From piotr.budny at gmail.com Tue Aug 9 21:45:35 2011 From: piotr.budny at gmail.com (Piotr Budny) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 21:45:35 +0200 Subject: packages: xorg-driver-video-intel/xorg-driver-video-intel.spec - updated to... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <201108092145.35375.piotr.budny@gmail.com> Dnia wtorek, 9 sierpnia 2011, qboosh napisa?: > Author: qboosh Date: Tue Aug 9 19:19:15 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - updated to 2.16.0 + /bin/rm --interactive=never /home/users/vip/tmp/xorg-driver-video- intel-2.16.0-root-vip/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.la /home/users/vip/tmp/xorg-driver-video-intel-2.16.0-root- vip/usr/lib64/lib*XvMC.la /home/users/vip/tmp/xorg-driver-video-intel-2.16.0- root-vip/usr/lib64/lib*XvMC.so /bin/rm: cannot remove `/home/users/vip/tmp/xorg-driver-video-intel-2.16.0- root-vip/usr/lib64/lib*XvMC.la': No such file or directory /bin/rm: cannot remove `/home/users/vip/tmp/xorg-driver-video-intel-2.16.0- root-vip/usr/lib64/lib*XvMC.so': No such file or directory b??d: B??dny status wyj?cia z /home/users/vip/tmp/rpm-tmp.44529 (%install) B??dy budowania RPM-a: B??dny status wyj?cia z /home/users/vip/tmp/rpm-tmp.44529 (%install) Error: package build failed. (no more info) rel 1? vip; From glen at delfi.ee Sat Aug 13 23:48:22 2011 From: glen at delfi.ee (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:48:22 +0300 Subject: python weakestref Message-ID: <4E46F126.9080301@delfi.ee> no attention there, so maybe gets here https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148 -- glen From wrobell at pld-linux.org Sun Aug 14 12:33:50 2011 From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (Artur Wroblewski) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:33:50 +0100 Subject: python weakestref In-Reply-To: <4E46F126.9080301@delfi.ee> References: <4E46F126.9080301@delfi.ee> Message-ID: 2011/8/13 Elan Ruusam?e : > no attention there, so maybe gets here > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148 yes, it should. best regards, w From glen at delfi.ee Sun Aug 14 21:53:27 2011 From: glen at delfi.ee (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:53:27 +0300 Subject: python weakestref In-Reply-To: References: <4E46F126.9080301@delfi.ee> Message-ID: <4E4827B7.8030600@delfi.ee> On 08/14/2011 01:33 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote: > 2011/8/13 Elan Ruusam?e: >> no attention there, so maybe gets here >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148 > > yes, it should. should what? ticket proposes (questions) several options, you can't anser to multiple conflicting questions with an answer "yes". -- glen From wrobell at pld-linux.org Sun Aug 14 22:01:50 2011 From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (Artur Wroblewski) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:01:50 +0100 Subject: python weakestref In-Reply-To: <4E4827B7.8030600@delfi.ee> References: <4E46F126.9080301@delfi.ee> <4E4827B7.8030600@delfi.ee> Message-ID: 2011/8/14 Elan Ruusam?e : > On 08/14/2011 01:33 PM, Artur Wroblewski wrote: >> >> 2011/8/13 Elan Ruusam?e: >>> >>> no attention there, so maybe gets here >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/pld-linux/+bug/800148 >> >> yes, it should. > > should what? > > ticket proposes (questions) several options, you can't anser to multiple > conflicting questions with an answer "yes". the first question :) :P purpose of python-libs is to run minimal python scripts (i.e. within gnumeric in the past). put weakestref in python-libs. regards, w From ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl Mon Aug 15 16:40:01 2011 From: ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?=A3ukasz_Ma=B6ko?=) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:40:01 +0200 Subject: [th-test] lxde i locale Message-ID: <201108151640.01724@laptok.ed.pl> poldek:/all-avail> install metapackage-lxde-0.2-1.noarch [...] metapackage-lxde-0.2-1.noarch zaznaczy? lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686 (w?. lxlauncher) b??d: lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686: nie znaleziono wymaganego /usr/share/locale/frp/LC_MESSAGES b??d: lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686: nie znaleziono wymaganego /usr/share/locale/tt_RU/LC_MESSAGES [...] -- ?ukasz Ma?ko GG: 2441498 _o) Lukasz.Masko(at)ipipan.waw.pl /\\ Registered Linux User #61028 _\_V Ubuntu: staroafryka?skie s?owo oznaczaj?ce "Nie umiem zainstalowa? Debiana" From glen at delfi.ee Wed Aug 17 23:30:39 2011 From: glen at delfi.ee (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:30:39 +0300 Subject: [th-test] lxde i locale In-Reply-To: <201108151640.01724@laptok.ed.pl> References: <201108151640.01724@laptok.ed.pl> Message-ID: <4E4C32FF.20102@delfi.ee> On 08/15/2011 05:40 PM, ?ukasz Ma?ko wrote: > poldek:/all-avail> install metapackage-lxde-0.2-1.noarch > [...] > metapackage-lxde-0.2-1.noarch zaznaczy? lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686 (w?. > lxlauncher) > b??d: lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686: nie znaleziono wymaganego > /usr/share/locale/frp/LC_MESSAGES > b??d: lxlauncher-0.2.2-1.i686: nie znaleziono wymaganego > /usr/share/locale/tt_RU/LC_MESSAGES > [...] > a tcevo, milles problema? -- glen From glen at delfi.ee Mon Aug 22 21:19:27 2011 From: glen at delfi.ee (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:19:27 +0300 Subject: packages: timeit/timeit.spec (NEW) - initial - find_lang does not package p... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <4E52ABBF.6080805@delfi.ee> On 07/19/2011 09:06 AM, uzsolt wrote: > Author: uzsolt Date: Tue Jul 19 06:06:13 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - initial > - find_lang does not package pl locale, why? because empty translations ARE NOT packaged? http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/2006-November/018278.html http://www.mail-archive.com/pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org/msg03574.html -- glen From udvzsolt at gmail.com Tue Aug 23 07:44:59 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:44:59 +0200 Subject: packages: timeit/timeit.spec (NEW) - initial - find_lang does not package p... In-Reply-To: <4E52ABBF.6080805@delfi.ee> References:

<4E52ABBF.6080805@delfi.ee> Message-ID: > because empty translations ARE NOT packaged? Okay, true :) Zsolt From blues at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 16:44:24 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:44:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, caleb wrote: > Author: caleb Date: Tue Aug 23 11:10:00 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - Up to 0.56 > > ---- Files affected: > packages/etckeeper: > etckeeper.spec (1.5 -> 1.6) [...] > # - %{py_sitescriptdir}/bzrlib/plugins also created by qbzr package? > Summary: Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs > Name: etckeeper [...] > +Requires: bash-completion Are you sure? IMvHO it shouldn't be more than "Suggests"... if any... -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 16:44:29 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:44:29 +0300 Subject: poldek hooks Message-ID: Does poldek offer any hooks or way to trigger actions at any point? For example are there pre/post transaction hooks that I could modify to run something before and/or after any rpm action is taken? How about an "on exit if any package installed / upgraded / uninstalled" during the lifetime of the process? If so where is the best place to find documentation on this? On a related note, is it possible to globally add something to the rpm %pre/%post/%preun/%postun macros? Caleb From patrys at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 16:54:14 2011 From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:54:14 +0200 Subject: poldek hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > Does poldek offer any hooks or way to trigger actions at any point? > For example are there pre/post transaction hooks that I could modify > to run something before and/or after any rpm action is taken? How > about an "on exit if any package installed / upgraded / uninstalled" > during the lifetime of the process? If so where is the best place to > find documentation on this? AFAIK, no. > On a related note, is it possible to globally add something to the rpm > %pre/%post/%preun/%postun macros? You can inject stuff at spec preprocessing time but that's not something we usually do. If you're only interested in a particular group of packages, consider faking install-time expansion by calling a common shell script in %post or %posttrans. -- Patryk Zawadzki I solve problems. From blues at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 17:01:37 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > >> +Requires: ? ?bash-completion > > > > Are you sure? > > IMvHO it shouldn't be more than "Suggests"... if any... > No I'm not sure how to handle this, but it does provide a file for use > by bash-completion: > > %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} > > The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is installed, > resulting in an rpm error. 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires (prefered method). 2. Put %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d to some "filesystem" or something package (unlikely). Make your choice. IMO "1" is preffered one. Take a look at other packages how to do it. > If there is a more graceful way to both package this file and not throw > rpm errors without requiring bash-completion I would love to learn how. Require bash_completion for directory only is insane. I can even not have bash... -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. From gotar at polanet.pl Tue Aug 23 17:31:29 2011 From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:31:29 +0200 Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 17:01:37 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: >> %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} >> >> The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is installed, >> resulting in an rpm error. > > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires > (prefered method). This is overkill. > 2. Put %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d to some "filesystem" or something > package (unlikely). > > Make your choice. IMO "1" is preffered one. Take a look at other packages > how to do it. Once upon a time we got a very nice solution - if one doesn't have a package shipping directory itself, he doesn't intend to use any of the contained files, so We Do Not Care (about permissions). But then an evil dragon came and invented 'directory dependencies' - since then every peasant lives his life in fear, that some shitty dependency will install things he doesn't want to use (and sometimes will kill his cow as 'not needed now' - see my tmpwatch battles), and every knight in kingdom must pray for the cursed single-file subpackages to perish. Maybe, I'm going to repeat this question, maybe instead 'fixing' packages by producing these sub-midgets or enforcing people to install garbage, we simply remove the flawed directory dependency? Current RPM is broken anyway, older one reported 'directory not empty - not removing', now I got dozens of stumps (especially after some perl or python modules) after each upgrade. >> If there is a more graceful way to both package this file and not throw >> rpm errors without requiring bash-completion I would love to learn how. > > Require bash_completion for directory only is insane. I can even not have > bash... Yeah, it sucks. -- Tomasz Pala From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 18:10:21 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:10:21 +0300 Subject: poldek hooks In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 17:54, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > If you're only interested in a particular > group of packages, consider faking install-time expansion by calling a > common shell script in %post or %posttrans. I am interested in ALL packages, however I don't understand what you mean by "faking install-time expansion" or what %posttrans is. Could you explain? I am specifically trying to port etckeeper to PLD. For example yum has an API that you can get callbacks pre-transaction and post-transaction. Apt has command hooks that can be triggered before and after any call to dpkg (or rpm). Pacman likewise has a hook system that can invoke something pre/post any upgrade or install. Caleb From patrys at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 18:14:39 2011 From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:14:39 +0200 Subject: poldek hooks In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 17:54, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: >> If you're only interested in a particular >> group of packages, consider faking install-time expansion by calling a >> common shell script in %post or %posttrans. > I am interested in ALL packages, however I don't understand what you > mean by "faking install-time expansion" or what %posttrans is. Could > you explain? I meant to say that if you don't want to hardcode precise commands in %post, you could just make it call an external script. But from your explanation it's not what you want to do. > I am specifically trying to port etckeeper to PLD. For example yum has > an API that you can get callbacks pre-transaction and > post-transaction. Apt has command hooks that can be triggered before > and after any call to dpkg (or rpm). Pacman likewise has a hook system > that can invoke something pre/post any upgrade or install. Yes, other rpm wrappers support triggers. I think the proper way would be to add these to rpm itself rather than trying to hack them into poldek. On the other hand our current rpm (4.5) is not supported by either rpm5.org or rpm.org. -- Patryk Zawadzki I solve problems. From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 19:09:37 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:09:37 +0300 Subject: poldek hooks In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 19:14, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > Yes, other rpm wrappers support triggers. I think the proper way would > be to add these to rpm itself rather than trying to hack them into > poldek. Add add system wide %pre-transaction %post-transaction macros to rpm itself? That sounds fair enough. > On the other hand our current rpm (4.5) is not supported by either > rpm5.org or rpm.org. What's the deal there? Are we happily patching up a dinosaur? What's the barrier to moving to one of the newer branches? Caleb From arekm at maven.pl Tue Aug 23 19:15:27 2011 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:15:27 +0200 Subject: poldek hooks In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <201108231915.27129.arekm@maven.pl> On Tuesday 23 of August 2011, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > What's the deal there? Are we happily patching up a dinosaur? What's > the barrier to moving to one of the newer branches? Lack of working spec with rpm from these branches. Only that. W would also switch to newer berkeley db then. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From blues at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 23 21:42:43 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:42:43 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: <20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> References:

<20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> Message-ID: On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} > >> > >> The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is > >> installed, resulting in an rpm error. > > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires > > (prefered method). > This is overkill. why? It's nice, IMHO. Wan't some completion? Install proper package. -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. From gotar at polanet.pl Wed Aug 24 13:09:17 2011 From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:09:17 +0200 Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> Message-ID: <20110824110917.GA9228@polanet.pl> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 21:42:43 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: >> > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires >> > (prefered method). >> This is overkill. > > why? It's nice, IMHO. > Wan't some completion? Install proper package. 1. one needs to know he wants the completion - as they exist for a very limited set of programs only, 2. one has to perform additional action - while it might just work OOTB, 3. it eats space (additional rpm/poldek indexes) and clutters rpm -q. As a conclusion of 1 and 2: if new completion arise, it won't automagically show up after upgrade. Otherwise why don't separate each man page? We could get rid of /usr/share/man from FHS (let's say we create FHS-man subpackage). -- Tomasz Pala From blues at pld-linux.org Wed Aug 24 14:26:22 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:26:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: <20110824110917.GA9228@polanet.pl> References:

<20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> <20110824110917.GA9228@polanet.pl> Message-ID: On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires > >> > (prefered method). > >> This is overkill. > > why? It's nice, IMHO. Wan't some completion? Install proper package. > 1. one needs to know he wants the completion - as they exist for a very > limited set of programs only. > 2. one has to perform additional action - while it might just work OOTB. > 3. it eats space (additional rpm/poldek indexes) and clutters rpm -q. > > As a conclusion of 1 and 2: if new completion arise, it won't > automagically show up after upgrade. If you see better method right now - you are welcome. But DO THIS, don't talk about "how rpm should work". Any of us know it. > Otherwise why don't separate each man page? We could get rid of > /usr/share/man from FHS (let's say we create FHS-man subpackage). Reductio ad absurdum Maybe each file in filesystem? :P -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. From n3npq at mac.com Wed Aug 24 14:26:36 2011 From: n3npq at mac.com (Jeff Johnson) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:26:36 -0400 Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> <20110824110917.GA9228@polanet.pl> Message-ID: <788B3E6E-B2E9-4820-8B43-284A66256663@mac.com> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > Maybe each file in filesystem? :P > That won't work: one needs to put every byte in a virtualized environment with full hardware enforced isolation to please everyone. And RPM will *still* have extraordinary abilities to be able to continue same old, same old, installations. 73 de Jeff From gotar at polanet.pl Wed Aug 24 17:32:55 2011 From: gotar at polanet.pl (Tomasz Pala) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:32:55 +0200 Subject: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56 In-Reply-To: References:

<20110823153129.GA28237@polanet.pl> <20110824110917.GA9228@polanet.pl> Message-ID: <20110824153254.GA24664@polanet.pl> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 14:26:22 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > If you see better method right now - you are welcome. Of course - leave this bash completion code in main package (I'm strictly againt using bash at all, but it doesn't bother even me) and do not care at all about directory owner (until appropriate package claims it). > But DO THIS, don't talk about "how rpm should work". Any of us know it. May I? It was introduced here as a big rpm feature! And it was PITA before all the packages were 'fixed' (creating ridiculous subpackages like this for nonsesne purpose of meting dumb requirements). >> Otherwise why don't separate each man page? We could get rid of >> /usr/share/man from FHS (let's say we create FHS-man subpackage). > > Reductio ad absurdum Why? 1. both are plain text files with NO real dependencies, 2. both are useless without appropriate package (bash, man/pinfo), 3. both 'require' some directory structure only. > Maybe each file in filesystem? :P I thought about this writing previous mail, but this was reductio ad absurdum - man pages are much better (real life) example and this is the same usage scheme (I'd say that the same number of people use bash as man - I use zsh and pinfo). So, if I want to have info pages and regular documentation (%_docdir, so can't %_excludedocs), but don't use man pages, I could 'save' much more on dividing man pages into subpackages. But this is totally insane. Just like separating a few dozens of bash completion files into their own subpackages. It would be much better to package them as %doc instead... -- Tomasz Pala From arekm at maven.pl Wed Aug 24 20:29:54 2011 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:29:54 +0200 Subject: kernel-3.0.3-0.3 - tests Message-ID: <201108242029.54557.arekm@maven.pl> Please test kernel 3.0.3-0.3 from th-test (warning, tuxonice not included - default off now, see changelog). -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From wojciech at blaszkowski.com Thu Aug 25 08:36:11 2011 From: wojciech at blaszkowski.com (Wojciech =?utf-8?q?B=C5=82aszkowski?=) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:36:11 +0200 Subject: kernel-3.0.3-0.3 - tests In-Reply-To: <201108242029.54557.arekm@maven.pl> References: <201108242029.54557.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <201108250836.11319@wojtosz> Dnia Wednesday 24 of August 2011, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisa?: > Please test kernel 3.0.3-0.3 from th-test (warning, tuxonice not included > - default off now, see changelog). 3.0.3-0.3 booted up on i686 (2x P3, RAID1, 1GB RAM ECC-R) machine. Nothing unusual in dmsesg, vservers are OK for now. -- Pozdrawiam, Best regards, Mit freundlichen Gr??en, Wojciech B?aszkowski www.blaszkowski.com GSM: +48 600 197 207 JID: wojtosz at jabber.biz.pl From blues at pld-linux.org Fri Aug 26 09:09:28 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:09:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: xorg-xserver-server/xorg-xserver-server.spec - xorg-driver-video ... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, glen wrote: > Author: glen Date: Fri Aug 26 03:42:59 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - xorg-driver-video virtual for video drivers > - release 1 [...] > +# Requires at least one video driver to run, see xorg.log which one exactly > +Requires xorg-driver-video I don't think so. You can have network X-server which doesn't even have display. It should be "Suggests" -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free. From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Aug 26 10:49:55 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:49:55 +0300 Subject: packages: xorg-xserver-server/xorg-xserver-server.spec - xorg-driver-video ... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <4E575E33.7010602@pld-linux.org> On 26.08.2011 10:09, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > +# Requires at least one video driver to run, see xorg.log which one > exactly >> +Requires xorg-driver-video > I don't think so. > > You can have network X-server which doesn't even have display. > > It should be "Suggests" i tought Xvfb/Xnest and the like is for that... i'll change to suggests then, but out of curiosity, how do you get such setup? and on what purpose? -- glen From blues at pld-linux.org Wed Aug 31 22:54:05 2011 From: blues at pld-linux.org (Pawel Golaszewski) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Subject: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, arekm wrote: > Author: arekm Date: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it) [...] > -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint > +#%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint what about upstart and systemd users? :) -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski jid:bluesjabbergdapl -------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.