From qboosh at pld-linux.org Sat Aug 3 21:26:08 2019 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 21:26:08 +0200 Subject: upgrade failed ERRORS: python3.spec In-Reply-To: References: <82ca3325-6197-4537-8200-36225ec8724a@pld.src.builder> Message-ID: <20190803192608.GA29915@mail> ??? Build failed on tests, but builder says, that only upgrade failed... And what are "foo" RPMs it tried to install? python3.spec produces different packages. On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 06:14:49PM +0000, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: > python3.spec (auto/th/python3-3.7.4-2): FAILED > > --- python3.spec:auto/th/python3-3.7.4-2: > upgrading packages > error: open of /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm failed: No such file or directory > package upgrade failed > Build-Time: user:5378.04s sys:169.65s real:5102.93s (faults io:0 non-io:28072151) > > Files queued for ftp: > 0 foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm > 0 foo-0.1-1.src.rpm > 98 python3-3.7.4-2.src.rpm.uploadinfo [...] > Total duration: 2 min 41 sec > Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE > make: *** [Makefile:1078: test] Error 2 > error: Bad exit status from /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/rpm-tmp.77271 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/rpm-tmp.77271 (%build) > ended at: Sat Aug 3 20:14:48 2019, done in 1:24:51.824189 > + chmod -R u+rwX /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD > + rm -rf /tmp/B.LdDK2F/tmp /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD > copy rpm files to cache_dir: /spools/ready > cp: cannot stat '/tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm': No such file or directory > cp: cannot stat '/tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/SRPMS/foo-0.1-1.src.rpm': No such file or directory > Begin-PLD-Builder-Info > upgrading packages > error: open of /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm failed: No such file or directory > package upgrade failed > End-PLD-Builder-Info > + rm -rf /tmp/B.LdDK2F > Begin-PLD-Builder-Info > Build-Time: user:5378.04s sys:169.65s real:5102.93s (faults io:0 non-io:28072151) > > Files queued for ftp: > 0 foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm > 0 foo-0.1-1.src.rpm > 98 python3-3.7.4-2.src.rpm.uploadinfo > > End-PLD-Builder-Info > -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From arekm at maven.pl Sat Aug 3 23:08:41 2019 From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=c5=9bkiewicz?=) Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 23:08:41 +0200 Subject: upgrade failed ERRORS: python3.spec In-Reply-To: <20190803192608.GA29915@mail> References: <82ca3325-6197-4537-8200-36225ec8724a@pld.src.builder> <20190803192608.GA29915@mail> Message-ID: On 03/08/2019 21:26, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > ??? > > Build failed on tests, but builder says, that only upgrade failed... > > And what are "foo" RPMs it tried to install? > python3.spec produces different packages. python 3 test suite builds foo*.rpm packages and our pld-builder automatic gets confused by that. We should skip that test but that doesn't seem to be working (%define broken_tests ... test_bdist_rpm) > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 06:14:49PM +0000, PLD th-x86_64 builder wrote: >> python3.spec (auto/th/python3-3.7.4-2): FAILED >> >> --- python3.spec:auto/th/python3-3.7.4-2: >> upgrading packages >> error: open of /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm failed: No such file or directory >> package upgrade failed >> Build-Time: user:5378.04s sys:169.65s real:5102.93s (faults io:0 non-io:28072151) >> >> Files queued for ftp: >> 0 foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm >> 0 foo-0.1-1.src.rpm >> 98 python3-3.7.4-2.src.rpm.uploadinfo > [...] >> Total duration: 2 min 41 sec >> Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE >> make: *** [Makefile:1078: test] Error 2 >> error: Bad exit status from /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/rpm-tmp.77271 (%build) >> >> >> RPM build errors: >> Bad exit status from /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/rpm-tmp.77271 (%build) >> ended at: Sat Aug 3 20:14:48 2019, done in 1:24:51.824189 >> + chmod -R u+rwX /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD >> + rm -rf /tmp/B.LdDK2F/tmp /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD >> copy rpm files to cache_dir: /spools/ready >> cp: cannot stat '/tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm': No such file or directory >> cp: cannot stat '/tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/SRPMS/foo-0.1-1.src.rpm': No such file or directory >> Begin-PLD-Builder-Info >> upgrading packages >> error: open of /tmp/B.LdDK2F/BUILD/tmp/tmpcyf9boma/foo/build/bdist.linux-x86_64/rpm/RPMS/foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm failed: No such file or directory >> package upgrade failed >> End-PLD-Builder-Info >> + rm -rf /tmp/B.LdDK2F >> Begin-PLD-Builder-Info >> Build-Time: user:5378.04s sys:169.65s real:5102.93s (faults io:0 non-io:28072151) >> >> Files queued for ftp: >> 0 foo-0.1-1.noarch.rpm >> 0 foo-0.1-1.src.rpm >> 98 python3-3.7.4-2.src.rpm.uploadinfo >> >> End-PLD-Builder-Info >> > -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org ) From atler at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 6 00:37:29 2019 From: atler at pld-linux.org (Jan Palus) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 00:37:29 +0200 Subject: No new packages on ftp Message-ID: <20190805223729.ciuh326wtbazjiy6@kalarepa> Looks like packages built on Aug 4 and later did not reach ftp. Can someone have a look? From adamg at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 6 11:59:25 2019 From: adamg at pld-linux.org (Adam =?utf-8?Q?Go=C5=82=C4=99biowski?=) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Subject: No new packages on ftp In-Reply-To: <20190805223729.ciuh326wtbazjiy6@kalarepa> Message-ID: <1555904904.2973.1565085561369.JavaMail.adamg@adamg-agmk> Looks like we hit -ENOSPC on ftp. There's some extra space added now, not sure if pending packages will be synced from builders or will need to be pushed manually . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Palus" To: pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org Sent: wtorek, 6 sierpie? 2019 0:37:29 Subject: No new packages on ftp Looks like packages built on Aug 4 and later did not reach ftp. Can someone have a look? _______________________________________________ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en From glen at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 6 14:35:50 2019 From: glen at pld-linux.org (glen) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 15:35:50 +0300 Subject: No new packages on ftp In-Reply-To: <1555904904.2973.1565085561369.JavaMail.adamg@adamg-agmk> References: <1555904904.2973.1565085561369.JavaMail.adamg@adamg-agmk> Message-ID: <98d8391d-3167-0a53-100a-736bd32580dd@pld-linux.org> On 8/6/19 12:59 PM, Adam Go??biowski wrote: > Looks like we hit -ENOSPC on ftp. th-test indexes (still?) broken ``` poldek:/all-avail> !poldek --up -n th-test Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.md... Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.gz... .............................. 100.0% [248.1K (27.9K/s)] error: ftp://ftp1.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/i686/RPMS/packages.ndir.gz: broken file Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.md... Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.gz... .............................. 100.0% [431.0K (16.7K/s)] Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.dscr.gz... .............................. 100.0% [19.3K (19.3K/s)] poldek:/all-avail> !poldek --up -n th-test error: ftp://ftp1.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/i686/RPMS/packages.ndir.gz: broken file Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.md... Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.gz... .............................. 100.0% [248.1K (248.1K/s)] error: ftp://ftp1.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/i686/RPMS/packages.ndir.gz: broken file Retrieving th-test::packages.ndir.md... th-test is up to date poldek:/all-avail> ``` -- glen From qboosh at pld-linux.org Tue Aug 27 05:55:23 2019 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 05:55:23 +0200 Subject: [builder-th-i686@pld-linux.org: ERRORS: COMMAND] Message-ID: <20190827035523.GA31132@mail> FHS package is too old on th-i686 (missing "ta" man dir), but it cannot be simply upgraded. Could sb do it manually (possibly adding /proc to netsharedpath or so)? ----- Forwarded message from PLD th-i686 builder ----- COMMAND (): FAILED --- COMMAND:: Build-Time: user:7.09s sys:1.02s real:8.32s (faults io:0 non-io:114006) *** buildlog for COMMAND Loading [pndir]ready... Loading [pndir]th-test... Loading [pndir]th-test... Loading [pndir]th-ready... Loading [pndir]th-ready... Loading [pndir]th... Loading [pndir]th... 31996 packages read Removed 371 duplicate packages from available set Processing dependencies... FHS-3.0-2.i686 obsoleted by FHS-3.0-3.i686 There are 1 package to install, 1 to remove: I FHS-3.0-3.i686 R FHS-3.0-2.i686 Need to get 51.9KB of archives. Executing pm-command.sh --upgrade -vh --root / --define _check_dirname_deps 1... Preparing... ################################################## FHS ################################################## error: unpacking of archive failed on file /proc: cpio: chown failed - Inappropriate ioctl for device Begin-PLD-Builder-Info Build-Time: user:7.09s sys:1.02s real:8.32s (faults io:0 non-io:114006) End-PLD-Builder-Info ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From j.rekorajski at gmail.com Tue Aug 27 11:08:07 2019 From: j.rekorajski at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Jan_R=C4=99korajski?=) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:08:07 +0200 Subject: [builder-th-i686@pld-linux.org: ERRORS: COMMAND] In-Reply-To: <20190827035523.GA31132@mail> References: <20190827035523.GA31132@mail> Message-ID: On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM Jakub Bogusz wrote: > FHS package is too old on th-i686 (missing "ta" man dir), but it cannot > be simply upgraded. > Could sb do it manually (possibly adding /proc to netsharedpath or so)? > Done. -- Jan R?korajski | SysAdm | PLD/Linux | http://www.pld-linux.org/ bagginspld-linux.org From qboosh at pld-linux.org Wed Aug 28 20:56:01 2019 From: qboosh at pld-linux.org (Jakub Bogusz) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:56:01 +0200 Subject: What happened to distfiles? Message-ID: <20190828185601.GA18665@mail> Downloading works, but uploading doesn't: ----- Forwarded message from distfiles at distfiles.pld-linux.org ----- From: To: qboosh at pld-linux.org Subject: DISTFILES: glpk: ERRORS: glpk-4.65.tar.gz X-distfiles-program: file-fetcher.pl Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:22:43 +0200 scp problems: scp -pr -B -q ./tmp/6b636521-54cc-4839-bf3e-3ab6408ed2ed/470a984a8b1c0e027bdb6d5859063fe8/ plddist at distfiles.pld-linux.org:ftp//by-md5/4/7: lost connection The command has exited with a non-zero status. Files fetched: 0 -- Virtually Yours: distfiles. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/ From glen at delfi.ee Thu Aug 29 08:39:58 2019 From: glen at delfi.ee (=?UTF-8?Q?Elan_Ruusam=c3=a4e?=) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:39:58 +0300 Subject: [packages/dyninst] - dropped cfg_to_dot (its from examples subdir) - dropped unstrip and its non-binary *.db files In-Reply-To: References: <676d1ad60297a79e2cce91c47f8eb21121599913_refs_heads_master@pld-linux.org> Message-ID: On 28/08/2019 22:22, hawk wrote: > commit e356d518636cfc5a412f3e9a5ad163badc267374 > Author: Marcin Krol > Date: Wed Aug 28 21:20:09 2019 +0200 > > - dropped cfg_to_dot (its from examples subdir) > - dropped unstrip and its non-binary *.db files you should (also) rm them in %install otherwise (*) someone will see them unpackaged, and add back to %files without even looking at previous commits. * unlikely to happen in real life as only you update the package, but this has happened with more popular packages. From arekm at maven.pl Thu Aug 29 12:50:26 2019 From: arekm at maven.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Arkadiusz_Mi=c5=9bkiewicz?=) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:50:26 +0200 Subject: What happened to distfiles? In-Reply-To: <20190828185601.GA18665@mail> References: <20190828185601.GA18665@mail> Message-ID: <64595099-a0ef-d1ad-3504-958630fc1a81@maven.pl> On 28/08/2019 20:56, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Downloading works, but uploading doesn't: > > ----- Forwarded message from distfiles at distfiles.pld-linux.org ----- > > From: > To: qboosh at pld-linux.org > Subject: DISTFILES: glpk: ERRORS: glpk-4.65.tar.gz > X-distfiles-program: file-fetcher.pl > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:22:43 +0200 > > scp problems: scp -pr -B -q ./tmp/6b636521-54cc-4839-bf3e-3ab6408ed2ed/470a984a8b1c0e027bdb6d5859063fe8/ plddist at distfiles.pld-linux.org:ftp//by-md5/4/7: > lost connection > > The command has exited with a non-zero status. > > Files fetched: 0 tons of defunct sshds. Try now. -- Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )