Git migration: next step

[Przemo Firszt]

Dnia 5 Kwietnia 2012, 4:01 pm, Cz, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 09:00:34AM +0100, Przemo Firszt wrote:
>>
[..]
>> Can we agree a naming convention? Something like:
>> "package-name: description" (it's similar to kernel patches)
>> i.e. "xorg-driver-input-wacom: up to 14.0.0" or
>> "xorg-driver-input-wacom: fix invalid BuildReq"?
>
> I don't find "package-name: " prefix useful, as there (AFAIK) will be
> one package per repository.
[..]
In the repository it's useless, but on the list, I think, it's quite
important: compare [1] and [2]. The subject of [1] is useless on the list.

The only problem I see is that some of the package name are quite long.

My idea: if the patch is going through the list it should contain package
name. If it's going to do directly to the repo there is no need for the
name.

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pld.devel.english/7717/
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.pld.devel.english/7729/
-- 
Regards,
Przemo Firszt