less aggressive glibc rebuilds
jajcus at jajcus.net
Thu Sep 6 10:59:18 CEST 2018
On 2018-09-06 10:50, glen wrote:
> could we make not so often glibc upgrades in th?
> at least keep builders glibc version low, so that built packages do not
> require the latest and bleeding glibc SONAME symbols? (unless there's
> actual benefit in that package for newer glibc)
> it's very disturbing that wanting to install some new package, i'm
> forced to upgrade whole system.
Why whole system? Glibc upgrades are backward compatible most of the
time. So it is just upgrading the package you want and glibc, not a big
issue. I cannot recall the last time glibc upgrade pulled anything more.
openssl upgrades are much more problematic.
More information about the pld-devel-en