From kkrenski at gmail.com  Wed May  2 13:33:40 2012
From: kkrenski at gmail.com (Karol Krenski)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:33:40 +0200
Subject: packages: msmtp/msmtp.spec - revert unthinkable adapter, see
 also r1.58
In-Reply-To: <packages_msmtp_msmtp.spec.1.95@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_msmtp_msmtp.spec.1.94@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_msmtp_msmtp.spec.1.95@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <4FA11B94.9090504@gmail.com>

W dniu 02.05.2012 12:24, glen pisze:
> Author: glen                         Date: Wed May  2 10:24:27 2012 GMT
> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - revert unthinkable adapter, see also r1.58
>
> ---- Files affected:
> packages/msmtp:
>     msmtp.spec (1.94 ->  1.95)
>
> ---- Diffs:
[...]
> -%{_prefix}/lib/sendmail
> +/usr/lib/sendmail

OK, but see (for example) to sendmail.spec, omta.spec, ssmtp.spec etc.

-- 
Karol Krenski


From shadzik at gmail.com  Thu May  3 23:37:15 2012
From: shadzik at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?=)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 23:37:15 +0200
Subject: packages: frogatto/frogatto.spec,
 frogatto/frogatto-no_fbo_assert.patch (NE...
Message-ID: <CADfyV2MuEuMVHk1Ot4QniOMRWnbKWBShTQhpuUJf2aKt9oNcug@mail.gmail.com>

+-	ASSERT_EQ(status, EXT_MACRO(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE));
++//	ASSERT_EQ(status, EXT_MACRO(GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE));

:) Are you serious? Is this seriously your patch?
Do you even know what assert_eq(a,b) does?

Since when do we remove bug checking in programs and call it fixes or hacks?!

If you, for some weird reason, are still using a 11 year old GPU*,
then at least do a proper fix for it or use your "hack" privately. You
didn't check what your "fix" causes on other GPUs. Revert please.

*"ATI's first R200-based card was the Radeon 8500, launched in October 2001."

-- 
"I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Fri May  4 13:47:14 2012
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:47:14 +0300
Subject: CVS rename for nautilussvn
Message-ID: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>

The upstream project NautilusSVN has been renamed to RabbitVCS. Can we
get our CVS module renamed or should I work on a new spec?

Thanks,
Caleb


From baggins at pld-linux.org  Fri May  4 15:20:56 2012
From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 15:20:56 +0200
Subject: CVS rename for nautilussvn
In-Reply-To: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>

On Fri, 04 May 2012, Caleb Maclennan wrote:

> The upstream project NautilusSVN has been renamed to RabbitVCS. Can we
> get our CVS module renamed or should I work on a new spec?

Package copied/renamed server-side.

cvs co packages/rabbitvcs

You can cvs rm the old package.

-- 
Jan R?korajski                                 | PLD/Linux
SysAdm                                         | http://www.pld-linux.org/
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl
baggins<at>pld-linux.org


From caleb at pld-linux.org  Sat May  5 11:48:59 2012
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 12:48:59 +0300
Subject: CVS rename for nautilussvn
In-Reply-To: <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
Message-ID: <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>

> Package copied/renamed server-side.

Thank you!

Can I ask why our gedit module is called gedit2 on cvs? The upstream
project seems to be at 3.4.1, which is what we have in that spec file.
Is there any point in keeping that legacy name in our cvs module?

Caleb


From glen at pld-linux.org  Sun May  6 10:09:57 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 11:09:57 +0300
Subject: gedit2 (Re: CVS rename for nautilussvn)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
 <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>

On 05/05/12 12:48, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
>> Package copied/renamed server-side.
> Thank you!
>
> Can I ask why our gedit module is called gedit2 on cvs? The upstream
> project seems to be at 3.4.1, which is what we have in that spec file.
> Is there any point in keeping that legacy name in our cvs module?
>
probably at some point it was wanted to keep gedit and gedit2 in distro.

right now gedit.spec last updated in 2007, and no longer on ftp (even ac)

so, feel free to merge gedit2.spec to gedit.spec (and drop the former), 
just remember to handle obsoletes properly

-- 
glen



From caleb at pld-linux.org  Mon May  7 14:01:47 2012
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 15:01:47 +0300
Subject: gedit2 (Re: CVS rename for nautilussvn)
In-Reply-To: <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
 <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <CAP9w9P454-ANkj1VP8ViVApsPavVpVUvmLHTAFMxTNY1wpVKwQ@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/6 Elan Ruusam?e <glen at pld-linux.org>:
> feel free to merge gedit2.spec to gedit.spec (and drop the former), just
> remember to handle obsoletes properly

As a latecomer to CVS (backporting my knowledge of VCS from
subversion, git, etc) I am not sure which button to push here. Since
these two specs aren't a branch scenario, merge doesn't seem like the
right option to me and I wouldn't know how to do it if it was.
Shouldn't this be 1) remove the current gedit module 2) rename gedit2
to gedit and 3) cleanup the spec, setup obsoletes, and go through
other specs for dependency issues?

If so, I can take care of #3 if somebody else does the cvs server side
stuff in #1 and #2.

If not, then I have no idea what I'm doing.

Caleb


From glen at pld-linux.org  Mon May  7 14:45:48 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:45:48 +0300
Subject: gedit2 (Re: CVS rename for nautilussvn)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9w9P454-ANkj1VP8ViVApsPavVpVUvmLHTAFMxTNY1wpVKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
 <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>
 <CAP9w9P454-ANkj1VP8ViVApsPavVpVUvmLHTAFMxTNY1wpVKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FA7C3FC.3090608@pld-linux.org>

On 07.05.2012 15:01, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2012/5/6 Elan Ruusam?e<glen at pld-linux.org>:
>> feel free to merge gedit2.spec to gedit.spec (and drop the former), just
>> remember to handle obsoletes properly
> As a latecomer to CVS (backporting my knowledge of VCS from
> subversion, git, etc) I am not sure which button to push here. Since
> these two specs aren't a branch scenario, merge doesn't seem like the
> right option to me and I wouldn't know how to do it if it was.
> Shouldn't this be 1) remove the current gedit module 2) rename gedit2
> to gedit and 3) cleanup the spec, setup obsoletes, and go through
> other specs for dependency issues?
merging history for same file is not possible in cvs (without excessive 
*,v file hacking).
so the "removing gedit module" could be replaced with "renaming gedit 
module" as otherwise you end up with same *,v file again:


1. rename gedit dir to gedit0 in cvs server side and optionally drop it 
client side
2. rename gedit2 dir to gedit in cvs server side, and adjust names in 
files on cvs client side


> If so, I can take care of #3 if somebody else does the cvs server side
> stuff in #1 and #2.
>
> If not, then I have no idea what I'm doing.
>
> Caleb


-- 
glen



From caleb at pld-linux.org  Mon May  7 15:14:12 2012
From: caleb at pld-linux.org (Caleb Maclennan)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:14:12 +0300
Subject: gedit2 (Re: CVS rename for nautilussvn)
In-Reply-To: <4FA7C3FC.3090608@pld-linux.org>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
 <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>
 <CAP9w9P454-ANkj1VP8ViVApsPavVpVUvmLHTAFMxTNY1wpVKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA7C3FC.3090608@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <CAP9w9P7+WisW3-_VL8AVQtj_wp2L7JBcEgsnH065=Op2_XK95A@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/7 Elan Ruusam?e <glen at pld-linux.org>:
> 1. rename gedit dir to gedit0 in cvs server side and optionally drop it
> client side
> 2. rename gedit2 dir to gedit in cvs server side, and adjust names in files
> on cvs client side

This sounds good. If somebody takes care of the server side bit I'll
help cleanup the resulting spec.


From glen at pld-linux.org  Mon May  7 17:31:12 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:31:12 +0300
Subject: gedit2 (Re: CVS rename for nautilussvn)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9w9P7+WisW3-_VL8AVQtj_wp2L7JBcEgsnH065=Op2_XK95A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP9w9P7XmmQNpk1+5-ygt-7cd3eZ=qi2HmhSydn8Uuj7UcOR_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120504132056.GA1503@home.lan>
 <CAP9w9P4JsCt61G224BtZhdayE1FJUMhLLqyCUHWyWxrkOv8ugw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA631D5.9070806@pld-linux.org>
 <CAP9w9P454-ANkj1VP8ViVApsPavVpVUvmLHTAFMxTNY1wpVKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FA7C3FC.3090608@pld-linux.org>
 <CAP9w9P7+WisW3-_VL8AVQtj_wp2L7JBcEgsnH065=Op2_XK95A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FA7EAC0.8020903@pld-linux.org>

On 07.05.2012 16:14, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> 2012/5/7 Elan Ruusam?e<glen at pld-linux.org>:
>> 1. rename gedit dir to gedit0 in cvs server side and optionally drop it
>> client side
>> 2. rename gedit2 dir to gedit in cvs server side, and adjust names in files
>> on cvs client side
> This sounds good. If somebody takes care of the server side bit I'll
> help cleanup the resulting spec.

renamed gedit to gedit0
renamed gedit2 to gedit

(just in case made backup of gedit2 dir, if somebody wakes up and finds 
original gedit2 should be kept in cvs as well for some reason)

-- 
glen



From glen at pld-linux.org  Fri May 11 10:37:06 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:37:06 +0300
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python_noarch_to_datadir.patch.1.12@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python_pythonpath.patch.1.5@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.386@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>

On 10/05/12 19:28, arekm wrote:
> Author: arekm                        Date: Thu May 10 16:28:27 2012 GMT
> Module: packages                      Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - up to 2.7.3; include py files
>
> ---- Files affected:
> packages/python:
>     python-lib64.patch (1.21 ->  1.22) , python-noarch_to_datadir.patch (1.12 ->  1.13) , python-pythonpath.patch (1.5 ->  1.6) , python.spec (1.386 ->  1.387)
...


> -%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/*.py[co]
> +%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/*.py*
>   %{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/*.pickle
> -%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/fixes/*.py[co]
> -%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/pgen2/*.py[co]
> +%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/fixes/*.py*
> +%{py_scriptdir}/lib2to3/pgen2/*.py*
>
>   %files static
>   %defattr(644,root,root,755)
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,9 @@
>   All persons listed below can be reached at<cvs_login>@pld-linux.org
>
>   $Log$
> +Revision 1.387  2012/05/10 16:28:22  arekm
> +- up to 2.7.3; include py files
> +

why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?

even if *YOUR* disk is cheap, i don't support packaging source files as 
they are not needed runtime

-- 
glen



From wolf.pld at gmail.com  Fri May 11 10:44:41 2012
From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:44:41 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python_noarch_to_datadir.patch.1.12@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python_pythonpath.patch.1.5@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.386@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <CAAz5wPg4hPLFRyZ61DurZx2xZ-81mkdm2fEcwXM=dXUWS1tJgA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Elan Ruusam?e <glen at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
You don't have to understand.

wolf


From arekm at maven.pl  Fri May 11 10:45:26 2012
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:45:26 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>

On Friday 11 of May 2012, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:

> why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?

It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong 
opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead of 
10MB package.

> even if *YOUR* disk is cheap, i don't support packaging source files as
> they are not needed runtime

Use separate branch for AC then.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From wolf.pld at gmail.com  Fri May 11 10:47:17 2012
From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:47:17 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <CAAz5wPjhpW2_vq0LRm=P2bswcbmCNeSgn6=fh3uY4Uub08ec6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz <arekm at maven.pl> wrote:
> I am for including py files.
That's the only argument you need. Suck it up, glen.

wolf


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Fri May 11 11:42:24 2012
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:42:24 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <20120511094224.GD32547@jajo.eggsoft>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 11 of May 2012, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> 
> > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
> 
> It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong 
> opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead of 
> 10MB package.

But for the Python 2.7 we already have those *.py files in
python-devel-src, no need to duplicate them in the main package now.

Greets,
        Jacek


From blues at pld-linux.org  Fri May 11 12:38:17 2012
From: blues at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Pawe=B3_Go=B3aszewski?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:38:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org> <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205111237240.32171@fgnss.gnfx.tqn.cy>

On Fri, 11 May 2012, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
> 
> It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong 
> opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead of 
> 10MB package.

AFAIR the discussion was about python3, not python2 which is working 
fine...

-- 
pozdr.  Pawe? Go?aszewski          jid:blues<at>jabber<dot>gda<dot>pl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby
Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free.

From shadzik at gmail.com  Fri May 11 12:54:57 2012
From: shadzik at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:54:57 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205111237240.32171@fgnss.gnfx.tqn.cy>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
 <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205111237240.32171@fgnss.gnfx.tqn.cy>
Message-ID: <CADfyV2Pji9gL66WRPpj9QAx0MjscM5FDFmtd427RoDi89W4usg@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/11 Pawe? Go?aszewski <blues at pld-linux.org>:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
>> > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
>>
>> It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong
>> opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead of
>> 10MB package.
>
> AFAIR the discussion was about python3, not python2 which is working
> fine...

How dare you question the CEOs decision!?

-- 
"I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki


From glen at alkohol.ee  Fri May 11 13:36:47 2012
From: glen at alkohol.ee (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:36:47 +0300
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <CAAz5wPjhpW2_vq0LRm=P2bswcbmCNeSgn6=fh3uY4Uub08ec6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_python.spec.1.387@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org> <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
 <CAAz5wPjhpW2_vq0LRm=P2bswcbmCNeSgn6=fh3uY4Uub08ec6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4FACF9CF.4020303@alkohol.ee>

On 11/05/12 11:47, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> That's the only argument you need. Suck it up, glen.

Bartosz Taudul <wolf.pld at gmail.com>

On 11/05/12 13:54, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote:
> How dare you question the CEOs decision!? 
Bartosz ?wi?tek <shadzik at gmail.com>



-- 
glen



From mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl  Fri May 11 11:06:04 2012
From: mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl (Mateusz Korniak)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:06:04 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org> <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
Message-ID: <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>

On Friday 11 of May 2012, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 11 of May 2012, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
> 
> It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong
> opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead
> of 10MB package.

Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost 
of little extra disk space.


There was discussion about genereating auto -src/-debug packages for python 
and python modules, but nobody implemented it.


-- 
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - powa?ny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobo?ni?,
 	kr?tko m?wi?c - podpora spo?ecze?stwa."
				Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"


From arekm at maven.pl  Fri May 11 13:43:15 2012
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?iso-8859-2?q?Mi=B6kiewicz?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:43:15 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <20120511094224.GD32547@jajo.eggsoft>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl> <20120511094224.GD32547@jajo.eggsoft>
Message-ID: <201205111343.16030.arekm@maven.pl>

On Friday 11 of May 2012, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 of May 2012, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> > > why such sudden change on existing 2.x branch?
> > 
> > It was discussed some time ago, ideas were mixed but there was no strong
> > opposition and I am for including py files. It makes 15MB package instead
> > of 10MB package.
> 
> But for the Python 2.7 we already have those *.py files in
> python-devel-src, no need to duplicate them in the main package now.

Right, thanks! Reverted.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From wolf.pld at gmail.com  Fri May 11 13:45:09 2012
From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:45:09 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
 <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
Message-ID: <CAAz5wPjmUDrnM0XpggH7G9Q9itMn1awOnb_buGDRcAsUp5Hs_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mateusz Korniak
<mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl> wrote:
> Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost
> of little extra disk space.
Are we having this idiotic argument again? Do we package debuginfo
with compiled programs, or does it land in separate package, so only
the people that need it will have it? Maybe we should start including
source code of the compiled binaries inside all RPMs? Because, you
know, it would make debugging easier.

wolf


From glen at pld-linux.org  Fri May 11 13:47:33 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:47:33 +0300
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org> <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
 <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
Message-ID: <4FACFC55.7040604@pld-linux.org>

On 11/05/12 12:06, Mateusz Korniak wrote:
>
> Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost
> of little extra disk space.
>
>
> There was discussion about genereating auto -src/-debug packages for python
> and python modules, but nobody implemented it.
not true. it is implemented, but i don't remember what was left for it 
to fully work :)

http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/SOURCES.old/rpm-build-macros-pydebuginfo.patch
http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/cvs/SOURCES.old/rpm-pydebuginfo.patch

-- 
glen



From shadzik at gmail.com  Fri May 11 14:29:24 2012
From: shadzik at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?=)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:29:24 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <CAAz5wPjmUDrnM0XpggH7G9Q9itMn1awOnb_buGDRcAsUp5Hs_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <4FACCFB2.4010507@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111045.26549.arekm@maven.pl>
 <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
 <CAAz5wPjmUDrnM0XpggH7G9Q9itMn1awOnb_buGDRcAsUp5Hs_g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADfyV2PwRKWLz5Q0OSji6SgBopb_f17+YTRzjVa7OwWuHVDcqA@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/11 Bartosz Taudul <wolf.pld at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mateusz Korniak
> <mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl> wrote:
>> Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on cost
>> of little extra disk space.
> Are we having this idiotic argument again? Do we package debuginfo
> with compiled programs, or does it land in separate package, so only
> the people that need it will have it?

Shut up you fscking troll! Everyone's already sick of your rational
arguments!! This is not the PLD way! And debuginfo can and will be
changed if the CEO says so. Noone needs to understand, punk!

;-)

> Maybe we should start including
> source code of the compiled binaries inside all RPMs? Because, you
> know, it would make debugging easier.

No, now that you proposed that yourself it's not going to happen, just
to screw with you :)



-- 
"I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki


From wiget at pld-linux.org  Fri May 11 16:50:04 2012
From: wiget at pld-linux.org (Artur Frysiak)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:50:04 +0200
Subject: packages: python-south/python-south.spec (NEW) - new package
In-Reply-To: <packages_python_south_python_south.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
References: <packages_python_south_python_south.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_south_python_south.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <CAHxPtFphFv6x6+moGcMk8pJzR-wDqG1DKF9X6zr57h-U-gYWTA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jajcus <jajcus at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> Author: jajcus ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Date: Fri May 11 12:21:20 2012 GMT
> Module: packages ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tag: HEAD
> ---- Log message:
> - new package
>
> ---- Files affected:
> packages/python-south:
> ? python-south.spec (NONE -> 1.1) ?(NEW)

Look at python-django-south.spec
-- 
Artur Frysiak


From mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl  Fri May 11 15:09:07 2012
From: mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl (Mateusz Korniak)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:09:07 +0200
Subject: packages: python/python-lib64.patch,
 python/python-noarch_to_datadir.patch, ...
In-Reply-To: <CAAz5wPjmUDrnM0XpggH7G9Q9itMn1awOnb_buGDRcAsUp5Hs_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <packages_python_python_lib64.patch.1.21@pld-linux.org>
 <201205111106.05631.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>
 <CAAz5wPjmUDrnM0XpggH7G9Q9itMn1awOnb_buGDRcAsUp5Hs_g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201205111509.08431.mateusz@ant.gliwice.pl>

On Friday 11 of May 2012, Bartosz Taudul wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mateusz Korniak
> 
> <mateusz at ant.gliwice.pl> wrote:
> > Including .py in python and python modules helps a lot with debugging on
> > cost of little extra disk space.
> 
> Do we package debuginfo
> with compiled programs, or does it land in separate package, so only
> the people that need it will have it? 

AFAIK we do not have -src/-debug for python modules, so it is different 
situation.
Do we package in separate package _every_ file which _some_ people do not need 
?

-- 
Mateusz Korniak
"(...) mam brata - powa?ny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobo?ni?,
 	kr?tko m?wi?c - podpora spo?ecze?stwa."
				Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"


From jajcus at jajcus.net  Fri May 11 17:16:02 2012
From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:16:02 +0200
Subject: packages: python-south/python-south.spec (NEW) - new package
In-Reply-To: <CAHxPtFphFv6x6+moGcMk8pJzR-wDqG1DKF9X6zr57h-U-gYWTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <packages_python_south_python_south.spec.NONE@pld-linux.org>
 <packages_python_south_python_south.spec.1.1@pld-linux.org>
 <CAHxPtFphFv6x6+moGcMk8pJzR-wDqG1DKF9X6zr57h-U-gYWTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120511151602.GA5765@lolek.nigdzie>

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jajcus <jajcus at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> > Author: jajcus ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Date: Fri May 11 12:21:20 2012 GMT
> > Module: packages ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - new package
> >
> > ---- Files affected:
> > packages/python-south:
> > ? python-south.spec (NONE -> 1.1) ?(NEW)
> 
> Look at python-django-south.spec

Yeah? knowing the usual mess with Python package naming I have checked:

python-south.spec
python-South.spec
south.spec
South.spec

?and yet, I haven't spotted the duplicate - didn't think about yet
another naming idea.

Source package name is 'south' (not django-south!). Official project
name is 'South' (not 'Django South'!), the python package can be
imported via 'import south' (not 'import django.south'). Why the hell
should it be named 'python-django-south'?!

Maybe we should call it glibc-python-django-south? ;)

Greets,
        Jacek


From qboosh at pld-linux.org  Sun May 27 13:20:23 2012
From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:23 +0200
Subject: udev-acl on non-systemd systems
Message-ID: <20120527112023.GA3152@mail>

udev-acl disappeared, there was changelog entry:

- don't obsolete udev-acl as it is provided by systemd and will also be
  provided by ConsoleKit

but it's not provided by ConsoleKit.
And it's still required by some packages, like gnome-bluetooth.


(BTW, since udev 183 it has been merged into systemd, but it's said to be
still possible to use udev without systemd)

-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/


From lukaszgl at post.pl  Sun May 27 13:36:32 2012
From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 13:36:32 +0200
Subject: Using google-chrome plugins by chromium
Message-ID: <1354515.FXyxMINvqm@inhell>

On my x86_64 machine I did symbolic link from google-chrome to chromium for 
pdf plugin and it works fine.

On i686 there is also flash plugin. Does anybody knows if we can use libraries 
from google-chrome package and package it separately for chromium browser?

Regards,
-- 
?ukasz G??bicki  mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy  PLD/Linux Team
gg:246267    Linux Registered User #318551   blekot:{irc,skype}


From baggins at pld-linux.org  Sun May 27 21:50:58 2012
From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 21:50:58 +0200
Subject: udev-acl on non-systemd systems
In-Reply-To: <20120527112023.GA3152@mail>
References: <20120527112023.GA3152@mail>
Message-ID: <20120527195058.GA24441@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Sun, 27 May 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:

> udev-acl disappeared, there was changelog entry:
> 
> - don't obsolete udev-acl as it is provided by systemd and will also be
>   provided by ConsoleKit
> 
> but it's not provided by ConsoleKit.
> And it's still required by some packages, like gnome-bluetooth.

I thought that when udev/systemd clowns said it will be in next CK
release then that release will be real soon now. How naive of me.
I will add git patch to CK and package udev-acl there.

> (BTW, since udev 183 it has been merged into systemd, but it's said to be
> still possible to use udev without systemd)

Yes, binary packages names and contents should not change, udev will
still be udev and work without systemd.

-- 
Jan R?korajski                                 | PLD/Linux
SysAdm                                         | http://www.pld-linux.org/
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl
baggins<at>pld-linux.org


From glen at pld-linux.org  Sun May 27 23:09:15 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 00:09:15 +0300
Subject: Using google-chrome plugins by chromium
In-Reply-To: <1354515.FXyxMINvqm@inhell>
References: <1354515.FXyxMINvqm@inhell>
Message-ID: <4FC297FB.4040801@pld-linux.org>

On 05/27/2012 02:36 PM, Lukasz Glebicki wrote:
> On my x86_64 machine I did symbolic link from google-chrome to chromium for
> pdf plugin and it works fine.
perhaps better try to build pdf plugin on chromium package too?
unless it's some re-distribution restriction like there is one for adobe 
flash.

> On i686 there is also flash plugin. Does anybody knows if we can use libraries
> from google-chrome package and package it separately for chromium browser?

you're supposed to build yourself adobe-flash.spec and install resulting 
rpm. both for x86 and x86_64:

$ builder -bb adobe-flash --with license_agreement


-- 
glen



From glen at pld-linux.org  Mon May 28 13:01:24 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:01:24 +0300
Subject: cdg broken aliases (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
In-Reply-To: <20120528091725.312E9B6F7@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
References: <20120528091723.BA94BB6FF@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
 <20120528091723.90079B6EF@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
 <20120528091725.312E9B6F7@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <4FC35B04.7000800@pld-linux.org>

hi

what should be done with cdg members whose alias bounces?

<adasi at grubno.da.ru> (expanded from <adasi at pld-linux.org>): host
     grubno.da.ru[85.10.219.146] said: 554 5.7.1 <adasi at grubno.da.ru>: Relay
     access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)

<dzimi at d2.net.pl> (expanded from <dzimi at pld-linux.org>): Host or domain name
     not found. Name service error for name=d2.net.pl type=AAAA: Host 
not found

<marcin at dolinski.org> (expanded from <averne at pld-linux.org>): host
     smtp.secureserver.net[216.69.186.201] said: 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected
     marcin at dolinski.org (in reply to RCPT TO command)
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: MAILER-DAEMON at pld-linux.org (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:17:23 +0200 (CEST)
Size: 4731
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20120528/6e3bb4e8/attachment.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: MAILER-DAEMON at pld-linux.org (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:17:23 +0200 (CEST)
Size: 4718
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20120528/6e3bb4e8/attachment-0001.eml>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: MAILER-DAEMON at pld-linux.org (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:17:25 +0200 (CEST)
Size: 4750
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20120528/6e3bb4e8/attachment-0002.eml>

From arekm at maven.pl  Mon May 28 13:07:58 2012
From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:07:58 +0200
Subject: cdg broken aliases (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
In-Reply-To: <4FC35B04.7000800@pld-linux.org>
References: <20120528091723.BA94BB6FF@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
 <20120528091725.312E9B6F7@b.mx.pld-linux.org>
 <4FC35B04.7000800@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <201205281307.58879.arekm@maven.pl>

On Monday 28 of May 2012, Elan Ruusam?e wrote:
> hi
> 
> what should be done with cdg members whose alias bounces?
> 
> <adasi at grubno.da.ru> (expanded from <adasi at pld-linux.org>): host
>      grubno.da.ru[85.10.219.146] said: 554 5.7.1 <adasi at grubno.da.ru>:
> Relay access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command)
> 
> <dzimi at d2.net.pl> (expanded from <dzimi at pld-linux.org>): Host or domain
> name not found. Name service error for name=d2.net.pl type=AAAA: Host not
> found
> 
> <marcin at dolinski.org> (expanded from <averne at pld-linux.org>): host
>      smtp.secureserver.net[216.69.186.201] said: 550 #5.1.0 Address
> rejected marcin at dolinski.org (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Remove dead souls via cdg voting? Or find them and ask to drop cdg membership 
or fix aliases file.

adasi as least is alive.

-- 
Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/


From lukaszgl at post.pl  Mon May 28 17:43:55 2012
From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 17:43:55 +0200
Subject: Using google-chrome plugins by chromium
In-Reply-To: <4FC297FB.4040801@pld-linux.org>
References: <1354515.FXyxMINvqm@inhell> <4FC297FB.4040801@pld-linux.org>
Message-ID: <1588076.QtpI77GQK0@inhell>

On Monday 28 of May 2012 00:09:15 Elan Ruusam?e wrote:

> perhaps better try to build pdf plugin on chromium package too?
> unless it's some re-distribution restriction like there is one for adobe
> flash.

I was reading that pdf and flash are included only in binary version. Based on 
that I wrote previous email.
I'm going to check it in the near future.

> > On i686 there is also flash plugin. Does anybody knows if we can use
> > libraries from google-chrome package and package it separately for
> > chromium browser?
> you're supposed to build yourself adobe-flash.spec and install resulting
> rpm. both for x86 and x86_64:
> 
> $ builder -bb adobe-flash --with license_agreement

I have this one, but I assume plugin from google works faster..
-- 
?ukasz G??bicki  mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy  PLD/Linux Team
gg:246267    Linux Registered User #318551   blekot:{irc,skype}


From glen at pld-linux.org  Mon May 28 20:31:39 2012
From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 21:31:39 +0300
Subject: adobe flash (Re: Using google-chrome plugins by chromium)
In-Reply-To: <1588076.QtpI77GQK0@inhell>
References: <1354515.FXyxMINvqm@inhell> <4FC297FB.4040801@pld-linux.org>
 <1588076.QtpI77GQK0@inhell>
Message-ID: <4FC3C48B.6080001@pld-linux.org>

On 05/28/2012 06:43 PM, Lukasz Glebicki wrote:
>>> On i686 there is also flash plugin. Does anybody knows if we can use
>>> >  >  libraries from google-chrome package and package it separately for
>>> >  >  chromium browser?
>> >  you're supposed to build yourself adobe-flash.spec and install resulting
>> >  rpm. both for x86 and x86_64:
>> >  
>> >  $ builder -bb adobe-flash --with license_agreement
> I have this one, but I assume plugin from google works faster..

seems that pepper based flash plugin is the new future too:

https://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html

-- 
glen



From przemo at firszt.eu  Wed May 30 22:49:30 2012
From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:49:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
Message-ID: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>

The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
vanilla kernel.
-- 
Regards,
Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kernel.spec.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 456 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20120530/f0e318b2/attachment.bin>

From przemo at firszt.eu  Wed May 30 22:50:57 2012
From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 21:50:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0
Message-ID: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>


-- 
Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xorg-driver-input-wacom.spec.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 562 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20120530/d806e3ec/attachment.bin>

From shadzik at gmail.com  Wed May 30 22:54:16 2012
From: shadzik at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?=)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:54:16 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
In-Reply-To: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
References: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
Message-ID: <CADfyV2MwoA=tSvExuA-TMe4k5rQ+Mk8nbny=pr144NYeGkZzVg@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>:
> The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
> vanilla kernel.

So? What should be done with it now?
Oh wait! I know! You should finish the patch, start your mails with a
'Hallo' and say nicely what you expect from the developers. Easy,
right?
Good luck!


-- 
"I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki


From shadzik at gmail.com  Wed May 30 22:54:36 2012
From: shadzik at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?=)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:54:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0
In-Reply-To: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
References: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
Message-ID: <CADfyV2OYM71JYyprh7jkiw6LUCFeLcrF415w=smi1j4n7XCyhQ@mail.gmail.com>

2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>:
>
> --
> Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>


-- 
"I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki


From wolf.pld at gmail.com  Wed May 30 22:57:40 2012
From: wolf.pld at gmail.com (Bartosz Taudul)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:57:40 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0
In-Reply-To: <CADfyV2OYM71JYyprh7jkiw6LUCFeLcrF415w=smi1j4n7XCyhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
 <CADfyV2OYM71JYyprh7jkiw6LUCFeLcrF415w=smi1j4n7XCyhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAAz5wPiX=ihAf2y0ChfmukVNXOQzkM5KweoeQyOHjXkaKmMdbw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Bartosz ?wi?tek <shadzik at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>:
>>
>> --
>> Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>
>
>
> --
> "I'm living proof if you do one thing right in your career, you can
> coast for a long time. A LOOOOONG time." -Guy Kawasaki
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en


From wrobell at pld-linux.org  Thu May 31 01:09:41 2012
From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (Artur Wroblewski)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:09:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0
In-Reply-To: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
References: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
Message-ID: <CA+92fu_DqRCsWQ9s7u+oc_f15ojkzfXkqVV3kLwpVVs70b-88Q@mail.gmail.com>

applied, thanks

regards,

w


From wrobell at pld-linux.org  Thu May 31 01:14:21 2012
From: wrobell at pld-linux.org (Artur Wroblewski)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:14:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
In-Reply-To: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
References: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
Message-ID: <CA+92fu8gPk+WwvxFZe5PGF6AYCoOOewurOjookUdL4iKGFYRZA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu> wrote:
> The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
> vanilla kernel.

does it work?

regards,

w


From baggins at pld-linux.org  Thu May 31 07:20:20 2012
From: baggins at pld-linux.org (Jan =?utf-8?Q?R=C4=99korajski?=)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 07:20:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
In-Reply-To: <CA+92fu8gPk+WwvxFZe5PGF6AYCoOOewurOjookUdL4iKGFYRZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
 <CA+92fu8gPk+WwvxFZe5PGF6AYCoOOewurOjookUdL4iKGFYRZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120531052020.GA12886@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>

On Thu, 31 May 2012, Artur Wroblewski wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu> wrote:
> > The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
> > vanilla kernel.
> 
> does it work?

No, it looks to change the logic from "apply patches if it is NOT vanilla"
to "apply patches if it IS vanilla" which is not what we want,
obviously.

-- 
Jan R?korajski                                 | PLD/Linux
SysAdm                                         | http://www.pld-linux.org/
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl
baggins<at>pld-linux.org


From przemo at firszt.eu  Thu May 31 22:45:32 2012
From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:45:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] xorg-driver-input-wacom 0.13.0->0.15.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+92fu_DqRCsWQ9s7u+oc_f15ojkzfXkqVV3kLwpVVs70b-88Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1338411057.2054.3.camel@pldmachine>
 <CA+92fu_DqRCsWQ9s7u+oc_f15ojkzfXkqVV3kLwpVVs70b-88Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1338497132.30170.0.camel@pldmachine>

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 00:09 +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> applied, thanks
> 
> regards,
thanks
-- 
Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>



From przemo at firszt.eu  Thu May 31 22:47:21 2012
From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 21:47:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
In-Reply-To: <CADfyV2MwoA=tSvExuA-TMe4k5rQ+Mk8nbny=pr144NYeGkZzVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
 <CADfyV2MwoA=tSvExuA-TMe4k5rQ+Mk8nbny=pr144NYeGkZzVg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1338497241.30170.2.camel@pldmachine>

On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:54 +0200, Bartosz ?wi?tek wrote:
> 2012/5/30 Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>:
> > The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
> > vanilla kernel.
> 
> So? What should be done with it now?
> Oh wait! I know! You should finish the patch, start your mails with a
> 'Hallo' and say nicely what you expect from the developers. Easy,
> right?
> Good luck!

Let's make a nice flame out of this.
I don't expect _anything_ from the developers. If my patch is useful
apply it, if it's not ignore/comment back.

-- 
Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>



From przemo at firszt.eu  Thu May 31 23:12:49 2012
From: przemo at firszt.eu (Przemo Firszt)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:12:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-vanilla
In-Reply-To: <20120531052020.GA12886@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
References: <1338410970.2054.1.camel@pldmachine>
 <CA+92fu8gPk+WwvxFZe5PGF6AYCoOOewurOjookUdL4iKGFYRZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120531052020.GA12886@sith.mimuw.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <1338498769.30170.6.camel@pldmachine>

On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 07:20 +0200, Jan R?korajski wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2012, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu> wrote:
> > > The patch not finished (new config options), but it allows to build the
> > > vanilla kernel.
> > 
> > does it work?
> 
> No, it looks to change the logic from "apply patches if it is NOT vanilla"
> to "apply patches if it IS vanilla" which is not what we want,
> obviously.
> 
Oppps, my fault.
But at least I learned that I can define "with" and use "without" as
condition. 
-- 
regards,
Przemo Firszt <przemo at firszt.eu>