packages: gdk-pixbuf2/gdk-pixbuf2.spec - +x libpixbufloader-*.so, - removed...
Tomasz Pala
gotar at polanet.pl
Mon Nov 15 14:02:21 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 07:14:26 +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>> >> -%{!?with_apidocs:%{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_gtkdocdir}}
^ removed this one too
>> >> +%{!?with_apidocs:rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_gtkdocdir}}
>> >
>> > %{__rm} is intentional here.
>
> We don't want to keep hundreds of obsolete rms - nobody checks such
> commands on upgrade unless build fails.
OK, so I've brought it back and additionally:
%prep %{__rm} po/io.po
>> And if we want so - why not plain rm without -f?
>
> %{__rm} is defined as "rm --interactive=never".
OK, this is the first PLD spec file I've seen using __rm macro. And I
see it's over 21 months old now, this should go into some guideline.
--
Tomasz Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list