cdg: shadzik-rw (NEW)

[Bartosz Taudul]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Mariusz Mazur <mmazur at kernel.pl> wrote:
>> The admision/removal of a CDG member is accomplished by a 2/3 majority
>> vote with a minimum of 50% turnout. Only CDG members vote.
> With the current cdg member's list, any vote will result in at least 50% of
> members getting automatically booted from cdg.
Yes, rules are not perfect.

>> A proposal for removing a member is to be voted on after 3 months of
>> that members inactivity as a CDG (lack of comments, no voting, etc.).
> Can multible removals/additions be made in a single vote?
Why not?

>> > For this example, members that does not exists on that statistics are:
>> So what?
> For a CDG decission to have any legitimacy, the CDG members should reflect the
> currently active developers. So it makes sense to base the updated CDG members
> list on the top commiters list + infrastructure admins.
cdg is cdg. Changing rules and/or member list in a way that breaks the
aforementioned rules is in no way legal. Staging a coup d'état  breaks
the continouity of our "government", for the lack of better word.

wolf