rpm 5.x in Th
Tomasz Pala
gotar at polanet.pl
Mon Sep 24 00:18:46 CEST 2012
In this episode...
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 18:03:06 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY
>
> troll++
...Jeff-the-Omniscient knows better what user wanted to acomplish!
>>> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively,
>>
>> Which one, this broken?
>
> troll++
...Jeff-almighty can run broken code!
>>> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback
>>> is false advertising.
>>
>> Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right?
>
> troll++
>
> Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x.
So is it broken or not?
> Now you can all bugger off ?
Last time I've checked we were on PLD maillist not rpm one, so if anyone
it's you who should go fuck himself.
--
Tomasz Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list