IcedTea8

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly 
> instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its 
> own, though probably without x32 support. 

how would pld name the package?

a) openjdk.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec?

in Fedora it's like this:

[~/fc] ➔ cat java-1.7.0-icedtea/dead.package; echo
java-1.7.0-icedtea was replaced by java-1.6.0-openjdk.

[~/fc] ➔ LC_ALL=C ls -ld *openjdk*
drwxr-xr-x 3 glen users 36 May 9 2012 java-1.6.0-openjdk/
drwxr-xr-x 3 glen users 36 Jul 12 2014 java-1.7.0-openjdk/
drwxrwxr-x 3 glen users 4096 Jul 22 08:01 java-1.8.0-openjdk/

[~/fc] ➔


-- 
glen