sun Apr 18 17:04:51 2010
From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?utf-8?q?Ruusam=C3=A4e?=)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:04:51 +0300
Subject: CVS admin request: java packages renames
In-Reply-To: <20100418123619.GA4078@lolek.nigdzie>
References: <20100417133814.GA3823@lolek.nigdzie>
	<201004181420.48940.glen@pld-linux.org>
	<20100418123619.GA4078@lolek.nigdzie>
Message-ID: <201004181804.52291.glen@pld-linux.org>

On Sunday 18 April 2010 15:36:19 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 02:20:48PM +0300, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 April 2010 16:38:14 Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Could we have another few java packages renamed?
> > >
> > > antlr -> java-antlr
>
> Ooops? this one was too much. Java is just a part of it.
> Could you please revert this change?
>
> antlr3 rename was ok (antlr3 provides only the Java library).

damage reverted

> Greets,
>         Jacek

-- 
glen


From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl  Tue Apr 20 15:05:49 2010
From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:05:49 +0200
Subject: python-virtualenv
Message-ID: <20100420130549.GI6579@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

Can some python hacker chack and fix why python has hardcoded
sys.prefix, thus making python-virtualenv a no-op?

[baggins at sith tmp]$ virtualenv xxx
New python executable in xxx/bin/python
ERROR: The executable xxx/bin/python is not functioning
ERROR: It thinks sys.prefix is '/usr' (should be '/tmp/xxx')
ERROR: virtualenv is not compatible with this system or executable

[baggins at sith tmp]$ rpm -q python
python-2.6.5-3.x86_64

-- 
Jan R?korajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio


From patrys at pld-linux.org  Tue Apr 20 15:12:42 2010
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:12:42 +0200
Subject: python-virtualenv
In-Reply-To: <20100420130549.GI6579@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <20100420130549.GI6579@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <i2g89b6ba3a1004200612rb387cfa4v512f2f0b0e8cbf83@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Jan R?korajski
<baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:
> Can some python hacker chack and fix why python has hardcoded
> sys.prefix, thus making python-virtualenv a no-op?

System-wide python builds are supposed to work that way. This
functionality depends on how python is configured and built (sometimes
referred to as "framework build").

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki


From august84 at autocom.pl  Wed Apr 21 13:03:06 2010
From: august84 at autocom.pl (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcnplaiBBdWd1c3R5xYRza2k=?=)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:03:06 +0200
Subject: kdelibs.spec
Message-ID: <4BCEDB6A.7070806@autocom.pl>

Hi,

Compilation kdelibs-3.5.10 with new openssl needs patch:
http://www.thel.ro/kde3-fedora/SOURCES/kdelibs-3.5.10-ossl-1.x.patch

Reference:
http://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html:
Changes between 0.9.8n and 1.0.0  [xx XXX xxxx]:
*) Remove the ancient ASN1_METHOD code. This was only ever used in one
   place for the (very old) "NETSCAPE" format certificates which are now
   handled using new ASN1 code equivalents.
   [Steve Henson]

th+redy+test-i686: i've successfully built patched 1.589, so current
should work too.
Build for th may also require arts built against boost-1.42.0. Arts from
1.181 builds fine for my local builder (with and without java*
packages). Is there still problem with it on bulider? (
http://buildlogs.pld-linux.org/index.php?dist=th&arch=SRPMS&ok=1&name=arts&id=e1d2b671-ee9d-4236-843a-dd4ba4a37c5b&action=tail
)


Regards,

-- 
Andrzej Augusty?ski
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdelibs-3.5.10-ossl-1.x.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7178 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100421/a9626d6f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kdelibs.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 768 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100421/a9626d6f/attachment-0001.bin>

From arekm at maven.pl  Wed Apr 21 18:38:25 2010
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:38:25 +0200
Subject: Th: help needed / pomoc potrzebna - openssl
Message-ID: <201004211838.25961.arekm@maven.pl>

Big number of packages needs rebuild due to soname change in openssl library. 
Feel free to fix any package you will find at url below.

Du?a ilo?? paczek wymaga przebudowania z powodu zmiany wersji biblioteki 
openssl. Zainteresowani mog? poprawia? dowoln? wybran? paczk? z urla poni?ej.

http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt

Due to really big number of packages ready is going to be stalled until all 
are fixed so help is needed.

Z powodu naprawd? du?ej ilo?ci paczek "ready" prze?yje wstrzymanie do czasu 
poprawienia paczek, a co za tym idzie pomoc w poprawianiu jest potrzebna... i 
niezb?dna.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Wed Apr 21 19:28:33 2010
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:28:33 +0200
Subject: Th: help needed / pomoc potrzebna - openssl
In-Reply-To: <201004211838.25961.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <201004211838.25961.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <20100421172832.GB3720@lolek.nigdzie>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 06:38:25PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt

To i ja co? wykopi? z listy:

error: bacula-console-gnome-2.4.4-3: req bacula-common = 2.4.4-3 not found
error: bacula-console-gnome-2.4.4-3: req libcrypto.so.0.9.8 not found

Tego pakietu ju? nie ma i raczej nie b?dzie. Nad reszt? baculi w?a?nie
pracuj?.

Pozdrowienia,
        Jacek


From august84 at autocom.pl  Wed Apr 21 23:18:06 2010
From: august84 at autocom.pl (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcnplaiBBdWd1c3R5xYRza2k=?=)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:18:06 +0200
Subject: AMAROK_1_4
In-Reply-To: <201003021736.23315.glen@pld-linux.org>
References: <4B8C4206.2080707@autocom.pl>
	<201003021736.23315.glen@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <4BCF6B8E.9030502@autocom.pl>

W dniu 02.03.2010 16:36, Elan Ruusam?e pisze:
> yes, it lives, as any branch is open for commits until there are insterested 
> developers.
> 
> however it is not officially supported in th, and building it needs manual 
> installing of depdendant packages from th-obsolete.

autoconf-2.63-4 still needed :/

> there will be no default build with mysql, unless you send a patch that builds 
> sqlite AND mysql/postgresql by default (i.e sqlite support is produced from 
> same build), but as much i know it supports one backend a time.
> 
> happy hacking on software that upstream considers dead :)

Patch ruby19 is based on http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amarok1/amarok1/
I don't know if it breaks building against ruby-1.8.x, but BuildRequires
bumped up just in case (RUBY_1_8 failed to build with new openssl).
Maybe it is time to remove unused zeroconf code?
Small fix for new gcc 4.5 added.
Mysql & pqsql support turned on by default. Amarok supports different DB
(sqlite,mysql,pqsql) simultaneously and you can switch between
_different_ collections in settings. There is no built-in method of
moving collection from one type of DB to another, but you may try
http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/MySQL_HowTo#Database_Conversions

>> [..]
>> i686-pld-linux-g++: Internal error: Killed (program collect2)
>> Please submit a full bug report.
>> See <http://bugs.pld-linux.org> for instructionadvas.
>> [..]

Now in th with libtool-2.2.6-13.i686 works fine.

arts(boost) and kdelibs(openssl) in th propably need rebuild in order to
use this amarok in distro.
th+ready+test+obsolete-i686: (with homemade arts and kdelibs) amarok
builds and works.

I would be graceful to somebody for putting changes in repo.


thX in advance :)

-- 
Andrzej Augusty?ski
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: amarok-gcc45.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 579 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100421/c916f755/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: amarok-ruby19.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2686 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100421/c916f755/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: amarok.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3156 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20100421/c916f755/attachment-0002.bin>

From patrys at pld-linux.org  Wed Apr 21 23:22:12 2010
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:22:12 +0200
Subject: udev-152
Message-ID: <g2y89b6ba3a1004211422xe1b7478fp6504e1f0e43b6eab@mail.gmail.com>

The firmware helper is broken and does not load any firmware the
kernel requests.

Downgrading to 151 immediately fixes the problem (which seems to point
to /lib/udev/firmware binary).

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki


From kornet at camk.edu.pl  Thu Apr 22 00:30:50 2010
From: kornet at camk.edu.pl (Kacper Kornet)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:30:50 +0200
Subject: udev-152
In-Reply-To: <g2y89b6ba3a1004211422xe1b7478fp6504e1f0e43b6eab@mail.gmail.com>
References: <g2y89b6ba3a1004211422xe1b7478fp6504e1f0e43b6eab@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100421223050.GA2470@gatekeeper.camk.edu.pl>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:22:12PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> The firmware helper is broken and does not load any firmware the
> kernel requests.

> Downgrading to 151 immediately fixes the problem (which seems to point
> to /lib/udev/firmware binary).

There is a typo in configure.ac. See:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=summary

Corrected in udev-153 (please, let someone send it to builders).

-- 
  Kacper


From patrys at pld-linux.org  Thu Apr 22 00:37:38 2010
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:37:38 +0200
Subject: udev-152
In-Reply-To: <20100421223050.GA2470@gatekeeper.camk.edu.pl>
References: <g2y89b6ba3a1004211422xe1b7478fp6504e1f0e43b6eab@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100421223050.GA2470@gatekeeper.camk.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <q2o89b6ba3a1004211537j2d66f009u477b5b90cbfe732f@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Kacper Kornet <kornet at camk.edu.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:22:12PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
>> The firmware helper is broken and does not load any firmware the
>> kernel requests.
>
>> Downgrading to 151 immediately fixes the problem (which seems to point
>> to /lib/udev/firmware binary).
>
> There is a typo in configure.ac. See:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=summary
>
> Corrected in udev-153 (please, let someone send it to builders).

Done.

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki


From adamg at pld-linux.org  Fri Apr 23 14:15:08 2010
From: adamg at pld-linux.org (Adam Golebiowski)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:15:08 +0200
Subject: opengfx -> openttd-opengfx
In-Reply-To: <sig.17296d9231.4BD18DCA.2090004@gmail.com>
References: <sig.17296d9231.4BD18DCA.2090004@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100423121508.GA22577@agmk.net>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 02:08:42PM +0200, Micha? Lisowski wrote:
> mv opengfx openttd-opengfx

done.

-- 
adamg


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr 24 00:27:02 2010
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:27:02 +0300
Subject: Adapter problem, difference between make and %{__make}
Message-ID: <q2y5b3145a1004231527yc21ab29fm8247e870471455b5@mail.gmail.com>

In an attempt to get emerillon packaged for PLD I've been working on
specs for the two missing deps, librest and libethos. Librest went ok
but I'm having fits with libethos.

Most PLD packages use the macro %{__make}  for the build, but for some
reason that breaks the build whereas just make runs and builds fine.
Can somebody tell me what is different and therefore how to fix the
build process so it can get a clean bill of health from adapter and
still build!

http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/packages/libethos/libethos.spec?rev=1.1

Also, while it builds fine on two out of three of my TH systems, the
third bombs during configure with this cryptic error:

...
Running intltoolize...
Running gtkdocize...
Running gnome-doc-common...
Running aclocal-1.11...
configure.ac:34: warning: AM_NLS is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd
m4/intltool.m4:27: IT_PROG_INTLTOOL is expanded from...
configure.ac:34: the top level
Running autoconf...
configure.ac:34: warning: AM_NLS is m4_require'd but not m4_defun'd
m4/intltool.m4:27: IT_PROG_INTLTOOL is expanded from...
configure.ac:34: the top level
configure:5568: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_NLS
      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
      See the Autoconf documentation.
error: Bad exit status from /home/users/caleb/tmp/rpm-tmp.88172 (%build)

Thanks for any input.

Caleb


From patrys at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr 24 01:16:49 2010
From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 01:16:49 +0200
Subject: Adapter problem, difference between make and %{__make}
In-Reply-To: <q2y5b3145a1004231527yc21ab29fm8247e870471455b5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <q2y5b3145a1004231527yc21ab29fm8247e870471455b5@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <g2t89b6ba3a1004231616p650f0ae7zb6ba04d00072b067@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Caleb Maclennan <caleb at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> In an attempt to get emerillon packaged for PLD I've been working on
> specs for the two missing deps, librest and libethos. Librest went ok
> but I'm having fits with libethos.
>
> Most PLD packages use the macro %{__make} ?for the build, but for some
> reason that breaks the build whereas just make runs and builds fine.
> Can somebody tell me what is different and therefore how to fix the
> build process so it can get a clean bill of health from adapter and
> still build!

If %{__make} fails, your first target is -j1 :)

-- 
Patryk Zawadzki


From z at xatka.net  Sat Apr 24 05:29:50 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 05:29:50 +0200
Subject: cvs rename: hsqldb -> java-hsqldb
Message-ID: <20100424032950.GA5517@davabel>

Please rename hsqldb to java-hsqldb.

This package contains library and standalone server, but it's more
often used as library than as standalone application, so imo main
package should contain library and be named java-hsqldb, and
standalone part should be packaged as -n hsqldb.

-- 
Pozdrawiam,
Pawe?


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr 24 12:07:26 2010
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:07:26 +0300
Subject: Adapter problem, difference between make and %{__make}
In-Reply-To: <g2t89b6ba3a1004231616p650f0ae7zb6ba04d00072b067@mail.gmail.com>
References: <q2y5b3145a1004231527yc21ab29fm8247e870471455b5@mail.gmail.com> 
	<g2t89b6ba3a1004231616p650f0ae7zb6ba04d00072b067@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <m2v5b3145a1004240307yd12ba533jf978ec4e798fd0f7@mail.gmail.com>

2010/4/24 Patryk Zawadzki <patrys at pld-linux.org>:
> If %{__make} fails, your first target is -j1 :)

Good to know, thanks. Is the proper way to do this just to run
%{__make} -j1? I noticed this gets executed as make -j6 -j1 which
seems kinda clumsy.

In this case that did not fix my problem, but with some help from
deejay1 it looks like my problem was before the make routine, the
configure steps needed to be pld-ified as well.


From adamg at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr 24 12:57:18 2010
From: adamg at pld-linux.org (Adam Golebiowski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:57:18 +0200
Subject: new developer
In-Reply-To: <4BD2D05A.3070402@autocom.pl>
References: <4BD2D05A.3070402@autocom.pl>
Message-ID: <20100424105718.GA3631@agmk.net>

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 01:04:58PM +0200, Andrzej Augusty?ski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> (en): I want to be a new developer - here is my login and hash of pass:
> (pl): Chcia?em zosta? nowym deweloperem - a tu m?j login i skr?t has?a:

Hi,

You may login with your cvs account now, please add yourself to
CVSROOT/users file.

regards,
adamg


From adamg at pld-linux.org  Sat Apr 24 13:00:04 2010
From: adamg at pld-linux.org (Adam Golebiowski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:00:04 +0200
Subject: cvs rename: hsqldb -> java-hsqldb
In-Reply-To: <20100424032950.GA5517@davabel>
References: <20100424032950.GA5517@davabel>
Message-ID: <20100424110003.GA4031@agmk.net>

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 05:29:50AM +0200, Pawe? Zuzelski wrote:
> Please rename hsqldb to java-hsqldb.
> 
> This package contains library and standalone server, but it's more
> often used as library than as standalone application, so imo main
> package should contain library and be named java-hsqldb, and
> standalone part should be packaged as -n hsqldb.

done.

Since there were auto-tags on hsqldb, I did server-side cp, please
do a 'cvs rm' on hsqldb.

regards,
adamg


From robert.tomasik at gmail.com  Sat Apr 24 19:36:27 2010
From: robert.tomasik at gmail.com (Robert)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:36:27 +0200
Subject: packages: openoffice.org/openoffice.org.spec - updated hsqldb
	deps - rel 2
In-Reply-To: <packages_openoffice.org_openoffice.org.spec.1.862@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_openoffice.org_openoffice.org.spec.1.861@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_openoffice.org_openoffice.org.spec.1.862@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <201004241936.27802.Robert.Tomasik@gmail.com>

To raczej nie jest to samo. zmiana chyba do cofni?cia 


Dnia sobota, 24 kwietnia 2010 o 19:02:54 pawelz napisa?(a):
> -Epoch:         1
> +Epoch:         2
>----------------------------------------
>+- updated hsqldb deps
>+- rel 2


From z at xatka.net  Sat Apr 24 20:06:01 2010
From: z at xatka.net (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3?= Zuzelski)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:06:01 +0200
Subject: packages: openoffice.org/openoffice.org.spec - updated hsqldb
	deps - rel 2
In-Reply-To: <201004241936.27802.Robert.Tomasik@gmail.com>
References: <packages_openoffice.org_openoffice.org.spec.1.861@pld-linux.org>
	<packages_openoffice.org_openoffice.org.spec.1.862@pld-linux.org>
	<201004241936.27802.Robert.Tomasik@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100424180601.GD5517@davabel>

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Robert wrote:
> To raczej nie jest to samo. zmiana chyba do cofni?cia 

whooaaaa, faktycznie si? r?bn??em. Dzi?ki.

Poprawione.

-- 
Pawe?


From arekm at maven.pl  Mon Apr 26 11:59:11 2010
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:59:11 +0200
Subject: Th: help needed / pomoc potrzebna - openssl
In-Reply-To: <201004211838.25961.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <201004211838.25961.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <201004261159.11642.arekm@maven.pl>

On Wednesday 21 of April 2010, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Big number of packages needs rebuild due to soname change in openssl
> library. Feel free to fix any package you will find at url below.
> 
> Du?a ilo?? paczek wymaga przebudowania z powodu zmiany wersji biblioteki
> openssl. Zainteresowani mog? poprawia? dowoln? wybran? paczk? z urla
> poni?ej.
> 
> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt

Due to lack of interest I'm going to drop all packages that weren't rebuild 
with new openssl, so double check that there isn't anything that you use at:

http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/main-ready-test.txt

If you need anything from this list then make sure that it builds on current 
th and give me a note.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/