[packages/rpm-pld-macros] - version 1.749: fixed _ver_* macros
Jakub Bogusz
qboosh at pld-linux.org
Mon Sep 28 22:00:15 CEST 2020
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 07:07:54PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Jan Palus wrote:
> > On 27.09.2020 20:17, qboosh wrote:
> > > commit a04002a841905f8c84ca1c955e047676994c1ef2
> > > Author: Jakub Bogusz <qboosh at pld-linux.org>
> > > Date: Sun Sep 27 20:20:03 2020 +0200
> > >
> > > - version 1.749: fixed _ver_* macros
> > ...
> > > -# BuildRequires: rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.748
> > > -%_ver_lt() %(test rpmvercmp "%{1}" "%{2}" >/dev/null 2>&1 -eq 2; echo $?)
> > > -%_ver_ge() !%(test rpmvercmp "%{1}" "%{2}" >/dev/null 2>&1 -eq 2; echo $?)
> > > +# BuildRequires: rpmbuild(macros) >= 1.749
> > > +%_ver_lt() %(test $(rpmvercmp "%{1}" "%{2}" >/dev/null 2>&1; echo $?) -eq 2; echo $?)
> > > +%_ver_ge() %(test $(rpmvercmp "%{1}" "%{2}" >/dev/null 2>&1; echo $?) -ne 2; echo $?)
> >
> > Isn't it the other way? -ne 2 for_ver_lt and -eq 2 for _ver_ge?
> >
> > "Satisfied condition" in terms of test return code (0) is the opposite
> > of "satisfied condition" as interpreted by rpm (1).
>
> Ouch, you're right.
Fixed in 1.750.
> > ie rapidjson has:
> >
> > %if %{_ver_ge "%{_rpmversion}" "4.6"}
> >
> > which I suppose does not work correctly at the moment.
>
> After fixing conditions it would work.
>
> But throws parse error when too old (or no) macros are installed, so
> I tried the following:
>
> > while glabels has:
> >
> > %if 0%{?_ver_ge "%{_rpmversion}" "4.6"}
> >
> > but I don't quite get it, I thought %{? construct is only to check if
> > something is defined or does it somehow interpret return value?
>
> %{?macro} construct returns macro value if it's defined.
>
> But unfortunately it appears that doesn't pass arguments to macro, so the
> result is equal to just %{_ver_ge} :/
>
> %{?_ver_ge:%_ver_ge x y} works, but needs more keystrokes...
> I'll try to look for nicer solution.
A little nicer proposal:
%if "%{_ver_ge '%{_rpmversion}' '4.6'}" == "1"
Both false comparison or unexpanded macro evaluates to false condition.
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list