From glen at pld-linux.org Mon Apr 1 10:52:04 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:52:04 +0300 Subject: distfiles clamscan Message-ID: <51594AB4.4000400@pld-linux.org> --- Day changed R m?rts 29 2013 14:37 glen> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~glen/clamscan.log 14:37 glen> excluded test signatures: grep -vE 'ClamAV-Test-File|ClamAV-Test-Signature|Eicar-Test-Signature' 14:38 glen> any ideas what to do with them? 0/3/03db43c3af6dd6e21a49da428d80fa21/wine-doors-0.1pre1.tar.gz: Win.Trojan.Agent-83938 FOUND 0/6/06a8923913eb3196619a909fde9afa37/lg-141.tar.gz: HTML.Phishing.Bank-473 FOUND 0/b/0b02df514c1a2bf8af346bc9c7e97111/amavisd-new-2.3.3.tar.gz: Trojan.ArcBomb-1 FOUND 0/d/0d2d2b9f5fcf9057b1d710283c1e9a10/zmailer-20040915.tar.bz2: W95.Hybris.PI.001 FOUND 0/f/0f95c9b15f2d74255279d9f33488f384/wine-doors-0.1.tar.gz: Win.Trojan.Agent-83938 FOUND 1/2/12c09b7b4575042c72cebcdd1227147f/webcleaner-2.26.tar.gz: Exploit.HTML.ObjectType FOUND 1/b/1b0b37c3722bb1e31f7eb496ce358963/webcleaner-2.29.tar.gz: Exploit.HTML.ObjectType FOUND 1/c/1c9ec97b340ad1f802bce3f6b2dd9430/mailman-2.1.3.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 1/c/1caff10d2fa3968ed8e0def126f74b40/pydspam-1.1.9.tar.gz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 1/f/1f53b7da3cc4f3d78631546335ff9dcd/anomy-sanitizer-1.76.tar.gz: Exploit.WMF.Gen-1 FOUND 2/2/2297980ddd54b919acc8dadd72b4a915/wine-doors-20070515.697.tar.bz2: Win.Trojan.Agent-83938 FOUND 2/4/24d2917ba0229e7bcd6153661d749e60/mailman-2.1.2.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 3/2/322d3d1c57ac46b342bde2b0342f5c27/sup-0.6.tgz: Exploit.HTML.IFrame-8 FOUND 3/6/368c147db86d534b6fdfcae21138ddc4/zmailer-20040426.tar.bz2: W95.Hybris.PI.001 FOUND 3/7/370be99c5cdc2e756c82c44d774933c8/php-5.3.13.tar.bz2: PHP.Exploit.CVE_2011_4153-3 FOUND 3/8/38dea5b731af0c29fcc16cd16897f12f/webcleaner-2.24.tar.gz: Exploit.HTML.ObjectType FOUND 4/8/48026c92297478ae87efe9afbf1bda4c/lg-112.tar.gz: HTML.Phishing.Pay-239 FOUND 4/a/4af47f7e0b2aaf71bd5783dc26a576a8/amavisd-new-2.3.2.tar.gz: Trojan.ArcBomb-1 FOUND 5/5/550717e0af6df020d4caf1d456f5d617/lg-issue86.tar.gz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 5/6/567b6df37a2f049fe23c176e6fd1472f/amavisd-new-2.2.1.tar.gz: Trojan.ArcBomb-1 FOUND 6/c/6c95f6c590dfcdfa29f15bf8e5e22235/webcleaner-2.19.tar.gz: Exploit.HTML.ObjectType FOUND 7/0/70af3c7b6d06de900b74e216cfcf12f7/amavisd-new-2.2.0.tar.gz: Trojan.ArcBomb-1 FOUND 7/5/7589d810e0b9821ae5efd10c36d107d4/wine-doors-0.1.1.tar.gz: Win.Trojan.Agent-83938 FOUND 8/0/80965714ebcd5411c42a9c6df4137ff7/mailman-2.1.4.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 8/6/866d1bf2fe156bbaf94bfcec2014767e/sbd-1.36.tar.gz: Win.Trojan.Agent-128889 FOUND 9/2/9285000f7a9389e09d7948af490be1e0/shc-3.8.tgz: Unix.Xsh-src FOUND 9/4/94709f6e7c920cbe26e19fa991d9975d/php-5.3.11.tar.bz2: PHP.Exploit.CVE_2011_4153-3 FOUND 9/7/9773d1f0db265d072715c7bf7e20ff3c/mailman-2.1.5c2.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND 9/7/97d2b1825b3e2d5bcd85df48eb15a45e/boomerang.tar.gz: Worm.Blaster.A FOUND a/5/a530569ee6335e960914d9b1d6527477/sqlmap-0.6.4.tar.bz2: PHP.Shell-32 FOUND a/9/a9f15806eb670686869f67a06e8a6fbb/boomerang.tar.gz: Worm.Blaster.A FOUND a/b/ab98f0a09b371f9638c7f49f1b83f5c4/framework-3.0.tar.gz: Exploit.CVE-2006-3730 FOUND a/b/abe568c51d5b3daa53880391ec350d0d/zmailer-20040808.tar.gz: W95.Hybris.PI.001 FOUND b/f/bf932b3a59ede4786ae704bf238323db/lg-130.tar.gz: HTML.Phishing.Bank-791 FOUND c/7/c7bec37bd0729775fb29bbd867e926de/lg-108.tar.gz: HTML.Phishing.Bank-1 FOUND c/f/cf02c29be279c506cbd4ffc2819d7c82/php-5.3.12.tar.bz2: PHP.Exploit.CVE_2011_4153-3 FOUND d/2/d24bafbe84668dec71a38a074b6bb920/amavisd-new-2.1.2.tar.gz: Trojan.ArcBomb-1 FOUND d/4/d486abaa1404e2fe93d72d3cdd9c84af/mailman-2.1.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND d/a/da820b616b24349628ec6f44ed1c534c/lg-108.tar.gz: HTML.Phishing.Bank-1 FOUND e/9/e90aebf14893f2d850d2a173ea4b815d/bogofilter-0.92.0.tar.gz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND e/a/ea592cfb006e1b2510b533cece4ecb18/framework-2.7.tar.gz: Exploit.Alpha_Mixed FOUND f/5/f5f56f04747cd4aff67427e7a45631af/mailman-2.1.5.tgz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND f/6/f68af07b6ab028949789380bd5c92ede/lg-issue86.tar.gz: Exploit.IFrame.Gen FOUND -- glen From arekm at maven.pl Mon Apr 1 10:59:06 2013 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:59:06 +0200 Subject: distfiles clamscan In-Reply-To: <51594AB4.4000400@pld-linux.org> References: <51594AB4.4000400@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <201304011059.06614.arekm@maven.pl> On Monday 01 of April 2013, Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > --- Day changed R m?rts 29 2013 > 14:37 glen> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~glen/clamscan.log > 14:37 glen> excluded test signatures: grep -vE > 'ClamAV-Test-File|ClamAV-Test-Signature|Eicar-Test-Signature' > 14:38 glen> any ideas what to do with them? Delete these which are not false positives (I guess most of these contain sample signatures or test cases for these viruses). -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / maven.pl From glen at pld-linux.org Mon Apr 1 11:32:37 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:32:37 +0300 Subject: distfiles clamscan In-Reply-To: <201304011059.06614.arekm@maven.pl> References: <51594AB4.4000400@pld-linux.org> <201304011059.06614.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <51595435.9030801@pld-linux.org> On 01.04.2013 11:59, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > On Monday 01 of April 2013, Elan Ruusam?e wrote: >> --- Day changed R m?rts 29 2013 >> 14:37 glen> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~glen/clamscan.log >> 14:37 glen> excluded test signatures: grep -vE >> 'ClamAV-Test-File|ClamAV-Test-Signature|Eicar-Test-Signature' >> 14:38 glen> any ideas what to do with them? > Delete these which are not false positives (I guess most of these contain > sample signatures or test cases for these viruses). > and which ones are false positives? php? how would i know that? -- glen From arekm at maven.pl Mon Apr 1 11:34:22 2013 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:34:22 +0200 Subject: distfiles clamscan In-Reply-To: <51595435.9030801@pld-linux.org> References: <51594AB4.4000400@pld-linux.org> <201304011059.06614.arekm@maven.pl> <51595435.9030801@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <201304011134.22740.arekm@maven.pl> On Monday 01 of April 2013, Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > On 01.04.2013 11:59, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > > On Monday 01 of April 2013, Elan Ruusam?e wrote: > >> --- Day changed R m?rts 29 2013 > >> 14:37 glen> http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~glen/clamscan.log > >> 14:37 glen> excluded test signatures: grep -vE > >> 'ClamAV-Test-File|ClamAV-Test-Signature|Eicar-Test-Signature' > >> 14:38 glen> any ideas what to do with them? > > > > Delete these which are not false positives (I guess most of these contain > > sample signatures or test cases for these viruses). > > and which ones are false positives? php? how would i know that? By scanning contents of each tarball, locating file and manually analyzing. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / maven.pl From qboosh at pld-linux.org Mon Apr 1 20:32:11 2013 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:32:11 +0200 Subject: gdb update needed Message-ID: <20130401183211.GA26054@mail> Current gdb is too old, it uses some obsolete libbfd version, which makes gdb-lib package unable to link with current system libbfd. BTW: how is our gdb package made and why gdb upstream is not used? -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From arekm at maven.pl Mon Apr 1 22:38:09 2013 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:38:09 +0200 Subject: gdb update needed In-Reply-To: <20130401183211.GA26054@mail> References: <20130401183211.GA26054@mail> Message-ID: <201304012238.09787.arekm@maven.pl> On Monday 01 of April 2013, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Current gdb is too old, it uses some obsolete libbfd version, which > makes gdb-lib package unable to link with current system libbfd. > > BTW: how is our gdb package made It's mostly copy of fedora gdb from their packages git. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / maven.pl From lukaszgl at post.pl Sat Apr 6 14:51:50 2013 From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:51:50 +0200 Subject: rpm and pkg-config Message-ID: <8287069.8vSLLChjGz@inhell> I have noticed some unexpected behavior of rpm or requires written in RPM is wrong. There is a problem during install of gsnmp-devel error: Failed dependencies: pkgconfig(gnet-2.0) is needed by gsnmp-devel-0.3.0-0.1.x86_64 When I check this library, everything is ok: pkg-config --modversion gnet-2.0 2.0.7 What is wrong ? rpm-5.4.10-45.x86_64 -- ?ukasz G??bicki mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy PLD/Linux Team gg:246267 Linux Registered User #318551 blekot:{irc,skype} From n3npq at me.com Sat Apr 6 15:03:34 2013 From: n3npq at me.com (Jeffrey Johnson) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 09:03:34 -0400 Subject: rpm and pkg-config In-Reply-To: <8287069.8vSLLChjGz@inhell> References: <8287069.8vSLLChjGz@inhell> Message-ID: On Apr 6, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Lukasz Glebicki wrote: > I have noticed some unexpected behavior of rpm or requires written in RPM is > wrong. > > There is a problem during install of gsnmp-devel > > error: Failed dependencies: > pkgconfig(gnet-2.0) is needed by gsnmp-devel-0.3.0-0.1.x86_64 > > > When I check this library, everything is ok: > pkg-config --modversion gnet-2.0 > 2.0.7 > This isn't the right check for package dependencies. Try rpm -q --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(gnet-2.0)' > What is wrong ? > You have a missing provides. This should satisfy the dependency (but the right fix is to find/install a pkg with the desired provides) mkdir -p /etc/rpm/sysinfo echo 'pkgconfig(gnet-2.0)' >> /etc/rpm/sysinfo/Providename 73 de Jeff From lukaszgl at post.pl Sun Apr 7 11:10:40 2013 From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:10:40 +0200 Subject: rpm and pkg-config In-Reply-To: References: <8287069.8vSLLChjGz@inhell> Message-ID: <2175853.6cSS032Y9v@inhell> On Saturday 06 of April 2013 09:03:34 Jeffrey Johnson wrote: > This isn't the right check for package dependencies. Try > rpm -q --whatprovides 'pkgconfig(gnet-2.0)' > > > What is wrong ? > > You have a missing provides. > > This should satisfy the dependency (but the right fix is to find/install a > pkg with the desired provides) gnet was broken. Never version was in repo, but I had to apply fix for new autoconf to build it. Now it has proper Provides. Kind Regards, -- ?ukasz G??bicki mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy PLD/Linux Team gg:246267 Linux Registered User #318551 blekot:{irc,skype} From draenog at pld-linux.org Tue Apr 9 23:42:31 2013 From: draenog at pld-linux.org (Kacper Kornet) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 23:42:31 +0200 Subject: [ANN] STBR by ssh/git Message-ID: <20130409214230.GA31770@camk.edu.pl> There is a new way to send requests to Th builders. Every developer can send a test build with command: ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr Developers who have such priviliges can also send ready builds (the ones which go to Th-test): ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr -r More options (most for make-request.sh works): ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr --help --------------------------------------------------------------------- Istnieje nowy spos?b na wysy?anie zlece? dla builder?w Th. Ka?dy developer mo?e wys?a? testowe zlecenie (wynik l?duje w .test-builds na ftp): ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr Osobny z odpowiednimi uprawnieniami mog? wysy?a? te? zlecenia na tzw. ready builds (wynik l?duje w Th-test): ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr -r Wi?cej opcji (pokrywa si? z wi?kszo?ci? opcji make-request.sh): ssh git at git.pld-linux.org stbr --help -- Kacper From arekm at maven.pl Wed Apr 10 11:15:04 2013 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:15:04 +0200 Subject: th-test: apache 2.4 Message-ID: <201304101115.04493.arekm@maven.pl> Hi, New apache 2.4 is arriving to th-test. Please test and share with upgrade results (there are triggers that convert configuration etc but likely miss some cases). Thanks, -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / maven.pl From mmazur at kernel.pl Fri Apr 12 20:46:14 2013 From: mmazur at kernel.pl (Mariusz Mazur) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 20:46:14 +0200 Subject: [move command] packages/xorg-driver-video-fglrx-legacy-12.x -> packages/xorg-driver-video-fglrx-legacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201304122046.14571.mmazur@kernel.pl> Is something similar being already done with ftp moves? And if not, are there any takers to add it? --mmazur From jajcus at jajcus.net Fri Apr 19 14:56:20 2013 From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:56:20 +0200 Subject: icedtea6 build stuck again? Message-ID: <20130419145620.33ffcae0@jajo.eggsoft> Hi, I have sent icedtea6 and icedtea7 build requests to our builders (single arch each, as they are heavy). STBR request for icedtea6 had been send much earlier, but icedtea7 has already finished, and icedtea6 is still 'building'. Can anybody check what is happening there? IIRC we used to have similar problems with icedtea6 builds. But it can also be that icedtea6 build takes more time as it is 'full' and not a 'bootstrap' build and the builder may be slower. Greets, Jacek From jajcus at jajcus.net Fri Apr 19 15:13:48 2013 From: jajcus at jajcus.net (Jacek Konieczny) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:13:48 +0200 Subject: icedtea6 build stuck again? In-Reply-To: <20130419145620.33ffcae0@jajo.eggsoft> References: <20130419145620.33ffcae0@jajo.eggsoft> Message-ID: <20130419151348.2c2afc98@jajo.eggsoft> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:56:20 +0200 Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Can anybody check what is happening there? IIRC we used to have > similar problems with icedtea6 builds. False alarm. Build successful, it just took a lot of time. Greets, Jacek From draenog at pld-linux.org Fri Apr 19 20:15:18 2013 From: draenog at pld-linux.org (Kacper Kornet) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:15:18 +0200 Subject: Rpm doesn't replace symbolic links during upgrade Message-ID: <20130419181518.GA9105@camk.edu.pl> I have just encountered an rpm behaviour which is counter intuitive for me. Let's say that I have a package with one directory and a file in it: $ rpm -ql test-pkg /tmp/dir /tmp/dir/a Then I remove the dir directory and in its place I create a symbolic link to another directory: $ mkdir /tmp/dir2; rm -r /tmp/dir; ln -s /tmp/dir2 /tmp/dir $ rpm -V test-pkg ....L... /tmp/dir missing /tmp/dir/a So far everything is fine. Now I have a trivial upgrade for the package: $ rpm -qpl test-pkg-1-0.2.i686.rpm /tmp/dir /tmp/dir/a $ rpm -Uv test-pkg-1-0.2.i686.rpm Preparing packages for installation... test-pkg-1-0.2.i686 $ rpm -V test-pkg ....L... /tmp/dir Why did rpm preserve the wrong symbolic link during upgrade? I would expect it to remove it and recreate /tmp/dir as proper directory. $ rpm -q rpm rpm-5.4.10-47.i686 -- Kacper From glen at pld-linux.org Sat Apr 20 12:28:37 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:28:37 +0300 Subject: Rpm doesn't replace symbolic links during upgrade In-Reply-To: <20130419181518.GA9105@camk.edu.pl> References: <20130419181518.GA9105@camk.edu.pl> Message-ID: <51726DD5.9060706@pld-linux.org> On 19.04.2013 21:15, Kacper Kornet wrote: > Why did rpm preserve the wrong symbolic link during upgrade? I would > expect it to remove it and recreate /tmp/dir as proper directory. this behaviour of rpm not replacing dirs vs links, is old as rpm itself i believe. jbj can probably throw in some good links from mailinglists why and why not. my random guess it's mostly due to have local sysadmin possibility to locate directory resources to different partition, i.e replace /var/log with a symlink to /mnt/hugepart, and not make rpm upgrade providing /var/log dir destroy that setup. roughly speaking, rpm is not making distinction of linktodir and dir (lstat vs stat) calls if you need to convert dir to link, then it's usually done in %pretrans (not %pre), see logrotate, iceweasel, libreoffice, etc for examples. -- glen From qboosh at pld-linux.org Sat Apr 20 13:27:14 2013 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:27:14 +0200 Subject: [packages/crossmingw32-atk] do not provide pkgconfig deps in system namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20130420112714.GA12954@mail> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 11:26:56AM +0200, glen wrote: > commit e0548e4b7f6f8f171a81a7455f20c913a692f698 > Author: Elan Ruusam?e > Date: Sat Apr 20 12:26:55 2013 +0300 > > do not provide pkgconfig deps in system namespace > > crossmingw32-atk.spec | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) In such case pkgconfig requires shouldn't be generated either. -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From glen at pld-linux.org Sat Apr 20 21:33:53 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elan_Ruusam=E4e?=) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 22:33:53 +0300 Subject: poldek: funny dep: // Message-ID: <5172EDA1.70905@pld-linux.org> # poldek --up -u filesystem 25766 packages read Removed 14 duplicate packages from available set Processing dependencies... filesystem-4.0-11.x86_64 obsoleted by filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64 filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64 marks FHS-2.3-35.x86_64 (cap //) error: FHS-2.3-35.x86_64: equal version installed, give up # rpm -q rpm poldek filesystem FHS rpm-5.4.10-47.x86_64 poldek-0.30.0-1.rc7.2.x86_64 filesystem-4.0-11.x86_64 FHS-2.3-35.x86_64 rpm has itself no problems installing that update: # rpm -Uhv filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64.rpm --test Preparing... ########################################### [100%] # -- glen From kiesiu at pld-linux.org Sat Apr 20 21:46:33 2013 From: kiesiu at pld-linux.org (Lukasz Kies) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:46:33 +0200 Subject: poldek: funny dep: // In-Reply-To: <5172EDA1.70905@pld-linux.org> References: <5172EDA1.70905@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: Hi, I believe this commit ( http://gitorious.org/poldek/poldek/commit/2f6b86835cbbad530f838bcf5d3e183f92eb3396) was created to fix this behaviour. And if I recall correctly you need to remove local indexes to make it works as intended. -- Regards Lukasz 2013/4/20 Elan Ruusam?e > > # poldek --up -u filesystem > 25766 packages read > Removed 14 duplicate packages from available set > Processing dependencies... > filesystem-4.0-11.x86_64 obsoleted by filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64 > filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64 marks FHS-2.3-35.x86_64 (cap //) > error: FHS-2.3-35.x86_64: equal version installed, give up > > # rpm -q rpm poldek filesystem FHS > rpm-5.4.10-47.x86_64 > poldek-0.30.0-1.rc7.2.x86_64 > filesystem-4.0-11.x86_64 > FHS-2.3-35.x86_64 > > rpm has itself no problems installing that update: > # rpm -Uhv filesystem-4.0-21.x86_64.rpm --test > Preparing... ##############################**############# [100%] > # > > -- > glen > > ______________________________**_________________ > pld-devel-en mailing list > pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.**org > http://lists.pld-linux.org/**mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en > From glen at pld-linux.org Sat Apr 20 22:55:43 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 23:55:43 +0300 Subject: poldek: funny dep: // In-Reply-To: References: <5172EDA1.70905@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <517300CF.9080501@pld-linux.org> On 20.04.2013 22:46, Lukasz Kies wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this commit ( > http://gitorious.org/poldek/poldek/commit/2f6b86835cbbad530f838bcf5d3e183f92eb3396) > was created to fix this behaviour. And if I recall correctly you need to > remove local indexes to make it works as intended. ahaa, yeah. poldek --clean-whole and then try again helped! thanks -- glen From lukaszgl at post.pl Tue Apr 23 10:43:20 2013 From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:43:20 +0200 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash (browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) Message-ID: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> Since last updates my sound from flash is little crackling, but update to alsa* 1.0.27 caused huge crackling and there is no source from chromium browser (alsa-plugin).in pulseaudio. Does anybody has similar problems? It is no dependency on flash version. About month ago there wasn't any problems with sound from flash. Regards, -- ?ukasz G??bicki mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy PLD/Linux Team gg:246267 Linux Registered User #318551 blekot:{irc,skype} From arekm at maven.pl Tue Apr 23 10:45:57 2013 From: arekm at maven.pl (Arkadiusz =?utf-8?q?Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz?=) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:45:57 +0200 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash (browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) In-Reply-To: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> References: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> Message-ID: <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> On Tuesday 23 of April 2013, Lukasz Glebicki wrote: > Since last updates my sound from flash is little crackling, but update to > alsa* 1.0.27 caused huge crackling and there is no source from chromium > browser (alsa-plugin).in pulseaudio. > > Does anybody has similar problems? > > It is no dependency on flash version. > > About month ago there wasn't any problems with sound from flash. Which browser? If google-chrome/chromium 26 only then it's "bug" in chrome. Workaround, run chrome with --audio-buffer-size=2048 > Regards, -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / maven.pl From lukaszgl at post.pl Thu Apr 25 21:47:53 2013 From: lukaszgl at post.pl (Lukasz Glebicki) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:47:53 +0200 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash (browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) In-Reply-To: <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> References: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <15190965.3DV9rYAQs9@inhell> On Tuesday 23 of April 2013 10:45:57 Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > Which browser? If google-chrome/chromium 26 only then it's "bug" in chrome. Chromium > Workaround, run chrome with --audio-buffer-size=2048 This cause crackling like in never alsa, which doesn't work in any of combination of 2^x. Buffer size less than 2048 on older alsa produces sound with spontaneous short intervals. Regards, -- ?ukasz G??bicki mail/rot13:yhxnfmty at cbfg.cy PLD/Linux Team gg:246267 Linux Registered User #318551 blekot:{irc,skype} From glen at pld-linux.org Fri Apr 26 10:19:45 2013 From: glen at pld-linux.org (=?UTF-8?B?RWxhbiBSdXVzYW3DpGU=?=) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:19:45 +0300 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash (browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) In-Reply-To: <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> References: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> Message-ID: <517A38A1.3080309@pld-linux.org> On 23.04.2013 11:45, Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: > Which browser? If google-chrome/chromium 26 only then it's "bug" in chrome. > > Workaround, run chrome with --audio-buffer-size=2048 for me --audio-buffer-size=2048 helped $ echo "--audio-buffer-size=2048" >> ~/.config/chromium/"Chrome Flags" btw, i noticed the audio problems with youtube html5 player too, not just flash player -- glen From ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl Fri Apr 26 12:59:51 2013 From: ed at yen.ipipan.waw.pl (=?utf-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBNYcWba28=?=) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:59:51 +0200 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash (browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) In-Reply-To: <517A38A1.3080309@pld-linux.org> References: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl> <517A38A1.3080309@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <7904631.IPIKRgDhZg@laptok> Dnia pi?tek, 26 kwietnia 2013 11:19:45 Elan Ruusam?e pisze: [...] > btw, i noticed the audio problems with youtube html5 player too, not > just flash player Same for me. I have no sound in youtube at all. -- ?ukasz Ma?ko _o) Lukasz.Masko(at)ipipan.waw.pl /\\ Registered Linux User #61028 _\_V Ubuntu: staroafryka?skie s?owo oznaczaj?ce "Nie umiem zainstalowa? Debiana" From lukaszgl at post.pl Fri Apr 26 20:43:20 2013 From: lukaszgl at post.pl (=?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBHxYLEmWJpY2tp?=) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:43:20 +0200 Subject: alsa-utils-1.0.27 vs flash ( browser-plugin-adobe-flash-11.6.602.180 or adobe-flash-11.2.202.275) References: <1592562.0KUf4dBGU1@inhell> <201304231045.58087.arekm@maven.pl>< 517A38A1.3080309@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: <51a10582883b03e62bf23808d4a01c6c.qmail@home.pl> Dnia 2013-04-26 13:00 ?ukasz Ma?ko napisa?(a): >Same for me. I have no sound in youtube at all. Chromium is the best and also the most annoying browser on Linux. Regards, -- ?ukasz G??bicki