[packages/rpm] - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz) - add settings provided by patche
Jan Rękorajski
baggins at pld-linux.org
Wed Sep 12 20:26:10 CEST 2012
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:37:59PM +0200, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:51:26PM +0200, baggins wrote:
> > > > commit c73c505644fa30c3e32a596dbc4aea90cfac0bcc
> > > > Author: Jan Rękorajski <baggins at pld-linux.org>
> > > > Date: Wed Sep 12 13:24:58 2012 +0200
> > > >
> > > > - set binary payload to xzdio (same as lzdio, but uses current xz)
> > >
> > > > %_source_payload w9.gzdio
> > > > -%_binary_payload w9.lzdio
> > > > +%_binary_payload w9.xzdio
> > >
> > > What is the minimal rpm version that supports xzdio (and what was that
> > > supports lzdio)?
> >
> > None of our rpm4 supports xzdio, but rpm package by itself is build with
> > gzdio payload.
> >
> > > If not the same, there must exist some easy upgrade path.
> >
> > rpm-*.rpm packages are built with gzdio payload so it should
> > be possible to upgrade without problems using any rpm version.
>
> But rpm.rpm requires also some library rpms, e.g.:
> - db5.3 is something new in Th
> - xz 5.1.x (5.0.x dated few months ago won't satisfy)
Good point, I'll revert that change then.
As there is no real difference between lzdio and xzdio that I can find,
we can postpone the switch for later.
--
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | http://www.pld-linux.org/
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl
baggins<at>pld-linux.org
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list