From glen at pld-linux.org Wed Mar 2 06:24:18 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 07:24:18 +0200 Subject: packages: chromium-browser/chromium-browser.spec - updated to 11.0.687.0, r... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <4D6DD482.7010906@pld-linux.org> On 01/03/11 21:44, charles wrote: > Author: charles Date: Tue Mar 1 19:44:54 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > - updated to 11.0.687.0, r76345 > > ---- Files affected: > packages/chromium-browser: > chromium-browser.spec (1.100 -> 1.101) is the missing running app icon solved finally that you decided to bump the version? -- glen From lisu87 at gmail.com Mon Mar 7 13:15:34 2011 From: lisu87 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBMaXNvd3NraQ==?=) Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 13:15:34 +0100 Subject: packages: supertux2/supertux2.desktop (NEW), supertux2/supertux2.sh (NEW), ... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <4D74CC66.2020608@gmail.com> W dniu 07.03.2011 10:25, mguevara pisze: > Author: mguevara Date: Mon Mar 7 09:25:10 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > supertux 0.3.3 aka supertux2 initial release > > ---- Files affected: > packages/supertux2: > supertux2.desktop (NONE -> 1.1) (NEW), supertux2.sh (NONE -> 1.1) (NEW), supertux2.spec (NONE -> 1.1) (NEW) supertux 0.3.3 exist on DEVEL branch of supertux.spec... From udvzsolt at gmail.com Wed Mar 9 09:49:02 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:49:02 +0100 Subject: Fwd: ERRORS: cdcat.spec In-Reply-To: <6dc07c50-3205-4184-9817-7292109af674@pld.src.builder> References: <6dc07c50-3205-4184-9817-7292109af674@pld.src.builder> Message-ID: Hi all! Can anybody say what's the problem? Thanks! Zsolt ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: PLD th-src builder Date: 2011/3/9 Subject: ERRORS: cdcat.spec To: uzsolt at pld-linux.org Cc: pld-logs-th at lists.pld-linux.org cdcat.spec (HEAD): FAILED --- cdcat.spec:HEAD: Build-Time: user:0.29s sys:0.27s real:2.15s (faults io:0 non-io:45217) *** buildlog for cdcat.spec request from: uzsolt started at: Wed Mar 9 09:41:00 2011 building SRPM using: cd rpm/packages; nice -n 0 ./builder -nu -nm --nodeps --http -bs -r HEAD -Tp auto-th- -tt cdcat.spec 2>&1 Can't find java virtual machine, aborting. U cdcat/cdcat.spec # $Revision: 1.30 $, $Date: 2011/03/08 14:58:31 $ Available branches: AC-branch Searching for tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1... Tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1 already exists (spec release: 1.29). exit status 2304 error: No files produced. Can't find java virtual machine, aborting. error: Fetching /%{_Rsourcedir}/cdcat.desktop failed: Unknown or unexpected error error: Fetching /%{_Rsourcedir}/cdcat-1.2.tar.bz2 failed: Unknown or unexpected error Can't find java virtual machine, aborting. Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:0.29s sys:0.27s real:2.15s (faults io:0 non-io:45217) End-PLD-Builder-Info From megabajt at pld-linux.org Wed Mar 9 10:01:06 2011 From: megabajt at pld-linux.org (Marcin Banasiak) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:01:06 +0100 Subject: ERRORS: cdcat.spec In-Reply-To: References: <6dc07c50-3205-4184-9817-7292109af674@pld.src.builder> Message-ID: 2011/3/9 Zsolt Udvari : > Can anybody say what's the problem? > [...] > Can't find java virtual machine, aborting. > U cdcat/cdcat.spec > # $Revision: 1.30 $, $Date: 2011/03/08 14:58:31 $ > Available branches: AC-branch > Searching for tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1... > Tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1 already exists (spec release: 1.29). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You should increase release. -- Marcin Banasiak From udvzsolt at gmail.com Wed Mar 9 10:43:36 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:43:36 +0100 Subject: ERRORS: cdcat.spec In-Reply-To: References: <6dc07c50-3205-4184-9817-7292109af674@pld.src.builder> Message-ID: Thank you for your answer! Zsolt 2011/3/9 Marcin Banasiak > 2011/3/9 Zsolt Udvari : > > Can anybody say what's the problem? > > > [...] > > Can't find java virtual machine, aborting. > > U cdcat/cdcat.spec > > # $Revision: 1.30 $, $Date: 2011/03/08 14:58:31 $ > > Available branches: AC-branch > > Searching for tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1... > > Tag auto-th-cdcat-1_2-1 already exists (spec release: 1.29). > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > You should increase release. > > > -- > Marcin Banasiak > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > From przemo at firszt.eu Thu Mar 10 13:50:02 2011 From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:50:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] i915 failed to set cursor + garbage on screen Message-ID: <1299761402.5672.11.camel@pldmachine> Hi, I had some problems with 2.6.38-rc6 and xorg-driver-video-intel-2.14.0 xorg was spitting hundreds of errors like that on the consle: (EE) intel(0): failed to set cursor: Input/output error and this in /var/log/kernel: Mar 4 11:31:51 pldmachine kernel: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Mar 4 11:31:51 pldmachine kernel: [drm:i915_do_wait_request] *ERROR* i915_do_wait_request returns -11 (awaiting 1057835 at 1057827, next 1057836) Mar 4 11:31:51 pldmachine kernel: [drm:i915_reset] *ERROR* Failed to reset chip. There were also mixed colours (especially in gnome-panel) and cursor was jumping on text fields and links in iceweasel. The attached patch found here [1] seems to solve the problem. MORE TESTING REQUIRED as I have only one laptop with intel graphic card. Anyone has similiar problem with PLD kernel or it's just my "custom made" problem? [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=112720 -- Przemo Firszt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xorg-driver-video-intel.spec.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 795 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xorg-driver-video-intel-uxa-damage.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 385 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl Thu Mar 10 15:09:03 2011 From: ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl (=?iso-8859-2?q?=A3ukasz_Ma=B6ko?=) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:09:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] i915 failed to set cursor + garbage on screen In-Reply-To: <1299761402.5672.11.camel@pldmachine> References: <1299761402.5672.11.camel@pldmachine> Message-ID: <201103101509.03750@laptok.ed.pl> Dnia czwartek, 10 marca 2011, Przemo Firszt napisa?: > Hi, > I had some problems with 2.6.38-rc6 and xorg-driver-video-intel-2.14.0 > xorg was spitting hundreds of errors like that on the consle: I have no problems, but right now I'm on kernel 2.6.37.3 (no such problems for a quite wide range of recent kernels). Intel driver as above, KDE from PLD, hardware is Intel i945GM. -- ?ukasz Ma?ko GG: 2441498 _o) Lukasz.Masko(at)ipipan.waw.pl /\\ Registered Linux User #61028 _\_V Ubuntu: staroafryka?skie s?owo oznaczaj?ce "Nie umiem zainstalowa? Debiana" From qboosh at pld-linux.org Thu Mar 10 16:48:55 2011 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:48:55 +0100 Subject: packages: mysql/mysql.spec - trim out obsolete set-variable. unsupported in... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20110310154855.GA20884@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:28:49AM +0100, glen wrote: > ================================================================ > Index: packages/mysql/mysql.spec > diff -u packages/mysql/mysql.spec:1.528 packages/mysql/mysql.spec:1.529 > --- packages/mysql/mysql.spec:1.528 Fri Feb 25 16:25:50 2011 > +++ packages/mysql/mysql.spec Tue Mar 8 07:28:44 2011 > @@ -902,14 +902,16 @@ > configs="$configs $config_file" > done > > -( > echo 'You should run MySQL upgrade script *after* restarting MySQL server for all MySQL clusters.' > echo 'Thus, you should invoke:' > for config in $configs; do > + sed -i -e ' > + #set-variable\s*=\s* ## > + ' $config > + > datadir=$(awk -F= '!/^#/ && $1 ~ /datadir/{print $2}' $config | xargs) > echo "# mysql_upgrade --datadir=$datadir" > done > -) | %banner -e %{name}-5.1 Why echo not %banner? -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From marekguevara at gmail.com Thu Mar 10 19:40:57 2011 From: marekguevara at gmail.com (Marek Guevara Braun) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:40:57 +0100 Subject: packages: supertux2/supertux2.desktop (NEW), supertux2/supertux2.sh (NEW), ... In-Reply-To: <4D74CC66.2020608@gmail.com> References:

<4D74CC66.2020608@gmail.com> Message-ID: W dniu 7 marca 2011 13:15 u?ytkownik Micha? Lisowski napisa?: > supertux 0.3.3 exist on DEVEL branch of supertux.spec... Thanks, for the info. I've just built the DEVEL version. Is it ready? I have found that it requires libsquirrel.so: $ which supertux2 /usr/bin/supertux2 $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/supertux2 supertux-0.3.3-0.1.x86_64 $ supertux2 supertux2: error while loading shared libraries: libsquirrel.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I had no such problems before with the crude spec version I've comitted. Pozdrawiam, Marek From przemo at firszt.eu Thu Mar 10 20:01:19 2011 From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:01:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] i915 failed to set cursor + garbage on screen In-Reply-To: <201103101509.03750@laptok.ed.pl> References: <1299761402.5672.11.camel@pldmachine> <201103101509.03750@laptok.ed.pl> Message-ID: <1299783679.5672.13.camel@pldmachine> Dnia 2011-03-10, czw o godzinie 15:09 +0100, ?ukasz Ma?ko pisze: > Dnia czwartek, 10 marca 2011, Przemo Firszt napisa?: > > Hi, > > I had some problems with 2.6.38-rc6 and xorg-driver-video-intel-2.14.0 > > xorg was spitting hundreds of errors like that on the consle: > > I have no problems, but right now I'm on kernel 2.6.37.3 (no such problems > for a quite wide range of recent kernels). Intel driver as above, KDE from > PLD, hardware is Intel i945GM. OK, the patch doesn't work - it took 2 days to get "failed to set cursor", but the problem is back. -- Przemo Firszt From glen at pld-linux.org Thu Mar 10 20:20:44 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:20:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] i915 failed to set cursor + garbage on screen In-Reply-To: <201103101509.03750@laptok.ed.pl> References: <1299761402.5672.11.camel@pldmachine> <201103101509.03750@laptok.ed.pl> Message-ID: <4D79248C.6030200@pld-linux.org> On 10.03.2011 16:09, ?ukasz Ma?ko wrote: > Dnia czwartek, 10 marca 2011, Przemo Firszt napisa?: >> Hi, >> I had some problems with 2.6.38-rc6 and xorg-driver-video-intel-2.14.0 >> xorg was spitting hundreds of errors like that on the consle: > I have no problems, but right now I'm on kernel 2.6.37.3 (no such problems > for a quite wide range of recent kernels). Intel driver as above, KDE from > PLD, hardware is Intel i945GM. same card, i saw random pixels in gnome-terminal with 2.6.37 and upwards (2.6.38rc5 was last i tested) but i had to downgrade back to 2.6.35 as tvout is blank > 2.6.35 -- glen From lisu87 at gmail.com Fri Mar 11 10:34:00 2011 From: lisu87 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBMaXNvd3NraQ==?=) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:34:00 +0100 Subject: packages: supertux2/supertux2.desktop (NEW), supertux2/supertux2.sh (NEW), ... In-Reply-To: References:

<4D74CC66.2020608@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D79EC88.8020001@gmail.com> W dniu 10.03.2011 19:40, Marek Guevara Braun pisze: > W dniu 7 marca 2011 13:15 u?ytkownik Micha? Lisowski napisa?: >> supertux 0.3.3 exist on DEVEL branch of supertux.spec... > Thanks, for the info. I've just built the DEVEL version. Is it ready? > I have found that it requires libsquirrel.so: > > $ which supertux2 > /usr/bin/supertux2 > $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/supertux2 > supertux-0.3.3-0.1.x86_64 > $ supertux2 > supertux2: error while loading shared libraries: libsquirrel.so: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > I had no such problems before with the crude spec version I've comitted. Try now. I think that putting DEVEL supertux.spec in separate spec (supertux2.spec) is good idea anyway. From lisu87 at gmail.com Fri Mar 11 13:54:12 2011 From: lisu87 at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBMaXNvd3NraQ==?=) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:54:12 +0100 Subject: cp enet enet12 Message-ID: <4D7A1B74.3010703@gmail.com> Please copy enet/enet.spec rev. 1.4 to enet12/enet12.spec. Reason: ENet 1.3 branch is API-incopatible with ENet 1.2 From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Mar 11 17:29:46 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:29:46 +0200 Subject: cp enet enet12 In-Reply-To: <4D7A1B74.3010703@gmail.com> References: <4D7A1B74.3010703@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D7A4DFA.6080203@pld-linux.org> On 11.03.2011 14:54, Micha? Lisowski wrote: > Please copy enet/enet.spec rev. 1.4 to enet12/enet12.spec. why do you need two versions, can you upgrade to latest and rebuild deps? from th deps only enet-devel requires enet -- glen From udvzsolt at gmail.com Wed Mar 16 09:13:12 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:13:12 +0100 Subject: Ati fglrx video driver Message-ID: Hello everybody! I've a small question: is there any reason that xorg-driver-video-fglrx (and its packages) doesn't available in repos? Is there any package that obsoletes this? When I try poldek --upgrade-dist, I receive the following message: error: Failed dependencies: xorg-xserver-server(videodrv-abi) <= 8.0 is needed by (installed) xorg-driver-video-fglrx-11.1-6.i686 And can't upgrade xorg-driver-video-fglrx because there isn't exist. Thanks! Zsolt From arekm at maven.pl Wed Mar 16 09:17:30 2011 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:17:30 +0100 Subject: Ati fglrx video driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201103160917.30741.arekm@maven.pl> On Wednesday 16 of March 2011, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I've a small question: is there any reason that xorg-driver-video-fglrx > (and its packages) doesn't available in repos? Is there any package that > obsoletes this? > When I try poldek --upgrade-dist, I receive the following message: > > error: Failed dependencies: > xorg-xserver-server(videodrv-abi) <= 8.0 is needed by (installed) > xorg-driver-video-fglrx-11.1-6.i686 > > And can't upgrade xorg-driver-video-fglrx because there isn't exist. If you want fglrx then you can't upgrade xserver. ATI is very slow when dealing with new xservers. So you have two options, wait for ATI to release supported version or try to use -ati driver. > Thanks! > > Zsolt -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From udvzsolt at gmail.com Wed Mar 16 09:19:34 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:19:34 +0100 Subject: Ati fglrx video driver In-Reply-To: <201103160917.30741.arekm@maven.pl> References: <201103160917.30741.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: Thanks for response! If you want fglrx then you can't upgrade xserver. ATI is very slow when > dealing with new xservers. > > So you have two options, wait for ATI to release supported version or try > to > use -ati driver. > And this driver has 3D hardware acceleration? Zsolt From arekm at maven.pl Wed Mar 16 09:22:22 2011 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:22:22 +0100 Subject: Ati fglrx video driver In-Reply-To: References: <201103160917.30741.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <201103160922.23134.arekm@maven.pl> On Wednesday 16 of March 2011, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Thanks for response! > > If you want fglrx then you can't upgrade xserver. ATI is very slow when > > > dealing with new xservers. > > > > So you have two options, wait for ATI to release supported version or try > > to > > use -ati driver. > > And this driver has 3D hardware acceleration? There is a driver (a few actually, Mesa...dri-rxxx) but no idea how well it works. > Zsolt -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl Wed Mar 16 10:06:46 2011 From: baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl (Jan Rekorajski) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:06:46 +0100 Subject: Ati fglrx video driver In-Reply-To: References: <201103160917.30741.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <20110316090646.GA19500@sith.mimuw.edu.pl> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Thanks for response! > > If you want fglrx then you can't upgrade xserver. ATI is very slow when > > dealing with new xservers. > > > > So you have two options, wait for ATI to release supported version or try > > to > > use -ati driver. > > > And this driver has 3D hardware acceleration? It has pretty good 3D, at least on my HD4650. But ati driver has a tendency to overheat the GPU, my card is 15C hotter with ati driver than with fglrx. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/557829 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27705 -- Jan R?korajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD! bagginsmimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY? BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio From aredridel at nbtsc.org Fri Mar 18 06:02:44 2011 From: aredridel at nbtsc.org (Aria Stewart) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:02:44 -0600 Subject: RFC: rename drizzle to drizzle7 Message-ID: Any thoughts? The official tarballs are drizzle7-y.m.d format. Aria From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Mar 18 09:27:05 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:27:05 +0200 Subject: RFC: rename drizzle to drizzle7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201103181027.05999.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 18 March 2011 07:02, Aria Stewart wrote: > Any thoughts? The official tarballs are drizzle7-y.m.d format. we don't even have stable one to keep serveral versions. official thinks like debian/ubuntu where everywhere are versions in name so -1 from me > Aria -- glen From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Mar 18 09:34:49 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:34:49 +0200 Subject: packages: protobuf/protobuf.spec 2.4.0a In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <201103181034.50359.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 18 March 2011 07:32, aredridel wrote: > Author: aredridel Date: Fri Mar 18 05:32:39 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > ---- Log message: > 2.4.0a > > ---- Files affected: > packages/protobuf: > protobuf.spec (1.6 -> 1.7) > > ---- Diffs: > > ================================================================ > Index: packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec > diff -u packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.6 > packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.7 --- > packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.6 Sat Nov 28 02:43:15 2009 > +++ packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec Fri Mar 18 06:32:33 2011 > @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ > Summary: Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format > Summary(pl.UTF-8): Protocol Buffers - format wymiany danych Google > Name: protobuf > -Version: 2.0.3 > +Version: 2.4.0a > Release: 1 > License: BSD > Group: Libraries > Source0: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > -# Source0-md5: 37e6e4d63434672c70bd977be9c372cb > +# Source0-md5: 61df3f63ec284fc6f57a68c67e4918c6 > URL: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ > BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel > BuildRequires: rpm-pythonprov > @@ -109,22 +109,29 @@ > > %files libs > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so.*.*.* > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so.? > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.*.*.* > -%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.3 > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.? > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.*.*.* > -%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.3 > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.? > > %files devel > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so > +%{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.la > %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.la > %{_libdir}/libprotoc.la > %{_includedir}/google > %{_examplesdir}/%{name}-%{version} > +%{_pkgconfigdir}/protobuf-lite.pc > +%{_pkgconfigdir}/protobuf.pc > > %files static > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > +%{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.a > %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.a > %{_libdir}/libprotoc.a > > @@ -134,6 +141,9 @@ > All persons listed below can be reached at @pld-linux.org > > $Log$ > +Revision 1.7 2011/03/18 05:32:33 aredridel > + 2.4.0a do you know what next version will be that you included "a" in Version field? 2.4.0? or 2.4.0b? if "a" denotes "alpha" stage, then it version should be 2.4.0 and "a" included in release. see PLD-doc/devel-hints-en.txt about "epoch bumping" -- glen From udvzsolt at gmail.com Fri Mar 18 11:47:37 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:47:37 +0100 Subject: poldek segfault Message-ID: Hi all! I receive sometimes segfault in poldek (when I want to try install some *specified* packages, e.g. ssh, coreutils, etc.). Now I've created (only for testing, for me) a repo: [source] type = %{_type} name = carme-texlive2010 path = http://carme.pld-linux.org/~uzsolt/other-rpms/texlive2010/RPMS/i686/ When I run poldek in gdb: poldek:/all-avail> install texlive warn: texlive: ambiguous name Detaching after fork from child process 20464. Detaching after fork from child process 20465. Processing dependencies... Detaching after fork from child process 20466. texlive-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-20100722-0.1.i686 Detaching after fork from child process 20467. greedy upgrade kpathsea-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved texlive = 1:20091107-0.1) kpathsea-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by kpathsea-20100722-0.1.i686 greedy upgrade texlive-dvips-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved libkpathsea.so.5) texlive-dvips-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-dvips-20100722-0.1.i686 greedy upgrade texconfig-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved texlive-dvips = 1:20091107-0.1) texconfig-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texconfig-20100722-0.1.i686 Detaching after fork from child process 20468. texconfig-20100722-0.1.i686 marks xdvi-20100722-0.1.i686 (cap xdvi = 1:20100722-0.1) xdvi-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by xdvi-20100722-0.1.i686 Detaching after fork from child process 20469. greedy upgrade texlive-pdftex-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved libkpathsea.so.5) texlive-pdftex-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-pdftex-20100722-0.1.i686 greedy upgrade texlive-format-pdflatex-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved texlive-pdftex = 1:20091107-0.1) texlive-format-pdflatex-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-format-pdflatex-20100722-0.1.i686 texlive-format-pdflatex-20100722-0.1.i686 marks texlive-latex-20100722-0.1.i686 (cap texlive-latex = 1:20100722-0.1) texlive-latex-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-latex-20100722-0.1.i686 greedy upgrade texlive-latex-bibtex-20091107-0.1.i686 to 20100722-0.1.i686 (unresolved texlive-latex = 1:20091107-0.1) texlive-latex-bibtex-20091107-0.1.i686 obsoleted by texlive-latex-bibtex-20100722-0.1.i686 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. find_db_conflicts_dbcnfl_with_cap (indent=0, ictx=0xbffff078, pkg=0x8129728, cap=0x8128f76) at conflicts.c:320 320 } (gdb) quit Can anybody know what can I do? Can anybody patch the sources? If needed some other information, please write :) Zsolt From glen at pld-linux.org Sun Mar 20 19:55:37 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:55:37 +0200 Subject: packages: protobuf/protobuf.spec 2.4.0a In-Reply-To: <201103181034.50359.glen@pld-linux.org> References:

<201103181034.50359.glen@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <201103202055.41550.glen@pld-linux.org> On Friday 18 March 2011 10:34, Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > On Friday 18 March 2011 07:32, aredridel wrote: > > Author: aredridel Date: Fri Mar 18 05:32:39 2011 GMT > > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > > > > ---- Log message: > > 2.4.0a > > > > ---- Files affected: > > > > packages/protobuf: > > protobuf.spec (1.6 -> 1.7) > > > > ---- Diffs: > > > > ================================================================ > > Index: packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec > > diff -u packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.6 > > packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.7 --- > > packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec:1.6 Sat Nov 28 02:43:15 2009 > > +++ packages/protobuf/protobuf.spec Fri Mar 18 06:32:33 2011 > > @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ > > > > Summary: Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format > > Summary(pl.UTF-8): Protocol Buffers - format wymiany danych Google > > Name: protobuf > > > > -Version: 2.0.3 > > +Version: 2.4.0a > > > > Release: 1 > > License: BSD > > Group: Libraries > > Source0: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 > > > > -# Source0-md5: 37e6e4d63434672c70bd977be9c372cb > > +# Source0-md5: 61df3f63ec284fc6f57a68c67e4918c6 > > > > URL: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ > > BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel > > BuildRequires: rpm-pythonprov > > > > @@ -109,22 +109,29 @@ > > > > %files libs > > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > > > > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so.*.*.* > > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so.? > > > > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.*.*.* > > > > -%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.3 > > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so.? > > > > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.*.*.* > > > > -%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.3 > > +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.? > > > > %files devel > > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > > > > +%attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.so > > > > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.so > > %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so > > > > +%{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.la > > > > %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.la > > %{_libdir}/libprotoc.la > > %{_includedir}/google > > %{_examplesdir}/%{name}-%{version} > > > > +%{_pkgconfigdir}/protobuf-lite.pc > > +%{_pkgconfigdir}/protobuf.pc > > > > %files static > > %defattr(644,root,root,755) > > > > +%{_libdir}/libprotobuf-lite.a > > > > %{_libdir}/libprotobuf.a > > %{_libdir}/libprotoc.a > > > > @@ -134,6 +141,9 @@ > > > > All persons listed below can be reached at @pld-linux.org > > > > $Log$ > > > > +Revision 1.7 2011/03/18 05:32:33 aredridel > > + 2.4.0a > > do you know what next version will be that you included "a" in Version > field? 2.4.0? or 2.4.0b? > > if "a" denotes "alpha" stage, then it version should be 2.4.0 and "a" > included in release. > > see PLD-doc/devel-hints-en.txt about "epoch bumping" also do not do this: -%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.3 +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libprotoc.so.? it is needed for soname tracking to include exact soname version in filelist -- glen From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Mar 22 10:28:40 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:28:40 +0200 Subject: packages: mm-common/mm-common.spec - %files fix - rel. 2 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: 2011/3/22 wiget : > - %files fix > ... > +%{_npkgconfigdir}/mm-common-util.pc Widget ... sorry I guess I broke that, but that file did not show up when I built the first time. It does now. Any idea what I was doing wrong? Caleb From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Mar 22 11:04:27 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:04:27 +0200 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: 2011/3/22 wiget : > - merge DEVEL branch Is there a magic CVS command for doing that merge or did you do it by hand? I've wanted to do it to a few other specs and not known what was the best practice. From wiget at pld-linux.org Tue Mar 22 11:08:51 2011 From: wiget at pld-linux.org (Artur Frysiak) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:08:51 +0100 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:04, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > 2011/3/22 wiget : >> - merge DEVEL branch > > Is there a magic CVS command for doing that merge or did you do it by > hand? I've wanted to do it to a few other specs and not known what was > the best practice. cvs up -jDEVEL -- Artur Frysiak From wolf.pld at gmail.com Tue Mar 22 11:12:32 2011 From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:12:32 +0100 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Artur Frysiak wrote: >> Is there a magic CVS command for doing that merge or did you do it by >> hand? I've wanted to do it to a few other specs and not known what was >> the best practice. > cvs up -jDEVEL http://images.mylot.com/userImages/images/postphotos/2130671.jpg wolf From caleb at pld-linux.org Tue Mar 22 11:26:29 2011 From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:26:29 +0200 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: 2011/3/22 Bartosz Taudul : >> cvs up -jDEVEL Thanks widget. > http://images.mylot.com/userImages/images/postphotos/2130671.jpg Wolf, I feel like I'm on the outside of an insider joke. Caleb From wolf.pld at gmail.com Tue Mar 22 11:35:05 2011 From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:35:05 +0100 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > Wolf, I feel like I'm on the outside of an insider joke. You will need a prayer book if you want to do merges in CVS. wolf From udvzsolt at gmail.com Tue Mar 22 11:35:35 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:35:35 +0100 Subject: packages: mm-common/mm-common.spec - %files fix - rel. 2 In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: Maybe pkgconfigdir, without letter 'n'. 2011/3/22 Caleb Maclennan > 2011/3/22 wiget : > > - %files fix > > ... > > +%{_npkgconfigdir}/mm-common-util.pc > > Widget ... sorry I guess I broke that, but that file did not show up > when I built the first time. It does now. Any idea what I was doing > wrong? > > Caleb > _______________________________________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > From patrys at pld-linux.org Tue Mar 22 11:47:34 2011 From: patrys at pld-linux.org (Patryk Zawadzki) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:47:34 +0100 Subject: packages: telepathy-glib/telepathy-glib.spec - merge DEVEL branch In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > 2011/3/22 Bartosz Taudul : >>> cvs up -jDEVEL > Thanks widget. s/widget/wiget/g -- Patryk Zawadzki I solve problems. From qboosh at pld-linux.org Thu Mar 24 17:14:09 2011 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:14:09 +0100 Subject: packages: shotwell/shotwell.spec - fix building on x86_64 - BR m4 (used in ... In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <20110324161408.GA5103@stranger.qboosh.pl> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:40:48AM +0100, wiget wrote: > rm -r $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_localedir}/te_IN te_IN is supported, its directory is /usr/share/locale/te . -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From qboosh at pld-linux.org Thu Mar 24 20:34:03 2011 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:34:03 +0100 Subject: global specs grep request: unsupported locales Message-ID: <20110324193403.GA12183@stranger.qboosh.pl> Does anyone have all specs locally? (I don't - with new layout it would require too much effort/resources) I ask to grep them for unsupported locales (removed by rm or so) in order to update: - list in glibc.spec - rm commands themselves (some locales became supported or need mv instead of rm) -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From arekm at maven.pl Thu Mar 24 20:38:56 2011 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz Miskiewicz) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:38:56 +0100 Subject: global specs grep request: unsupported locales In-Reply-To: <20110324193403.GA12183@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20110324193403.GA12183@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <201103242038.56505.arekm@maven.pl> On Thursday 24 of March 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Does anyone have all specs locally? > (I don't - with new layout it would require too much effort/resources) > > I ask to grep them for unsupported locales (removed by rm or so) in > order to update: > - list in glibc.spec > - rm commands themselves (some locales became supported or need mv > instead of rm) Use carme account and the effort will be +- two commands: ssh, cvs checkout. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Mar 25 10:54:56 2011 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:54:56 +0200 Subject: global specs grep request: unsupported locales In-Reply-To: <20110324193403.GA12183@stranger.qboosh.pl> References: <20110324193403.GA12183@stranger.qboosh.pl> Message-ID: <4D8C6670.2050603@pld-linux.org> On 24.03.2011 21:34, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Does anyone have all specs locally? > (I don't - with new layout it would require too much effort/resources) SPECS module contains symlinks to active package specs: cvs -d :pserver:cvs at cvs.pld-linux.org:/cvsroot co SPECS all-specs -- glen From udvzsolt at gmail.com Thu Mar 31 19:05:29 2011 From: udvzsolt at gmail.com (Zsolt Udvari) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:05:29 +0200 Subject: MySQL fails to start Message-ID: Hi all! After upgrade mysql, fails to start. But after change of owner of /var/lib/mysql (chmod mysql /var/lib/mysql), it starts. As I see that the owner of this directory is root (in spec file) long-long time ago. Is it a bug in mysql or in spec or in my machine? Thanks! Zsolt